Using a map-based assessment tool for the development of cost-effective WFD river basin action programmes in a changing climate
For the 2nd and 3rd river basin management cycles (2015–2027) of the Water Framework Directive (WFD), EU Member States are required to fully integrate climate change into the process of river basin management planning (RBMP). Complying with the main WFD objective of achieving ‘good ecological status...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of environmental management 2016-08, Vol.178, p.70-82 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 82 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 70 |
container_title | Journal of environmental management |
container_volume | 178 |
creator | Kaspersen, Bjarke Stoltze Jacobsen, Torsten Vammen Butts, Michael Brian Jensen, Niels H. Boegh, Eva Seaby, Lauren Paige Müller, Henrik Gioertz Kjaer, Tyge |
description | For the 2nd and 3rd river basin management cycles (2015–2027) of the Water Framework Directive (WFD), EU Member States are required to fully integrate climate change into the process of river basin management planning (RBMP). Complying with the main WFD objective of achieving ‘good ecological status’ in all water bodies in Denmark requires Programmes of Measures (PoMs) to reduce nitrogen (N) pollution from point and diffuse sources. Denmark is among the world's most intensively farmed countries and in spite of thirty years of significant policy actions to reduce diffuse nutrient emissions, there is still a need for further reductions. In addition, the impacts of climate change are projected to lead to a situation where nutrient loads will have to be reduced still further in comparison to current climate conditions. There is an urgent need to address this challenge in WFD action programmes in order to develop robust and cost-effective adaptation strategies for the next WFD RBMP cycles. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate and discuss how a map-based PoMs assessment tool can support the development of adaptive and cost-effective strategies to reduce N losses in the Isefjord and Roskilde Fjord River Basin in the north east of Denmark. The tool facilitates assessments of the application of agri-environmental measures that are targeted towards low retention agricultural areas, where limited or no surface and subsurface N reduction takes place. Effects of climate change on nitrate leaching were evaluated using the dynamic agro-ecosystem model ‘Daisy’. Results show that nitrate leaching rates increase by approx. 25% under current management practices. This impact outweighs the expected total N reduction effect of Baseline 2015 and the first RBMP in the case study river basin. The particular PoMs investigated in our study show that WFD N reduction targets can be achieved by targeted land use changes on approx. 4% of the agricultural area under current climate conditions and approx. 9% of the agricultural area, when projected climate change impacts on nitrate leaching rates are included in the assessment. The study highlights the potential of the PoMs assessment tool to assist in evaluation of alternative WFD RBMP scenarios to achieve spatially targeted and cost-effective reductions of N loads at catchment scale in the context of a changing climate.
•A methodology for integrating climate change in river basin planning is presented.•A map-based tool is used to as |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.04.043 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808679820</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479716302146</els_id><sourcerecordid>1789759460</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-43872a16291caf2f36fb5ea293ad9ee3fce1e3234f4472f45a56d7dad740cfbd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9vFCEUx4nR2G31T9CQePEyK79mGE7GVFtNmnhp0yNh4bFlMgMrzG7iyX-9jLt66KXJS4DH530fjy9C7yhZU0K7T8N6gHiYTFyzelwTUYO_QCtKVNv0HScv0YpwQhshlTxD56UMhBDOqHyNzpikXLVKrdCfuxLiFhs8mV2zMQUcNqVAKRPEGc8pjdinjOcHwA4OMKbd34vksU1lbsB7sHM4AL6_-opz3WRcVULEpqZTxLucttlMExS8JLF9MHG7dLRjmMwMb9Arb8YCb0_rBbq7-nZ7-b25-Xn94_LLTWMF6-ZG8F4yQzumqDWeed75TQuGKW6cAuDeAgXOuPBCSOZFa9rOSWecFMT6jeMX6ONRtz7o1x7KrKdQLIyjiZD2RdOe9J1UPSPPo7JXslWiW9APT9Ah7XOsg1RKUSV7JmSl2iNlcyolg9e7XIfPvzUlejFTD_pkpl7M1ETU4LXu_Ul9v5nA_a_6514FPh8BqD93CJB1sQGiBRdytUW7FJ5p8QjEM7Ps</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1791978247</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using a map-based assessment tool for the development of cost-effective WFD river basin action programmes in a changing climate</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Kaspersen, Bjarke Stoltze ; Jacobsen, Torsten Vammen ; Butts, Michael Brian ; Jensen, Niels H. ; Boegh, Eva ; Seaby, Lauren Paige ; Müller, Henrik Gioertz ; Kjaer, Tyge</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaspersen, Bjarke Stoltze ; Jacobsen, Torsten Vammen ; Butts, Michael Brian ; Jensen, Niels H. ; Boegh, Eva ; Seaby, Lauren Paige ; Müller, Henrik Gioertz ; Kjaer, Tyge</creatorcontrib><description>For the 2nd and 3rd river basin management cycles (2015–2027) of the Water Framework Directive (WFD), EU Member States are required to fully integrate climate change into the process of river basin management planning (RBMP). Complying with the main WFD objective of achieving ‘good ecological status’ in all water bodies in Denmark requires Programmes of Measures (PoMs) to reduce nitrogen (N) pollution from point and diffuse sources. Denmark is among the world's most intensively farmed countries and in spite of thirty years of significant policy actions to reduce diffuse nutrient emissions, there is still a need for further reductions. In addition, the impacts of climate change are projected to lead to a situation where nutrient loads will have to be reduced still further in comparison to current climate conditions. There is an urgent need to address this challenge in WFD action programmes in order to develop robust and cost-effective adaptation strategies for the next WFD RBMP cycles. