Detection of prostate cancer index lesions with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp‐MRI) using whole‐mount histological sections as the reference standard
Objective To evaluate the sensitivity of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp‐MRI) for detecting prostate cancer foci, including the largest (index) lesions. Patients and Methods In all, 115 patients with biopsy confirmed prostate cancer underwent mp‐MRI before radical prostatectomy. A sin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BJU international 2016-07, Vol.118 (1), p.84-94 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 94 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 84 |
container_title | BJU international |
container_volume | 118 |
creator | Russo, Filippo Regge, Daniele Armando, Enrico Giannini, Valentina Vignati, Anna Mazzetti, Simone Manfredi, Matteo Bollito, Enrico Correale, Loredana Porpiglia, Francesco |
description | Objective
To evaluate the sensitivity of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp‐MRI) for detecting prostate cancer foci, including the largest (index) lesions.
Patients and Methods
In all, 115 patients with biopsy confirmed prostate cancer underwent mp‐MRI before radical prostatectomy. A single expert radiologist recorded all prostate cancer foci including the index lesion ‘blinded’ to the pathologist's biopsy report. Stained whole‐mount histological sections were used as the reference standard. All lesions were contoured by an experienced uropathologist who assessed their volume and pathological Gleason score. All lesions with a volume of >0.5 mL and/or pathological Gleason score of >6 were defined as clinically significant prostate cancer. Multivariate analysis was used to ascertain the characteristics of lesions identified by MRI.
Results
In all, 104 of 115 index lesions were correctly diagnosed by mp‐MRI (sensitivity 90.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 83.5–95.1%), including 98/105 clinically significant index lesions (93.3%; 95% CI 86.8–97.3%), among which three of three lesions had a volume of 6. Overall, mp‐MRI detected 131/206 lesions including 13 of 68 ‘insignificant’ prostate cancers. The multivariate logistic regression modelling showed that pathological Gleason score (odds ratio [OR] 11.7, 95% CI 2.3–59.8; P = 0.003) and lesion volume (OR 4.24, 95% CI 1.3–14.7; P = 0.022) were independently associated with the detection of index lesions at MRI.
Conclusions
This study shows that mp‐MRI has a high sensitivity for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer index lesions, while having disappointing results for the detection of small‐volume, low Gleason score prostate cancer foci. Thus, mp‐MRI could be used to stratify patients according to risk, allowing better treatment selection. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/bju.13234 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808697935</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1797876151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4914-2104192ea5c3d84909cc3096fb9a103b258d29c80d378def11bacd9df8a522c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhSNERUthwQsgS2zaxbR27CT2Espfq1ZIiErsIse-mfEosQfb0dAdj8Br8Fo8CXeatgskhDe2jj8fXZ9TFC8YPWG4Trv1dMJ4ycWj4oCJWiwEo18f35-pqveLpymtKUWhrp4U-2XNlBRUHBS_3kIGk13wJPRkE0PKOgMx2huIxHkL38kACe8T2bq8IuM0ZLfRUY-QozNk1EsPGQ8RUvC7Z8Sh5vySHI2b3z9-Xn0-PyZT2gnbVRgApTFMPpOVSzkMYemMHkiah0hEJ5JXgG49RNi54UDe6mifFXu9HhI8v9sPi-v3776cfVxcfvpwfvb6cmGEYmJRMiqYKkFXhlspFFXGcIyg75RmlHdlJW2pjKSWN9JCz1injVW2l7oqS8P5YXE0-2IY3yZIuR1dMjAM2kOYUssklbVqFK_-jzaqkU3NKoboq7_QdZiix4_cUkKKmpZIHc-UwSISZtBuIqYZb1pG213VLVbd3laN7Ms7x6kbwT6Q990icDoDWzfAzb-d2jcX17PlH1DVt3s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1797484602</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detection of prostate cancer index lesions with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp‐MRI) using whole‐mount histological sections as the reference standard</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Russo, Filippo ; Regge, Daniele ; Armando, Enrico ; Giannini, Valentina ; Vignati, Anna ; Mazzetti, Simone ; Manfredi, Matteo ; Bollito, Enrico ; Correale, Loredana ; Porpiglia, Francesco</creator><creatorcontrib>Russo, Filippo ; Regge, Daniele ; Armando, Enrico ; Giannini, Valentina ; Vignati, Anna ; Mazzetti, Simone ; Manfredi, Matteo ; Bollito, Enrico ; Correale, Loredana ; Porpiglia, Francesco</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To evaluate the sensitivity of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp‐MRI) for detecting prostate cancer foci, including the largest (index) lesions.
Patients and Methods
In all, 115 patients with biopsy confirmed prostate cancer underwent mp‐MRI before radical prostatectomy. A single expert radiologist recorded all prostate cancer foci including the index lesion ‘blinded’ to the pathologist's biopsy report. Stained whole‐mount histological sections were used as the reference standard. All lesions were contoured by an experienced uropathologist who assessed their volume and pathological Gleason score. All lesions with a volume of >0.5 mL and/or pathological Gleason score of >6 were defined as clinically significant prostate cancer. Multivariate analysis was used to ascertain the characteristics of lesions identified by MRI.
