Trends in paediatric clinical pharmacology data in US pharmaceutical labelling

Background There is often a lack of safety and efficacy data in the paediatric population at the time of drug approval. Legislative efforts have promoted clinical pharmacology research in this underserved population. We sought to determine the quantity and quality of paediatric clinical pharmacology...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of disease in childhood 2014-09, Vol.99 (9), p.862-865
Hauptverfasser: Samiee-Zafarghandy, Samira, Mazer-Amirshahi, Maryann, van den Anker, Johannes N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 865
container_issue 9
container_start_page 862
container_title Archives of disease in childhood
container_volume 99
creator Samiee-Zafarghandy, Samira
Mazer-Amirshahi, Maryann
van den Anker, Johannes N
description Background There is often a lack of safety and efficacy data in the paediatric population at the time of drug approval. Legislative efforts have promoted clinical pharmacology research in this underserved population. We sought to determine the quantity and quality of paediatric clinical pharmacology data in US drug labelling at the time of initial approval and to evaluate trends over time. Materials and methods The labelling data of 213 new molecular entities approved between 2003 and 2012 were systematically reviewed. The type of paediatric pharmacology data present at the time of approval was recorded and stratified by age group. Labelling revisions were analysed for updated paediatric data. The presence of paediatric-specific black-box warnings was noted. Results Of the 213 drugs evaluated, 48 had adult-specific indications. Of the remaining 165 medicines, only 47 (28%) had paediatric study data at the time of initial labelling. The number of approved drugs with paediatric data was the greatest in 2005 (8, 44%) and was at its lowest point in 2012 (3, 11%). Only five medicines had neonatal data, with none of the anti-infective agents presenting neonatal information. Seven medications had a paediatric-specific black-box warning. Additional 16 medicines presented paediatric data during general labelling updates. Conclusions Despite efforts to improve the quality of paediatric clinical pharmacology data, there was not a significant increase in drugs with paediatric data at the time of approval over this 10-year study period. Paediatric drug approvals and labelling revisions continue to lag behind their adult counterparts.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305605
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808640646</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A381453150</galeid><sourcerecordid>A381453150</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b521t-51ddc496293422f621a215ec4e2411b944c619da0f305057f1dc3ac490e5bb0f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtv1DAUhS0EokPLX0CREBKbgK9f4yyrES-pahdt15ZjOzMeOclgJxL999whU0Bs6MrS1Xeu7zmHkAroBwCuPtrsdj4Wt4vJ14wCrzmVispnZAVCaRwJ8ZysKKW8brTWZ-RVKXtKgWnNX5IzJqnimssVub7LYfClikN1sMFHO-XoKpfiEJ1N1WFnc2_dmMbtQ-XtZI_g_e3jPMzTLyzZNiTUbC_Ii86mEl6f3nNy__nT3eZrfXXz5dvm8qpuJYOpluC9E41iDReMdYqBZSCDE4EJgLYRwilovKUd-qJy3YF33KKCBtm2OD0n75e9hzx-n0OZTI9x4A12CONcDGiqlaBKqP-jUopGMKo5om__QffjnAc0ggsxOt3INUOqXqitTcHEwY3DFH5MGFIK22DQ5-bGXHINQnKQFHm98C6PpeTQmUOOvc0PBqg51mn-rtMc6zRLnSh9czpobvvgfwsf-0Pg3QmwBYvosh1cLH84vcY8xdEZX7i23z_9-5-8D7m1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1828889572</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trends in paediatric clinical pharmacology data in US pharmaceutical labelling</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Samiee-Zafarghandy, Samira ; Mazer-Amirshahi, Maryann ; van den Anker, Johannes N</creator><creatorcontrib>Samiee-Zafarghandy, Samira ; Mazer-Amirshahi, Maryann ; van den Anker, Johannes N</creatorcontrib><description>Background There is often a lack of safety and efficacy data in the paediatric population at the time of drug approval. Legislative efforts have promoted clinical pharmacology research in this underserved population. We sought to determine the quantity and quality of paediatric clinical pharmacology data in US drug labelling at the time of initial approval and to evaluate trends over time. Materials and methods The labelling data of 213 new molecular entities approved between 2003 and 2012 were systematically reviewed. The type of paediatric pharmacology data present at the time of approval was recorded and stratified by age group. Labelling revisions were analysed for updated paediatric data. The presence of paediatric-specific black-box warnings was noted. Results Of the 213 drugs evaluated, 48 had adult-specific indications. Of the remaining 165 medicines, only 47 (28%) had paediatric study data at the time of initial labelling. The number of approved drugs with paediatric data was the greatest in 2005 (8, 44%) and was at its lowest point in 2012 (3, 11%). Only five medicines had neonatal data, with none of the anti-infective agents presenting neonatal information. Seven medications had a paediatric-specific black-box warning. Additional 16 medicines presented paediatric data during general labelling updates. Conclusions Despite efforts to improve the quality of paediatric clinical pharmacology data, there was not a significant increase in drugs with paediatric data at the time of approval over this 10-year study period. Paediatric drug approvals and labelling revisions continue to lag behind their adult counterparts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9888</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305605</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25063835</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ADCHAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age ; Anatomy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cancer ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Communicable Diseases ; Drug approval ; Drug Approval - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Drug dosages ; Drug labeling ; Drug Labeling - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Drug therapy ; Equity ; FDA approval ; General aspects ; Government regulation ; Gynecology ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Irritable bowel syndrome ; Labeling ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; Narcotics ; Neonates ; Oncology ; Ophthalmology ; Patient package inserts ; Pediatrics ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Pharmacology ; Pharmacology, Clinical - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Pharmacology, Clinical - trends ; Population ; Prevention and actions ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Retrospective Studies ; Revisions ; Safety and security measures ; Schizophrenia ; Studies ; United States ; United States Food and Drug Administration</subject><ispartof>Archives of disease in childhood, 2014-09, Vol.99 (9), p.862-865</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2014 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b521t-51ddc496293422f621a215ec4e2411b944c619da0f305057f1dc3ac490e5bb0f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b521t-51ddc496293422f621a215ec4e2411b944c619da0f305057f1dc3ac490e5bb0f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://adc.bmj.com/content/99/9/862.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://adc.bmj.com/content/99/9/862.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,780,784,3196,23571,27924,27925,77600,77631</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28741143$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25063835$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Samiee-Zafarghandy, Samira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazer-Amirshahi, Maryann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Anker, Johannes N</creatorcontrib><title>Trends in paediatric clinical pharmacology data in US pharmaceutical labelling</title><title>Archives of disease in childhood</title><addtitle>Arch Dis Child</addtitle><description>Background There is often a lack of safety and efficacy data in the paediatric population at the time of drug approval. Legislative efforts have promoted clinical pharmacology research in this underserved population. We sought to determine the quantity and quality of paediatric clinical pharmacology data in US drug labelling at the time of initial approval and to evaluate trends over time. Materials and methods The labelling data of 213 new molecular entities approved between 2003 and 2012 were systematically reviewed. The type of paediatric pharmacology data present at the time of approval was recorded and stratified by age group. Labelling revisions were analysed for updated paediatric data. The presence of paediatric-specific black-box warnings was noted. Results Of the 213 drugs evaluated, 48 had adult-specific indications. Of the remaining 165 medicines, only 47 (28%) had paediatric study data at the time of initial labelling. The number of approved drugs with paediatric data was the greatest in 2005 (8, 44%) and was at its lowest point in 2012 (3, 11%). Only five medicines had neonatal data, with none of the anti-infective agents presenting neonatal information. Seven medications had a paediatric-specific black-box warning. Additional 16 medicines presented paediatric data during general labelling updates. Conclusions Despite efforts to improve the quality of paediatric clinical pharmacology data, there was not a significant increase in drugs with paediatric data at the time of approval over this 10-year study period. Paediatric drug approvals and labelling revisions continue to lag behind their adult counterparts.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Communicable Diseases</subject><subject>Drug approval</subject><subject>Drug Approval - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Drug labeling</subject><subject>Drug Labeling - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Equity</subject><subject>FDA approval</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Government regulation</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Irritable bowel syndrome</subject><subject>Labeling</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Narcotics</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Patient package inserts</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Pharmacology</subject><subject>Pharmacology, Clinical - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Pharmacology, Clinical - trends</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Prevention and actions</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Revisions</subject><subject>Safety and security measures</subject><subject>Schizophrenia</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States Food and Drug Administration</subject><issn>0003-9888</issn><issn>1468-2044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtv1DAUhS0EokPLX0CREBKbgK9f4yyrES-pahdt15ZjOzMeOclgJxL999whU0Bs6MrS1Xeu7zmHkAroBwCuPtrsdj4Wt4vJ14wCrzmVispnZAVCaRwJ8ZysKKW8brTWZ-RVKXtKgWnNX5IzJqnimssVub7LYfClikN1sMFHO-XoKpfiEJ1N1WFnc2_dmMbtQ-XtZI_g_e3jPMzTLyzZNiTUbC_Ii86mEl6f3nNy__nT3eZrfXXz5dvm8qpuJYOpluC9E41iDReMdYqBZSCDE4EJgLYRwilovKUd-qJy3YF33KKCBtm2OD0n75e9hzx-n0OZTI9x4A12CONcDGiqlaBKqP-jUopGMKo5om__QffjnAc0ggsxOt3INUOqXqitTcHEwY3DFH5MGFIK22DQ5-bGXHINQnKQFHm98C6PpeTQmUOOvc0PBqg51mn-rtMc6zRLnSh9czpobvvgfwsf-0Pg3QmwBYvosh1cLH84vcY8xdEZX7i23z_9-5-8D7m1</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Samiee-Zafarghandy, Samira</creator><creator>Mazer-Amirshahi, Maryann</creator><creator>van den Anker, Johannes N</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>Trends in paediatric clinical pharmacology data in US pharmaceutical labelling</title><author>Samiee-Zafarghandy, Samira ; Mazer-Amirshahi, Maryann ; van den Anker, Johannes N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b521t-51ddc496293422f621a215ec4e2411b944c619da0f305057f1dc3ac490e5bb0f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Communicable Diseases</topic><topic>Drug approval</topic><topic>Drug Approval - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Drug labeling</topic><topic>Drug Labeling - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Equity</topic><topic>FDA approval</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Government regulation</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Irritable bowel syndrome</topic><topic>Labeling</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Narcotics</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Patient package inserts</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Pharmacology</topic><topic>Pharmacology, Clinical - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Pharmacology, Clinical - trends</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Prevention and actions</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Revisions</topic><topic>Safety and security measures</topic><topic>Schizophrenia</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States Food and Drug Administration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Samiee-Zafarghandy, Samira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazer-Amirshahi, Maryann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Anker, Johannes N</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Samiee-Zafarghandy, Samira</au><au>Mazer-Amirshahi, Maryann</au><au>van den Anker, Johannes N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trends in paediatric clinical pharmacology data in US pharmaceutical labelling</atitle><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Dis Child</addtitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>862</spage><epage>865</epage><pages>862-865</pages><issn>0003-9888</issn><eissn>1468-2044</eissn><coden>ADCHAK</coden><abstract>Background There is often a lack of safety and efficacy data in the paediatric population at the time of drug approval. Legislative efforts have promoted clinical pharmacology research in this underserved population. We sought to determine the quantity and quality of paediatric clinical pharmacology data in US drug labelling at the time of initial approval and to evaluate trends over time. Materials and methods The labelling data of 213 new molecular entities approved between 2003 and 2012 were systematically reviewed. The type of paediatric pharmacology data present at the time of approval was recorded and stratified by age group. Labelling revisions were analysed for updated paediatric data. The presence of paediatric-specific black-box warnings was noted. Results Of the 213 drugs evaluated, 48 had adult-specific indications. Of the remaining 165 medicines, only 47 (28%) had paediatric study data at the time of initial labelling. The number of approved drugs with paediatric data was the greatest in 2005 (8, 44%) and was at its lowest point in 2012 (3, 11%). Only five medicines had neonatal data, with none of the anti-infective agents presenting neonatal information. Seven medications had a paediatric-specific black-box warning. Additional 16 medicines presented paediatric data during general labelling updates. Conclusions Despite efforts to improve the quality of paediatric clinical pharmacology data, there was not a significant increase in drugs with paediatric data at the time of approval over this 10-year study period. Paediatric drug approvals and labelling revisions continue to lag behind their adult counterparts.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group</pub><pmid>25063835</pmid><doi>10.1136/archdischild-2013-305605</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-9888
ispartof Archives of disease in childhood, 2014-09, Vol.99 (9), p.862-865
issn 0003-9888
1468-2044
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808640646
source MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Age
Anatomy
Biological and medical sciences
Cancer
Child
Child, Preschool
Communicable Diseases
Drug approval
Drug Approval - statistics & numerical data
Drug dosages
Drug labeling
Drug Labeling - statistics & numerical data
Drug therapy
Equity
FDA approval
General aspects
Government regulation
Gynecology
Humans
Infectious diseases
Irritable bowel syndrome
Labeling
Laws, regulations and rules
Medical sciences
Miscellaneous
Narcotics
Neonates
Oncology
Ophthalmology
Patient package inserts
Pediatrics
Pharmaceutical industry
Pharmacology
Pharmacology, Clinical - statistics & numerical data
Pharmacology, Clinical - trends
Population
Prevention and actions
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Retrospective Studies
Revisions
Safety and security measures
Schizophrenia
Studies
United States
United States Food and Drug Administration
title Trends in paediatric clinical pharmacology data in US pharmaceutical labelling
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T15%3A25%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trends%20in%20paediatric%20clinical%20pharmacology%20data%20in%20US%20pharmaceutical%20labelling&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20disease%20in%20childhood&rft.au=Samiee-Zafarghandy,%20Samira&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=862&rft.epage=865&rft.pages=862-865&rft.issn=0003-9888&rft.eissn=1468-2044&rft.coden=ADCHAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2013-305605&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA381453150%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1828889572&rft_id=info:pmid/25063835&rft_galeid=A381453150&rfr_iscdi=true