Does Early Second‐Trimester Sonography Predict Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Pregnancies?
Objectives To determine whether intertwin discordant abdominal circumference, femur length, head circumference, and estimated fetal weight sonographic measurements in early second‐trimester monochorionic diamniotic twins predict adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Methods We conducted a multice...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of ultrasound in medicine 2014-09, Vol.33 (9), p.1573-1578 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1578 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1573 |
container_title | Journal of ultrasound in medicine |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Allaf, M. Baraa Campbell, Winston A. Vintzileos, Anthony M. Haeri, Sina Javadian, Pouya Shamshirsaz, Amir A. Ogburn, Paul Figueroa, Reinaldo Wax, Joseph Markenson, Glenn Chavez, Martin R. Ravangard, Samadh F. Ruano, Rodrigo Sangi-Haghpeykar, Haleh Salmanian, Bahram Meyer, Marjorie Johnson, Jeffery Ozhand, Ali Davis, Sarah Borgida, Adam Belfort, Michael A. Shamshirsaz, Alireza A. |
description | Objectives
To determine whether intertwin discordant abdominal circumference, femur length, head circumference, and estimated fetal weight sonographic measurements in early second‐trimester monochorionic diamniotic twins predict adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes.
Methods
We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study involving 9 regional perinatal centers in the United States. We examined the records of all monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies with two live fetuses at the 16‐ to 18‐week sonographic examination who had serial follow‐up sonography until delivery. The intertwin discordance in abdominal circumference, femur length, head circumference, and estimated fetal weight was calculated as the difference between the two fetuses, expressed as a percentage of the larger using the 16‐ to 18‐week sonographic measurements. An adverse composite obstetric outcome was defined as the occurrence of 1 or more of the following in either fetus: intrauterine growth restriction, twin‐twin transfusion syndrome, intrauterine fetal death, abnormal growth discordance (≥20% difference), and very preterm birth at or before 28 weeks. An adverse composite neonatal outcome was defined as the occurrence of 1 or more of the following: respiratory distress syndrome, any stage of intraventricular hemorrhage, 5‐minute Apgar score less than 7, necrotizing enterocolitis, culture‐proven early‐onset sepsis, and neonatal death. Receiver operating characteristic and logistic regression–with–generalized estimating equation analyses were constructed.
Results
Among the 177 monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies analyzed, intertwin abdominal circumference and estimated fetal weight discordances were only predictive of adverse composite obstetric outcomes (areas under the curve, 79% and 80%, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that intertwin discordances in abdominal circumference, femur length, head circumference, and estimated fetal weight were not acceptable predictors of twin‐twin transfusion syndrome or adverse neonatal outcomes.
Conclusions
In our cohort, only second‐trimester abdominal circumference and estimated fetal weight discordances in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies were predictive of adverse composite obstetric outcomes. Twin‐twin transfusion syndrome and adverse neonatal outcomes were not predicted by any of the intertwin discordances measured. |
