Differential trends in cigarette smoking in the USA: is menthol slowing progress?
Introduction Mentholated cigarettes are at least as dangerous to an individual's health as non-mentholated varieties. The addition of menthol to cigarettes reduces perceived harshness of smoke, which can facilitate initiation. Here, we examine correlates of menthol use, national trends in smoki...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Tobacco control 2015-01, Vol.24 (1), p.28-37 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 37 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 28 |
container_title | Tobacco control |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Giovino, Gary A Villanti, Andrea C Mowery, Paul D Sevilimedu, Varadan Niaura, Raymond S Vallone, Donna M Abrams, David B |
description | Introduction Mentholated cigarettes are at least as dangerous to an individual's health as non-mentholated varieties. The addition of menthol to cigarettes reduces perceived harshness of smoke, which can facilitate initiation. Here, we examine correlates of menthol use, national trends in smoking menthol and non-menthol cigarettes, and brand preferences over time. Methods We estimated menthol cigarette use during 2004–2010 using annual data on persons ≥12 years old from the National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. We adjusted self-reported menthol status for selected brands that were either exclusively menthol or non-menthol, based on sales data. Data were weighted to provide national estimates. Results Among cigarette smokers, menthol cigarette use was more common among 12–17 year olds (56.7%) and 18–25 year olds (45.0%) than among older persons (range 30.5% to 34.7%). In a multivariable analysis, menthol use was associated with being younger, female and of non-Caucasian race/ethnicity. Among all adolescents, the percentage who smoked non-menthol cigarettes decreased from 2004–2010, while menthol smoking rates remained constant; among all young adults, the percentage who smoked non-menthol cigarettes also declined, while menthol smoking rates increased. The use of Camel menthol and Marlboro menthol increased among adolescent and young adult smokers, particularly non-Hispanic Caucasians, during the study period. Conclusions Young people are heavy consumers of mentholated cigarettes. Progress in reducing youth smoking has likely been attenuated by the sale and marketing of mentholated cigarettes, including emerging varieties of established youth brands. This study should inform the Food and Drug Administration regarding the potential public health impact of a menthol ban. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051159 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808647437</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43289604</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43289604</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b570t-777142388739cb0fe361ffe0d6025bc52562b8fc219479ecda5fc48bbbe2dbec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkU1LHTEYhUOp1OvHT2gZ2o2b0bz5jpsiVqsgiKjrMMlkrnM7M9Ekl-K_N5dRod2UrhJynpPzJgehr4APAag4ysE2zgUXphzDUBMMtMYcgOsPaAFMqJpSUB_RAmvBasYF3UY7Ka1wASWHT2ibUK0llniBbn70Xeejn3LfDFUumzZV_VS5ftlEn7Ov0hh-9dNyc5gffHV_e3Jc9akai-UhDFUawu-N_BjDMvqUvu-hra4Zkt9_XXfR_fnZ3elFfXX98_L05Kq2XOJcSymBEaqUpNpZ3HkqoEyCW4EJt44TLohVnSOgmdTetQ3vHFPWWk9a6x3dRQfzvSX5ae1TNmOfnB-GZvJhnQworASTjMp_o6L8i1Cak4J--wtdhXWcykMMSAWaCwBVqOOZcjGkFH1nHmM_NvHZADabjsyfHZlNR2buqJi_vEas7ejbd-tbKQX4PAOrlEN81xklSgvMis5n3Y6r_wl-AQzmrJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1781956118</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differential trends in cigarette smoking in the USA: is menthol slowing progress?</title><source>BMJ Journals Online Archive</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Giovino, Gary A ; Villanti, Andrea C ; Mowery, Paul D ; Sevilimedu, Varadan ; Niaura, Raymond S ; Vallone, Donna M ; Abrams, David B</creator><creatorcontrib>Giovino, Gary A ; Villanti, Andrea C ; Mowery, Paul D ; Sevilimedu, Varadan ; Niaura, Raymond S ; Vallone, Donna M ; Abrams, David B</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Mentholated cigarettes are at least as dangerous to an individual's health as non-mentholated varieties. The addition of menthol to cigarettes reduces perceived harshness of smoke, which can facilitate initiation. Here, we examine correlates of menthol use, national trends in smoking menthol and non-menthol cigarettes, and brand preferences over time. Methods We estimated menthol cigarette use during 2004–2010 using annual data on persons ≥12 years old from the National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. We adjusted self-reported menthol status for selected brands that were either exclusively menthol or non-menthol, based on sales data. Data were weighted to provide national estimates. Results Among cigarette smokers, menthol cigarette use was more common among 12–17 year olds (56.7%) and 18–25 year olds (45.0%) than among older persons (range 30.5% to 34.7%). In a multivariable analysis, menthol use was associated with being younger, female and of non-Caucasian race/ethnicity. Among all adolescents, the percentage who smoked non-menthol cigarettes decreased from 2004–2010, while menthol smoking rates remained constant; among all young adults, the percentage who smoked non-menthol cigarettes also declined, while menthol smoking rates increased. The use of Camel menthol and Marlboro menthol increased among adolescent and young adult smokers, particularly non-Hispanic Caucasians, during the study period. Conclusions Young people are heavy consumers of mentholated cigarettes. Progress in reducing youth smoking has likely been attenuated by the sale and marketing of mentholated cigarettes, including emerging varieties of established youth brands. This study should inform the Food and Drug Administration regarding the potential public health impact of a menthol ban.