On-Site Energy Consumption at Softwood Sawmills in Montana
Total on-site energy requirements for wood product manufacturing are generally not well understood or publicly available, particularly at subregional scales, such as the state level. This article uses a mail survey of softwood sawmills in Montana to develop a profile of all on-site energy consumptio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Forest products journal 2016-07, Vol.66 (3-4), p.155-163 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 163 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3-4 |
container_start_page | 155 |
container_title | Forest products journal |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Loeffler, Dan Anderson, Nathaniel Morgan, Todd A Sorenson, Colin B |
description | Total on-site energy requirements for wood product manufacturing are generally not well understood or publicly available, particularly at subregional scales, such as the state level. This article uses a mail survey of softwood sawmills in Montana to develop a profile of all on-site energy consumption. Energy use is delineated by fuel type on a production basis for both renewable and nonrenewable sources for production year 2009. Survey respondents represented 92 percent of total Montana softwood lumber production of 449 million board feet, which is 4 percent of western US production and 2 percent of national production. Total annual on-site sawmill energy required was 1.6 trillion British thermal units. Seventy-seven percent was derived from wood and bark, primarily for process heat and steam for lumber drying; 16 percent was from electricity; 5 percent was from diesel used for on-site rolling stock; and the remainder was from gasoline, propane, and natural gas. Energy produced from renewable sources accounted for 86 percent of total on-site energy consumption. In addition to providing an energy profile of Montana sawmills for policymakers, aggregated results may be useful to individual firms in characterizing their energy requirements relative to the state average and in identifying potential opportunities for bioenergy expansion. |
doi_str_mv | 10.13073/FPJ-D-14-00108 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808673202</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A459001372</galeid><sourcerecordid>A459001372</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-4d6cb1e79e8ce204ef3b1c86cb306e6f9002670b5a018727b555fc91a7e134a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0s9LHDEUB_AgFlyt514HevHQ6MuPmcx4k1Vbi8XC2nPIZN9MIzPJdpJB_O_NqgctSyCBx-c9HuFLyBcGp0yAEmfXv3_SS8okBWBQ75EFF6qiTSXUPlnkWkmVVOKAHMb4AACqrPiCnN95unIJiyuPU_9ULIOP87hJLvjCpGIVuvQYwrpYmcfRDUMsnC9-BZ-MN5_Jp84MEY_f3iPy5_rqfvmD3t59v1le3FIrpUxUrivbMlQN1hY5SOxEy2ydiwIqrLoGgFcK2tIAqxVXbVmWnW2YUciENFIckZPXuZsp_JsxJj26aHEYjMcwR81qqCslOPBMv_5HH8I8-bzdVvGyEZy_U70ZUDvfhTQZux2qL2SZ92FCbRXdoXrM_2SG4LFzufzBn-7w-axxdHZnw7d3De0cnceYr-j6vyn2Zo7xIz975XYKMU7Y6c3kRjM9aQb6JQE6J0Bfaib1SwLEMz9dnuo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1802593222</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On-Site Energy Consumption at Softwood Sawmills in Montana</title><source>Allen Press Journals</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Loeffler, Dan ; Anderson, Nathaniel ; Morgan, Todd A ; Sorenson, Colin B</creator><creatorcontrib>Loeffler, Dan ; Anderson, Nathaniel ; Morgan, Todd A ; Sorenson, Colin B</creatorcontrib><description>Total on-site energy requirements for wood product manufacturing are generally not well understood or publicly available, particularly at subregional scales, such as the state level. This article uses a mail survey of softwood sawmills in Montana to develop a profile of all on-site energy consumption. Energy use is delineated by fuel type on a production basis for both renewable and nonrenewable sources for production year 2009. Survey respondents represented 92 percent of total Montana softwood lumber production of 449 million board feet, which is 4 percent of western US production and 2 percent of national production. Total annual on-site sawmill energy required was 1.6 trillion British thermal units. Seventy-seven percent was derived from wood and bark, primarily for process heat and steam for lumber drying; 16 percent was from electricity; 5 percent was from diesel used for on-site rolling stock; and the remainder was from gasoline, propane, and natural gas. Energy produced from renewable sources accounted for 86 percent of total on-site energy consumption. In addition to providing an energy profile of Montana sawmills for policymakers, aggregated results may be useful to individual firms in characterizing their energy requirements relative to the state average and in identifying potential opportunities for bioenergy expansion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-7473</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2376-9637</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.13073/FPJ-D-14-00108</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FPJOAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: Forest Products Society</publisher><subject>Alternative energy sources ; Biomass energy ; Energy consumption ; Environmental aspects ; Forecasts and trends ; Forest products industry ; Fossil fuels ; Kilns ; Manufacturing ; Renewable resources ; Sawmills</subject><ispartof>Forest products journal, 2016-07, Vol.66 (3-4), p.155-163</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Forest Products Society</rights><rights>Copyright Forest Products Society 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-4d6cb1e79e8ce204ef3b1c86cb306e6f9002670b5a018727b555fc91a7e134a43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loeffler, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Nathaniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Todd A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorenson, Colin B</creatorcontrib><title>On-Site Energy Consumption at Softwood Sawmills in Montana</title><title>Forest products journal</title><description>Total on-site energy requirements for wood product manufacturing are generally not well understood or publicly available, particularly at subregional scales, such as the state level. This article uses a mail survey of softwood sawmills in Montana to develop a profile of all on-site energy