Effects of input discretization, model complexity, and calibration strategy on model performance in a data‐scarce glacierized catchment in Central Asia

Glacierized high‐mountainous catchments are often the water towers for downstream region, and modeling these remote areas are often the only available tool for the assessment of water resources availability. Nevertheless, data scarcity affects different aspects of hydrological modeling in such mount...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water resources research 2016-06, Vol.52 (6), p.4674-4699
Hauptverfasser: Tarasova, L., Knoche, M., Dietrich, J., Merz, R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4699
container_issue 6
container_start_page 4674
container_title Water resources research
container_volume 52
creator Tarasova, L.
Knoche, M.
Dietrich, J.
Merz, R.
description Glacierized high‐mountainous catchments are often the water towers for downstream region, and modeling these remote areas are often the only available tool for the assessment of water resources availability. Nevertheless, data scarcity affects different aspects of hydrological modeling in such mountainous glacierized basins. On the example of poorly gauged glacierized catchment in Central Asia, we examined the effects of input discretization, model complexity, and calibration strategy on model performance. The study was conducted with the GSM‐Socont model driven with climatic input from the corrected High Asia Reanalysis data set of two different discretizations. We analyze the effects of the use of long‐term glacier volume loss, snow cover images, and interior runoff as an additional calibration data. In glacierized catchments with winter accumulation type, where the transformation of precipitation into runoff is mainly controlled by snow and glacier melt processes, the spatial discretization of precipitation tends to have less impact on simulated runoff than a correct prediction of the integral precipitation volume. Increasing model complexity by using spatially distributed input or semidistributed parameters values does not increase model performance in the Gunt catchment, as the more complex model tends to be more sensitive to errors in the input data set. In our case, better model performance and quantification of the flow components can be achieved by additional calibration data, rather than by using a more distributed model parameters. However, a semidistributed model better predicts the spatial patterns of snow accumulation and provides more plausible runoff predictions at the interior sites. Key Points In glacierized data‐scarce regions increasing model and input complexity not necessarily lead to better performance Long‐term glacier mass balance modeled with GlabTop is proposed for multiple data set calibration Calibration data are more important than model or input complexity for model performance
doi_str_mv 10.1002/2015WR018551
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808645260</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4121038501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4292-aa286f9d0d75daaa7a8bd1a21b7f99a7f59156a63410566c22f360e4e5517b5d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90c2KFDEQB_AgCo6rNx8g4MXDtCbpfHSOy7DqwoIwKHtsavKxZkl32iSDzp58BK--nk-yGceDeNhTFcWPP0UVQi8peUMJYW8ZoeJ6S-ggBH2EVlRz3imt-sdoRQjvO9pr9RQ9K-WWEMqFVCv068J7Z2rByeMwL_uKbSgmuxruoIY0r_GUrIvYpGmJ7nuohzWG2WIDMezyH4JLbY27OeDWn_Tisk95gtm4looBW6jw-8fPYiC30U0EE1wOd-4YVM2Xyc31CDetZoj4vAR4jp54iMW9-FvP0Od3F582H7qrj-8vN-dXHXCmWQfABum1JVYJCwAKhp2lwOhOea1BeaGpkCB7TomQ0jDme0kcd-1Gaidsf4Zen3KXnL7uXanj1C7gYoTZpX0Z6UAGyQWTpNFX_9HbtM9z226kmnCuiabDg2oggjGhpGxqfVImp1Ky8-OSwwT5MFIyHr85_vvNxvsT_xaiOzxox-vtZssYpay_B_eYoq0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1805225766</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of input discretization, model complexity, and calibration strategy on model performance in a data‐scarce glacierized catchment in Central Asia</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Tarasova, L. ; Knoche, M. ; Dietrich, J. ; Merz, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tarasova, L. ; Knoche, M. ; Dietrich, J. ; Merz, R.</creatorcontrib><description>Glacierized high‐mountainous catchments are often the water towers for downstream region, and modeling these remote areas are often the only available tool for the assessment of water resources availability. Nevertheless, data scarcity affects different aspects of hydrological modeling in such mountainous glacierized basins. On the example of poorly gauged glacierized catchment in Central Asia, we examined the effects of input discretization, model complexity, and calibration strategy on model performance. The study was conducted with the GSM‐Socont model driven with climatic input from the corrected High Asia Reanalysis data set of two different discretizations. We analyze the effects of the use of long‐term glacier volume loss, snow cover images, and interior runoff as an additional calibration data. In glacierized catchments with winter accumulation type, where the transformation of precipitation into runoff is mainly controlled by snow and glacier melt processes, the spatial discretization of precipitation tends to have less impact on simulated runoff than a correct prediction of the integral precipitation volume. Increasing model complexity by using spatially distributed input or semidistributed parameters values does not increase model performance in the Gunt catchment, as the more complex model tends to be more sensitive to errors in the input data set. In our case, better model performance and quantification of the flow components can be achieved by additional calibration data, rather than by using a more distributed model parameters. However, a semidistributed model better predicts the spatial patterns of snow accumulation and provides more plausible runoff predictions at the interior sites. Key Points In glacierized data‐scarce regions increasing model and input complexity not necessarily lead to better performance Long‐term glacier mass balance modeled