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-4563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3318</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051159</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23997070</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adolescents ; Adult ; Age ; Age Factors ; Bans ; Brands ; Chemical industry ; Child ; Cigarettes ; Consumer Behavior ; Drug use ; Estimates ; Ethnicity ; Family income ; Federal regulation ; Female ; Gender ; Hispanic people ; Humans ; Male ; Menthol ; Middle Aged ; Military bases ; Nicotine ; Older people ; Polls & surveys ; Population ; Public health ; Race ; Sales ; Smoking ; Smoking - trends ; Studies ; Teenagers ; Tobacco ; Trends ; United States ; White people ; Young Adult ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>Tobacco control, 2015-01, Vol.24 (1), p.28-37</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>2014 BMJ Publishing Group</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2015 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b570t-777142388739cb0fe361ffe0d6025bc52562b8fc219479ecda5fc48bbbe2dbec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b570t-777142388739cb0fe361ffe0d6025bc52562b8fc219479ecda5fc48bbbe2dbec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/24/1/28.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/24/1/28.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,799,3183,23550,27901,27902,57992,58225,77343,77374</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23997070$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giovino, Gary A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villanti, Andrea C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mowery, Paul D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sevilimedu, Varadan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niaura, Raymond S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallone, Donna M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrams, David B</creatorcontrib><title>Differential trends in cigarette smoking in the USA: is menthol slowing progress?</title><title>Tobacco control</title><addtitle>Tob Control</addtitle><description>Introduction Mentholated cigarettes are at least as dangerous to an individual's health as non-mentholated varieties. The addition of menthol to cigarettes reduces perceived harshness of smoke, which can facilitate initiation. Here, we examine correlates of menthol use, national trends in smoking menthol and non-menthol cigarettes, and brand preferences over time. Methods We estimated menthol cigarette use during 2004–2010 using annual data on persons ≥12 years old from the National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. We adjusted self-reported menthol status for selected brands that were either exclusively menthol or non-menthol, based on sales data. Data were weighted to provide national estimates. Results Among cigarette smokers, menthol cigarette use was more common among 12–17 year olds (56.7%) and 18–25 year olds (45.0%) than among older persons (range 30.5% to 34.7%). In a multivariable analysis, menthol use was associated with being younger, female and of non-Caucasian race/ethnicity. Among all adolescents, the percentage who smoked non-menthol cigarettes decreased from 2004–2010, while menthol smoking rates remained constant; among all young adults, the percentage who smoked non-menthol cigarettes also declined, while menthol smoking rates increased. The use of Camel menthol and Marlboro menthol increased among adolescent and young adult smokers, particularly non-Hispanic Caucasians, during the study period. Conclusions Young people are heavy consumers of mentholated cigarettes. Progress in reducing youth smoking has likely been attenuated by the sale and marketing of mentholated cigarettes, including emerging varieties of established youth brands. This study should inform the Food and Drug Administration regarding the potential public health impact of a menthol ban.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Bans</subject><subject>Brands</subject><subject>Chemical industry</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Cigarettes</subject><subject>Consumer Behavior</subject><subject>Drug use</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Family income</subject><subject>Federal regulation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Hispanic people</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Menthol</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Military bases</subject><subject>Nicotine</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Sales</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Smoking - trends</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>White people</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>0964-4563</issn><issn>1468-3318</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkU1LHTEYhUOp1OvHT2gZ2o2b0bz5jpsiVqsgiKjrMMlkrnM7M9Ekl-K_N5dRod2UrhJynpPzJgehr4APAag4ysE2zgUXphzDUBMMtMYcgOsPaAFMqJpSUB_RAmvBasYF3UY7Ka1wASWHT2ibUK0llniBbn70Xeejn3LfDFUumzZV_VS5ftlEn7Ov0hh-9dNyc5gffHV_e3Jc9akai-UhDFUawu-N_BjDMvqUvu-hra4Zkt9_XXfR_fnZ3elFfXX98_L05Kq2XOJcSymBEaqUpNpZ3HkqoEyCW4EJt44TLohVnSOgmdTetQ3vHFPWWk9a6x3dRQfzvSX5ae1TNmOfnB-GZvJhnQworASTjMp_o6L8i1Cak4J--wtdhXWcykMMSAWaCwBVqOOZcjGkFH1nHmM_NvHZADabjsyfHZlNR2buqJi_vEas7ejbd-tbKQX4PAOrlEN81xklSgvMis5n3Y6r_wl-AQzmrJA</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Giovino, Gary A</creator><creator>Villanti, Andrea C</creator><creator>Mowery, Paul D</creator><creator>Sevilimedu, Varadan</creator><creator>Niaura, Raymond S</creator><creator>Vallone, Donna M</creator><creator>Abrams, David B</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Differential trends in cigarette smoking in the USA: is menthol slowing progress?