doi_str_mv | 10.7863/ultra.33.9.1573 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808664799</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1808664799</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3823-269c2a0634e63fb287e6c5e049441ec61cfdd4d17602b7e2657d733ef1752d423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkbtOHDEUhq0oKGxI6nSRyzSz-O6xUkQIyAWBQGKpLa99BhzNjjf2TNB0eYQ8Y54khiVpqXwkf_8nnfMj9I6SpW4VP5z6Mbsl50uzpFLzF2hBpSSNUZS_RAvCdNsIZvQ-el3Kd0IYoVq8QvtMUikM1ws0nyQo-NTlfsbX4NMQ_vz6vcpxA2WEjK_TkG6z297N-CpDiH7ER-En5AL4CnIc3Oh6fDmNPtUAjgO-qAF_l3JMQ_T4JLrNENNYx9V9_a2O28ENPkL59Abtda4v8PbpPUA3n09Xx1-b88sv346PzhvPW8YbpoxnjiguQPFuzVoNyksgwghBwSvquxBEoFoRttbAlNRBcw4d1ZIFwfgB-rDzbnP6MdW17CYWD33vBkhTsbQlrVJCG_M8KqUmLeWSVvRwh_qcSsnQ2W09msuzpcQ-VGMfq7GcW2MfqqmJ90_yab2B8J__10UFPu6A-9jD_JzPnt1c1DoF5-ZR_xeZ3J74</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1557081351</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Early Second‐Trimester Sonography Predict Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Pregnancies?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Allaf, M. Baraa ; Campbell, Winston A. ; Vintzileos, Anthony M. ; Haeri, Sina ; Javadian, Pouya ; Shamshirsaz, Amir A. ; Ogburn, Paul ; Figueroa, Reinaldo ; Wax, Joseph ; Markenson, Glenn ; Chavez, Martin R. ; Ravangard, Samadh F. ; Ruano, Rodrigo ; Sangi-Haghpeykar, Haleh ; Salmanian, Bahram ; Meyer, Marjorie ; Johnson, Jeffery ; Ozhand, Ali ; Davis, Sarah ; Borgida, Adam ; Belfort, Michael A. ; Shamshirsaz, Alireza A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Allaf, M. Baraa ; Campbell, Winston A. ; Vintzileos, Anthony M. ; Haeri, Sina ; Javadian, Pouya ; Shamshirsaz, Amir A. ; Ogburn, Paul ; Figueroa, Reinaldo ; Wax, Joseph ; Markenson, Glenn ; Chavez, Martin R. ; Ravangard, Samadh F. ; Ruano, Rodrigo ; Sangi-Haghpeykar, Haleh ; Salmanian, Bahram ; Meyer, Marjorie ; Johnson, Jeffery ; Ozhand, Ali ; Davis, Sarah ; Borgida, Adam ; Belfort, Michael A. ; Shamshirsaz, Alireza A.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To determine whether intertwin discordant abdominal circumference, femur length, head circumference, and estimated fetal weight sonographic measurements in early second‐trimester monochorionic diamniotic twins predict adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes.
Methods
We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study involving 9 regional perinatal centers in the United States. We examined the records of all monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies with two live fetuses at the 16‐ to 18‐week sonographic examination who had serial follow‐up sonography until delivery. The intertwin discordance in abdominal circumference, femur length, head circumference, and estimated fetal weight was calculated as the difference between the two fetuses, expressed as a percentage of the larger using the 16‐ to 18‐week sonographic measurements. An adverse composite obstetric outcome was defined as the occurrence of 1 or more of the following in either fetus: intrauterine growth restriction, twin‐twin transfusion syndrome, intrauterine fetal death, abnormal growth discordance (≥20% difference), and very preterm birth at or before 28 weeks. An adverse composite neonatal outcome was defined as the occurrence of 1 or more of the following: respiratory distress syndrome, any stage of intraventricular hemorrhage, 5‐minute Apgar score less than 7, necrotizing enterocolitis, culture‐proven early‐onset sepsis, and neonatal death. Receiver operating characteristic and logistic regression–with–generalized estimating equation analyses were constructed.
Results
Among the 177 monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies analyzed, intertwin abdominal circumference and estimated fetal weight discordances were only predictive of adverse composite obstetric outcomes (areas under the curve, 79% and 80%, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that intertwin discordances in abdominal circumference, femur length, head circumference, and estimated fetal weight were not acceptable predictors of twin‐twin transfusion syndrome or adverse neonatal outcomes.
