OP02 THALAMIC TUMOURS IN CHILDREN: EVALUATION OF SURGICAL STRATEGY

INTRODUCTION: Indication for resection of paediatric thalamic tumours has always been debated, varying from biopsy only strategy to total resection. Thalamic tumours are considered unfavourable for resection because of high morbidity and a lack of data between extent of resection and survival. In th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.) Va.), 2014-10, Vol.16 (suppl 6), p.vi16-vi16
Hauptverfasser: Pettorini, B., Pizer, B., Kanwar, A., Chamilos, C., Zebian, B., Parks, C., Avula, S., Mallucci, C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page vi16
container_issue suppl 6
container_start_page vi16
container_title Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)
container_volume 16
creator Pettorini, B.
Pizer, B.
Kanwar, A.
Chamilos, C.
Zebian, B.
Parks, C.
Avula, S.
Mallucci, C.
description INTRODUCTION: Indication for resection of paediatric thalamic tumours has always been debated, varying from biopsy only strategy to total resection. Thalamic tumours are considered unfavourable for resection because of high morbidity and a lack of data between extent of resection and survival. In this study we reviewed our experience with thalamic tumours since 1998 to appraise our practice and surgical strategies and to determine which factors guided treatment. METHOD: Medical records were obtained in 17 children with thalamic tumours operated on between 1998 and 2011. Age at presentation, duration and type of symptoms, radiological features, treatment received, surgical approach, follow-up and survival were recorded. Type of surgery was classified as biopsy, partial resection (90%) or total. RESULTS: The patients ranged in age from 2 to 15 (median 7.4 years). The tumours were treated by biopsy alone (stereotactically or endoscopically) in 10 cases, by biopsy followed by resection in 4 cases and resection alone in 5 cases. Partial resection was then achieved in 33% of cases, subtotal in 44% and total in 22%. The tumours were approached via transcortical transtemporal route in 7 cases and transcallosal route in 2 cases.The tumour diagnosis was pilocytic astrocytoma in 37% of cases, oligodendroglioma in 28%, astrocytoma grade II in 43%, astrocytoma grade III in 18%, glioblastoma in 6% and glioneuronal tumour in 6%. Five children suffered transient morbidity after surgery, two of them after biopsy. Two children died during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Recent improvement in imaging techniques and surgical tools make more aggressive surgery technically feasible and safe.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/neuonc/nou251.2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808702778</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1808702778</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1142-f0465f87f594341eb2feb3c8193320308cc84370c7ce394ecf9c36a390f42d983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkLtOwzAARS0EEqUws3pkSeNnbLOFkLaR0gblgcRkpcaWitqkxGTg71EbpnuHozMcAB4xWmCkaNjZse9M2PUj4XhBrsAMc0IDLqPo-vJJIDkWt-DO-y-ECOYRnoGX4g0RWK_jPN5kCaybTdGUFcy2MFln-WuZbp9h-h7nTVxnxRYWS1g15SpL4hxWdRnX6erjHty49uDtw__OQbNM62Qd5MUFDAzGjAQOsYg7KRxXjDJsd8TZHTUSK0oJokgaIxkVyAhjqWLWOGVo1FKFHCOfStI5eJq8p6H_Hq3_0ce9N_ZwaDvbj15jiaRARIgzGk6oGXrvB-v0adgf2-FXY6TPtfRUS0-1NKF_cFhYhg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1808702778</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>OP02 THALAMIC TUMOURS IN CHILDREN: EVALUATION OF SURGICAL STRATEGY</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Pettorini, B. ; Pizer, B. ; Kanwar, A. ; Chamilos, C. ; Zebian, B. ; Parks, C. ; Avula, S. ; Mallucci, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pettorini, B. ; Pizer, B. ; Kanwar, A. ; Chamilos, C. ; Zebian, B. ; Parks, C. ; Avula, S. ; Mallucci, C.