The Meaning of ‘Regular Partner’ in HIV Research Among Gay and Bisexual Men: Implications of an Australian Cross-Sectional Survey
Estimates of the proportion of HIV infections coming from within regular sexual relationships among gay and bisexual men (GBM) vary widely. Research surveys use various partner type categories, but there is little understanding of how men classify their partners. We conducted an online cross-section...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | AIDS and behavior 2016-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1777-1784 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1784 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 1777 |
| container_title | AIDS and behavior |
| container_volume | 20 |
| creator | Bavinton, Benjamin R. Duncan, Duane Grierson, Jeffrey Zablotska, Iryna B. Down, Ian A. Grulich, Andrew E. Prestage, Garrett P. |
| description | Estimates of the proportion of HIV infections coming from within regular sexual relationships among gay and bisexual men (GBM) vary widely. Research surveys use various partner type categories, but there is little understanding of how men classify their partners. We conducted an online cross-sectional survey of Australian GBM exploring sexual relationships, including 2057 men reporting on 2566 regular partnerships. Just over half of the partnerships were considered ‘relationships’, while the remainder were non-romantic ‘fuckbuddy’-style arrangements. In multivariable analysis, factors associated with considering the partnership a ‘relationship’ were: using a ‘romantic’ descriptor, partnership length, monogamous agreements, any condomless anal sex with each other, love, and commitment. The category of ‘regular partner’ can mask diverse partnership types, which have different meanings to GBM, associated behaviours, and HIV risks. Certain HIV prevention techniques may be more suited to particular types of partnerships. ‘Fuckbuddy’ arrangements need to be more explicitly acknowledged in HIV prevention. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10461-016-1354-5 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808689870</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4114656531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-29cf32898df388b51fca9546d974aab1594db8ea33f699a72ea9be06e81e267a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAURiMEoqXwAGyQJTbdmNqOf9kNI2hHKgK1hW10k9xMUyXOYCcVs-uGd4DX65PUYQpCSEisfKV7vmPZX5Y95-wVZ8wcRc6k5pRxTXmuJFUPsn2uTE5zoeTDNDPHqOFa7WVPYrxijDlt3ONsT2hnuLByP_t2cYnkPYJv_ZoMDbm9-X6G66mDQD5CGD2G25sfpPXkZPWZnGFECNUlWfRDwo9hS8DX5E0b8esEXfL412TVb7q2grEdfJyN4MliimOArk3jMgwx0nOs5n2KnE_hGrdPs0cNdBGf3Z8H2ad3by-WJ_T0w_FquTillZR2pMJVTS6ss3WTW1sq3lTglNS1MxKg5MrJurQIed5o58AIBFci02g5Cm0gP8gOd95NGL5MGMeib2OFXQcehykW3DKrk9-w_0Eld1YYm9CXf6FXwxTS635SqQuj7SzkO6qavyBgU2xC20PYFpwVc53Frs4i1VnMdRYqZV7cm6eyx_p34ld_CRA7IKaVX2P44-p_Wu8ATBSrWw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1803257680</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Meaning of ‘Regular Partner’ in HIV Research Among Gay and Bisexual Men: Implications of an Australian Cross-Sectional Survey</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Bavinton, Benjamin R. ; Duncan, Duane ; Grierson, Jeffrey ; Zablotska, Iryna B. ; Down, Ian A. ; Grulich, Andrew E. ; Prestage, Garrett P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bavinton, Benjamin R. ; Duncan, Duane ; Grierson, Jeffrey ; Zablotska, Iryna B. ; Down, Ian A. ; Grulich, Andrew E. ; Prestage, Garrett P.</creatorcontrib><description>Estimates of the proportion of HIV infections coming from within regular sexual relationships among gay and bisexual men (GBM) vary widely. Research surveys use various partner type categories, but there is little understanding of how men classify their partners. We conducted an online cross-sectional survey of Australian GBM exploring sexual relationships, including 2057 men reporting on 2566 regular partnerships. Just over half of the partnerships were considered ‘relationships’, while the remainder were non-romantic ‘fuckbuddy’-style arrangements. In multivariable analysis, factors associated with considering the partnership a ‘relationship’ were: using a ‘romantic’ descriptor, partnership length, monogamous agreements, any condomless anal sex with each other, love, and commitment. The category of ‘regular partner’ can mask diverse partnership types, which have different meanings to GBM, associated behaviours, and HIV risks. Certain HIV prevention techniques may be more suited to particular types of partnerships. ‘Fuckbuddy’ arrangements need to be more explicitly acknowledged in HIV prevention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-7165</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3254</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10461-016-1354-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26971284</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AIBEFC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome ; Adult ; AIDS ; Anal sex ; Australia ; Bisexuality ; Contracts ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Cross-sections ; Data collection ; Gays & lesbians ; Health Psychology ; Health risks ; HIV ; HIV Infections - prevention & control ; Homosexuality ; Homosexuality, Male - psychology ; Human immunodeficiency virus ; Humans ; Infectious Diseases ; Internet ; Love ; Male ; Males ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Men ; Middle Aged ; Original Paper ; Partnerships ; Personal relationships ; Prevention ; Public Health ; Risk ; Risk taking ; Sexual and Gender Minorities ; Sexual behavior ; Sexual Behavior - statistics & numerical data ; Sexual Partners ; Sexual relationships ; Sexually transmitted diseases ; STD ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>AIDS and behavior, 2016-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1777-1784</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-29cf32898df388b51fca9546d974aab1594db8ea33f699a72ea9be06e81e267a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-29cf32898df388b51fca9546d974aab1594db8ea33f699a72ea9be06e81e267a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10461-016-1354-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10461-016-1354-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27343,27923,27924,33773,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26971284$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bavinton, Benjamin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Duane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grierson, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zablotska, Iryna B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Down, Ian A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grulich, Andrew E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prestage, Garrett P.</creatorcontrib><title>The Meaning of ‘Regular Partner’ in HIV Research Among Gay and Bisexual Men: Implications of an Australian Cross-Sectional Survey</title><title>AIDS and behavior</title><addtitle>AIDS Behav</addtitle><addtitle>AIDS Behav</addtitle><description>Estimates of the proportion of HIV infections coming from within regular sexual relationships among gay and bisexual men (GBM) vary widely. Research surveys use various partner type categories, but there is little understanding of how men classify their partners. We conducted an online cross-sectional survey of Australian GBM exploring sexual relationships, including 2057 men reporting on 2566 regular partnerships. Just over half of the partnerships were considered ‘relationships’, while the remainder were non-romantic ‘fuckbuddy’-style arrangements. In multivariable analysis, factors associated with considering the partnership a ‘relationship’ were: using a ‘romantic’ descriptor, partnership length, monogamous agreements, any condomless anal sex with each other, love, and commitment. The category of ‘regular partner’ can mask diverse partnership types, which have different meanings to GBM, associated behaviours, and HIV risks. Certain HIV prevention techniques may be more suited to particular types of partnerships. ‘Fuckbuddy’ arrangements need to be more explicitly acknowledged in HIV prevention.</description><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>AIDS</subject><subject>Anal sex</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Bisexuality</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Cross-sections</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Gays & lesbians</subject><subject>Health Psychology</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>HIV</subject><subject>HIV Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Homosexuality</subject><subject>Homosexuality, Male - psychology</subject><subject>Human immunodeficiency virus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious Diseases</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Love</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Partnerships</subject><subject>Personal relationships</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk taking</subject><subject>Sexual and Gender Minorities</subject><subject>Sexual behavior</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Sexual Partners</subject><subject>Sexual relationships</subject><subject>Sexually transmitted diseases</subject><subject>STD</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1090-7165</issn><issn>1573-3254</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAURiMEoqXwAGyQJTbdmNqOf9kNI2hHKgK1hW10k9xMUyXOYCcVs-uGd4DX65PUYQpCSEisfKV7vmPZX5Y95-wVZ8wcRc6k5pRxTXmuJFUPsn2uTE5zoeTDNDPHqOFa7WVPYrxijDlt3ONsT2hnuLByP_t2cYnkPYJv_ZoMDbm9-X6G66mDQD5CGD2G25sfpPXkZPWZnGFECNUlWfRDwo9hS8DX5E0b8esEXfL412TVb7q2grEdfJyN4MliimOArk3jMgwx0nOs5n2KnE_hGrdPs0cNdBGf3Z8H2ad3by-WJ_T0w_FquTillZR2pMJVTS6ss3WTW1sq3lTglNS1MxKg5MrJurQIed5o58AIBFci02g5Cm0gP8gOd95NGL5MGMeib2OFXQcehykW3DKrk9-w_0Eld1YYm9CXf6FXwxTS635SqQuj7SzkO6qavyBgU2xC20PYFpwVc53Frs4i1VnMdRYqZV7cm6eyx_p34ld_CRA7IKaVX2P44-p_Wu8ATBSrWw</recordid><startdate>20160801</startdate><enddate>20160801</enddate><creator>Bavinton, Benjamin R.</creator><creator>Duncan, Duane</creator><creator>Grierson, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Zablotska, Iryna B.</creator><creator>Down, Ian A.</creator><creator>Grulich, Andrew E.</creator><creator>Prestage, Garrett P.