Monitoring tidal volumes in preterm infants at birth: mask versus endotracheal ventilation

Objective Upper airway distention during mask ventilation could reduce gas volumes entering the lung compared with ventilation via an endotracheal tube. Therefore, respiratory tract volumes were measured in lambs and tidal volumes were compared in preterm infants before and after intubation. Design:...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition 2015-01, Vol.100 (1), p.F43-F46
Hauptverfasser: van Vonderen, Jeroen J, Hooper, Stuart B, Krabbe, Vera B, Siew, Melissa L, te Pas, Arjan B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page F46
container_issue 1
container_start_page F43
container_title Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition
container_volume 100
creator van Vonderen, Jeroen J
Hooper, Stuart B
Krabbe, Vera B
Siew, Melissa L
te Pas, Arjan B
description Objective Upper airway distention during mask ventilation could reduce gas volumes entering the lung compared with ventilation via an endotracheal tube. Therefore, respiratory tract volumes were measured in lambs and tidal volumes were compared in preterm infants before and after intubation. Design: In seven preterm lambs, volumes of the airways (oropharynx, trachea, lungs) were assessed. In 10 preterm infants, delta pressures, tidal volumes and leak were measured during ventilation 2 min before (mask ventilation) and 2 min after intubation (endotracheal ventilation). Inflations coinciding with breaths were excluded. Outcome measures Amount of upper airway distention in lambs and differences in inspiratory and expiratory tidal volume before and after intubation. Results In lambs, the combined trachea and oropharynx contributed to 14 (12–21) % (median (IQR), whereas the oropharynx contributed to 9 (7–10) % of the total tidal volume measured at the mouth. In preterm infants, inspiratory (11.1 (7.9–22.6) mL/kg vs 5.8 (3.9–9.6) mL/kg (p=0.01)) and expiratory (8.3 (6.8–15.4) mL/kg vs 4.9 (3.9–9.6) mL/kg (p=0.02)) tidal volumes were significantly larger during mask ventilation compared with endotracheal ventilation. Leak was 18.7 (3.3–28.7) % before versus 0 (0–2.3) % after intubation (p0.05). During mask ventilation, expiratory tidal volume increased from 10.0 (5.4–15.6) mL/kg to 11.3 (7.6–17.0) mL/kg (p=0.01), but remained unchanged during endotracheal ventilation. Conclusions During neonatal mask ventilation, distention of the upper respiratory tract contributes to the tidal volumes measured and should be taken into account when targeting tidal volumes during mask ventilation.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306614
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808633315</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1808633315</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b470t-7dd35c9b3a9f2915cad2be00d4940c14dcb8de65c66325f59e352f6eafb2910f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkT1vFDEQhi0URMLBX0CW0qRZGH_umi6KEkAKooGGxvLaXs7Hrn2xvZH49_HpAkI0ofLIet4ZzTwIYQJvCWHyncl260Kx2zC7jgLhHQMpCX-GzgiXQ_sS9KTVTKiOKjWcopel7ACA9H3_Ap1SQTmAgDP0_XOKoaYc4g9cgzMzvk_zuviCQ8T77KvPSysnE2vBpuIx5Lp9jxdTfuJ7n8tasI8u1Wzs1h_SPtYwmxpSfIWeT2Yu_vXju0Hfbq6_Xn3sbr98-HR1eduNvIfa9c4xYdXIjJqoIsIaR0cP4LjiYAl3dhycl8JKyaiYhPJM0El6M40Nh4lt0MWx7z6nu9WXqpd2Gj_PJvq0Fk0GGCRjjIinUcl60YNo-Aad_4Pu0ppjW0STfgAuiBK0UcORsjmVkv2k9zksJv_SBPRBlf5blT6o0kdVLfrmccA6Lt79Cf520wB2BMZl9_9tHwDLvqRO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1780451952</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Monitoring tidal volumes in preterm infants at birth: mask versus endotracheal ventilation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>van Vonderen, Jeroen J ; Hooper, Stuart B ; Krabbe, Vera B ; Siew, Melissa L ; te Pas, Arjan B</creator><creatorcontrib>van Vonderen, Jeroen J ; Hooper, Stuart B ; Krabbe, Vera B ; Siew, Melissa L ; te Pas, Arjan B</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Upper airway distention during mask ventilation could reduce gas volumes entering the lung compared with ventilation via an endotracheal tube. Therefore, respiratory tract volumes were measured in lambs and tidal volumes were compared in preterm infants before and after intubation. Design: In seven preterm lambs, volumes of the airways (oropharynx, trachea, lungs) were assessed. In 10 preterm infants, delta pressures, tidal volumes and leak were measured during ventilation 2 min before (mask ventilation) and 2 min after intubation (endotracheal ventilation). Inflations coinciding with breaths were excluded. Outcome measures Amount of upper airway distention in lambs and differences in inspiratory and expiratory tidal volume before and after intubation. Results In lambs, the combined trachea and oropharynx contributed to 14 (12–21) % (median (IQR), whereas the oropharynx contributed to 9 (7–10) % of the total tidal volume measured at the mouth. In preterm infants, inspiratory (11.1 (7.9–22.6) mL/kg vs 5.8 (3.9–9.6) mL/kg (p=0.01)) and expiratory (8.3 (6.8–15.4) mL/kg vs 4.9 (3.9–9.6) mL/kg (p=0.02)) tidal volumes were significantly larger during mask ventilation compared with endotracheal ventilation. Leak was 18.7 (3.3–28.7) % before versus 0 (0–2.3) % after intubation (p&lt;0.0001). Delta pressure was 23.7 (20.8–25.6) cm H2O before