Modelling marine protected areas: insights and hurdles
Models provide useful insights into conservation and resource management issues and solutions. Their use to date has highlighted conditions under which no-take marine protected areas (MPAs) may help us to achieve the goals of ecosystem-based management by reducing pressures, and where they might fai...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences 2015-11, Vol.370 (1681), p.1-17 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 17 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1681 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences |
container_volume | 370 |
creator | Fulton, Elizabeth A. Bax, Nicholas J. Bustamante, Rodrigo H. Dambacher, Jeffrey M. Dichmont, Catherine Dunstan, Piers K. Hayes, Keith R. Hobday, Alistair J. Pitcher, Roland Plagányi, Éva E. Punt, André E. Savina-Rolland, Marie Smith, Anthony D. M. Smith, David C. |
description | Models provide useful insights into conservation and resource management issues and solutions. Their use to date has highlighted conditions under which no-take marine protected areas (MPAs) may help us to achieve the goals of ecosystem-based management by reducing pressures, and where they might fail to achieve desired goals. For example, static reserve designs are unlikely to achieve desired objectives when applied to mobile species or when compromised by climate-related ecosystem restructuring and range shifts. Modelling tools allow planners to explore a range of options, such as basing MPAs on the presence of dynamic oceanic features, and to evaluate the potential future impacts of alternative interventions compared with 'no-action' counterfactuals, under a range of environmental and development scenarios. The modelling environment allows the analyst to test if indicators and management strategies are robust to uncertainties in how the ecosystem (and the broader human–ecosystem combination) operates, including the direct and indirect ecological effects of protection. Moreover, modelling results can be presented at multiple spatial and temporal scales, and relative to ecological, economic and social objectives. This helps to reveal potential 'surprises', such as regime shifts, trophic cascades and bottlenecks in human responses. Using illustrative examples, this paper briefly covers the history of the use of simulation models for evaluating MPA options, and discusses their utility and limitations for informing protected area management in the marine realm. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1098/rstb.2014.0278 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808632720</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24768288</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24768288</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c623t-9af02769687f3cf0001215943b229dc6271e94f6922e53d7bfd30148f29173493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1v1DAQxS0Eokvhyg2UIxyyzNiOPzgglQraSouQoJytbOLsesnGi52stPz1OE0pLQg4WbZ_8-bNPEKeIswRtHoVYr-cU0A-ByrVPTJDLjGnWsJ9MgMtaK44E0fkUYwbANCF5A_JERVcADKcEfHB17ZtXbfKtmVwnc12wfe26m2dlcGW8XXmuuhW6z5mZVdn6yHUrY2PyYOmbKN9cn0eky_v312enueLj2cXpyeLvBKU9bkum2RLaKFkw6omGUCKheZsSamuEyPRat4ITaktWC2XTc3SLKqhGiXjmh2TN5PublhubV3Zrg9la3bBJbcH40tn7v50bm1Wfm-4SItgRRJ4OQmsfys7P1mY8Q04BZCg9pjYF9fNgv822NibrYtV2k7ZWT9EgwqUYFRS-D8qKUVVaMkSOp_QKvgYg21ubCCYMUMzZmjGDM2YYSp4fnvmG_xnaAlgExD8IS3fV872B7PxQ-jS9e-yX_9V9enz5ds9k-BQKDSgGIIoEJn57naTVPo0LsbBmivkrvyf3Z5N3Tax9-HXDFwKRZViPwD67NOC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1722185973</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modelling marine protected areas: insights and hurdles</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Fulton, Elizabeth A. ; Bax, Nicholas J. ; Bustamante, Rodrigo H. ; Dambacher, Jeffrey M. ; Dichmont, Catherine ; Dunstan, Piers K. ; Hayes, Keith R. ; Hobday, Alistair J. ; Pitcher, Roland ; Plagányi, Éva E. ; Punt, André E. ; Savina-Rolland, Marie ; Smith, Anthony D. M. ; Smith, David C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fulton, Elizabeth A. ; Bax, Nicholas J. ; Bustamante, Rodrigo H. ; Dambacher, Jeffrey M. ; Dichmont, Catherine ; Dunstan, Piers K. ; Hayes, Keith R. ; Hobday, Alistair J. ; Pitcher, Roland ; Plagányi, Éva E. ; Punt, André E. ; Savina-Rolland, Marie ; Smith, Anthony D. M. ; Smith, David C.</creatorcontrib><description>Models provide useful insights into conservation and resource management issues and solutions. Their use to date has highlighted conditions under which no-take marine protected areas (MPAs) may help us to achieve the goals of ecosystem-based management by reducing pressures, and where they might fail to achieve desired goals. For example, static reserve designs are unlikely to achieve desired objectives when applied to mobile species or when compromised by climate-related ecosystem restructuring and range shifts. Modelling tools allow planners to explore a range of options, such as basing MPAs on the presence of dynamic oceanic features, and to evaluate the potential future impacts of alternative interventions compared with 'no-action' counterfactuals, under a range of environmental and development scenarios. The modelling environment allows the analyst to test if indicators and management strategies are robust to uncertainties in how the ecosystem (and the broader human–ecosystem combination) operates, including the direct and indirect ecological effects of protection. Moreover, modelling results can be presented at multiple spatial and temporal scales, and relative to ecological, economic and social objectives. This helps to reveal potential 'surprises', such as regime shifts, trophic cascades and bottlenecks in human responses. Using illustrative examples, this paper briefly covers the history of the use of simulation models for evaluating MPA options, and discusses their utility and limitations for informing protected area management in the marine realm.