Results
In all, 104 of 115 index lesions were correctly diagnosed by mp‐MRI (sensitivity 90.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 83.5–95.1%), including 98/105 clinically significant index lesions (93.3%; 95% CI 86.8–97.3%), among which three of three lesions had a volume of <0.5 mL and Gleason score of >6. Overall, mp‐MRI detected 131/206 lesions including 13 of 68 ‘insignificant’ prostate cancers. The multivariate logistic regression modelling showed that pathological Gleason score (odds ratio [OR] 11.7, 95% CI 2.3–59.8; P = 0.003) and lesion volume (OR 4.24, 95% CI 1.3–14.7; P = 0.022) were independently associated with the detection of index lesions at MRI.
Conclusions
This study shows that mp‐MRI has a high sensitivity for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer index lesions, while having disappointing results for the detection of small‐volume, low Gleason score prostate cancer foci. Thus, mp‐MRI could be used to stratify patients according to risk, allowing better treatment selection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-4096</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-410X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bju.13234</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26198404</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJINFO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; diagnostic imaging ; Histocytological Preparation Techniques ; Humans ; magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; prostatic neoplasm ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Reference Standards ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>BJU international, 2016-07, Vol.118 (1), p.84-94</ispartof><rights>2015 The Authors BJU International © 2015 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2015 The Authors BJU International © 2015 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2016 BJU International</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4914-2104192ea5c3d84909cc3096fb9a103b258d29c80d378def11bacd9df8a522c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4914-2104192ea5c3d84909cc3096fb9a103b258d29c80d378def11bacd9df8a522c33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbju.13234$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbju.13234$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26198404$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Russo, Filippo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regge, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armando, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannini, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vignati, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzetti, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manfredi, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bollito, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Correale, Loredana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porpiglia, Francesco</creatorcontrib><title>Detection of prostate cancer index lesions with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp‐MRI) using whole‐mount histological sections as the reference standard</title><title>BJU international</title><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><description>Objective
To evaluate the sensitivity of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp‐MRI) for detecting prostate cancer foci, including the largest (index) lesions.
Patients and Methods
In all, 115 patients with biopsy confirmed prostate cancer underwent mp‐MRI before radical prostatectomy. A single expert radiologist recorded all prostate cancer foci including the index lesion ‘blinded’ to the pathologist's biopsy report. Stained whole‐mount histological sections were used as the reference standard. All lesions were contoured by an experienced uropathologist who assessed their volume and pathological Gleason score. All lesions with a volume of >0.5 mL and/or pathological Gleason score of >6 were defined as clinically significant prostate cancer. Multivariate analysis was used to ascertain the characteristics of lesions identified by MRI.
Results
In all, 104 of 115 index lesions were correctly diagnosed by mp‐MRI (sensitivity 90.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 83.5–95.1%), including 98/105 clinically significant index lesions (93.3%; 95% CI 86.8–97.3%), among which three of three lesions had a volume of <0.5 mL and Gleason score of >6. Overall, mp‐MRI detected 131/206 lesions including 13 of 68 ‘insignificant’ prostate cancers. The multivariate logistic regression modelling showed that pathological Gleason score (odds ratio [OR] 11.7, 95% CI 2.3–59.8; P = 0.003) and lesion volume (OR 4.24, 95% CI 1.3–14.7; P = 0.022) were independently associated with the detection of index lesions at MRI.