with GlabTop is proposed for multiple data set calibration Calibration data are more important than model or input complexity for model performance</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2015WR018551</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Accumulation ; Atmospheric precipitations ; Availability ; Basins ; Calibration ; Catchment area ; Catchments ; Complexity ; Components ; Computer simulation ; Data ; Data processing ; data scarcity ; Datasets ; Discretization ; Errors ; Glacier melting ; Glaciers ; Glaciohydrology ; glacio‐hydrological modeling ; GSM‐Socont model ; high Asia reanalysis ; Hydrologic models ; Hydrology ; Mathematical models ; Modelling ; Mountains ; multiple data set calibration ; Pamir ; Parameters ; Precipitation ; Resource availability ; Resources ; Runoff ; Snow ; Snow accumulation ; Snow cover ; Spatial distribution ; Strategy ; Water ; Water resources ; Water towers ; Winter</subject><ispartof>Water resources research, 2016-06, Vol.52 (6), p.4674-4699</ispartof><rights>2016. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4292-aa286f9d0d75daaa7a8bd1a21b7f99a7f59156a63410566c22f360e4e5517b5d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4292-aa286f9d0d75daaa7a8bd1a21b7f99a7f59156a63410566c22f360e4e5517b5d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2015WR018551$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2015WR018551$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,11493,27901,27902,45550,45551,46443,46867</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tarasova, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knoche, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietrich, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merz, R.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of input discretization, model complexity, and calibration strategy on model performance in a data‐scarce glacierized catchment in Central Asia</title><title>Water resources research</title><description>Glacierized high‐mountainous catchments are often the water towers for downstream region, and modeling these remote areas are often the only available tool for the assessment of water resources availability. Nevertheless, data scarcity affects different aspects of hydrological modeling in such mountainous glacierized basins. On the example of poorly gauged glacierized catchment in Central Asia, we examined the effects of input discretization, model complexity, and calibration strategy on model performance. The study was conducted with the GSM‐Socont model driven with climatic input from the corrected High Asia Reanalysis data set of two different discretizations. We analyze the effects of the use of long‐term glacier volume loss, snow cover images, and interior runoff as an additional calibration data. In glacierized catchments with winter accumulation type, where the transformation of precipitation into runoff is mainly controlled by snow and glacier melt processes, the spatial discretization of precipitation tends to have less impact on simulated runoff than a correct prediction of the integral precipitation volume. Increasing model complexity by using spatially distributed input or semidistributed parameters values does not increase model performance in the Gunt catchment, as the more complex model tends to be more sensitive to errors in the input data set. In our case, better model performance and quantification of the flow components can be achieved by additional calibration data, rather than by using a more distributed model parameters. However, a semidistributed model better predicts the spatial patterns of snow accumulation and provides more plausible runoff predictions at the interior sites. Key Points In glacierized data‐scarce regions increasing model and input complexity not necessarily lead to better performance Long‐term glacier mass balance modeled with GlabTop is proposed for multiple data set calibration Calibration data are more important than model or input complexity for model performance</description><subject>Accumulation</subject><subject>Atmospheric precipitations</subject><subject>Availability</subject><subject>Basins</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Catchment area</subject><subject>Catchments</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Components</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>data scarcity</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Discretization</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Glacier melting</subject><subject>Glaciers</subject><subject>Glaciohydrology</subject><subject>glacio‐hydrological modeling</subject><subject>GSM‐Socont model</subject><subject>high Asia reanalysis</subject><subject>Hydrologic models</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>multiple data set calibration</subject><subject>Pamir</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Resource availability</subject><subject>Resources</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Snow</subject><subject>Snow accumulation</subject><subject>Snow cover</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Water towers</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>0043-1397</issn><issn>1944-7973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90c2KFDEQB_AgCo6rNx8g4MXDtCbpfHSOy7DqwoIwKHtsavKxZkl32iSDzp58BK--nk-yGceDeNhTFcWPP0UVQi8peUMJYW8ZoeJ6S-ggBH2EVlRz3imt-sdoRQjvO9pr9RQ9K-WWEMqFVCv068J7Z2rByeMwL_uKbSgmuxruoIY0r_GUrIvYpGmJ7nuohzWG2WIDMezyH4JLbY27OeDWn_Tisk95gtm4looBW6jw-8fPYiC30U0EE1wOd-4YVM2Xyc31CDetZoj4vAR4jp54iMW9-FvP0Od3F582H7qrj-8vN-dXHXCmWQfABum1JVYJCwAKhp2lwOhOea1BeaGpkCB7TomQ0jDme0kcd-1Gaidsf4Zen3KXnL7uXanj1C7gYoTZpX0Z6UAGyQWTpNFX_9HbtM9z226kmnCuiabDg2oggjGhpGxqfVImp1Ky8-OSwwT5MFIyHr85_vvNxvsT_xaiOzxox-vtZssYpay_B_eYoq0</recordid><startdate>201606</startdate><enddate>201606</enddate><creator>Tarasova, L.</creator><creator>Knoche, M.</creator><creator>Dietrich, J.</creator><creator>Merz, R.