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160801</creationdate><title>The Meaning of ‘Regular Partner’ in HIV Research Among Gay and Bisexual Men: Implications of an Australian Cross-Sectional Survey</title><author>Bavinton, Benjamin R. ; Duncan, Duane ; Grierson, Jeffrey ; Zablotska, Iryna B. ; Down, Ian A. ; Grulich, Andrew E. ; Prestage, Garrett P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-29cf32898df388b51fca9546d974aab1594db8ea33f699a72ea9be06e81e267a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>AIDS</topic><topic>Anal sex</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Bisexuality</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Cross-sections</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Gays & lesbians</topic><topic>Health Psychology</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>HIV</topic><topic>HIV Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Homosexuality</topic><topic>Homosexuality, Male - psychology</topic><topic>Human immunodeficiency virus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious Diseases</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Love</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Partnerships</topic><topic>Personal relationships</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk taking</topic><topic>Sexual and Gender Minorities</topic><topic>Sexual behavior</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Sexual Partners</topic><topic>Sexual relationships</topic><topic>Sexually transmitted diseases</topic><topic>STD</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bavinton, Benjamin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Duane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grierson, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zablotska, Iryna B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Down, Ian A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grulich, Andrew E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prestage, Garrett P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>AIDS and behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bavinton, Benjamin R.</au><au>Duncan, Duane</au><au>Grierson, Jeffrey</au><au>Zablotska, Iryna B.</au><au>Down, Ian A.</au><au>Grulich, Andrew E.</au><au>Prestage, Garrett P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Meaning of ‘Regular Partner’ in HIV Research Among Gay and Bisexual Men: Implications of an Australian Cross-Sectional Survey</atitle><jtitle>AIDS and behavior</jtitle><stitle>AIDS Behav</stitle><addtitle>AIDS Behav</addtitle><date>2016-08-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1777</spage><epage>1784</epage><pages>1777-1784</pages><issn>1090-7165</issn><eissn>1573-3254</eissn><coden>AIBEFC</coden><abstract>Estimates of the proportion of HIV infections coming from within regular sexual relationships among gay and bisexual men (GBM) vary widely. Research surveys use various partner type categories, but there is little understanding of how men classify their partners. We conducted an online cross-sectional survey of Australian GBM exploring sexual relationships, including 2057 men reporting on 2566 regular partnerships. Just over half of the partnerships were considered ‘relationships’, while the remainder were non-romantic ‘fuckbuddy’-style arrangements. In multivariable analysis, factors associated with considering the partnership a ‘relationship’ were: using a ‘romantic’ descriptor, partnership length, monogamous agreements, any condomless anal sex with each other, love, and commitment. The category of ‘regular partner’ can mask diverse partnership types, which have different meanings to GBM, associated behaviours, and HIV risks. Certain HIV prevention techniques may be more suited to particular types of partnerships. ‘Fuckbuddy’ arrangements need to be more explicitly acknowledged in HIV prevention.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>26971284</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10461-016-1354-5</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1090-7165 |
| ispartof | AIDS and behavior, 2016-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1777-1784 |
| issn | 1090-7165 1573-3254 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808689870 |
| source | MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Acquired immune deficiency syndrome Adult AIDS Anal sex Australia Bisexuality Contracts Cross-Sectional Studies Cross-sections Data collection Gays & lesbians Health Psychology Health risks HIV HIV Infections - prevention & control Homosexuality Homosexuality, Male - psychology Human immunodeficiency virus Humans Infectious Diseases Internet Love Male Males Medicine Medicine & Public Health Men Middle Aged Original Paper Partnerships Personal relationships Prevention Public Health Risk Risk taking Sexual and Gender Minorities Sexual behavior Sexual Behavior - statistics & numerical data Sexual Partners Sexual relationships Sexually transmitted diseases STD Surveys and Questionnaires Young Adult |
| title | The Meaning of ‘Regular Partner’ in HIV Research Among Gay and Bisexual Men: Implications of an Australian Cross-Sectional Survey |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T01%3A58%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Meaning%20of%20%E2%80%98Regular%20Partner%E2%80%99%20in%20HIV%20Research%20Among%20Gay%20and%20Bisexual%20Men:%20Implications%20of%20an%20Australian%20Cross-Sectional%20Survey&rft.jtitle=AIDS%20and%20behavior&rft.au=Bavinton,%20Benjamin%20R.&rft.date=2016-08-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1777&rft.epage=1784&rft.pages=1777-1784&rft.issn=1090-7165&rft.eissn=1573-3254&rft.coden=AIBEFC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10461-016-1354-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4114656531%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1803257680&rft_id=info:pmid/26971284&rfr_iscdi=true |