Increased rodenticide exposure rate and risk of toxicosis in barn owls (Tyto alba) from southwestern Canada and linkage with demographic but not genetic factors

Among many anthropogenic drivers of population decline, continual rapid urbanization and industrialization pose major challenges for the survival of wildlife species. Barn owls ( Tyto alba ) in southwestern British Columbia (BC) face a multitude of threats ranging from habitat fragmentation to vehic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecotoxicology (London) 2016-08, Vol.25 (6), p.1061-1071
Hauptverfasser: Huang, Andrew C., Elliott, John E., Hindmarch, Sofi, Lee, Sandi L., Maisonneuve, France, Bowes, Victoria, Cheng, Kimberly M., Martin, Kathy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1071
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1061
container_title Ecotoxicology (London)
container_volume 25
creator Huang, Andrew C.
Elliott, John E.
Hindmarch, Sofi
Lee, Sandi L.
Maisonneuve, France
Bowes, Victoria
Cheng, Kimberly M.
Martin, Kathy
description Among many anthropogenic drivers of population decline, continual rapid urbanization and industrialization pose major challenges for the survival of wildlife species. Barn owls ( Tyto alba ) in southwestern British Columbia (BC) face a multitude of threats ranging from habitat fragmentation to vehicle strikes. They are also at risk from secondary poisoning of second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGARs), a suite of toxic compounds which at high doses results in a depletion of blood clotting factors leading to internal bleeding and death. Here, using long-term data (N = 119) for the hepatic residue levels of SGAR, we assessed the risk of toxicosis from SGAR for the BC barn owl population over the past two decades. We also investigated whether sensitivity to SGAR is associated with genetic factors, namely Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) found in the CYP2C45 gene of barn owls. We found that residue concentration for total SGAR was significantly higher in 2006–2013 (141 ng/g) relative to 1992–2003 (57 ng/g). The proportion of owls exposed to multiple SGAR types was also significantly higher in 2006–2013. Those measures accordingly translate directly into an increase in toxicosis risk level. We also detected demographic differences, where adult females showed on average lower concentration of total SGAR (64 ng/g) when compared to adult males (106 ng/g). Juveniles were overall more likely to show signs of toxicosis than adults (33.3 and 6.9 %, respectively), and those symptoms were positively predicted by SGAR concentrations. We found no evidence that SNPs in the CYP2C45 gene of barn owls were associated with intraspecific variation in SGAR sensitivity. We recommend several preventative measures be taken to minimize wildlife exposure to SGAR.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10646-016-1662-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808680203</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A713749645</galeid><sourcerecordid>A713749645</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-31b01707c74c67d8fdc5a359607257278637736351c716161eb41f37bb9db27e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kk1v1DAQhi0EokvhB3BBlriUQ4o_Es_mWK34qFSJSzlbjjPJuk3sxXa07b_hp-Jly6dAc7Dked7RO6OXkJecnXPG4G3iTNWqYlxVXClRqUdkxRuQlWQcHpMVa5WsWtGKE_IspRvGWAs1e0pOBPCG10yuyNdLbyOahD2NoUefnXU9UrzbhbREpNFkpMaXrku3NAw0hztnQ3KJOk87Ez0N-ynRs-v7HKiZOvOGDjHMNIUlb_eYMhZkY7zpzfc5k_O3ZkS6d3lLe5zDGM1u6yztlkx9yHREj8UFHYzNIabn5MlgpoQvHt5T8vn9u-vNx-rq04fLzcVVZWsQuZK8KzszsFBbBf166G1jZNMqBqIBAWslAaSSDbfAVSnsaj5I6Lq27wSgPCVnx7m7GL4sxbeeXbI4TcZjWJLma7ZWayaYLOjrv9CbsERf3GkObVsLEIr9okYzoXZ-CDkaexiqL4BLqFtVN4U6_wdVqpym3Nnj4Mr_HwJ-FNgYUoo46F10s4n3mjN9SIU-pkKXVOhDKrQqmlcPhpduxv6n4kcMCiCOQCotP2L8baP_Tv0GOJPBUg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1799427260</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Increased rodenticide exposure rate and risk of toxicosis in barn owls (Tyto alba) from southwestern Canada and linkage with demographic but not genetic factors</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink (Online service)</source><creator>Huang, Andrew C. ; Elliott, John E. ; Hindmarch, Sofi ; Lee, Sandi L. ; Maisonneuve, France ; Bowes, Victoria ; Cheng, Kimberly M. ; Martin, Kathy</creator><creatorcontrib>Huang, Andrew C. ; Elliott, John E. ; Hindmarch, Sofi ; Lee, Sandi L. ; Maisonneuve, France ; Bowes, Victoria ; Cheng, Kimberly M. ; Martin, Kathy</creatorcontrib><description>Among many anthropogenic drivers of