Effects of input discretization, model complexity, and calibration strategy on model performance in a data‐scarce glacierized catchment in Central Asia
Glacierized high‐mountainous catchments are often the water towers for downstream region, and modeling these remote areas are often the only available tool for the assessment of water resources availability. Nevertheless, data scarcity affects different aspects of hydrological modeling in such mount...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water resources research 2016-06, Vol.52 (6), p.4674-4699 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4699 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 4674 |
container_title | Water resources research |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Tarasova, L. Knoche, M. Dietrich, J. Merz, R. |
description | Glacierized high‐mountainous catchments are often the water towers for downstream region, and modeling these remote areas are often the only available tool for the assessment of water resources availability. Nevertheless, data scarcity affects different aspects of hydrological modeling in such mountainous glacierized basins. On the example of poorly gauged glacierized catchment in Central Asia, we examined the effects of input discretization, model complexity, and calibration strategy on model performance. The study was conducted with the GSM‐Socont model driven with climatic input from the corrected High Asia Reanalysis data set of two different discretizations. We analyze the effects of the use of long‐term glacier volume loss, snow cover images, and interior runoff as an additional calibration data. In glacierized catchments with winter accumulation type, where the transformation of precipitation into runoff is mainly controlled by snow and glacier melt processes, the spatial discretization of precipitation tends to have less impact on simulated runoff than a correct prediction of the integral precipitation volume. Increasing model complexity by using spatially distributed input or semidistributed parameters values does not increase model performance in the Gunt catchment, as the more complex model tends to be more sensitive to errors in the input data set. In our case, better model performance and quantification of the flow components can be achieved by additional calibration data, rather than by using a more distributed model parameters. However, a semidistributed model better predicts the spatial patterns of snow accumulation and provides more plausible runoff predictions at the interior sites.
Key Points
In glacierized data‐scarce regions increasing model and input complexity not necessarily lead to better performance
Long‐term glacier mass balance modeled with GlabTop is proposed for multiple data set calibration
Calibration data are more important than model or input complexity for model performance |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/2015WR018551 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808645260</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4121038501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4292-aa286f9d0d75daaa7a8bd1a21b7f99a7f59156a63410566c22f360e4e5517b5d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90c2KFDEQB_AgCo6rNx8g4MXDtCbpfHSOy7DqwoIwKHtsavKxZkl32iSDzp58BK--nk-yGceDeNhTFcWPP0UVQi8peUMJYW8ZoeJ6S-ggBH2EVlRz3imt-sdoRQjvO9pr9RQ9K-WWEMqFVCv068J7Z2rByeMwL_uKbSgmuxruoIY0r_GUrIvYpGmJ7nuohzWG2WIDMezyH4JLbY27OeDWn_Tisk95gtm4looBW6jw-8fPYiC30U0EE1wOd-4YVM2Xyc31CDetZoj4vAR4jp54iMW9-FvP0Od3F582H7qrj-8vN-dXHXCmWQfABum1JVYJCwAKhp2lwOhOea1BeaGpkCB7TomQ0jDme0kcd-1Gaidsf4Zen3KXnL7uXanj1C7gYoTZpX0Z6UAGyQWTpNFX_9HbtM9z226kmnCuiabDg2oggjGhpGxqfVImp1Ky8-OSwwT5MFIyHr85_vvNxvsT_xaiOzxox-vtZssYpay_B_eYoq0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1805225766</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of input discretization, model complexity, and calibration strategy on model performance in a data‐scarce glacierized catchment in Central Asia</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Tarasova, L. ; Knoche, M. ; Dietrich, J. ; Merz, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tarasova, L. ; Knoche, M. ; Dietrich, J. ; Merz, R.</creatorcontrib><description>Glacierized high‐mountainous catchments are often the water towers for downstream region, and modeling these remote areas are often the only available tool for the assessment of water resources availability. Nevertheless, data scarcity affects different aspects of hydrological modeling in such mountainous glacierized basins. On the example of poorly gauged glacierized catchment in Central Asia, we examined the effects of input discretization, model complexity, and calibration strategy on model performance. The study was conducted with the GSM‐Socont model driven with climatic input from the corrected High Asia Reanalysis data set of two different discretizations. We analyze the effects of the use of long‐term glacier volume loss, snow cover images, and interior runoff as an additional calibration data. In glacierized catchments with winter accumulation type, where the transformation of precipitation into runoff is mainly controlled by snow and glacier melt processes, the spatial discretization of precipitation tends to have less impact on simulated runoff than a correct prediction of the integral precipitation volume. Increasing model complexity by using spatially distributed input or semidistributed parameters values does not increase model performance in the Gunt catchment, as the more complex model tends to be more sensitive to errors in the input data set. In our case, better model performance and quantification of the flow components can be achieved by additional calibration data, rather than by using a more distributed model parameters. However, a semidistributed model better predicts the spatial patterns of snow accumulation and provides more plausible runoff predictions at the interior sites.
