Groundwater influence differentially affects periphyton and macrophyte production in lakes
Groundwater influx can significantly contribute to nutrient and carbon budgets of lakes, and its influence is the strongest in littoral areas dominated by macrophytes and periphyton. We have reviewed the effects of groundwater-borne nitrogen and phosphorus and dissolved inorganic and organic carbon...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Hydrobiologia 2016-09, Vol.778 (1), p.91-103 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 103 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 91 |
| container_title | Hydrobiologia |
| container_volume | 778 |
| creator | Périllon, Cécile Hilt, Sabine |
| description | Groundwater influx can significantly contribute to nutrient and carbon budgets of lakes, and its influence is the strongest in littoral areas dominated by macrophytes and periphyton. We have reviewed the effects of groundwater-borne nitrogen and phosphorus and dissolved inorganic and organic carbon (DIC, DOC) on these benthic primary producers in lakes. We develop a hypothesis for groundwater effects including the less studied impacts of periphyton shading on macrophytes. Groundwater-borne nutrients and DIC promote both macrophytes and periphyton. Direct studies on groundwater-borne DOC effects are lacking, but coloured DOC contributes to light attenuation and thus can restrict the growth of benthic primary producers. We predict that above certain threshold levels of nutrient influx by groundwater, periphyton and macrophyte biomass should decline owing to shading by phytoplankton and periphyton, respectively. However, because of their higher light requirements, those thresholds should be lower for macrophytes. For macrophytes, a threshold level is also predicted for a shift from DIC limitation to light limitation. Differences in light requirements are expected to result in lower thresholds of DOC loading for declines of macrophytes than periphyton. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10750-015-2485-9 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808660239</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A470564917</galeid><sourcerecordid>A470564917</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-2f603c98171bb49444815026cd4a1677c97ca9fc149393a2c04d4e00f9923f953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1v1DAQhi0EEsvCD-BEJC5wSDuT2HF8rCoolSoh9ePSi-U648Ul6yy2I9h_j6NwoByQD9bYz2O9mjFjbxFOEECeJgQpoAYUdcN7UatnbINCtrVAlM_ZBgD7ukfRv2SvUnqE4qgGNuz-Ik5zGH6aTLHywY0zBUvV4J2jSCF7M47HypTK5lQdKPrDt2OeQmXCUO2NjdNSU3WI0zDb7MuND9VovlN6zV44MyZ682ffsrvPn27Pv9RXXy8uz8-uast5l-vGddBa1aPEhweuOOclJjSdHbjBTkqrpDXKWeSqVa1pLPCBE4BTqmmdEu2WfVjfLRl-zJSy3vtkaRxNoGlOGnvouw6aYm_Z-3_Qx2mOoaRbKBSCdxwLdbJSOzOSLk2ZcjS2rIH23k6BnC_nZ1yC6LhCWYSPT4TCZPqVd2ZOSV_eXD9lcWVL61KK5PQh-r2JR42gl1HqdZS6xNHLKPUSu1mdVNiwo_hX7P9I71bJmUmbXfRJ3900gN3yFQCEan8DxVKoqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1801554641</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Groundwater influence differentially affects periphyton and macrophyte production in lakes</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Périllon, Cécile ; Hilt, Sabine</creator><creatorcontrib>Périllon, Cécile ; Hilt, Sabine</creatorcontrib><description>Groundwater influx can significantly contribute to nutrient and carbon budgets of lakes, and its influence is the strongest in littoral areas dominated by macrophytes and periphyton. We have reviewed the effects of groundwater-borne nitrogen and phosphorus and dissolved inorganic and organic carbon (DIC, DOC) on these benthic primary producers in lakes. We develop a hypothesis for groundwater effects including the less studied impacts of periphyton shading on macrophytes. Groundwater-borne nutrients and DIC promote both macrophytes and periphyton. Direct studies on groundwater-borne DOC effects are lacking, but coloured DOC contributes to light attenuation and thus can restrict the growth of benthic primary producers. We predict that above certain threshold levels of nutrient influx by groundwater, periphyton and macrophyte biomass should decline owing to shading by phytoplankton and periphyton, respectively. However, because of their higher light requirements, those thresholds should be lower for macrophytes. For macrophytes, a threshold level is also predicted for a shift from DIC limitation to light limitation. Differences in light requirements are expected to result in lower thresholds of DOC loading for declines of macrophytes than periphyton.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-8158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10750-015-2485-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Aquatic plants ; biomass ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Carbon ; Ecology ; Freshwater ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Groundwater ; Lakes ; Life Sciences ; littoral zone ; macrophytes ; nitrogen ; nutrient content ; Nutrients ; Organic carbon ; periphyton ; phosphorus ; Phytoplankton ; shade ; Shallow Lakes ; trophic relationships ; Water, Underground ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Hydrobiologia, 2016-09, Vol.778 (1), p.91-103</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Springer</rights><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-2f603c98171bb49444815026cd4a1677c97ca9fc149393a2c04d4e00f9923f953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-2f603c98171bb49444815026cd4a1677c97ca9fc149393a2c04d4e00f9923f953</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10750-015-2485-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10750-015-2485-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Périllon, Cécile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilt, Sabine</creatorcontrib><title>Groundwater influence differentially affects periphyton and macrophyte production in lakes</title><title>Hydrobiologia</title><addtitle>Hydrobiologia</addtitle><description>Groundwater influx can significantly contribute to nutrient and carbon budgets of lakes, and its influence is the strongest in littoral areas dominated by macrophytes and periphyton. We have reviewed the effects of groundwater-borne nitrogen and phosphorus and dissolved inorganic and organic carbon (DIC, DOC) on these benthic primary producers in lakes. We develop a hypothesis for groundwater effects including the less studied impacts of periphyton shading on macrophytes. Groundwater-borne nutrients and DIC promote both macrophytes and periphyton. Direct studies on groundwater-borne DOC effects are lacking, but coloured DOC contributes to light attenuation and thus can restrict the growth of benthic primary producers. We predict that above certain threshold levels of nutrient influx by groundwater, periphyton and macrophyte biomass should decline owing to shading by phytoplankton and periphyton, respectively. However, because of their higher light requirements, those thresholds should be lower for macrophytes. For macrophytes, a threshold level is also predicted for a shift from DIC limitation to light limitation. Differences in light requirements are expected to result in lower thresholds of DOC loading for declines of macrophytes than periphyton.</description><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>biomass</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>littoral zone</subject><subject>macrophytes</subject><subject>nitrogen</subject><subject>nutrient content</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>periphyton</subject><subject>phosphorus</subject><subject>Phytoplankton</subject><subject>shade</subject><subject>Shallow Lakes</subject><subject>trophic relationships</subject><subject>Water, Underground</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0018-8158</issn><issn>1573-5117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk1v1DAQhi0EEsvCD-BEJC5wSDuT2HF8rCoolSoh9ePSi-U648Ul6yy2I9h_j6NwoByQD9bYz2O9mjFjbxFOEECeJgQpoAYUdcN7UatnbINCtrVAlM_ZBgD7ukfRv2SvUnqE4qgGNuz-Ik5zGH6aTLHywY0zBUvV4J2jSCF7M47HypTK5lQdKPrDt2OeQmXCUO2NjdNSU3WI0zDb7MuND9VovlN6zV44MyZ682ffsrvPn27Pv9RXXy8uz8-uast5l-vGddBa1aPEhweuOOclJjSdHbjBTkqrpDXKWeSqVa1pLPCBE4BTqmmdEu2WfVjfLRl-zJSy3vtkaRxNoGlOGnvouw6aYm_Z-3_Qx2mOoaRbKBSCdxwLdbJSOzOSLk2ZcjS2rIH23k6BnC_nZ1yC6LhCWYSPT4TCZPqVd2ZOSV_eXD9lcWVL61KK5PQh-r2JR42gl1HqdZS6xNHLKPUSu1mdVNiwo_hX7P9I71bJmUmbXfRJ3900gN3yFQCEan8DxVKoqw</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>Périllon, Cécile</creator><creator>Hilt, Sabine</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>Groundwater influence differentially affects periphyton and macrophyte production in lakes</title><author>Périllon, Cécile ; Hilt, Sabine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-2f603c98171bb49444815026cd4a1677c97ca9fc149393a2c04d4e00f9923f953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>biomass</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>littoral zone</topic><topic>macrophytes</topic><topic>nitrogen</topic><topic>nutrient content</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>periphyton</topic><topic>phosphorus</topic><topic>Phytoplankton</topic><topic>shade</topic><topic>Shallow Lakes</topic><topic>trophic relationships</topic><topic>Water, Underground</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Périllon, Cécile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilt, Sabine</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Périllon, Cécile</au><au>Hilt, Sabine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Groundwater influence differentially affects periphyton and macrophyte production in lakes</atitle><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle><stitle>Hydrobiologia</stitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>778</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>91</spage><epage>103</epage><pages>91-103</pages><issn>0018-8158</issn><eissn>1573-5117</eissn><abstract>Groundwater influx can significantly contribute to nutrient and carbon budgets of lakes, and its influence is the strongest in littoral areas dominated by macrophytes and periphyton. We have reviewed the effects of groundwater-borne nitrogen and phosphorus and dissolved inorganic and organic carbon (DIC, DOC) on these benthic primary producers in lakes. We develop a hypothesis for groundwater effects including the less studied impacts of periphyton shading on macrophytes. Groundwater-borne nutrients and DIC promote both macrophytes and periphyton. Direct studies on groundwater-borne DOC effects are lacking, but coloured DOC contributes to light attenuation and thus can restrict the growth of benthic primary producers. We predict that above certain threshold levels of nutrient influx by groundwater, periphyton and macrophyte biomass should decline owing to shading by phytoplankton and periphyton, respectively. However, because of their higher light requirements, those thresholds should be lower for macrophytes. For macrophytes, a threshold level is also predicted for a shift from DIC limitation to light limitation. Differences in light requirements are expected to result in lower thresholds of DOC loading for declines of macrophytes than periphyton.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10750-015-2485-9</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0018-8158 |
| ispartof | Hydrobiologia, 2016-09, Vol.778 (1), p.91-103 |
| issn | 0018-8158 1573-5117 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808660239 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Aquatic plants biomass Biomedical and Life Sciences Carbon Ecology Freshwater Freshwater & Marine Ecology Groundwater Lakes Life Sciences littoral zone macrophytes nitrogen nutrient content Nutrients Organic carbon periphyton phosphorus Phytoplankton shade Shallow Lakes trophic relationships Water, Underground Zoology |
| title | Groundwater influence differentially affects periphyton and macrophyte production in lakes |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T00%3A31%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Groundwater%20influence%20differentially%20affects%20periphyton%20and%20macrophyte%20production%20in%20lakes&rft.jtitle=Hydrobiologia&rft.au=P%C3%A9rillon,%20C%C3%A9cile&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=778&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=103&rft.pages=91-103&rft.issn=0018-8158&rft.eissn=1573-5117&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10750-015-2485-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA470564917%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1801554641&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A470564917&rfr_iscdi=true |