versus 24.8 (20.8–26.0) cm H2O after intubation (p&gt;0.05). During mask ventilation, expiratory tidal volume increased from 10.0 (5.4–15.6) mL/kg to 11.3 (7.6–17.0) mL/kg (p=0.01), but remained unchanged during endotracheal ventilation. Conclusions During neonatal mask ventilation, distention of the upper respiratory tract contributes to the tidal volumes measured and should be taken into account when targeting tidal volumes during mask ventilation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1359-2998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306614</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25240050</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Animals ; Female ; Gas flow ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Infant, Premature - physiology ; Infants ; Intubation ; Intubation, Intratracheal ; Laryngeal Masks ; Lungs ; Male ; Masks ; Oropharynx - physiology ; Premature birth ; Respiratory tract ; Sheep ; Traumatic brain injury ; Ventilation</subject><ispartof>Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2015-01, Vol.100 (1), p.F43-F46</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2015 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b470t-7dd35c9b3a9f2915cad2be00d4940c14dcb8de65c66325f59e352f6eafb2910f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b470t-7dd35c9b3a9f2915cad2be00d4940c14dcb8de65c66325f59e352f6eafb2910f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://fn.bmj.com/content/100/1/F43.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://fn.bmj.com/content/100/1/F43.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,780,784,3194,23570,27923,27924,77371,77402</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25240050$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Vonderen, Jeroen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooper, Stuart B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krabbe, Vera B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siew, Melissa L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>te Pas, Arjan B</creatorcontrib><title>Monitoring tidal volumes in preterm infants at birth: mask versus endotracheal ventilation</title><title>Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition</title><addtitle>Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed</addtitle><description>Objective Upper airway distention during mask ventilation could reduce gas volumes entering the lung compared with ventilation via an endotracheal tube. Therefore, respiratory tract volumes were measured in lambs and tidal volumes were compared in preterm infants before and after intubation. Design: In seven preterm lambs, volumes of the airways (oropharynx, trachea, lungs) were assessed. In 10 preterm infants, delta pressures, tidal volumes and leak were measured during ventilation 2 min before (mask ventilation) and 2 min after intubation (endotracheal ventilation). Inflations coinciding with breaths were excluded. Outcome measures Amount of upper airway distention in lambs and differences in inspiratory and expiratory tidal volume before and after intubation. Results In lambs, the combined trachea and oropharynx contributed to 14 (12–21) % (median (IQR), whereas the oropharynx contributed to 9 (7–10) % of the total tidal volume measured at the mouth. In preterm infants, inspiratory (11.1 (7.9–22.6) mL/kg vs 5.8 (3.9–9.6) mL/kg (p=0.01)) and expiratory (8.3 (6.8–15.4) mL/kg vs 4.9 (3.9–9.6) mL/kg (p=0.02)) tidal volumes were significantly larger during mask ventilation compared with endotracheal ventilation. Leak was 18.7 (3.3–28.7) % before versus 0 (0–2.3) % after intubation (p&lt;0.0001). Delta pressure was 23.7 (20.8–25.6) cm H2O before versus 24.8 (20.8–26.0) cm H2O after intubation (p&gt;0.05). During mask ventilation, expiratory tidal volume increased from 10.0 (5.4–15.6) mL/kg to 11.3 (7.6–17.0) mL/kg (p=0.01), but remained unchanged during endotracheal ventilation. Conclusions During neonatal mask ventilation, distention of the upper respiratory tract contributes to the tidal volumes measured and should be taken into account when targeting tidal volumes during mask ventilation.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gas flow</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infant, Premature - physiology</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal</subject><subject>Laryngeal Masks</subject><subject>Lungs</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Masks</subject><subject>Oropharynx - physiology</subject><subject>Premature birth</subject><subject>Respiratory tract</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>Traumatic brain injury</subject><subject>Ventilation</subject><issn>1359-2998</issn><issn>1468-2052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkT1vFDEQhi0URMLBX0CW0qRZGH_umi6KEkAKooGGxvLaXs7Hrn2xvZH49_HpAkI0ofLIet4ZzTwIYQJvCWHyncl260Kx2zC7jgLhHQMpCX-GzgiXQ_sS9KTVTKiOKjWcopel7ACA9H3_Ap1SQTmAgDP0_XOKoaYc4g9cgzMzvk_zuviCQ8T77KvPSysnE2vBpuIx5Lp9jxdTfuJ7n8tasI8u1Wzs1h_SPtYwmxpSfIWeT2Yu_vXju0Hfbq6_Xn3sbr98-HR1eduNvIfa9c4xYdXIjJqoIsIaR0cP4LjiYAl3dhycl8JKyaiYhPJM0El6M40Nh4lt0MWx7z6nu9WXqpd2Gj_PJvq0Fk0GGCRjjIinUcl60YNo-Aad_4Pu0ppjW0STfgAuiBK0UcORsjmVkv2k9zksJv_SBPRBlf5blT6o0kdVLfrmccA6Lt79Cf520wB2BMZl9_9tHwDLvqRO</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>van