Key Points
In glacierized data‐scarce regions increasing model and input complexity not necessarily lead to better performance
Long‐term glacier mass balance modeled with GlabTop is proposed for multiple data set calibration
Calibration data are more important than model or input complexity for model performance</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2015WR018551</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Accumulation ; Atmospheric precipitations ; Availability ; Basins ; Calibration ; Catchment area ; Catchments ; Complexity ; Components ; Computer simulation ; Data ; Data processing ; data scarcity ; Datasets ; Discretization ; Errors ; Glacier melting ; Glaciers ; Glaciohydrology ; glacio‐hydrological modeling ; GSM‐Socont model ; high Asia reanalysis ; Hydrologic models ; Hydrology ; Mathematical models ; Modelling ; Mountains ; multiple data set calibration ; Pamir ; Parameters ; Precipitation ; Resource availability ; Resources ; Runoff ; Snow ; Snow accumulation ; Snow cover ; Spatial distribution ; Strategy ; Water ; Water resources ; Water towers ; Winter</subject><ispartof>Water resources research, 2016-06, Vol.52 (6), p.4674-4699</ispartof><rights>2016. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4292-aa286f9d0d75daaa7a8bd1a21b7f99a7f59156a63410566c22f360e4e5517b5d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4292-aa286f9d0d75daaa7a8bd1a21b7f99a7f59156a63410566c22f360e4e5517b5d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2015WR018551$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2015WR018551$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,11493,27901,27902,45550,45551,46443,46867</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tarasova, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knoche, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietrich, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merz, R.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of input discretization, model complexity, and calibration strategy on model performance in a data‐scarce glacierized catchment in Central Asia</title><title>Water resources research</title><description>Glacierized high‐mountainous catchments are often the water towers for downstream region, and modeling these remote areas are often the only available tool for the assessment of water resources availability. Nevertheless, data scarcity affects different aspects of hydrological modeling in such mountainous glacierized basins. On the example of poorly gauged glacierized catchment in Central Asia, we examined the effects of input discretization, model complexity, and calibration strategy on model performance. The study was conducted with the GSM‐Socont model driven with climatic input from the corrected High Asia Reanalysis data set of two different discretizations. We analyze the effects of the use of long‐term glacier volume loss, snow cover images, and interior runoff as an additional calibration data. In glacierized catchments with winter accumulation type, where the transformation of precipitation into runoff is mainly controlled by snow and glacier melt processes, the spatial discretization of precipitation tends to have less impact on simulated runoff than a correct prediction of the integral precipitation volume. Increasing model complexity by using spatially distributed input or semidistributed parameters values does not increase model performance in the Gunt catchment, as the more complex model tends to be more sensitive to errors in the input data set. In our case, better model performance and quantification of the flow components can be achieved by additional calibration data, rather than by using a more distributed model parameters. However, a semidistributed model better predicts the spatial patterns of snow accumulation and provides more plausible runoff predictions at the interior sites.
Key Points
In glacierized data‐scarce regions increasing model and input complexity not necessarily lead to better performance
Long‐term glacier mass balance modeled with GlabTop is proposed for multiple data set calibration
Calibration data are more important than model or input complexity for model performance</description><subject>Accumulation</subject><subject>Atmospheric precipitations</subject><subject>Availability</subject><subject>Basins</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Catchment area</subject><subject>Catchments</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Components</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>data scarcity</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Discretization</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Glacier melting</subject><subject>Glaciers</subject><subject>Glaciohydrology</subject><subject>glacio‐hydrological modeling</subject><subject>GSM‐Socont model</subject><subject>high Asia reanalysis</subject><subject>Hydrologic models</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>multiple data set calibration</subject><subject>Pamir</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Resource availability</subject><subject>Resources</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Snow</subject><subject>Snow accumulation</subject><subject>Snow cover</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Water towers</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>0043-1397</issn><issn>1944-7973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90c2KFDEQB_AgCo6rNx8g4MXDtCbpfHSOy7DqwoIwKHtsavKxZkl32iSDzp58BK--nk-yGceDeNhTFcWPP0UVQi8peUMJYW8ZoeJ6S-ggBH2EVlRz3imt-sdoRQjvO9pr9RQ9K-WWEMqFVCv068J7Z2rByeMwL_uKbSgmuxruoIY0r_GUrIvYpGmJ7nuohzWG2WIDMezyH4JLbY27OeDWn_Tisk95gtm4looBW6jw-8fPYiC30U0EE1wOd-4YVM2Xyc31CDetZoj4vAR4jp54iMW9-FvP0Od3F582H7qrj-8vN-dXHXCmWQfABum1JVYJCwAKhp2lwOhOea1BeaGpkCB7TomQ0jDme0kcd-1Gaidsf4Zen3KXnL7uXanj1C7gYoTZpX0Z6UAGyQWTpNFX_9HbtM9z226kmnCuiabDg2oggjGhpGxqfVImp1Ky8-OSwwT5MFIyHr85_vvNxvsT_xaiOzxox-vtZssYpay_B_eYoq0</recordid><startdate>201606</startdate><enddate>201606</enddate><creator>Tarasova, L.</creator><creator>Knoche, M.</creator><creator>Dietrich, J.</creator><creator>Merz, R.