Conclusions
In our cohort, only second‐trimester abdominal circumference and estimated fetal weight discordances in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies were predictive of adverse composite obstetric outcomes. Twin‐twin transfusion syndrome and adverse neonatal outcomes were not predicted by any of the intertwin discordances measured.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-4297</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-9613</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7863/ultra.33.9.1573</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25154937</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine</publisher><subject>Birth Weight ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Fetal Death ; Fetal Growth Retardation - diagnostic imaging ; Fetofetal Transfusion - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; monochorionic twins ; nuchal translucency ; obstetric ultrasound ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Trimester, Second ; Pregnancy, Twin ; Premature Birth ; Retrospective Studies ; second trimester ; twin-twin transfusion syndrome ; Twins, Monozygotic ; Ultrasonography, Prenatal</subject><ispartof>Journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2014-09, Vol.33 (9), p.1573-1578</ispartof><rights>2016 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine</rights><rights>2014 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3823-269c2a0634e63fb287e6c5e049441ec61cfdd4d17602b7e2657d733ef1752d423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3823-269c2a0634e63fb287e6c5e049441ec61cfdd4d17602b7e2657d733ef1752d423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.7863%2Fultra.33.9.1573$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.7863%2Fultra.33.9.1573$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25154937$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allaf, M. Baraa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Winston A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vintzileos, Anthony M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haeri, Sina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Javadian, Pouya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shamshirsaz, Amir A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogburn, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueroa, Reinaldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wax, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Markenson, Glenn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chavez, Martin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravangard, Samadh F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruano, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sangi-Haghpeykar, Haleh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salmanian, Bahram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Marjorie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Jeffery</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozhand, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borgida, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belfort, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shamshirsaz, Alireza A.</creatorcontrib><title>Does Early Second‐Trimester Sonography Predict Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Pregnancies?</title><title>Journal of ultrasound in medicine</title><addtitle>J Ultrasound Med</addtitle><description>Objectives
To determine whether intertwin discordant abdominal circumference, femur length, head circumference, and estimated fetal weight sonographic measurements in early second‐trimester monochorionic diamniotic twins predict adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes.
Methods
We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study involving 9 regional perinatal centers in the United States. We examined the records of all monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies with two live fetuses at the 16‐ to 18‐week sonographic examination who had serial follow‐up sonography until delivery. The intertwin discordance in abdominal circumference, femur length, head circumference, and estimated fetal weight was calculated as the difference between the two fetuses, expressed as a percentage of the larger using the 16‐ to 18‐week sonographic measurements. An adverse composite obstetric outcome was defined as the occurrence of 1 or more of the following in either fetus: intrauterine growth restriction, twin‐twin transfusion syndrome, intrauterine fetal death, abnormal growth discordance (≥20% difference), and very preterm birth at or before 28 weeks. An adverse composite neonatal outcome was defined as the occurrence of 1 or more of the following: respiratory distress syndrome, any stage of intraventricular hemorrhage, 5‐minute Apgar score less than 7, necrotizing enterocolitis, culture‐proven early‐onset sepsis, and neonatal death. Receiver operating characteristic and logistic regression–with–generalized estimating equation analyses were constructed.
Results
Among the 177 monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies analyzed, intertwin abdominal circumference and estimated fetal weight discordances were only predictive of adverse composite obstetric outcomes (areas under the curve, 79% and 80%, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that intertwin discordances in abdominal circumference, femur length, head circumference, and estimated fetal weight were not acceptable predictors of twin‐twin transfusion syndrome or adverse neonatal outcomes.