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201606</creationdate><title>Effects of input discretization, model complexity, and calibration strategy on model performance in a data‐scarce glacierized catchment in Central Asia</title><author>Tarasova, L. ; Knoche, M. ; Dietrich, J. ; Merz, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4292-aa286f9d0d75daaa7a8bd1a21b7f99a7f59156a63410566c22f360e4e5517b5d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Accumulation</topic><topic>Atmospheric precipitations</topic><topic>Availability</topic><topic>Basins</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Catchment area</topic><topic>Catchments</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Components</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>data scarcity</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Discretization</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Glacier melting</topic><topic>Glaciers</topic><topic>Glaciohydrology</topic><topic>glacio‐hydrological modeling</topic><topic>GSM‐Socont model</topic><topic>high Asia reanalysis</topic><topic>Hydrologic models</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>multiple data set calibration</topic><topic>Pamir</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Resource availability</topic><topic>Resources</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Snow</topic><topic>Snow accumulation</topic><topic>Snow cover</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Water towers</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tarasova, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knoche, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietrich, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merz, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tarasova, L.</au><au>Knoche, M.</au><au>Dietrich, J.</au><au>Merz, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of input discretization, model complexity, and calibration strategy on model performance in a data‐scarce glacierized catchment in Central Asia</atitle><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle><date>2016-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>4674</spage><epage>4699</epage><pages>4674-4699</pages><issn>0043-1397</issn><eissn>1944-7973</eissn><abstract>Glacierized high‐mountainous catchments are often the water towers for downstream region, and modeling these remote areas are often the only available tool for the assessment of water resources availability. Nevertheless, data scarcity affects different aspects of hydrological modeling in such mountainous glacierized basins. On the example of poorly gauged glacierized catchment in Central Asia, we examined the effects of input discretization, model complexity, and calibration strategy on model performance. The study was conducted with the GSM‐Socont model driven with climatic input from the corrected High Asia Reanalysis data set of two different discretizations. We analyze the effects of the use of long‐term glacier volume loss, snow cover images, and interior runoff as an additional calibration data. In glacierized catchments with winter accumulation type, where the transformation of precipitation into runoff is mainly controlled by snow and glacier melt processes, the spatial discretization of precipitation tends to have less impact on simulated runoff than a correct prediction of the integral precipitation volume. Increasing model complexity by using spatially distributed input or semidistributed parameters values does not increase model performance in the Gunt catchment, as the more complex model tends to be more sensitive to errors in the input data set. In our case, better model performance and quantification of the flow components can be achieved by additional calibration data, rather than by using a more distributed model parameters. However, a semidistributed model better predicts the spatial patterns of snow accumulation and provides more plausible runoff predictions at the interior sites. Key Points In glacierized data‐scarce regions increasing model and input complexity not necessarily lead to better performance Long‐term glacier mass balance modeled with GlabTop is proposed for multiple data set calibration Calibration data are more important than model or input complexity for model performance</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/2015WR018551</doi><tpages>26</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1397
ispartof Water resources research, 2016-06, Vol.52 (6), p.4674-4699
issn 0043-1397
1944-7973
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808645260
source Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Accumulation
Atmospheric precipitations
Availability
Basins
Calibration
Catchment area
Catchments
Complexity
Components
Computer simulation
Data
Data processing
data scarcity
Datasets
Discretization
Errors
Glacier melting
Glaciers
Glaciohydrology
glacio‐hydrological modeling
GSM‐Socont model
high Asia reanalysis
Hydrologic models
Hydrology
Mathematical models
Modelling
Mountains
multiple data set calibration
Pamir
Parameters
Precipitation
Resource availability
Resources
Runoff
Snow
Snow accumulation
Snow cover
Spatial distribution
Strategy
Water
Water resources
Water towers
Winter
title Effects of input discretization, model complexity, and calibration strategy on model performance in a data‐scarce glacierized catchment in Central Asia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T16%3A37%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20input%20discretization,%20model%20complexity,%20and%20calibration%20strategy%20on%20model%20performance%20in%20a%20data%E2%80%90scarce%20glacierized%20catchment%20in%20Central%20Asia&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20research&rft.au=Tarasova,%20L.&rft.date=2016-06&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=4674&rft.epage=4699&rft.pages=4674-4699&rft.issn=0043-1397&rft.eissn=1944-7973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2015WR018551&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4121038501%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1805225766&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true