population decline, continual rapid urbanization and industrialization pose major challenges for the survival of wildlife species. Barn owls ( Tyto alba ) in southwestern British Columbia (BC) face a multitude of threats ranging from habitat fragmentation to vehicle strikes. They are also at risk from secondary poisoning of second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGARs), a suite of toxic compounds which at high doses results in a depletion of blood clotting factors leading to internal bleeding and death. Here, using long-term data (N = 119) for the hepatic residue levels of SGAR, we assessed the risk of toxicosis from SGAR for the BC barn owl population over the past two decades. We also investigated whether sensitivity to SGAR is associated with genetic factors, namely Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) found in the CYP2C45 gene of barn owls. We found that residue concentration for total SGAR was significantly higher in 2006–2013 (141 ng/g) relative to 1992–2003 (57 ng/g). The proportion of owls exposed to multiple SGAR types was also significantly higher in 2006–2013. Those measures accordingly translate directly into an increase in toxicosis risk level. We also detected demographic differences, where adult females showed on average lower concentration of total SGAR (64 ng/g) when compared to adult males (106 ng/g). Juveniles were overall more likely to show signs of toxicosis than adults (33.3 and 6.9 %, respectively), and those symptoms were positively predicted by SGAR concentrations. We found no evidence that SNPs in the CYP2C45 gene of barn owls were associated with intraspecific variation in SGAR sensitivity. We recommend several preventative measures be taken to minimize wildlife exposure to SGAR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-9292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3017</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10646-016-1662-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27151403</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECOTEL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Animals ; Anthropogenic factors ; Anticoagulants (Medicine) ; Anticoagulants - toxicity ; British Columbia ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Ecotoxicology ; Environment ; Environmental Management ; Environmental Monitoring ; Environmental Pollutants - toxicity ; Genetic aspects ; Genetic factors ; Habitat fragmentation ; Owls ; Poisoning ; Population decline ; Risk ; Risk assessment ; Rodenticides ; Rodenticides - toxicity ; Single nucleotide polymorphisms ; Strigiformes - physiology ; Tyto alba ; Urbanization ; Wildlife</subject><ispartof>Ecotoxicology (London), 2016-08, Vol.25 (6), p.1061-1071</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-31b01707c74c67d8fdc5a359607257278637736351c716161eb41f37bb9db27e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-31b01707c74c67d8fdc5a359607257278637736351c716161eb41f37bb9db27e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10646-016-1662-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10646-016-1662-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27151403$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huang, Andrew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, John E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hindmarch, Sofi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sandi L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maisonneuve, France</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowes, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Kimberly M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Kathy</creatorcontrib><title>Increased rodenticide exposure rate and risk of toxicosis in barn owls (Tyto alba) from southwestern Canada and linkage with demographic but not genetic factors</title><title>Ecotoxicology (London)</title><addtitle>Ecotoxicology</addtitle><addtitle>Ecotoxicology</addtitle><description>Among many anthropogenic drivers of population decline, continual rapid urbanization and industrialization pose major challenges for the survival of wildlife species. Barn owls ( Tyto alba ) in southwestern British Columbia (BC) face a multitude of threats ranging from habitat fragmentation to vehicle strikes. They are also at risk from secondary poisoning of second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGARs), a suite of toxic compounds which at high doses results in a depletion of blood clotting factors leading to internal bleeding and death. Here, using long-term data (N = 119) for the hepatic residue levels of SGAR, we assessed the risk of toxicosis from SGAR for the BC barn owl population over the past two decades. We also investigated whether sensitivity to SGAR is associated with genetic factors, namely Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) found in the CYP2C45 gene of barn owls. We found that residue concentration for total SGAR was significantly higher in 2006–2013 (141 ng/g) relative to 1992–2003 (57 ng/g). The proportion of owls exposed to multiple SGAR types was also significantly higher in 2006–2013. Those measures accordingly translate directly into an increase in toxicosis risk level. We also detected demographic differences, where adult females showed on average lower concentration of total SGAR (64 ng/g) when compared to adult males (106 ng/g). Juveniles were overall more likely to show signs of toxicosis than adults (33.3 and 6.9 %, respectively), and those symptoms were positively predicted by SGAR concentrations. We found no evidence that SNPs in the CYP2C45 gene of barn owls were associated with intraspecific variation in SGAR sensitivity. We recommend several preventative measures be taken to minimize wildlife exposure to SGAR.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Anticoagulants (Medicine)</subject><subject>Anticoagulants - toxicity</subject><subject>British Columbia</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental Pollutants - toxicity</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Genetic factors</subject><subject>Habitat fragmentation</subject><subject>Owls</subject><subject>Poisoning</subject><subject>Population decline</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Rodenticides</subject><subject>Rodenticides - toxicity</subject><subject>Single nucleotide polymorphisms</subject><subject>Strigiformes - physiology</subject><subject>Tyto alba</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><issn>0963-9292</issn><issn>1573-3017</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kk1v1DAQhi0EokvhB3BBlriUQ4o_Es_mWK34qFSJSzlbjjPJuk3sxXa07b_hp-Jly6dAc7Dked7RO6OXkJecnXPG4G3iTNWqYlxVXClRqUdkxRuQlWQcHpMVa5WsWtGKE_IspRvGWAs1e0pOBPCG10yuyNdLbyOahD2NoUefnXU9UrzbhbREpNFkpMaXrku3NAw0hztnQ3KJOk87Ez0N-ynRs-v7HKiZOvOGDjHMNIUlb_eYMhZkY7zpzfc5k_O3ZkS6d3lLe5zDGM1u6yztlkx9yHREj8UFHYzNIabn5MlgpoQvHt5T8vn9u-vNx-rq04fLzcVVZWsQuZK8KzszsFBbBf166G1jZNMqBqIBAWslAaSSDbfAVSnsaj5I6Lq27wSgPCVnx7m7GL4sxbeeXbI4TcZjWJLma7ZWayaYLOjrv9CbsERf3GkObVsLEIr9okYzoXZ-CDkaexiqL4BLqFtVN4U6_wdVqpym3Nnj4Mr_HwJ-FNgYUoo46F10s4n3mjN9SIU-pkKXVOhDKrQqmlcPhpduxv6n4kcMCiCOQCotP2L8baP_Tv0GOJPBUg</recordid><startdate>20160801</startdate><enddate>20160801</enddate><creator>Huang, Andrew C.</creator><creator>Elliott, John E.</creator><creator>Hindmarch, Sofi</creator><creator>Lee, Sandi L.</creator><creator>Maisonneuve, France</creator><creator>Bowes, Victoria</creator><creator>Cheng, Kimberly M.</creator><creator>Martin, Kathy</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160801</creationdate><title>Increased rodenticide exposure rate and risk of toxicosis in barn owls (Tyto alba) from southwestern Canada and linkage with demographic but not genetic factors</title><author>Huang, Andrew C. ; Elliott, John E. ; Hindmarch, Sofi ; Lee, Sandi L. ; Maisonneuve, France ; Bowes, Victoria ; Cheng, Kimberly M. ; Martin, Kathy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-31b01707c74c67d8fdc5a359607257278637736351c716161eb41f37bb9db27e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Anticoagulants (Medicine)</topic><topic>Anticoagulants - toxicity</topic><topic>British Columbia</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental Pollutants - toxicity</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Genetic factors</topic><topic>Habitat fragmentation</topic><topic>Owls</topic><topic>Poisoning</topic><topic>Population decline</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Rodenticides</topic><topic>Rodenticides - toxicity</topic><topic>Single nucleotide polymorphisms</topic><topic>Strigiformes - physiology</topic><topic>Tyto alba</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huang, Andrew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, John E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hindmarch, Sofi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sandi L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maisonneuve, France</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowes, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Kimberly M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Kathy</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecotoxicology (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huang, Andrew C.