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate and discuss how a map-based PoMs assessment tool can support the development of adaptive and cost-effective strategies to reduce N losses in the Isefjord and Roskilde Fjord River Basin in the north east of Denmark. The tool facilitates assessments of the application of agri-environmental measures that are targeted towards low retention agricultural areas, where limited or no surface and subsurface N reduction takes place. Effects of climate change on nitrate leaching were evaluated using the dynamic agro-ecosystem model ‘Daisy’. Results show that nitrate leaching rates increase by approx. 25% under current management practices. This impact outweighs the expected total N reduction effect of Baseline 2015 and the first RBMP in the case study river basin. The particular PoMs investigated in our study show that WFD N reduction targets can be achieved by targeted land use changes on approx. 4% of the agricultural area under current climate conditions and approx. 9% of the agricultural area, when projected climate change impacts on nitrate leaching rates are included in the assessment. The study highlights the potential of the PoMs assessment tool to assist in evaluation of alternative WFD RBMP scenarios to achieve spatially targeted and cost-effective reductions of N loads at catchment scale in the context of a changing climate.
•A methodology for integrating climate change in river basin planning is presented.•A map-based tool is used to assess climate change adaptation in WFD PoMs scenarios.•Our findings indicate a significant effect of climate change on nitrate leaching.•Spatial targeting of measures can achieve WFD environmental goals cost-effectively.•Recommendations for adaptation to projected climate changes in RBMPs are provided.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.04.043</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27139599</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEVMAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Climate Change ; Climate change adaptation ; Costs and Cost Analysis ; Daisy ; Decision support systems ; Denmark ; Ecosystem ; Emissions control ; Environmental management ; Environmental Monitoring - economics ; EU directives ; EU membership ; Freshwater ; GIS ; Humans ; Leaching ; Maps as Topic ; Program Development - economics ; Programmes of measures ; River basin management planning ; Rivers ; Water framework directive ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry ; Water Supply - standards</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2016-08, Vol.178, p.70-82</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Academic Press Ltd. Aug 1, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-43872a16291caf2f36fb5ea293ad9ee3fce1e3234f4472f45a56d7dad740cfbd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-43872a16291caf2f36fb5ea293ad9ee3fce1e3234f4472f45a56d7dad740cfbd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.04.043$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27928,27929,45999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27139599$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaspersen, Bjarke Stoltze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Torsten Vammen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butts, Michael Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Niels H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boegh, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seaby, Lauren Paige</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Henrik Gioertz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kjaer, Tyge</creatorcontrib><title>Using a map-based assessment tool for the development of cost-effective WFD river basin action programmes in a changing climate</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><description>For the 2nd and 3rd river basin management cycles (2015–2027) of the Water Framework Directive (WFD), EU Member States are required to fully integrate climate change into the process of river basin management planning (RBMP). Complying with the main WFD objective of achieving ‘good ecological status’ in all water bodies in Denmark requires Programmes of Measures (PoMs) to reduce nitrogen (N) pollution from point and diffuse sources. Denmark is among the world's most intensively farmed countries and in spite of thirty years of significant policy actions to reduce diffuse nutrient emissions, there is still a need for further reductions. In addition, the impacts of climate change are projected to lead to a situation where nutrient loads will have to be reduced still further in comparison to current climate conditions. There is an urgent need to address this challenge in WFD action programmes in order to develop robust and cost-effective adaptation strategies for the next WFD RBMP cycles. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate and discuss how a map-based PoMs assessment tool can support the development of adaptive and cost-effective strategies to reduce N losses in the Isefjord and Roskilde Fjord River Basin in the north east of Denmark. The tool facilitates assessments of the application of agri-environmental measures that are targeted towards low retention agricultural areas, where limited or no surface and subsurface N reduction takes place. Effects of climate change on nitrate leaching were evaluated using the dynamic agro-ecosystem model ‘Daisy’. Results show that nitrate leaching rates increase by approx. 25% under current management practices. This impact outweighs the expected total N reduction effect of Baseline 2015 and the first RBMP in the case study river basin. The particular PoMs investigated in our study show that WFD N reduction targets can be achieved by targeted land use changes on approx. 4% of the agricultural area under current climate conditions and approx. 9% of the agricultural area, when projected climate change impacts on nitrate leaching rates are included in the assessment. The study highlights the potential of the PoMs assessment tool to assist in evaluation of alternative WFD RBMP scenarios to achieve spatially targeted and cost-effective reductions of N loads at catchment scale in the context of a changing climate.
•A methodology for integrating climate change in river basin planning is presented.•A map-based tool is used to assess climate change adaptation in WFD PoMs scenarios.•Our findings indicate a significant effect of climate change on nitrate leaching.•Spatial targeting of measures can achieve WFD environmental goals cost-effectively.•Recommendations for adaptation to projected climate changes in RBMPs are provided.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Climate Change</subject><subject>Climate change adaptation</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis</subject><subject>Daisy</subject><subject>Decision support systems</subject><subject>Denmark</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - economics</subject><subject>EU directives</subject><subject>EU membership</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>GIS</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leaching</subject><subject>Maps as Topic</subject><subject>Program Development - economics</subject><subject>Programmes of measures</subject><subject>River basin management planning</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Water framework directive</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry</subject><subject>Water Supply - standards</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9vFCEUx4nR2G31T9CQePEyK79mGE7GVFtNmnhp0yNh4bFlMgMrzG7iyX-9jLt66KXJS4DH530fjy9C7yhZU0K7T8N6gHiYTFyzelwTUYO_QCtKVNv0HScv0YpwQhshlTxD56UMhBDOqHyNzpikXLVKrdCfuxLiFhs8mV2zMQUcNqVAKRPEGc8pjdinjOcHwA4OMKbd34vksU1lbsB7sHM4AL6_-opz3WRcVULEpqZTxLucttlMExS8JLF9MHG7dLRjmMwMb9Arb8YCb0_rBbq7-nZ7-b25-Xn94_LLTWMF6-ZG8F4yQzumqDWeed75TQuGKW6cAuDeAgXOuPBCSOZFa9rOSWecFMT6jeMX6ONRtz7o1x7KrKdQLIyjiZD2RdOe9J1UPSPPo7JXslWiW9APT9Ah7XOsg1RKUSV7JmSl2iNlcyolg9e7XIfPvzUlejFTD_pkpl7M1ETU4LXu_Ul9v5nA_a_6514FPh8BqD93CJB1sQGiBRdytUW7FJ5p8QjEM7Ps</recordid><startdate>20160801</startdate><enddate>20160801</enddate><creator>Kaspersen, Bjarke Stoltze</creator><creator>Jacobsen, Torsten Vammen</creator><creator>Butts, Michael Brian</creator><creator>Jensen, Niels H.</creator><creator>Boegh, Eva</creator><creator>Seaby, Lauren Paige</creator><creator>Müller, Henrik Gioertz</creator><creator>Kjaer, Tyge</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Academic Press Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TV</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160801</creationdate><title>Using a map-based assessment tool for the development of cost-effective WFD river basin action programmes in a changing climate</title><author>Kaspersen, Bjarke Stoltze ; Jacobsen, Torsten Vammen ; Butts, Michael Brian ; Jensen, Niels H. ; Boegh, Eva ; Seaby, Lauren Paige ; Müller, Henrik Gioertz ; Kjaer, Tyge</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-43872a16291caf2f36fb5ea293ad9ee3fce1e3234f4472f45a56d7dad740cfbd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Climate Change</topic><topic>Climate change adaptation</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis</topic><topic>Daisy</topic><topic>Decision support systems</topic><topic>Denmark</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - economics</topic><topic>EU directives</topic><topic>EU membership</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>GIS</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leaching</topic><topic>Maps as Topic</topic><topic>Program Development - economics</topic><topic>Programmes of measures</topic><topic>River basin management planning</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Water framework directive</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry</topic><topic>Water Supply - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaspersen, Bjarke Stoltze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Torsten Vammen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butts, Michael Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Niels H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boegh, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seaby, Lauren Paige</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Henrik Gioertz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kjaer, Tyge</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaspersen, Bjarke Stoltze</au><au>Jacobsen, Torsten Vammen</au><au>Butts, Michael Brian</au><au>Jensen, Niels H.