Quality of websites with patient information about spinal cord injury in Spanish
Study Design: Descriptive, cross-sectional analysis of websites with information on spinal cord injury (SCI) in Spanish. Objective: To assess the quality, readability and presence of quality labels on web pages with information about SCI in Spanish. Setting: The Internet. Methods: An Internet search...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Spinal cord 2016-07, Vol.54 (7), p.540-545 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 545 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 540 |
container_title | Spinal cord |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Bea-Muñoz, M Medina-Sánchez, M Flórez-García, M T |
description | Study Design:
Descriptive, cross-sectional analysis of websites with information on spinal cord injury (SCI) in Spanish.
Objective:
To assess the quality, readability and presence of quality labels on web pages with information about SCI in Spanish.
Setting:
The Internet.
Methods:
An Internet search was conducted on Google with the keywords ‘lesión medular’ (spinal cord injury), ‘paraplejia’ (paraplegia) and ‘tetraplejia’ (tetraplegia). The first 50 results of each search were included. The quality of websites was assessed with the LIDA tool while the readability was assessed with the Flesch-Szigriszt index and the INFLESZ scale. We also checked the presence of any quality label.
Results:
After excluding duplicated and irrelevant results, 33 websites were analysed. Only four of them had a quality label. The mean score of the LIDA tool was 61.12% (medium quality), and the worst results were those referring to the reliability of the information. The readability of the web pages was somewhat difficult, with a mean of 48.22 in the Flesch-Szigriszt index. Only eight of the websites showed normal readability. We observed no differences in either the quality or the readability of the websites according to their origin or the presence of quality labels.
Conclusions:
The websites analysed present a medium quality. Mainly, they should improve the reliability of their contents and their readability, including more quality labels. For SCI information in Spanish to be understandable and to provide valuable content, websites analysed in our study need to improve the quality parameters. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/sc.2015.190 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808691708</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1800128917</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-eeb16b794f32b65736c327ae81689ad740226984019a8ec335da13014e38d24f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQhi0EoqUwsSOPSJDisxPHHlHFl1QJEDBbTuJQV2kc7ERV_z2uWpgYmO5O73Pv8CB0DmQKhImbUE4pgWwKkhygMaQ5TzJO08O4M06TlEk2QichLAkhEqQ4RiPKUwE5sDF6eR10Y_sNdjVemyLY3gS8tv0Cd7q3pu2xbWvnV_FwLdaFG3ocOtvqBpfOVzFdDn4TB37rdGvD4hQd1boJ5mw_J-jj_u599pjMnx-eZrfzpGSS94kxBfAil2nNaMGznPGS0VwbAVxIXeUpoZRLkRKQWpiSsazSwAikhomKxq8Jutz1dt59DSb0amVDaZpGt8YNQYEggkvIifgPSoCKCEf0aoeW3oXgTa06b1fabxQQtbWtQqm2tlW0HemLffFQrEz1y_7ojcD1Dggxaj-NV0s3-Cgv_Nn3DWYCh8U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1800128917</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality of websites with patient information about spinal cord injury in Spanish</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Bea-Muñoz, M ; Medina-Sánchez, M ; Flórez-García, M T</creator><creatorcontrib>Bea-Muñoz, M ; Medina-Sánchez, M ; Flórez-García, M T</creatorcontrib><description>Study Design:
Descriptive, cross-sectional analysis of websites with information on spinal cord injury (SCI) in Spanish.
Objective:
To assess the quality, readability and presence of quality labels on web pages with information about SCI in Spanish.
Setting:
The Internet.
Methods:
An Internet search was conducted on Google with the keywords ‘lesión medular’ (spinal cord injury), ‘paraplejia’ (paraplegia) and ‘tetraplejia’ (tetraplegia). The first 50 results of each search were included. The quality of websites was assessed with the LIDA tool while the readability was assessed with the Flesch-Szigriszt index and the INFLESZ scale. We also checked the presence of any quality label.
