Performance of an expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) reactor coupled with anoxic and aerobic bioreactors for treating poultry slaughterhouse wastewater
Generally, slaughterhouses have the largest consumption of fresh water and thus generate large quantities of high strength wastewater, which can be treated successfully using low cost biological treatment processes. In this study, the feasibility of using an expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) anaer...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Water practice and technology 2016-03, Vol.11 (1), p.86-92 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 92 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 86 |
| container_title | Water practice and technology |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Basitere, M. Williams, Y. Sheldon, M. S. Ntwampe, S. K. O. De Jager, D. Dlangamandla, C. |
| description | Generally, slaughterhouses have the largest consumption of fresh water and thus generate large quantities of high strength wastewater, which can be treated successfully using low cost biological treatment processes. In this study, the feasibility of using an expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) anaerobic reactor coupled with anoxic and aerobic bioreactors for the treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater was investigated. The poultry slaughterhouse was characterized by high chemical oxygen demand (COD), 2 to 6 g/L, with average biological oxygen demand of 2.4 g/L and average fats, oil and grease (FOG) being 0.55 g/L. A continuous EGSB anaerobic reactor was operated for 26 days at different hydraulic retention times (HRT), i.e. 7, 4, 3 days, and organic loading rates (OLR) of 0.5, 0.7 and 1.0 g COD/L.day, respectively, to assess the bioremediation of the poultry slaughterhouse wastewater. The average COD removal from the EGSB was 40%, 57% and 55% at the different OLR and HRT assessed. At high OLR of 1.0 g COD/L.day, the overall COD removal from the system (EGSB-anoxic/aerobic) averaged 65%. The system experienced periodical sludge washout during high FOG and suspended solids loading. It was concluded that the EGSB system requires a dissolved air flotation system, for FOG/suspended solid reduction, as the performance of the overall system was observed to deteriorate over time due to the presence of a high quantity of FOG including suspended solids. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2166/wpt.2016.013 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808664474</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1920658735</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-499f3930ebd13667eefa40ecc5ccab804332ccdd6c1cf547b9d76a53ef242d453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUdFKwzAULaLgnL75AQFfJriZNGnaPuqYUxgoqOBbSJPbraNrapLS7U_8XDO2B_Hp3HM499wLJ4quCZ7EhPP7vvWTGBM-wYSeRAOSJmQcU_J1-mc-jy6cW2PM0zyjg-jnDWxp7EY2CpApkWwQbFvZaNBoaWXT1dIiV3d6CagI2mg2f3-8RRak8sYiZbq2DnJf-VXYNdtKBdBIgjVFmIvKHK0OhTPIB-arZola09Xe7kK07JYrD3ZlOgeol85DLwO_jM5KWTu4OuIw-nyafUyfx4vX-cv0YTFWcc79mOV5SXOKodCEcp4ClJJhUCpRShYZZpTGSmnNFVFlwtIi1ymXCYUyZrFmCR1Go0Nua813B86LTeUU1LVsILwkSIYzzhlLWbDe_LOuTWeb8J0geYx5kqV0H3h3cClrnLNQitZWG2l3gmCxr0mEmsS-JhFqor_zCImH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1920658735</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance of an expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) reactor coupled with anoxic and aerobic bioreactors for treating poultry slaughterhouse wastewater</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Basitere, M. ; Williams, Y. ; Sheldon, M. S. ; Ntwampe, S. K. O. ; De Jager, D. ; Dlangamandla, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Basitere, M. ; Williams, Y. ; Sheldon, M. S. ; Ntwampe, S. K. O. ; De Jager, D. ; Dlangamandla, C.</creatorcontrib><description>Generally, slaughterhouses have the largest consumption of fresh water and thus generate large quantities of high strength wastewater, which can be treated successfully using low cost biological treatment processes. In this study, the feasibility of using an expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) anaerobic reactor coupled with anoxic and aerobic bioreactors for the treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater was investigated. The poultry slaughterhouse was characterized by high chemical oxygen demand (COD), 2 to 6 g/L, with average biological oxygen demand of 2.4 g/L and average fats, oil and grease (FOG) being 0.55 g/L. A continuous EGSB anaerobic reactor was operated for 26 days at different hydraulic retention times (HRT), i.e. 7, 4, 3 days, and organic loading rates (OLR) of 0.5, 0.7 and 1.0 g COD/L.day, respectively, to assess the bioremediation of the poultry slaughterhouse wastewater. The average COD removal from the EGSB was 40%, 57% and 55% at the different OLR and HRT assessed. At high OLR of 1.0 g COD/L.day, the overall COD removal from the system (EGSB-anoxic/aerobic) averaged 65%. The system experienced periodical sludge washout during high FOG and suspended solids loading. It was concluded that the EGSB system requires a dissolved air flotation system, for FOG/suspended solid reduction, as the performance of the overall system was observed to deteriorate over time due to the presence of a high quantity of FOG including suspended solids.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1751-231X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-231X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/wpt.2016.013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: IWA Publishing</publisher><subject>Abattoirs ; Anoxia ; Biochemical oxygen demand ; Biogas ; Biological activity ; Biological treatment ; Bioreactors ; Bioremediation ; Breweries ; Chemical engineering ; Chemical oxygen demand ; Efficiency ; Effluents ; Environmental impact ; Environmental science ; Fats ; Feasibility studies ; Flotation ; Flow velocity ; Fog ; Food science ; Fresh water ; Freshwater ; Freshwater environments ; Grease ; High strength ; Inland water environment ; Laboratories ; Low cost ; Oil ; Oils & fats ; Organic loading ; Oxygen demand ; Poultry ; Reactors ; Removal ; Separation techniques ; Sludge ; Sludge bed ; Suspended particulate matter ; Suspended solids ; Total oxygen demand ; Wastewater ; Wastewater treatment</subject><ispartof>Water practice and technology, 2016-03, Vol.11 (1), p.86-92</ispartof><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing Mar 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-499f3930ebd13667eefa40ecc5ccab804332ccdd6c1cf547b9d76a53ef242d453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-499f3930ebd13667eefa40ecc5ccab804332ccdd6c1cf547b9d76a53ef242d453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Basitere, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheldon, M. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ntwampe, S. K. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Jager, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dlangamandla, C.</creatorcontrib><title>Performance of an expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) reactor coupled with anoxic and aerobic bioreactors for treating poultry slaughterhouse wastewater</title><title>Water practice and technology</title><description>Generally, slaughterhouses have the largest consumption of fresh water and thus generate large quantities of high strength wastewater, which can be treated successfully using low cost biological treatment processes. In this study, the feasibility of using an expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) anaerobic reactor coupled with anoxic and aerobic bioreactors for the treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater was investigated. The poultry slaughterhouse was characterized by high chemical oxygen demand (COD), 2 to 6 g/L, with average biological oxygen demand of 2.4 g/L and average fats, oil and grease (FOG) being 0.55 g/L. A continuous EGSB anaerobic reactor was operated for 26 days at different hydraulic retention times (HRT), i.e. 7, 4, 3 days, and organic loading rates (OLR) of 0.5, 0.7 and 1.0 g COD/L.day, respectively, to assess the bioremediation of the poultry slaughterhouse wastewater. The average COD removal from the EGSB was 40%, 57% and 55% at the different OLR and HRT assessed. At high OLR of 1.0 g COD/L.day, the overall COD removal from the system (EGSB-anoxic/aerobic) averaged 65%. The system experienced periodical sludge washout during high FOG and suspended solids loading. It was concluded that the EGSB system requires a dissolved air flotation system, for FOG/suspended solid reduction, as the performance of the overall system was observed to deteriorate over time due to the presence of a high quantity of FOG including suspended solids.</description><subject>Abattoirs</subject><subject>Anoxia</subject><subject>Biochemical oxygen demand</subject><subject>Biogas</subject><subject>Biological activity</subject><subject>Biological treatment</subject><subject>Bioreactors</subject><subject>Bioremediation</subject><subject>Breweries</subject><subject>Chemical engineering</subject><subject>Chemical oxygen demand</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Effluents</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Fats</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Flotation</subject><subject>Flow velocity</subject><subject>Fog</subject><subject>Food science</subject><subject>Fresh water</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater environments</subject><subject>Grease</subject><subject>High strength</subject><subject>Inland water environment</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Low cost</subject><subject>Oil</subject><subject>Oils & fats</subject><subject>Organic loading</subject><subject>Oxygen demand</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Reactors</subject><subject>Removal</subject><subject>Separation techniques</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Sludge bed</subject><subject>Suspended particulate matter</subject><subject>Suspended solids</subject><subject>Total oxygen demand</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><issn>1751-231X</issn><issn>1751-231X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUdFKwzAULaLgnL75AQFfJriZNGnaPuqYUxgoqOBbSJPbraNrapLS7U_8XDO2B_Hp3HM499wLJ4quCZ7EhPP7vvWTGBM-wYSeRAOSJmQcU_J1-mc-jy6cW2PM0zyjg-jnDWxp7EY2CpApkWwQbFvZaNBoaWXT1dIiV3d6CagI2mg2f3-8RRak8sYiZbq2DnJf-VXYNdtKBdBIgjVFmIvKHK0OhTPIB-arZola09Xe7kK07JYrD3ZlOgeol85DLwO_jM5KWTu4OuIw-nyafUyfx4vX-cv0YTFWcc79mOV5SXOKodCEcp4ClJJhUCpRShYZZpTGSmnNFVFlwtIi1ymXCYUyZrFmCR1Go0Nua813B86LTeUU1LVsILwkSIYzzhlLWbDe_LOuTWeb8J0geYx5kqV0H3h3cClrnLNQitZWG2l3gmCxr0mEmsS-JhFqor_zCImH</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Basitere, M.</creator><creator>Williams, Y.</creator><creator>Sheldon, M. S.</creator><creator>Ntwampe, S. K. O.</creator><creator>De Jager, D.</creator><creator>Dlangamandla, C.