</au><au>Elliott, John E.</au><au>Hindmarch, Sofi</au><au>Lee, Sandi L.</au><au>Maisonneuve, France</au><au>Bowes, Victoria</au><au>Cheng, Kimberly M.</au><au>Martin, Kathy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Increased rodenticide exposure rate and risk of toxicosis in barn owls (Tyto alba) from southwestern Canada and linkage with demographic but not genetic factors</atitle><jtitle>Ecotoxicology (London)</jtitle><stitle>Ecotoxicology</stitle><addtitle>Ecotoxicology</addtitle><date>2016-08-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1061</spage><epage>1071</epage><pages>1061-1071</pages><issn>0963-9292</issn><eissn>1573-3017</eissn><coden>ECOTEL</coden><abstract>Among many anthropogenic drivers of population decline, continual rapid urbanization and industrialization pose major challenges for the survival of wildlife species. Barn owls ( Tyto alba ) in southwestern British Columbia (BC) face a multitude of threats ranging from habitat fragmentation to vehicle strikes. They are also at risk from secondary poisoning of second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGARs), a suite of toxic compounds which at high doses results in a depletion of blood clotting factors leading to internal bleeding and death. Here, using long-term data (N = 119) for the hepatic residue levels of SGAR, we assessed the risk of toxicosis from SGAR for the BC barn owl population over the past two decades. We also investigated whether sensitivity to SGAR is associated with genetic factors, namely Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) found in the CYP2C45 gene of barn owls. We found that residue concentration for total SGAR was significantly higher in 2006–2013 (141 ng/g) relative to 1992–2003 (57 ng/g). The proportion of owls exposed to multiple SGAR types was also significantly higher in 2006–2013. Those measures accordingly translate directly into an increase in toxicosis risk level. We also detected demographic differences, where adult females showed on average lower concentration of total SGAR (64 ng/g) when compared to adult males (106 ng/g). Juveniles were overall more likely to show signs of toxicosis than adults (33.3 and 6.9 %, respectively), and those symptoms were positively predicted by SGAR concentrations. We found no evidence that SNPs in the CYP2C45 gene of barn owls were associated with intraspecific variation in SGAR sensitivity. We recommend several preventative measures be taken to minimize wildlife exposure to SGAR.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>27151403</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10646-016-1662-6</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0963-9292
ispartof Ecotoxicology (London), 2016-08, Vol.25 (6), p.1061-1071
issn 0963-9292
1573-3017
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808680203
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink (Online service)
subjects Animals
Anthropogenic factors
Anticoagulants (Medicine)
Anticoagulants - toxicity
British Columbia
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Earth and Environmental Science
Ecology
Ecotoxicology
Environment
Environmental Management
Environmental Monitoring
Environmental Pollutants - toxicity
Genetic aspects
Genetic factors
Habitat fragmentation
Owls
Poisoning
Population decline
Risk
Risk assessment
Rodenticides
Rodenticides - toxicity
Single nucleotide polymorphisms
Strigiformes - physiology
Tyto alba
Urbanization
Wildlife
title Increased rodenticide exposure rate and risk of toxicosis in barn owls (Tyto alba) from southwestern Canada and linkage with demographic but not genetic factors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T11%3A23%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Increased%20rodenticide%20exposure%20rate%20and%20risk%20of%20toxicosis%20in%20barn%20owls%20(Tyto%20alba)%20from%20southwestern%20Canada%20and%20linkage%20with%20demographic%20but%20not%20genetic%20factors&rft.jtitle=Ecotoxicology%20(London)&rft.au=Huang,%20Andrew%20C.&rft.date=2016-08-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1061&rft.epage=1071&rft.pages=1061-1071&rft.issn=0963-9292&rft.eissn=1573-3017&rft.coden=ECOTEL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10646-016-1662-6&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA713749645%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1799427260&rft_id=info:pmid/27151403&rft_galeid=A713749645&rfr_iscdi=true