</creatorcontrib><description>INTRODUCTION: Indication for resection of paediatric thalamic tumours has always been debated, varying from biopsy only strategy to total resection. Thalamic tumours are considered unfavourable for resection because of high morbidity and a lack of data between extent of resection and survival. In this study we reviewed our experience with thalamic tumours since 1998 to appraise our practice and surgical strategies and to determine which factors guided treatment. METHOD: Medical records were obtained in 17 children with thalamic tumours operated on between 1998 and 2011. Age at presentation, duration and type of symptoms, radiological features, treatment received, surgical approach, follow-up and survival were recorded. Type of surgery was classified as biopsy, partial resection (&lt;90%), subtotal resection (&gt;90%) or total. RESULTS: The patients ranged in age from 2 to 15 (median 7.4 years). The tumours were treated by biopsy alone (stereotactically or endoscopically) in 10 cases, by biopsy followed by resection in 4 cases and resection alone in 5 cases. Partial resection was then achieved in 33% of cases, subtotal in 44% and total in 22%. The tumours were approached via transcortical transtemporal route in 7 cases and transcallosal route in 2 cases.The tumour diagnosis was pilocytic astrocytoma in 37% of cases, oligodendroglioma in 28%, astrocytoma grade II in 43%, astrocytoma grade III in 18%, glioblastoma in 6% and glioneuronal tumour in 6%. Five children suffered transient morbidity after surgery, two of them after biopsy. Two children died during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Recent improvement in imaging techniques and surgical tools make more aggressive surgery technically feasible and safe.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1522-8517</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-5866</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nou251.2</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.), 2014-10, Vol.16 (suppl 6), p.vi16-vi16</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pettorini, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pizer, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanwar, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamilos, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zebian, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parks, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avula, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallucci, C.</creatorcontrib><title>OP02 THALAMIC TUMOURS IN CHILDREN: EVALUATION OF SURGICAL STRATEGY</title><title>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)</title><description>INTRODUCTION: Indication for resection of paediatric thalamic tumours has always been debated, varying from biopsy only strategy to total resection. Thalamic tumours are considered unfavourable for resection because of high morbidity and a lack of data between extent of resection and survival. In this study we reviewed our experience with thalamic tumours since 1998 to appraise our practice and surgical strategies and to determine which factors guided treatment. METHOD: Medical records were obtained in 17 children with thalamic tumours operated on between 1998 and 2011. Age at presentation, duration and type of symptoms, radiological features, treatment received, surgical approach, follow-up and survival were recorded. Type of surgery was classified as biopsy, partial resection (&lt;90%), subtotal resection (&gt;90%) or total. RESULTS: The patients ranged in age from 2 to 15 (median 7.4 years). The tumours were treated by biopsy alone (stereotactically or endoscopically) in 10 cases, by biopsy followed by resection in 4 cases and resection alone in 5 cases. Partial resection was then achieved in 33% of cases, subtotal in 44% and total in 22%. The tumours were approached via transcortical transtemporal route in 7 cases and transcallosal route in 2 cases.The tumour diagnosis was pilocytic astrocytoma in 37% of cases, oligodendroglioma in 28%, astrocytoma grade II in 43%, astrocytoma grade III in 18%, glioblastoma in 6% and glioneuronal tumour in 6%. Five children suffered transient morbidity after surgery, two of them after biopsy. Two children died during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Recent improvement in imaging techniques and surgical tools make more aggressive surgery technically feasible and safe.</description><issn>1522-8517</issn><issn>1523-5866</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkLtOwzAARS0EEqUws3pkSeNnbLOFkLaR0gblgcRkpcaWitqkxGTg71EbpnuHozMcAB4xWmCkaNjZse9M2PUj4XhBrsAMc0IDLqPo-vJJIDkWt-DO-y-ECOYRnoGX4g0RWK_jPN5kCaybTdGUFcy2MFln-WuZbp9h-h7nTVxnxRYWS1g15SpL4hxWdRnX6erjHty49uDtw__OQbNM62Qd5MUFDAzGjAQOsYg7KRxXjDJsd8TZHTUSK0oJokgaIxkVyAhjqWLWOGVo1FKFHCOfStI5eJq8p6H_Hq3_0ce9N_ZwaDvbj15jiaRARIgzGk6oGXrvB-v0adgf2-FXY6TPtfRUS0-1NKF_cFhYhg</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Pettorini, B.