Conclusions
In our cohort, only second‐trimester abdominal circumference and estimated fetal weight discordances in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies were predictive of adverse composite obstetric outcomes. Twin‐twin transfusion syndrome and adverse neonatal outcomes were not predicted by any of the intertwin discordances measured.</description><subject>Birth Weight</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal Death</subject><subject>Fetal Growth Retardation - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Fetofetal Transfusion - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>monochorionic twins</subject><subject>nuchal translucency</subject><subject>obstetric ultrasound</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Trimester, Second</subject><subject>Pregnancy, Twin</subject><subject>Premature Birth</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>second trimester</subject><subject>twin-twin transfusion syndrome</subject><subject>Twins, Monozygotic</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</subject><issn>0278-4297</issn><issn>1550-9613</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkbtOHDEUhq0oKGxI6nSRyzSz-O6xUkQIyAWBQGKpLa99BhzNjjf2TNB0eYQ8Y54khiVpqXwkf_8nnfMj9I6SpW4VP5z6Mbsl50uzpFLzF2hBpSSNUZS_RAvCdNsIZvQ-el3Kd0IYoVq8QvtMUikM1ws0nyQo-NTlfsbX4NMQ_vz6vcpxA2WEjK_TkG6z297N-CpDiH7ER-En5AL4CnIc3Oh6fDmNPtUAjgO-qAF_l3JMQ_T4JLrNENNYx9V9_a2O28ENPkL59Abtda4v8PbpPUA3n09Xx1-b88sv346PzhvPW8YbpoxnjiguQPFuzVoNyksgwghBwSvquxBEoFoRttbAlNRBcw4d1ZIFwfgB-rDzbnP6MdW17CYWD33vBkhTsbQlrVJCG_M8KqUmLeWSVvRwh_qcSsnQ2W09msuzpcQ-VGMfq7GcW2MfqqmJ90_yab2B8J__10UFPu6A-9jD_JzPnt1c1DoF5-ZR_xeZ3J74</recordid><startdate>201409</startdate><enddate>201409</enddate><creator>Allaf, M. Baraa</creator><creator>Campbell, Winston A.</creator><creator>Vintzileos, Anthony M.</creator><creator>Haeri, Sina</creator><creator>Javadian, Pouya</creator><creator>Shamshirsaz, Amir A.</creator><creator>Ogburn, Paul</creator><creator>Figueroa, Reinaldo</creator><creator>Wax, Joseph</creator><creator>Markenson, Glenn</creator><creator>Chavez, Martin R.</creator><creator>Ravangard, Samadh F.</creator><creator>Ruano, Rodrigo</creator><creator>Sangi-Haghpeykar, Haleh</creator><creator>Salmanian, Bahram</creator><creator>Meyer, Marjorie</creator><creator>Johnson, Jeffery</creator><creator>Ozhand, Ali</creator><creator>Davis, Sarah</creator><creator>Borgida, Adam</creator><creator>Belfort, Michael A.</creator><creator>Shamshirsaz, Alireza A.</creator><general>American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201409</creationdate><title>Does Early Second‐Trimester Sonography Predict Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Pregnancies?</title><author>Allaf, M. Baraa ; Campbell, Winston A. ; Vintzileos, Anthony M. ; Haeri, Sina ; Javadian, Pouya ; Shamshirsaz, Amir A. ; Ogburn, Paul ; Figueroa, Reinaldo ; Wax, Joseph ; Markenson, Glenn ; Chavez, Martin R. ; Ravangard, Samadh F. ; Ruano, Rodrigo ; Sangi-Haghpeykar, Haleh ; Salmanian, Bahram ; Meyer, Marjorie ; Johnson, Jeffery ; Ozhand, Ali ; Davis, Sarah ; Borgida, Adam ; Belfort, Michael A. ; Shamshirsaz, Alireza A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3823-269c2a0634e63fb287e6c5e049441ec61cfdd4d17602b7e2657d733ef1752d423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Birth Weight</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal Death</topic><topic>Fetal Growth Retardation - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Fetofetal Transfusion - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>monochorionic twins</topic><topic>nuchal translucency</topic><topic>obstetric ultrasound</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Trimester, Second</topic><topic>Pregnancy, Twin</topic><topic>Premature Birth</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>second trimester</topic><topic>twin-twin transfusion syndrome</topic><topic>Twins, Monozygotic</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allaf, M. Baraa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Winston A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vintzileos, Anthony M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haeri, Sina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Javadian, Pouya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shamshirsaz, Amir A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogburn, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueroa, Reinaldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wax, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Markenson, Glenn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chavez, Martin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravangard, Samadh F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruano, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sangi-Haghpeykar, Haleh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salmanian, Bahram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Marjorie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Jeffery</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozhand, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borgida, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belfort, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shamshirsaz, Alireza A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of ultrasound in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allaf, M. Baraa</au><au>Campbell, Winston A.</au><au>Vintzileos, Anthony M.</au><au>Haeri, Sina</au><au>Javadian, Pouya</au><au>Shamshirsaz, Amir A.</au><au>Ogburn, Paul</au><au>Figueroa, Reinaldo</au><au>Wax, Joseph</au><au>Markenson, Glenn</au><au>Chavez, Martin R.</au><au>Ravangard, Samadh F.</au><au>Ruano, Rodrigo</au><au>Sangi-Haghpeykar, Haleh</au><au>Salmanian, Bahram</au><au>Meyer, Marjorie</au><au>Johnson, Jeffery</au><au>Ozhand, Ali</au><au>Davis, Sarah</au><au>Borgida, Adam</au><au>Belfort, Michael A.</au><au>Shamshirsaz, Alireza A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does Early Second‐Trimester Sonography Predict Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Pregnancies?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of ultrasound in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Ultrasound Med</addtitle><date>2014-09</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1573</spage><epage>1578</epage><pages>1573-1578</pages><issn>0278-4297</issn><eissn>1550-9613</eissn><abstract>Objectives
To determine whether intertwin discordant abdominal circumference, femur length, head circumference, and estimated fetal weight sonographic measurements in early second‐trimester monochorionic diamniotic twins predict adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes.