consumption. Energy use is delineated by fuel type on a production basis for both renewable and nonrenewable sources for production year 2009. Survey respondents represented 92 percent of total Montana softwood lumber production of 449 million board feet, which is 4 percent of western US production and 2 percent of national production. Total annual on-site sawmill energy required was 1.6 trillion British thermal units. Seventy-seven percent was derived from wood and bark, primarily for process heat and steam for lumber drying; 16 percent was from electricity; 5 percent was from diesel used for on-site rolling stock; and the remainder was from gasoline, propane, and natural gas. Energy produced from renewable sources accounted for 86 percent of total on-site energy consumption. In addition to providing an energy profile of Montana sawmills for policymakers, aggregated results may be useful to individual firms in characterizing their energy requirements relative to the state average and in identifying potential opportunities for bioenergy expansion.</description><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Biomass energy</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Forecasts and trends</subject><subject>Forest products industry</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Kilns</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Renewable resources</subject><subject>Sawmills</subject><issn>0015-7473</issn><issn>2376-9637</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0s9LHDEUB_AgFlyt514HevHQ6MuPmcx4k1Vbi8XC2nPIZN9MIzPJdpJB_O_NqgctSyCBx-c9HuFLyBcGp0yAEmfXv3_SS8okBWBQ75EFF6qiTSXUPlnkWkmVVOKAHMb4AACqrPiCnN95unIJiyuPU_9ULIOP87hJLvjCpGIVuvQYwrpYmcfRDUMsnC9-BZ-MN5_Jp84MEY_f3iPy5_rqfvmD3t59v1le3FIrpUxUrivbMlQN1hY5SOxEy2ydiwIqrLoGgFcK2tIAqxVXbVmWnW2YUciENFIckZPXuZsp_JsxJj26aHEYjMcwR81qqCslOPBMv_5HH8I8-bzdVvGyEZy_U70ZUDvfhTQZux2qL2SZ92FCbRXdoXrM_2SG4LFzufzBn-7w-axxdHZnw7d3De0cnceYr-j6vyn2Zo7xIz975XYKMU7Y6c3kRjM9aQb6JQE6J0Bfaib1SwLEMz9dnuo</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Loeffler, Dan</creator><creator>Anderson, Nathaniel</creator><creator>Morgan, Todd A</creator><creator>Sorenson, Colin B</creator><general>Forest Products Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>On-Site Energy Consumption at Softwood Sawmills in Montana</title><author>Loeffler, Dan ; Anderson, Nathaniel ; Morgan, Todd A ; Sorenson, Colin B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-4d6cb1e79e8ce204ef3b1c86cb306e6f9002670b5a018727b555fc91a7e134a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Biomass energy</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Forecasts and trends</topic><topic>Forest products industry</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Kilns</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Renewable resources</topic><topic>Sawmills</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loeffler, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Nathaniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Todd A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorenson, Colin B</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Forest products journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loeffler, Dan</au><au>Anderson, Nathaniel</au><au>Morgan, Todd A</au><au>Sorenson, Colin B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On-Site Energy Consumption at Softwood Sawmills in Montana</atitle><jtitle>Forest products journal</jtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>155</spage><epage>163</epage><pages>155-163</pages><issn>0015-7473</issn><eissn>2376-9637</eissn><coden>FPJOAB</coden><abstract>Total on-site energy requirements for wood product manufacturing are generally not well understood or publicly available, particularly at subregional scales, such as the state level. This article uses a mail survey of softwood sawmills in Montana to develop a profile of all on-site energy consumption. Energy use is delineated by fuel type on a production basis for both renewable and nonrenewable sources for production year 2009. Survey respondents represented 92 percent of total Montana softwood lumber production of 449 million board feet, which is 4 percent of western US production and 2 percent of national production. Total annual on-site sawmill energy required was 1.6 trillion British thermal units. Seventy-seven percent was derived from wood and bark, primarily for process heat and steam for lumber drying; 16 percent was from electricity; 5 percent was from diesel used for on-site rolling stock; and the remainder was from gasoline, propane, and natural gas. Energy produced from renewable sources accounted for 86 percent of total on-site energy consumption. In addition to providing an energy profile of Montana sawmills for policymakers, aggregated results may be useful to individual firms in characterizing their energy requirements relative to the state average and in identifying potential opportunities for bioenergy expansion.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>Forest Products Society</pub><doi>10.13073/FPJ-D-14-00108</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0015-7473 |
ispartof | Forest products journal, 2016-07, Vol.66 (3-4), p.155-163 |
issn | 0015-7473 2376-9637 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808673202 |
source | Allen Press Journals; Business Source Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Alternative energy sources Biomass energy Energy consumption Environmental aspects Forecasts and trends Forest products industry Fossil fuels Kilns Manufacturing Renewable resources Sawmills |
title | On-Site Energy Consumption at Softwood Sawmills in Montana |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T02%3A20%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On-Site%20Energy%20Consumption%20at%20Softwood%20Sawmills%20in%20Montana&rft.jtitle=Forest%20products%20journal&rft.au=Loeffler,%20Dan&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=155&rft.epage=163&rft.pages=155-163&rft.issn=0015-7473&rft.eissn=2376-9637&rft.coden=FPJOAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.13073/FPJ-D-14-00108&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA459001372%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1802593222&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A459001372&rfr_iscdi=true |