Vonderen, Jeroen J</creator><creator>Hooper, Stuart B</creator><creator>Krabbe, Vera B</creator><creator>Siew, Melissa L</creator><creator>te Pas, Arjan B</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Monitoring tidal volumes in preterm infants at birth: mask versus endotracheal ventilation</title><author>van Vonderen, Jeroen J ; Hooper, Stuart B ; Krabbe, Vera B ; Siew, Melissa L ; te Pas, Arjan B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b470t-7dd35c9b3a9f2915cad2be00d4940c14dcb8de65c66325f59e352f6eafb2910f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gas flow</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infant, Premature - physiology</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal</topic><topic>Laryngeal Masks</topic><topic>Lungs</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Masks</topic><topic>Oropharynx - physiology</topic><topic>Premature birth</topic><topic>Respiratory tract</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>Traumatic brain injury</topic><topic>Ventilation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Vonderen, Jeroen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooper, Stuart B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krabbe, Vera B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siew, Melissa L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>te Pas, Arjan B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Vonderen, Jeroen J</au><au>Hooper, Stuart B</au><au>Krabbe, Vera B</au><au>Siew, Melissa L</au><au>te Pas, Arjan B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Monitoring tidal volumes in preterm infants at birth: mask versus endotracheal ventilation</atitle><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed</addtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>F43</spage><epage>F46</epage><pages>F43-F46</pages><issn>1359-2998</issn><eissn>1468-2052</eissn><abstract>Objective Upper airway distention during mask ventilation could reduce gas volumes entering the lung compared with ventilation via an endotracheal tube. Therefore, respiratory tract volumes were measured in lambs and tidal volumes were compared in preterm infants before and after intubation. Design: In seven preterm lambs, volumes of the airways (oropharynx, trachea, lungs) were assessed. In 10 preterm infants, delta pressures, tidal volumes and leak were measured during ventilation 2 min before (mask ventilation) and 2 min after intubation (endotracheal ventilation). Inflations coinciding with breaths were excluded. Outcome measures Amount of upper airway distention in lambs and differences in inspiratory and expiratory tidal volume before and after intubation. Results In lambs, the combined trachea and oropharynx contributed to 14 (12–21) % (median (IQR), whereas the oropharynx contributed to 9 (7–10) % of the total tidal volume measured at the mouth. In preterm infants, inspiratory (11.1 (7.9–22.6) mL/kg vs 5.8 (3.9–9.6) mL/kg (p=0.01)) and expiratory (8.3 (6.8–15.4) mL/kg vs 4.9 (3.9–9.6) mL/kg (p=0.02)) tidal volumes were significantly larger during mask ventilation compared with endotracheal ventilation. Leak was 18.7 (3.3–28.7) % before versus 0 (0–2.3) % after intubation (p&lt;0.0001). Delta pressure was 23.7 (20.8–25.6) cm H2O before versus 24.8 (20.8–26.0) cm H2O after intubation (p&gt;0.05). During mask ventilation, expiratory tidal volume increased from 10.0 (5.4–15.6) mL/kg to 11.3 (7.6–17.0) mL/kg (p=0.01), but remained unchanged during endotracheal ventilation. Conclusions During neonatal mask ventilation, distention of the upper respiratory tract contributes to the tidal volumes measured and should be taken into account when targeting tidal volumes during mask ventilation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>25240050</pmid><doi>10.1136/archdischild-2014-306614</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1359-2998
ispartof Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2015-01, Vol.100 (1), p.F43-F46
issn 1359-2998
1468-2052
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808633315
source MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2
subjects Animals
Female
Gas flow
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Premature - physiology
Infants
Intubation
Intubation, Intratracheal
Laryngeal Masks
Lungs
Male
Masks
Oropharynx - physiology
Premature birth
Respiratory tract
Sheep
Traumatic brain injury
Ventilation
title Monitoring tidal volumes in preterm infants at birth: mask versus endotracheal ventilation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T19%3A46%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Monitoring%20tidal%20volumes%20in%20preterm%20infants%20at%20birth:%20mask%20versus%20endotracheal%20ventilation&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20disease%20in%20childhood.%20Fetal%20and%20neonatal%20edition&rft.au=van%20Vonderen,%20Jeroen%20J&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=F43&rft.epage=F46&rft.pages=F43-F46&rft.issn=1359-2998&rft.eissn=1468-2052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2014-306614&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1808633315%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1780451952&rft_id=info:pmid/25240050&rfr_iscdi=true