Methods
We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study involving 9 regional perinatal centers in the United States. We examined the records of all monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies with two live fetuses at the 16‐ to 18‐week sonographic examination who had serial follow‐up sonography until delivery. The intertwin discordance in abdominal circumference, femur length, head circumference, and estimated fetal weight was calculated as the difference between the two fetuses, expressed as a percentage of the larger using the 16‐ to 18‐week sonographic measurements. An adverse composite obstetric outcome was defined as the occurrence of 1 or more of the following in either fetus: intrauterine growth restriction, twin‐twin transfusion syndrome, intrauterine fetal death, abnormal growth discordance (≥20% difference), and very preterm birth at or before 28 weeks. An adverse composite neonatal outcome was defined as the occurrence of 1 or more of the following: respiratory distress syndrome, any stage of intraventricular hemorrhage, 5‐minute Apgar score less than 7, necrotizing enterocolitis, culture‐proven early‐onset sepsis, and neonatal death. Receiver operating characteristic and logistic regression–with–generalized estimating equation analyses were constructed.
Results
Among the 177 monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies analyzed, intertwin abdominal circumference and estimated fetal weight discordances were only predictive of adverse composite obstetric outcomes (areas under the curve, 79% and 80%, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that intertwin discordances in abdominal circumference, femur length, head circumference, and estimated fetal weight were not acceptable predictors of twin‐twin transfusion syndrome or adverse neonatal outcomes.
Conclusions
In our cohort, only second‐trimester abdominal circumference and estimated fetal weight discordances in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies were predictive of adverse composite obstetric outcomes. Twin‐twin transfusion syndrome and adverse neonatal outcomes were not predicted by any of the intertwin discordances measured.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine</pub><pmid>25154937</pmid><doi>10.7863/ultra.33.9.1573</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-4297 |
ispartof | Journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2014-09, Vol.33 (9), p.1573-1578 |
issn | 0278-4297 1550-9613 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808664799 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Birth Weight Cohort Studies Female Fetal Death Fetal Growth Retardation - diagnostic imaging Fetofetal Transfusion - diagnostic imaging Humans monochorionic twins nuchal translucency obstetric ultrasound Pregnancy Pregnancy Trimester, Second Pregnancy, Twin Premature Birth Retrospective Studies second trimester twin-twin transfusion syndrome Twins, Monozygotic Ultrasonography, Prenatal |
title | Does Early Second‐Trimester Sonography Predict Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Pregnancies? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T22%3A58%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Early%20Second%E2%80%90Trimester%20Sonography%20Predict%20Adverse%20Perinatal%20Outcomes%20in%20Monochorionic%20Diamniotic%20Twin%20Pregnancies?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20ultrasound%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Allaf,%20M.%20Baraa&rft.date=2014-09&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1573&rft.epage=1578&rft.pages=1573-1578&rft.issn=0278-4297&rft.eissn=1550-9613&rft_id=info:doi/10.7863/ultra.33.9.1573&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1808664799%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1557081351&rft_id=info:pmid/25154937&rfr_iscdi=true |