</au><au>Boegh, Eva</au><au>Seaby, Lauren Paige</au><au>Müller, Henrik Gioertz</au><au>Kjaer, Tyge</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using a map-based assessment tool for the development of cost-effective WFD river basin action programmes in a changing climate</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2016-08-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>178</volume><spage>70</spage><epage>82</epage><pages>70-82</pages><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><coden>JEVMAW</coden><abstract>For the 2nd and 3rd river basin management cycles (2015–2027) of the Water Framework Directive (WFD), EU Member States are required to fully integrate climate change into the process of river basin management planning (RBMP). Complying with the main WFD objective of achieving ‘good ecological status’ in all water bodies in Denmark requires Programmes of Measures (PoMs) to reduce nitrogen (N) pollution from point and diffuse sources. Denmark is among the world's most intensively farmed countries and in spite of thirty years of significant policy actions to reduce diffuse nutrient emissions, there is still a need for further reductions. In addition, the impacts of climate change are projected to lead to a situation where nutrient loads will have to be reduced still further in comparison to current climate conditions. There is an urgent need to address this challenge in WFD action programmes in order to develop robust and cost-effective adaptation strategies for the next WFD RBMP cycles. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate and discuss how a map-based PoMs assessment tool can support the development of adaptive and cost-effective strategies to reduce N losses in the Isefjord and Roskilde Fjord River Basin in the north east of Denmark. The tool facilitates assessments of the application of agri-environmental measures that are targeted towards low retention agricultural areas, where limited or no surface and subsurface N reduction takes place. Effects of climate change on nitrate leaching were evaluated using the dynamic agro-ecosystem model ‘Daisy’. Results show that nitrate leaching rates increase by approx. 25% under current management practices. This impact outweighs the expected total N reduction effect of Baseline 2015 and the first RBMP in the case study river basin. The particular PoMs investigated in our study show that WFD N reduction targets can be achieved by targeted land use changes on approx. 4% of the agricultural area under current climate conditions and approx. 9% of the agricultural area, when projected climate change impacts on nitrate leaching rates are included in the assessment. The study highlights the potential of the PoMs assessment tool to assist in evaluation of alternative WFD RBMP scenarios to achieve spatially targeted and cost-effective reductions of N loads at catchment scale in the context of a changing climate.
•A methodology for integrating climate change in river basin planning is presented.•A map-based tool is used to assess climate change adaptation in WFD PoMs scenarios.•Our findings indicate a significant effect of climate change on nitrate leaching.•Spatial targeting of measures can achieve WFD environmental goals cost-effectively.•Recommendations for adaptation to projected climate changes in RBMPs are provided.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27139599</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.04.043</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4797 |
ispartof | Journal of environmental management, 2016-08, Vol.178, p.70-82 |
issn | 0301-4797 1095-8630 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808679820 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Agriculture Climate Change Climate change adaptation Costs and Cost Analysis Daisy Decision support systems Denmark Ecosystem Emissions control Environmental management Environmental Monitoring - economics EU directives EU membership Freshwater GIS Humans Leaching Maps as Topic Program Development - economics Programmes of measures River basin management planning Rivers Water framework directive Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry Water Supply - standards |
title | Using a map-based assessment tool for the development of cost-effective WFD river basin action programmes in a changing climate |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T17%3A23%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20a%20map-based%20assessment%20tool%20for%20the%20development%20of%20cost-effective%20WFD%20river%20basin%20action%20programmes%20in%20a%20changing%20climate&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Kaspersen,%20Bjarke%20Stoltze&rft.date=2016-08-01&rft.volume=178&rft.spage=70&rft.epage=82&rft.pages=70-82&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft.coden=JEVMAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.04.043&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1789759460%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1791978247&rft_id=info:pmid/27139599&rft_els_id=S0301479716302146&rfr_iscdi=true |