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201606</creationdate><title>Effects of input discretization, model complexity, and calibration strategy on model performance in a data‐scarce glacierized catchment in Central Asia</title><author>Tarasova, L. ; Knoche, M. ; Dietrich, J. ; Merz, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4292-aa286f9d0d75daaa7a8bd1a21b7f99a7f59156a63410566c22f360e4e5517b5d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Accumulation</topic><topic>Atmospheric precipitations</topic><topic>Availability</topic><topic>Basins</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Catchment area</topic><topic>Catchments</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Components</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>data scarcity</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Discretization</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Glacier melting</topic><topic>Glaciers</topic><topic>Glaciohydrology</topic><topic>glacio‐hydrological modeling</topic><topic>GSM‐Socont model</topic><topic>high Asia reanalysis</topic><topic>Hydrologic models</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>multiple data set calibration</topic><topic>Pamir</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Resource availability</topic><topic>Resources</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Snow</topic><topic>Snow accumulation</topic><topic>Snow cover</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Water towers</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tarasova, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knoche, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietrich, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merz, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tarasova, L.</au><au>Knoche, M.</au><au>Dietrich, J.</au><au>Merz, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of input discretization, model complexity, and calibration strategy on model performance in a data‐scarce glacierized catchment in Central Asia</atitle><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle><date>2016-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>4674</spage><epage>4699</epage><pages>4674-4699</pages><issn>0043-1397</issn><eissn>1944-7973</eissn><abstract>Glacierized high‐mountainous catchments are often the water towers for downstream region, and modeling these remote areas are often the only available tool for the assessment of water resources availability. Nevertheless, data scarcity affects different aspects of hydrological modeling in such mountainous glacierized basins. On the example of poorly gauged glacierized catchment in Central Asia, we examined the effects of input discretization, model complexity, and calibration strategy on model performance. The study was conducted with the GSM‐Socont model driven with climatic input from the corrected High Asia Reanalysis data set of two different discretizations. We analyze the effects of the use of long‐term glacier volume loss, snow cover images, and interior runoff as an additional calibration data. In glacierized catchments with winter accumulation type, where the transformation of precipitation into runoff is mainly controlled by snow and glacier melt processes, the spatial discretization of precipitation tends to have less impact on simulated runoff than a correct prediction of the integral precipitation volume. Increasing model complexity by using spatially distributed input or semidistributed parameters values does not increase model performance in the Gunt catchment, as the more complex model tends to be more sensitive to errors in the input data set. In our case, better model performance and quantification of the flow components can be achieved by additional calibration data, rather than by using a more distributed model parameters. However, a semidistributed model better predicts the spatial patterns of snow accumulation and provides more plausible runoff predictions at the interior sites.
Key Points
In glacierized data‐scarce regions increasing model and input complexity not necessarily lead to better performance
Long‐term glacier mass balance modeled with GlabTop is proposed for multiple data set calibration
Calibration data are more important than model or input complexity for model performance</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/2015WR018551</doi><tpages>26</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1397 |
ispartof | Water resources research, 2016-06, Vol.52 (6), p.4674-4699 |
issn | 0043-1397 1944-7973 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808645260 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Accumulation Atmospheric precipitations Availability Basins Calibration Catchment area Catchments Complexity Components Computer simulation Data Data processing data scarcity Datasets Discretization Errors Glacier melting Glaciers Glaciohydrology glacio‐hydrological modeling GSM‐Socont model high Asia reanalysis Hydrologic models Hydrology Mathematical models Modelling Mountains multiple data set calibration Pamir Parameters Precipitation Resource availability Resources Runoff Snow Snow accumulation Snow cover Spatial distribution Strategy Water Water resources Water towers Winter |
title | Effects of input discretization, model complexity, and calibration strategy on model performance in a data‐scarce glacierized catchment in Central Asia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T16%3A37%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20input%20discretization,%20model%20complexity,%20and%20calibration%20strategy%20on%20model%20performance%20in%20a%20data%E2%80%90scarce%20glacierized%20catchment%20in%20Central%20Asia&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20research&rft.au=Tarasova,%20L.&rft.date=2016-06&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=4674&rft.epage=4699&rft.pages=4674-4699&rft.issn=0043-1397&rft.eissn=1944-7973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2015WR018551&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4121038501%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1805225766&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |