Reducing nitrogen fertilizer application as a climate change mitigation strategy: Understanding farmer decision-making and potential barriers to change in the US

•We examine farmer decision-making regarding nitrogen fertilizer application.•We explore reduced application as a climate change mitigation strategy.•Barriers include risk recognition and access to information and technology.•Barriers stem from constraints imposed by the political economy of agricul...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Land use policy 2014-01, Vol.36, p.210-218
Hauptverfasser: Stuart, D., Schewe, R.L., McDermott, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 218
container_issue
container_start_page 210
container_title Land use policy
container_volume 36
creator Stuart, D.
Schewe, R.L.
McDermott, M.
description •We examine farmer decision-making regarding nitrogen fertilizer application.•We explore reduced application as a climate change mitigation strategy.•Barriers include risk recognition and access to information and technology.•Barriers stem from constraints imposed by the political economy of agriculture.•Education and program and policy changes may address identified barriers. Nitrogen fertilizer use in agriculture is associated with water pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. While practices and programs to reduce nitrogen fertilizer application continue to be developed, inefficient fertilizer use persists and little is known about farmer decision-making regarding application rates. The purpose of this study was to explore farmer decision-making in the context of reducing the application of nitrogen fertilizer as a climate change mitigation strategy and to assess barriers to reduced application and participating in a potential offsets program. Research methods included mail surveys, interviews, and focus groups with corn farmers in Michigan, United States (US). Results indicate that potential barriers to increasing nitrogen use efficiency for climate change mitigation include: perceptions about climate change, limited access to information and technological tools, and constraints imposed by the political economy of US agriculture. Education programs, government subsidies or cost-sharing programs, and including influential market and political actors in discussions about fertilizer use and climate change mitigation may address some of these barriers. Policies and programs focused on nitrogen fertilizer use and climate change mitigation in agriculture should be aware of these barriers and how they might be addressed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.08.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808682872</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264837713001610</els_id><sourcerecordid>1500778851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c546t-4ca287581d7876686571615cbfd9983fa0d1f7ea624218084e5f4dd7adee6e743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1u1TAQhSMEEpfCO3iDxCbBdvwXdlABrVQJCbhry7UnqS-OE2zfSuVteFMc3QLLdmXJ850zo5nTNIjgjmAi3h66YKI7ZliX0FFM-g6rDhPypNkRJfuWS86eNjtMBWtVL-Xz5kXOB4yxGAjdNb-_gjtaHycUfUnLBBGNkIoP_hckZNY1eGuKXyIyGRlkg59NAWRvTJwAzb746VTOJdXCdPcO7aODlEudarMdTZqrkwPrc-Xa2fzYvmsVrUuBWLwJ6Nqk5KsIleWvtY-o3ADaf3vZPBtNyPDq_j1r9p8-fj-_aK--fL48f3_VWs5EaZk1VEmuiJNKCqEEl0QQbq9HNwyqHw12ZJRgBGWUKKwY8JE5J40DECBZf9a8Ofmuafl5hFz07LOFUNcLyzHrTSRU7UEfRjkjw8Aw5Y9Ae6Z6xfBjUIylVIqTiqoTatOSc4JRr6keJt1pgvUWC33Q_2Oht1horHSNRZW-vu9isjVhTCbWy_zTU0WHnglRuQ8nDurOb-txdLYeogXnE9ii3eIfbvYH-l3VbA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1500778851</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reducing nitrogen fertilizer application as a climate change mitigation strategy: Understanding farmer decision-making and potential barriers to change in the US</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Stuart, D. ; Schewe, R.L. ; McDermott, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stuart, D. ; Schewe, R.L. ; McDermott, M.</creatorcontrib><description>•We examine farmer decision-making regarding nitrogen fertilizer application.•We explore reduced application as a climate change mitigation strategy.•Barriers include risk recognition and access to information and technology.•Barriers stem from constraints imposed by the political economy of agriculture.•Education and program and policy changes may address identified barriers. Nitrogen fertilizer use in agriculture is associated with water pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. While practices and programs to reduce nitrogen fertilizer application continue to be developed, inefficient fertilizer use persists and little is known about farmer decision-making regarding application rates. The purpose of this study was to explore farmer decision-making in the context of reducing the application of nitrogen fertilizer as a climate change mitigation strategy and to assess barriers to reduced application and participating in a potential offsets program. Research methods included mail surveys, interviews, and focus groups with corn farmers in Michigan, United States (US). Results indicate that potential barriers to increasing nitrogen use efficiency for climate change mitigation include: perceptions about climate change, limited access to information and technological tools, and constraints imposed by the political economy of US agriculture. Education programs, government subsidies or cost-sharing programs, and including influential market and political actors in discussions about fertilizer use and climate change mitigation may address some of these barriers. Policies and programs focused on nitrogen fertilizer use and climate change mitigation in agriculture should be aware of these barriers and how they might be addressed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-8377</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.08.011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Air pollution ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Climate change mitigation ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Decision-making ; Education ; Farmers ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Global warming ; Markets ; Michigan ; Nitrogen fertilizer ; Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations ; Political economy ; Pollution ; Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments ; Subsidies ; Surveys ; United States ; Water pollution</subject><ispartof>Land use policy, 2014-01, Vol.36, p.210-218</ispartof><rights>2013</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c546t-4ca287581d7876686571615cbfd9983fa0d1f7ea624218084e5f4dd7adee6e743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c546t-4ca287581d7876686571615cbfd9983fa0d1f7ea624218084e5f4dd7adee6e743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.08.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,4021,27863,27921,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28293466$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stuart, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schewe, R.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDermott, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Reducing nitrogen fertilizer application as a climate change mitigation strategy: Understanding farmer decision-making and potential barriers to change in the US</title><title>Land use policy</title><description>•We examine farmer decision-making regarding nitrogen fertilizer application.•We explore reduced application as a climate change mitigation strategy.•Barriers include risk recognition and access to information and technology.•Barriers stem from constraints imposed by the political economy of agriculture.•Education and program and policy changes may address identified barriers. Nitrogen fertilizer use in agriculture is associated with water pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. While practices and programs to reduce nitrogen fertilizer application continue to be developed, inefficient fertilizer use persists and little is known about farmer decision-making regarding application rates. The purpose of this study was to explore farmer decision-making in the context of reducing the application of nitrogen fertilizer as a climate change mitigation strategy and to assess barriers to reduced application and participating in a potential offsets program. Research methods included mail surveys, interviews, and focus groups with corn farmers in Michigan, United States (US). Results indicate that potential barriers to increasing nitrogen use efficiency for climate change mitigation include: perceptions about climate change, limited access to information and technological tools, and constraints imposed by the political economy of US agriculture. Education programs, government subsidies or cost-sharing programs, and including influential market and political actors in discussions about fertilizer use and climate change mitigation may address some of these barriers. Policies and programs focused on nitrogen fertilizer use and climate change mitigation in agriculture should be aware of these barriers and how they might be addressed.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Climate change mitigation</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Decision-making</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Michigan</subject><subject>Nitrogen fertilizer</subject><subject>Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations</subject><subject>Political economy</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><issn>0264-8377</issn><issn>1873-5754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1u1TAQhSMEEpfCO3iDxCbBdvwXdlABrVQJCbhry7UnqS-OE2zfSuVteFMc3QLLdmXJ850zo5nTNIjgjmAi3h66YKI7ZliX0FFM-g6rDhPypNkRJfuWS86eNjtMBWtVL-Xz5kXOB4yxGAjdNb-_gjtaHycUfUnLBBGNkIoP_hckZNY1eGuKXyIyGRlkg59NAWRvTJwAzb746VTOJdXCdPcO7aODlEudarMdTZqrkwPrc-Xa2fzYvmsVrUuBWLwJ6Nqk5KsIleWvtY-o3ADaf3vZPBtNyPDq_j1r9p8-fj-_aK--fL48f3_VWs5EaZk1VEmuiJNKCqEEl0QQbq9HNwyqHw12ZJRgBGWUKKwY8JE5J40DECBZf9a8Ofmuafl5hFz07LOFUNcLyzHrTSRU7UEfRjkjw8Aw5Y9Ae6Z6xfBjUIylVIqTiqoTatOSc4JRr6keJt1pgvUWC33Q_2Oht1horHSNRZW-vu9isjVhTCbWy_zTU0WHnglRuQ8nDurOb-txdLYeogXnE9ii3eIfbvYH-l3VbA</recordid><startdate>201401</startdate><enddate>201401</enddate><creator>Stuart, D.</creator><creator>Schewe, R.L.</creator><creator>McDermott, M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201401</creationdate><title>Reducing nitrogen fertilizer application as a climate change mitigation strategy: Understanding farmer decision-making and potential barriers to change in the US</title><author>Stuart, D. ; Schewe, R.L. ; McDermott, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c546t-4ca287581d7876686571615cbfd9983fa0d1f7ea624218084e5f4dd7adee6e743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Climate change mitigation</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Decision-making</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Michigan</topic><topic>Nitrogen fertilizer</topic><topic>Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations</topic><topic>Political economy</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stuart, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schewe, R.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDermott, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stuart, D.</au><au>Schewe, R.L.</au><au>McDermott, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reducing nitrogen fertilizer application as a climate change mitigation strategy: Understanding farmer decision-making and potential barriers to change in the US</atitle><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle><date>2014-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>36</volume><spage>210</spage><epage>218</epage><pages>210-218</pages><issn>0264-8377</issn><eissn>1873-5754</eissn><abstract>•We examine farmer decision-making regarding nitrogen fertilizer application.•We explore reduced application as a climate change mitigation strategy.•Barriers include risk recognition and access to information and technology.•Barriers stem from constraints imposed by the political economy of agriculture.•Education and program and policy changes may address identified barriers. Nitrogen fertilizer use in agriculture is associated with water pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. While practices and programs to reduce nitrogen fertilizer application continue to be developed, inefficient fertilizer use persists and little is known about farmer decision-making regarding application rates. The purpose of this study was to explore farmer decision-making in the context of reducing the application of nitrogen fertilizer as a climate change mitigation strategy and to assess barriers to reduced application and participating in a potential offsets program. Research methods included mail surveys, interviews, and focus groups with corn farmers in Michigan, United States (US). Results indicate that potential barriers to increasing nitrogen use efficiency for climate change mitigation include: perceptions about climate change, limited access to information and technological tools, and constraints imposed by the political economy of US agriculture. Education programs, government subsidies or cost-sharing programs, and including influential market and political actors in discussions about fertilizer use and climate change mitigation may address some of these barriers. Policies and programs focused on nitrogen fertilizer use and climate change mitigation in agriculture should be aware of these barriers and how they might be addressed.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.08.011</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-8377
ispartof Land use policy, 2014-01, Vol.36, p.210-218
issn 0264-8377
1873-5754
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808682872
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; PAIS Index
subjects Agriculture
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Air pollution
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Climate change mitigation
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Decision-making
Education
Farmers
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General agronomy. Plant production
Global warming
Markets
Michigan
Nitrogen fertilizer
Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations
Political economy
Pollution
Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments
Subsidies
Surveys
United States
Water pollution
title Reducing nitrogen fertilizer application as a climate change mitigation strategy: Understanding farmer decision-making and potential barriers to change in the US
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T09%3A02%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reducing%20nitrogen%20fertilizer%20application%20as%20a%20climate%20change%20mitigation%20strategy:%20Understanding%20farmer%20decision-making%20and%20potential%20barriers%20to%20change%20in%20the%20US&rft.jtitle=Land%20use%20policy&rft.au=Stuart,%20D.&rft.date=2014-01&rft.volume=36&rft.spage=210&rft.epage=218&rft.pages=210-218&rft.issn=0264-8377&rft.eissn=1873-5754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.08.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1500778851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1500778851&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0264837713001610&rfr_iscdi=true