</creator><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Performance of an expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) reactor coupled with anoxic and aerobic bioreactors for treating poultry slaughterhouse wastewater</title><author>Basitere, M. ; Williams, Y. ; Sheldon, M. S. ; Ntwampe, S. K. O. ; De Jager, D. ; Dlangamandla, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-499f3930ebd13667eefa40ecc5ccab804332ccdd6c1cf547b9d76a53ef242d453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Abattoirs</topic><topic>Anoxia</topic><topic>Biochemical oxygen demand</topic><topic>Biogas</topic><topic>Biological activity</topic><topic>Biological treatment</topic><topic>Bioreactors</topic><topic>Bioremediation</topic><topic>Breweries</topic><topic>Chemical engineering</topic><topic>Chemical oxygen demand</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Effluents</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Fats</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Flotation</topic><topic>Flow velocity</topic><topic>Fog</topic><topic>Food science</topic><topic>Fresh water</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater environments</topic><topic>Grease</topic><topic>High strength</topic><topic>Inland water environment</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Low cost</topic><topic>Oil</topic><topic>Oils & fats</topic><topic>Organic loading</topic><topic>Oxygen demand</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Reactors</topic><topic>Removal</topic><topic>Separation techniques</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Sludge bed</topic><topic>Suspended particulate matter</topic><topic>Suspended solids</topic><topic>Total oxygen demand</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Basitere, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheldon, M. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ntwampe, S. K. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Jager, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dlangamandla, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture & Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Water practice and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Basitere, M.</au><au>Williams, Y.</au><au>Sheldon, M. S.</au><au>Ntwampe, S. K. O.</au><au>De Jager, D.</au><au>Dlangamandla, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance of an expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) reactor coupled with anoxic and aerobic bioreactors for treating poultry slaughterhouse wastewater</atitle><jtitle>Water practice and technology</jtitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>86</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>86-92</pages><issn>1751-231X</issn><eissn>1751-231X</eissn><abstract>Generally, slaughterhouses have the largest consumption of fresh water and thus generate large quantities of high strength wastewater, which can be treated successfully using low cost biological treatment processes. In this study, the feasibility of using an expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) anaerobic reactor coupled with anoxic and aerobic bioreactors for the treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater was investigated. The poultry slaughterhouse was characterized by high chemical oxygen demand (COD), 2 to 6 g/L, with average biological oxygen demand of 2.4 g/L and average fats, oil and grease (FOG) being 0.55 g/L. A continuous EGSB anaerobic reactor was operated for 26 days at different hydraulic retention times (HRT), i.e. 7, 4, 3 days, and organic loading rates (OLR) of 0.5, 0.7 and 1.0 g COD/L.day, respectively, to assess the bioremediation of the poultry slaughterhouse wastewater. The average COD removal from the EGSB was 40%, 57% and 55% at the different OLR and HRT assessed. At high OLR of 1.0 g COD/L.day, the overall COD removal from the system (EGSB-anoxic/aerobic) averaged 65%. The system experienced periodical sludge washout during high FOG and suspended solids loading. It was concluded that the EGSB system requires a dissolved air flotation system, for FOG/suspended solid reduction, as the performance of the overall system was observed to deteriorate over time due to the presence of a high quantity of FOG including suspended solids.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>IWA Publishing</pub><doi>10.2166/wpt.2016.013</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1751-231X |
| ispartof | Water practice and technology, 2016-03, Vol.11 (1), p.86-92 |
| issn | 1751-231X 1751-231X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808664474 |
| source | EZB Electronic Journals Library |
| subjects | Abattoirs Anoxia Biochemical oxygen demand Biogas Biological activity Biological treatment Bioreactors Bioremediation Breweries Chemical engineering Chemical oxygen demand Efficiency Effluents Environmental impact Environmental science Fats Feasibility studies Flotation Flow velocity Fog Food science Fresh water Freshwater Freshwater environments Grease High strength Inland water environment Laboratories Low cost Oil Oils & fats Organic loading Oxygen demand Poultry Reactors Removal Separation techniques Sludge Sludge bed Suspended particulate matter Suspended solids Total oxygen demand Wastewater Wastewater treatment |
| title | Performance of an expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) reactor coupled with anoxic and aerobic bioreactors for treating poultry slaughterhouse wastewater |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T21%3A45%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20of%20an%20expanded%20granular%20sludge%20bed%20(EGSB)%20reactor%20coupled%20with%20anoxic%20and%20aerobic%20bioreactors%20for%20treating%20poultry%20slaughterhouse%20wastewater&rft.jtitle=Water%20practice%20and%20technology&rft.au=Basitere,%20M.&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=86&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=86-92&rft.issn=1751-231X&rft.eissn=1751-231X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/wpt.2016.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1920658735%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1920658735&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |