What is the cost of a healthy diet? Using diet data from the UK Women's Cohort Study
Background A healthy diet is important to promote health and well-being while preventing chronic disease. However, the monetary cost of consuming such a diet can be a perceived barrier. This study will investigate the cost of consuming a range of dietary patterns. Methods A cross-sectional analysis,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979) 2014-11, Vol.68 (11), p.1043-1049 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1049 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1043 |
container_title | Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979) |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Morris, Michelle A Hulme, Claire Clarke, Graham P Edwards, Kimberley L Cade, Janet E |
description | Background A healthy diet is important to promote health and well-being while preventing chronic disease. However, the monetary cost of consuming such a diet can be a perceived barrier. This study will investigate the cost of consuming a range of dietary patterns. Methods A cross-sectional analysis, where cost of diet was assigned to dietary intakes recorded using a Food Frequency Questionnaire. A mean daily diet cost was calculated for seven data-driven dietary patterns. These dietary patterns were given a healthiness score according to how well they comply with the UK Department of Health's Eatwell Plate guidelines. This study involved ∼35 000 women recruited in the 1990s into the UK Women's Cohort Study. Results A significant positive association was observed between diet cost and healthiness of the diet (p for trend >0.001). The healthiest dietary pattern was double the price of the least healthy, £6.63/day and £3.29/day, respectively. Dietary diversity, described by the patterns, was also shown to be associated with increased cost. Those with higher education and a professional or managerial occupation were more likely to consume a healthier diet. Conclusions A healthy diet is more expensive to the consumer than a less healthy one. In order to promote health through diet and reduce potential inequalities in health, it seems sensible that healthier food choices should be made more accessible to all. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/jech-2014-204039 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808647331</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43281990</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43281990</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b547t-e8256c479b56dd3c85e865373b33daa9947df03d24f7c6d8347c0e75fcb44b513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUuLFDEUhYMoTs_o3o0SkEFBSvN-rEQaXzjgwmnGXZFKUlYVVZUxSS3635vuakdwo5t7L5zvHBIOAE8weo0xFW8Gb7uKIMzKYIjqe2CDmUQVkVTdB5si0Aoh_v0MnKc0oHJKoh-CM8IRpwKzDbi-6UyGfYK589CGlGFooYGdN2Pu9tD1Pr-Fu9TPP443dCYb2MYwHQ27L_AmTH5-keA2dCFm-C0vbv8IPGjNmPzj074Auw_vr7efqquvHz9v311VDWcyV14RLiyTuuHCOWoV90pwKmlDqTNGayZdi6gjrJVWOEWZtMhL3tqGsYZjegFerrm3MfxcfMr11Cfrx9HMPiypxgopwSSl_4EKorUUUvKCPv8LHcIS5_KRGkupiWLqGIhWysaQUvRtfRv7ycR9jVF9KKc-lFMfyqnXcorl2Sl4aSbv7gy_2yjA5QkwyZqxjWa2ffrDKUUJQqpwT1duSDnEO51RorDWqOivVr2Zhn8_6xexcqsk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1779284831</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What is the cost of a healthy diet? Using diet data from the UK Women's Cohort Study</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Morris, Michelle A ; Hulme, Claire ; Clarke, Graham P ; Edwards, Kimberley L ; Cade, Janet E</creator><creatorcontrib>Morris, Michelle A ; Hulme, Claire ; Clarke, Graham P ; Edwards, Kimberley L ; Cade, Janet E</creatorcontrib><description>Background A healthy diet is important to promote health and well-being while preventing chronic disease. However, the monetary cost of consuming such a diet can be a perceived barrier. This study will investigate the cost of consuming a range of dietary patterns. Methods A cross-sectional analysis, where cost of diet was assigned to dietary intakes recorded using a Food Frequency Questionnaire. A mean daily diet cost was calculated for seven data-driven dietary patterns. These dietary patterns were given a healthiness score according to how well they comply with the UK Department of Health's Eatwell Plate guidelines. This study involved ∼35 000 women recruited in the 1990s into the UK Women's Cohort Study. Results A significant positive association was observed between diet cost and healthiness of the diet (p for trend >0.001). The healthiest dietary pattern was double the price of the least healthy, £6.63/day and £3.29/day, respectively. Dietary diversity, described by the patterns, was also shown to be associated with increased cost. Those with higher education and a professional or managerial occupation were more likely to consume a healthier diet. Conclusions A healthy diet is more expensive to the consumer than a less healthy one. In order to promote health through diet and reduce potential inequalities in health, it seems sensible that healthier food choices should be made more accessible to all.