Results:
After excluding duplicated and irrelevant results, 33 websites were analysed. Only four of them had a quality label. The mean score of the LIDA tool was 61.12% (medium quality), and the worst results were those referring to the reliability of the information. The readability of the web pages was somewhat difficult, with a mean of 48.22 in the Flesch-Szigriszt index. Only eight of the websites showed normal readability. We observed no differences in either the quality or the readability of the websites according to their origin or the presence of quality labels.
Conclusions:
The websites analysed present a medium quality. Mainly, they should improve the reliability of their contents and their readability, including more quality labels. For SCI information in Spanish to be understandable and to provide valuable content, websites analysed in our study need to improve the quality parameters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1362-4393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5624</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/sc.2015.190</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26481713</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>692/699/375/1824 ; 692/700/1719 ; Anatomy ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Human Physiology ; Humans ; Information Dissemination ; Internet - standards ; Male ; Neurochemistry ; Neuropsychology ; Neurosciences ; original-article ; Reproducibility of Results ; Search Engine ; Spain - epidemiology ; Spinal Cord Injuries - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Spinal cord, 2016-07, Vol.54 (7), p.540-545</ispartof><rights>International Spinal Cord Society 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-eeb16b794f32b65736c327ae81689ad740226984019a8ec335da13014e38d24f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-eeb16b794f32b65736c327ae81689ad740226984019a8ec335da13014e38d24f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26481713$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bea-Muñoz, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medina-Sánchez, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flórez-García, M T</creatorcontrib><title>Quality of websites with patient information about spinal cord injury in Spanish</title><title>Spinal cord</title><addtitle>Spinal Cord</addtitle><addtitle>Spinal Cord</addtitle><description>Study Design:
Descriptive, cross-sectional analysis of websites with information on spinal cord injury (SCI) in Spanish.
Objective:
To assess the quality, readability and presence of quality labels on web pages with information about SCI in Spanish.
Setting:
The Internet.
Methods:
An Internet search was conducted on Google with the keywords ‘lesión medular’ (spinal cord injury), ‘paraplejia’ (paraplegia) and ‘tetraplejia’ (tetraplegia). The first 50 results of each search were included. The quality of websites was assessed with the LIDA tool while the readability was assessed with the Flesch-Szigriszt index and the INFLESZ scale. We also checked the presence of any quality label.
Results:
After excluding duplicated and irrelevant results, 33 websites were analysed. Only four of them had a quality label. The mean score of the LIDA tool was 61.12% (medium quality), and the worst results were those referring to the reliability of the information. The readability of the web pages was somewhat difficult, with a mean of 48.22 in the Flesch-Szigriszt index. Only eight of the websites showed normal readability. We observed no differences in either the quality or the readability of the websites according to their origin or the presence of quality labels.
Conclusions:
The websites analysed present a medium quality. Mainly, they should improve the reliability of their contents and their readability, including more quality labels. For SCI information in Spanish to be understandable and to provide valuable content, websites analysed in our study need to improve the quality parameters.</description><subject>692/699/375/1824</subject><subject>692/700/1719</subject><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human Physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Dissemination</subject><subject>Internet - standards</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neurochemistry</subject><subject>Neuropsychology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>original-article</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Search Engine</subject><subject>Spain - epidemiology</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - epidemiology</subject><issn>1362-4393</issn><issn>1476-5624</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQhi0EoqUwsSOPSJDisxPHHlHFl1QJEDBbTuJQV2kc7ERV_z2uWpgYmO5O73Pv8CB0DmQKhImbUE4pgWwKkhygMaQ5TzJO08O4M06TlEk2QichLAkhEqQ4RiPKUwE5sDF6eR10Y_sNdjVemyLY3gS8tv0Cd7q3pu2xbWvnV_FwLdaFG3ocOtvqBpfOVzFdDn4TB37rdGvD4hQd1boJ5mw_J-jj_u599pjMnx-eZrfzpGSS94kxBfAil2nNaMGznPGS0VwbAVxIXeUpoZRLkRKQWpiSsazSwAikhomKxq8Jutz1dt59DSb0amVDaZpGt8YNQYEggkvIifgPSoCKCEf0aoeW3oXgTa06b1fabxQQtbWtQqm2tlW0HemLffFQrEz1y_7ojcD1Dggxaj-NV0s3-Cgv_Nn3DWYCh8U</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Bea-Muñoz, M</creator><creator>Medina-Sánchez, M</creator><creator>Flórez-García, M