Conclusions
This study shows that mp‐MRI has a high sensitivity for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer index lesions, while having disappointing results for the detection of small‐volume, low Gleason score prostate cancer foci. Thus, mp‐MRI could be used to stratify patients according to risk, allowing better treatment selection.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Histocytological Preparation Techniques</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>prostatic neoplasm</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Reference Standards</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>1464-4096</issn><issn>1464-410X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhSNERUthwQsgS2zaxbR27CT2Espfq1ZIiErsIse-mfEosQfb0dAdj8Br8Fo8CXeatgskhDe2jj8fXZ9TFC8YPWG4Trv1dMJ4ycWj4oCJWiwEo18f35-pqveLpymtKUWhrp4U-2XNlBRUHBS_3kIGk13wJPRkE0PKOgMx2huIxHkL38kACe8T2bq8IuM0ZLfRUY-QozNk1EsPGQ8RUvC7Z8Sh5vySHI2b3z9-Xn0-PyZT2gnbVRgApTFMPpOVSzkMYemMHkiah0hEJ5JXgG49RNi54UDe6mifFXu9HhI8v9sPi-v3776cfVxcfvpwfvb6cmGEYmJRMiqYKkFXhlspFFXGcIyg75RmlHdlJW2pjKSWN9JCz1injVW2l7oqS8P5YXE0-2IY3yZIuR1dMjAM2kOYUssklbVqFK_-jzaqkU3NKoboq7_QdZiix4_cUkKKmpZIHc-UwSISZtBuIqYZb1pG213VLVbd3laN7Ms7x6kbwT6Q990icDoDWzfAzb-d2jcX17PlH1DVt3s</recordid><startdate>201607</startdate><enddate>201607</enddate><creator>Russo, Filippo</creator><creator>Regge, Daniele</creator><creator>Armando, Enrico</creator><creator>Giannini, Valentina</creator><creator>Vignati, Anna</creator><creator>Mazzetti, Simone</creator><creator>Manfredi, Matteo</creator><creator>Bollito, Enrico</creator><creator>Correale, Loredana</creator><creator>Porpiglia, Francesco</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201607</creationdate><title>Detection of prostate cancer index lesions with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp‐MRI) using whole‐mount histological sections as the reference standard</title><author>Russo, Filippo ; Regge, Daniele ; Armando, Enrico ; Giannini, Valentina ; Vignati, Anna ; Mazzetti, Simone ; Manfredi, Matteo ; Bollito, Enrico ; Correale, Loredana ; Porpiglia, Francesco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4914-2104192ea5c3d84909cc3096fb9a103b258d29c80d378def11bacd9df8a522c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Histocytological Preparation Techniques</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>prostatic neoplasm</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Reference Standards</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Russo, Filippo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regge, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armando, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannini, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vignati, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzetti, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manfredi, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bollito, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Correale, Loredana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porpiglia, Francesco</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Russo, Filippo</au><au>Regge, Daniele</au><au>Armando, Enrico</au><au>Giannini, Valentina</au><au>Vignati, Anna</au><au>Mazzetti, Simone</au><au>Manfredi, Matteo</au><au>Bollito, Enrico</au><au>Correale, Loredana</au><au>Porpiglia, Francesco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detection of prostate cancer index lesions with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp‐MRI) using whole‐mount histological sections as the reference standard</atitle><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><date>2016-07</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>84</spage><epage>94</epage><pages>84-94</pages><issn>1464-4096</issn><eissn>1464-410X</eissn><coden>BJINFO</coden><abstract>Objective
To evaluate the sensitivity of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp‐MRI) for detecting prostate cancer foci, including the largest (index) lesions.
Patients and Methods
In all, 115 patients with biopsy confirmed prostate cancer underwent mp‐MRI before radical prostatectomy. A single expert radiologist recorded all prostate cancer foci including the index lesion ‘blinded’ to the pathologist's biopsy report. Stained whole‐mount histological sections were used as the reference standard. All lesions were contoured by an experienced uropathologist who assessed their volume and pathological Gleason score. All lesions with a volume of >0.5 mL and/or pathological Gleason score of >6 were defined as clinically significant prostate cancer. Multivariate analysis was used to ascertain the characteristics of lesions identified by MRI.
Results
In all, 104 of 115 index lesions were correctly diagnosed by mp‐MRI (sensitivity 90.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 83.5–95.1%), including 98/105 clinically significant index lesions (93.3%; 95% CI 86.8–97.3%), among which three of three lesions had a volume of <0.5 mL and Gleason score of >6. Overall, mp‐MRI detected 131/206 lesions including 13 of 68 ‘insignificant’ prostate cancers. The multivariate logistic regression modelling showed that pathological Gleason score (odds ratio [OR] 11.7, 95% CI 2.3–59.8; P = 0.003) and lesion volume (OR 4.24, 95% CI 1.3–14.7; P = 0.022) were independently associated with the detection of index lesions at MRI.
Conclusions
This study shows that mp‐MRI has a high sensitivity for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer index lesions, while having disappointing results for the detection of small‐volume, low Gleason score prostate cancer foci. Thus, mp‐MRI could be used to stratify patients according to risk, allowing better treatment selection.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>26198404</pmid><doi>10.1111/bju.13234</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1464-4096 |
ispartof | BJU international, 2016-07, Vol.118 (1), p.84-94 |
issn | 1464-4096 1464-410X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808697935 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals |
subjects | Aged diagnostic imaging Histocytological Preparation Techniques Humans magnetic resonance imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Male Middle Aged prostatic neoplasm Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology Reference Standards Sensitivity and Specificity |
title | Detection of prostate cancer index lesions with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp‐MRI) using whole‐mount histological sections as the reference standard |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A42%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detection%20of%20prostate%20cancer%20index%20lesions%20with%20multiparametric%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20(mp%E2%80%90MRI)%20using%20whole%E2%80%90mount%20histological%20sections%20as%20the%20reference%20standard&rft.jtitle=BJU%20international&rft.au=Russo,%20Filippo&rft.date=2016-07&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=84&rft.epage=94&rft.pages=84-94&rft.issn=1464-4096&rft.eissn=1464-410X&rft.coden=BJINFO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bju.13234&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1797876151%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1797484602&rft_id=info:pmid/26198404&rfr_iscdi=true |