</creator><creator>Pizer, B.</creator><creator>Kanwar, A.</creator><creator>Chamilos, C.</creator><creator>Zebian, B.</creator><creator>Parks, C.</creator><creator>Avula, S.</creator><creator>Mallucci, C.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>OP02 THALAMIC TUMOURS IN CHILDREN: EVALUATION OF SURGICAL STRATEGY</title><author>Pettorini, B. ; Pizer, B. ; Kanwar, A. ; Chamilos, C. ; Zebian, B. ; Parks, C. ; Avula, S. ; Mallucci, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1142-f0465f87f594341eb2feb3c8193320308cc84370c7ce394ecf9c36a390f42d983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pettorini, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pizer, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanwar, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamilos, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zebian, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parks, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avula, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallucci, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pettorini, B.</au><au>Pizer, B.</au><au>Kanwar, A.</au><au>Chamilos, C.</au><au>Zebian, B.</au><au>Parks, C.</au><au>Avula, S.</au><au>Mallucci, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>OP02 THALAMIC TUMOURS IN CHILDREN: EVALUATION OF SURGICAL STRATEGY</atitle><jtitle>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>suppl 6</issue><spage>vi16</spage><epage>vi16</epage><pages>vi16-vi16</pages><issn>1522-8517</issn><eissn>1523-5866</eissn><abstract>INTRODUCTION: Indication for resection of paediatric thalamic tumours has always been debated, varying from biopsy only strategy to total resection. Thalamic tumours are considered unfavourable for resection because of high morbidity and a lack of data between extent of resection and survival. In this study we reviewed our experience with thalamic tumours since 1998 to appraise our practice and surgical strategies and to determine which factors guided treatment. METHOD: Medical records were obtained in 17 children with thalamic tumours operated on between 1998 and 2011. Age at presentation, duration and type of symptoms, radiological features, treatment received, surgical approach, follow-up and survival were recorded. Type of surgery was classified as biopsy, partial resection (&lt;90%), subtotal resection (&gt;90%) or total. RESULTS: The patients ranged in age from 2 to 15 (median 7.4 years). The tumours were treated by biopsy alone (stereotactically or endoscopically) in 10 cases, by biopsy followed by resection in 4 cases and resection alone in 5 cases. Partial resection was then achieved in 33% of cases, subtotal in 44% and total in 22%. The tumours were approached via transcortical transtemporal route in 7 cases and transcallosal route in 2 cases.The tumour diagnosis was pilocytic astrocytoma in 37% of cases, oligodendroglioma in 28%, astrocytoma grade II in 43%, astrocytoma grade III in 18%, glioblastoma in 6% and glioneuronal tumour in 6%. Five children suffered transient morbidity after surgery, two of them after biopsy. Two children died during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Recent improvement in imaging techniques and surgical tools make more aggressive surgery technically feasible and safe.</abstract><doi>10.1093/neuonc/nou251.2</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1522-8517
ispartof Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.), 2014-10, Vol.16 (suppl 6), p.vi16-vi16
issn 1522-8517
1523-5866
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808702778
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
title OP02 THALAMIC TUMOURS IN CHILDREN: EVALUATION OF SURGICAL STRATEGY
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T18%3A57%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=OP02%20THALAMIC%20TUMOURS%20IN%20CHILDREN:%20EVALUATION%20OF%20SURGICAL%20STRATEGY&rft.jtitle=Neuro-oncology%20(Charlottesville,%20Va.)&rft.au=Pettorini,%20B.&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=suppl%206&rft.spage=vi16&rft.epage=vi16&rft.pages=vi16-vi16&rft.issn=1522-8517&rft.eissn=1523-5866&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/neuonc/nou251.2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1808702778%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1808702778&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true