T</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Quality of websites with patient information about spinal cord injury in Spanish</title><author>Bea-Muñoz, M ; Medina-Sánchez, M ; Flórez-García, M T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-eeb16b794f32b65736c327ae81689ad740226984019a8ec335da13014e38d24f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>692/699/375/1824</topic><topic>692/700/1719</topic><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human Physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Dissemination</topic><topic>Internet - standards</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neurochemistry</topic><topic>Neuropsychology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>original-article</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Search Engine</topic><topic>Spain - epidemiology</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bea-Muñoz, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medina-Sánchez, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flórez-García, M T</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Spinal cord</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bea-Muñoz, M</au><au>Medina-Sánchez, M</au><au>Flórez-García, M T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality of websites with patient information about spinal cord injury in Spanish</atitle><jtitle>Spinal cord</jtitle><stitle>Spinal Cord</stitle><addtitle>Spinal Cord</addtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>540</spage><epage>545</epage><pages>540-545</pages><issn>1362-4393</issn><eissn>1476-5624</eissn><abstract>Study Design:
Descriptive, cross-sectional analysis of websites with information on spinal cord injury (SCI) in Spanish.
Objective:
To assess the quality, readability and presence of quality labels on web pages with information about SCI in Spanish.
Setting:
The Internet.
Methods:
An Internet search was conducted on Google with the keywords ‘lesión medular’ (spinal cord injury), ‘paraplejia’ (paraplegia) and ‘tetraplejia’ (tetraplegia). The first 50 results of each search were included. The quality of websites was assessed with the LIDA tool while the readability was assessed with the Flesch-Szigriszt index and the INFLESZ scale. We also checked the presence of any quality label.
Results:
After excluding duplicated and irrelevant results, 33 websites were analysed. Only four of them had a quality label. The mean score of the LIDA tool was 61.12% (medium quality), and the worst results were those referring to the reliability of the information. The readability of the web pages was somewhat difficult, with a mean of 48.22 in the Flesch-Szigriszt index. Only eight of the websites showed normal readability. We observed no differences in either the quality or the readability of the websites according to their origin or the presence of quality labels.
Conclusions:
The websites analysed present a medium quality. Mainly, they should improve the reliability of their contents and their readability, including more quality labels. For SCI information in Spanish to be understandable and to provide valuable content, websites analysed in our study need to improve the quality parameters.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>26481713</pmid><doi>10.1038/sc.2015.190</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1362-4393 |
ispartof | Spinal cord, 2016-07, Vol.54 (7), p.540-545 |
issn | 1362-4393 1476-5624 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808691708 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | 692/699/375/1824 692/700/1719 Anatomy Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Cross-Sectional Studies Female Human Physiology Humans Information Dissemination Internet - standards Male Neurochemistry Neuropsychology Neurosciences original-article Reproducibility of Results Search Engine Spain - epidemiology Spinal Cord Injuries - epidemiology |
title | Quality of websites with patient information about spinal cord injury in Spanish |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T21%3A33%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20of%20websites%20with%20patient%20information%20about%20spinal%20cord%20injury%20in%20Spanish&rft.jtitle=Spinal%20cord&rft.au=Bea-Mu%C3%B1oz,%20M&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=540&rft.epage=545&rft.pages=540-545&rft.issn=1362-4393&rft.eissn=1476-5624&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/sc.2015.190&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1800128917%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1800128917&rft_id=info:pmid/26481713&rfr_iscdi=true |