</title><author>Giovino, Gary A ; Villanti, Andrea C ; Mowery, Paul D ; Sevilimedu, Varadan ; Niaura, Raymond S ; Vallone, Donna M ; Abrams, David B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b570t-777142388739cb0fe361ffe0d6025bc52562b8fc219479ecda5fc48bbbe2dbec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Bans</topic><topic>Brands</topic><topic>Chemical industry</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Cigarettes</topic><topic>Consumer Behavior</topic><topic>Drug use</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Family income</topic><topic>Federal regulation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Hispanic people</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Menthol</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Military bases</topic><topic>Nicotine</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Sales</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Smoking - trends</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>White people</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giovino, Gary A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villanti, Andrea C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mowery, Paul D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sevilimedu, Varadan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niaura, Raymond S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallone, Donna M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrams, David B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Tobacco control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giovino, Gary A</au><au>Villanti, Andrea C</au><au>Mowery, Paul D</au><au>Sevilimedu, Varadan</au><au>Niaura, Raymond S</au><au>Vallone, Donna M</au><au>Abrams, David B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differential trends in cigarette smoking in the USA: is menthol slowing progress?</atitle><jtitle>Tobacco control</jtitle><addtitle>Tob Control</addtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>28</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>28-37</pages><issn>0964-4563</issn><eissn>1468-3318</eissn><abstract>Introduction Mentholated cigarettes are at least as dangerous to an individual's health as non-mentholated varieties. The addition of menthol to cigarettes reduces perceived harshness of smoke, which can facilitate initiation. Here, we examine correlates of menthol use, national trends in smoking menthol and non-menthol cigarettes, and brand preferences over time. Methods We estimated menthol cigarette use during 2004–2010 using annual data on persons ≥12 years old from the National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. We adjusted self-reported menthol status for selected brands that were either exclusively menthol or non-menthol, based on sales data. Data were weighted to provide national estimates. Results Among cigarette smokers, menthol cigarette use was more common among 12–17 year olds (56.7%) and 18–25 year olds (45.0%) than among older persons (range 30.5% to 34.7%). In a multivariable analysis, menthol use was associated with being younger, female and of non-Caucasian race/ethnicity. Among all adolescents, the percentage who smoked non-menthol cigarettes decreased from 2004–2010, while menthol smoking rates remained constant; among all young adults, the percentage who smoked non-menthol cigarettes also declined, while menthol smoking rates increased. The use of Camel menthol and Marlboro menthol increased among adolescent and young adult smokers, particularly non-Hispanic Caucasians, during the study period. Conclusions Young people are heavy consumers of mentholated cigarettes. Progress in reducing youth smoking has likely been attenuated by the sale and marketing of mentholated cigarettes, including emerging varieties of established youth brands. This study should inform the Food and Drug Administration regarding the potential public health impact of a menthol ban.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group</pub><pmid>23997070</pmid><doi>10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051159</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0964-4563 |
ispartof | Tobacco control, 2015-01, Vol.24 (1), p.28-37 |
issn | 0964-4563 1468-3318 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808647437 |
source | BMJ Journals Online Archive; MEDLINE; JSTOR |
subjects | Adolescent Adolescents Adult Age Age Factors Bans Brands Chemical industry Child Cigarettes Consumer Behavior Drug use Estimates Ethnicity Family income Federal regulation Female Gender Hispanic people Humans Male Menthol Middle Aged Military bases Nicotine Older people Polls & surveys Population Public health Race Sales Smoking Smoking - trends Studies Teenagers Tobacco Trends United States White people Young Adult Young adults |
title | Differential trends in cigarette smoking in the USA: is menthol slowing progress? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T08%3A18%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differential%20trends%20in%20cigarette%20smoking%20in%20the%20USA:%20is%20menthol%20slowing%20progress?&rft.jtitle=Tobacco%20control&rft.au=Giovino,%20Gary%20A&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=28&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=28-37&rft.issn=0964-4563&rft.eissn=1468-3318&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051159&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43289604%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1781956118&rft_id=info:pmid/23997070&rft_jstor_id=43289604&rfr_iscdi=true |