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-005X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-2738</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/jech-2014-204039</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25053614</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JECHDR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Body Mass Index ; Chronic illnesses ; Cluster analysis ; Cohort Studies ; Community health ; Cost analysis ; Cost control ; Cost estimates ; Costs and Cost Analysis ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Diet ; Diet - economics ; Diet - standards ; Diet Surveys ; Disease ; Energy Intake ; Feeding Behavior ; Female ; Food ; Food and body weights ; Food consumption ; General aspects ; Guideline Adherence - economics ; Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data ; Health care expenditures ; Health promotion ; Health Status ; Humans ; Meats ; Medical research ; Medical sciences ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Nutrition Policy ; Nutrition research ; Nutritional adequacy ; Omnivores ; Population ; Prices ; Public health ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Questionnaires ; Regression Analysis ; Studies ; Time ; United Kingdom ; Vegetarianism ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979), 2014-11, Vol.68 (11), p.1043-1049</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>2014 BMJ Publishing Group</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2014 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b547t-e8256c479b56dd3c85e865373b33daa9947df03d24f7c6d8347c0e75fcb44b513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b547t-e8256c479b56dd3c85e865373b33daa9947df03d24f7c6d8347c0e75fcb44b513</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jech.bmj.com/content/68/11/1043.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jech.bmj.com/content/68/11/1043.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,799,3183,23550,27901,27902,57992,58225,77342,77373</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28832008$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25053614$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morris, Michelle A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulme, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Graham P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Kimberley L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cade, Janet E</creatorcontrib><title>What is the cost of a healthy diet? Using diet data from the UK Women's Cohort Study</title><title>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</title><addtitle>J Epidemiol Community Health</addtitle><description>Background A healthy diet is important to promote health and well-being while preventing chronic disease. However, the monetary cost of consuming such a diet can be a perceived barrier. This study will investigate the cost of consuming a range of dietary patterns. Methods A cross-sectional analysis, where cost of diet was assigned to dietary intakes recorded using a Food Frequency Questionnaire. A mean daily diet cost was calculated for seven data-driven dietary patterns. These dietary patterns were given a healthiness score according to how well they comply with the UK Department of Health's Eatwell Plate guidelines. This study involved ∼35 000 women recruited in the 1990s into the UK Women's Cohort Study. Results A significant positive association was observed between diet cost and healthiness of the diet (p for trend >0.001). The healthiest dietary pattern was double the price of the least healthy, £6.63/day and £3.29/day, respectively. Dietary diversity, described by the patterns, was also shown to be associated with increased cost. Those with higher education and a professional or managerial occupation were more likely to consume a healthier diet. Conclusions A healthy diet is more expensive to the consumer than a less healthy one. In order to promote health through diet and reduce potential inequalities in health, it seems sensible that healthier food choices should be made more accessible to all.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Cluster analysis</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Community health</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Cost estimates</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Diet - economics</subject><subject>Diet - standards</subject><subject>Diet Surveys</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Energy Intake</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food and body weights</subject><subject>Food consumption</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence - economics</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Meats</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Nutrition Policy</subject><subject>Nutrition research</subject><subject>Nutritional adequacy</subject><subject>Omnivores</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Time</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Vegetarianism</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0143-005X</issn><issn>1470-2738</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUuLFDEUhYMoTs_o3o0SkEFBSvN-rEQaXzjgwmnGXZFKUlYVVZUxSS3635vuakdwo5t7L5zvHBIOAE8weo0xFW8Gb7uKIMzKYIjqe2CDmUQVkVTdB5si0Aoh_v0MnKc0oHJKoh-CM8IRpwKzDbi-6UyGfYK589CGlGFooYGdN2Pu9tD1Pr-Fu9TPP443dCYb2MYwHQ27L_AmTH5-keA2dCFm-C0vbv8IPGjNmPzj074Auw_vr7efqquvHz9v311VDWcyV14RLiyTuuHCOWoV90pwKmlDqTNGayZdi6gjrJVWOEWZtMhL3tqGsYZjegFerrm3MfxcfMr11Cfrx9HMPiypxgopwSSl_4EKorUUUvKCPv8LHcIS5_KRGkupiWLqGIhWysaQUvRtfRv7ycR9jVF9KKc-lFMfyqnXcorl2Sl4aSbv7gy_2yjA5QkwyZqxjWa2ffrDKUUJQqpwT1duSDnEO51RorDWqOivVr2Zhn8_6xexcqsk</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>Morris, Michelle A</creator><creator>Hulme, Claire</creator><creator>Clarke, Graham P</creator><creator>Edwards, Kimberley L</creator><creator>Cade, Janet E</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>What is the cost of a healthy diet? Using diet data from the UK Women's Cohort Study</title><author>Morris, Michelle A ; Hulme, Claire ; Clarke, Graham P ; Edwards, Kimberley L ; Cade, Janet E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b547t-e8256c479b56dd3c85e865373b33daa9947df03d24f7c6d8347c0e75fcb44b513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Cluster analysis</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Community health</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Cost estimates</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Diet - economics</topic><topic>Diet - standards</topic><topic>Diet Surveys</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Energy Intake</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food and body weights</topic><topic>Food consumption</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence - economics</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Meats</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Nutrition Policy</topic><topic>Nutrition research</topic><topic>Nutritional adequacy</topic><topic>Omnivores</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Time</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Vegetarianism</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morris, Michelle A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulme, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Graham P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Kimberley L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cade, Janet E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morris, Michelle A</au><au>Hulme, Claire</au><au>Clarke, Graham P</au><au>Edwards, Kimberley L</au><au>Cade, Janet E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What is the cost of a healthy diet? Using diet data from the UK Women's Cohort Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</jtitle><addtitle>J Epidemiol Community Health</addtitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1043</spage><epage>1049</epage><pages>1043-1049</pages><issn>0143-005X</issn><eissn>1470-2738</eissn><coden>JECHDR</coden><abstract>Background A healthy diet is important to promote health and well-being while preventing chronic disease. However, the monetary cost of consuming such a diet can be a perceived barrier. This study will investigate the cost of consuming a range of dietary patterns. Methods A cross-sectional analysis, where cost of diet was assigned to dietary intakes recorded using a Food Frequency Questionnaire. A mean daily diet cost was calculated for seven data-driven dietary patterns. These dietary patterns were given a healthiness score according to how well they comply with the UK Department of Health's Eatwell Plate guidelines. This study involved ∼35 000 women recruited in the 1990s into the UK Women's Cohort Study. Results A significant positive association was observed between diet cost and healthiness of the diet (p for trend >0.001). The healthiest dietary pattern was double the price of the least healthy, £6.63/day and £3.29/day, respectively. Dietary diversity, described by the patterns, was also shown to be associated with increased cost. Those with higher education and a professional or managerial occupation were more likely to consume a healthier diet. Conclusions A healthy diet is more expensive to the consumer than a less healthy one. In order to promote health through diet and reduce potential inequalities in health, it seems sensible that healthier food choices should be made more accessible to all.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group</pub><pmid>25053614</pmid><doi>10.1136/jech-2014-204039</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0143-005X |
ispartof | Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979), 2014-11, Vol.68 (11), p.1043-1049 |
issn | 0143-005X 1470-2738 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808647331 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2 |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Body Mass Index Chronic illnesses Cluster analysis Cohort Studies Community health Cost analysis Cost control Cost estimates Costs and Cost Analysis Cross-Sectional Studies Diet Diet - economics Diet - standards Diet Surveys Disease Energy Intake Feeding Behavior Female Food Food and body weights Food consumption General aspects Guideline Adherence - economics Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data Health care expenditures Health promotion Health Status Humans Meats Medical research Medical sciences Methods Middle Aged Miscellaneous Nutrition Policy Nutrition research Nutritional adequacy Omnivores Population Prices Public health Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Questionnaires Regression Analysis Studies Time United Kingdom Vegetarianism Womens health |
title | What is the cost of a healthy diet? Using diet data from the UK Women's Cohort Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T01%3A36%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20is%20the%20cost%20of%20a%20healthy%20diet?%20Using%20diet%20data%20from%20the%20UK%20Women's%20Cohort%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20epidemiology%20and%20community%20health%20(1979)&rft.au=Morris,%20Michelle%20A&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1043&rft.epage=1049&rft.pages=1043-1049&rft.issn=0143-005X&rft.eissn=1470-2738&rft.coden=JECHDR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/jech-2014-204039&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43281990%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1779284831&rft_id=info:pmid/25053614&rft_jstor_id=43281990&rfr_iscdi=true |