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2970</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0278</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26460131</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Royal Society</publisher><subject>Animals ; Climate ; Conservation of Natural Resources - methods ; Coral Reefs ; Counterfactual ; Ecosystem ; Humans ; Life Sciences ; Marine Biology ; Modelling ; Models, Biological ; Mpa ; Review ; Sciences of the Universe ; Spatial Management</subject><ispartof>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2015-11, Vol.370 (1681), p.1-17</ispartof><rights>The Royal Society 2015</rights><rights>2015 The Author(s)</rights><rights>2015 The Author(s).</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><rights>2015 The Author(s) 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c623t-9af02769687f3cf0001215943b229dc6271e94f6922e53d7bfd30148f29173493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c623t-9af02769687f3cf0001215943b229dc6271e94f6922e53d7bfd30148f29173493</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9787-338X ; 0000-0002-4740-4200 ; 0000-0001-9762-3295</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24768288$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24768288$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,799,881,27901,27902,53766,53768,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26460131$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04200708$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fulton, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bax, Nicholas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bustamante, Rodrigo H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dambacher, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dichmont, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunstan, Piers K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Keith R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hobday, Alistair J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitcher, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plagányi, Éva E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Punt, André E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savina-Rolland, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Anthony D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, David C.</creatorcontrib><title>Modelling marine protected areas: insights and hurdles</title><title>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B</addtitle><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><description>Models provide useful insights into conservation and resource management issues and solutions. Their use to date has highlighted conditions under which no-take marine protected areas (MPAs) may help us to achieve the goals of ecosystem-based management by reducing pressures, and where they might fail to achieve desired goals. For example, static reserve designs are unlikely to achieve desired objectives when applied to mobile species or when compromised by climate-related ecosystem restructuring and range shifts. Modelling tools allow planners to explore a range of options, such as basing MPAs on the presence of dynamic oceanic features, and to evaluate the potential future impacts of alternative interventions compared with 'no-action' counterfactuals, under a range of environmental and development scenarios. The modelling environment allows the analyst to test if indicators and management strategies are robust to uncertainties in how the ecosystem (and the broader human–ecosystem combination) operates, including the direct and indirect ecological effects of protection. Moreover, modelling results can be presented at multiple spatial and temporal scales, and relative to ecological, economic and social objectives. This helps to reveal potential 'surprises', such as regime shifts, trophic cascades and bottlenecks in human responses. Using illustrative examples, this paper briefly covers the history of the use of simulation models for evaluating MPA options, and discusses their utility and limitations for informing protected area management in the marine realm.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</subject><subject>Coral Reefs</subject><subject>Counterfactual</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine Biology</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Mpa</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Sciences of the Universe</subject><subject>Spatial Management</subject><issn>0962-8436</issn><issn>1471-2970</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1v1DAQxS0Eokvhyg2UIxyyzNiOPzgglQraSouQoJytbOLsesnGi52stPz1OE0pLQg4WbZ_8-bNPEKeIswRtHoVYr-cU0A-ByrVPTJDLjGnWsJ9MgMtaK44E0fkUYwbANCF5A_JERVcADKcEfHB17ZtXbfKtmVwnc12wfe26m2dlcGW8XXmuuhW6z5mZVdn6yHUrY2PyYOmbKN9cn0eky_v312enueLj2cXpyeLvBKU9bkum2RLaKFkw6omGUCKheZsSamuEyPRat4ITaktWC2XTc3SLKqhGiXjmh2TN5PublhubV3Zrg9la3bBJbcH40tn7v50bm1Wfm-4SItgRRJ4OQmsfys7P1mY8Q04BZCg9pjYF9fNgv822NibrYtV2k7ZWT9EgwqUYFRS-D8qKUVVaMkSOp_QKvgYg21ubCCYMUMzZmjGDM2YYSp4fnvmG_xnaAlgExD8IS3fV872B7PxQ-jS9e-yX_9V9enz5ds9k-BQKDSgGIIoEJn57naTVPo0LsbBmivkrvyf3Z5N3Tax9-HXDFwKRZViPwD67NOC</recordid><startdate>20151105</startdate><enddate>20151105</enddate><creator>Fulton, Elizabeth A.</creator><creator>Bax, Nicholas J.</creator><creator>Bustamante, Rodrigo H.</creator><creator>Dambacher, Jeffrey M.</creator><creator>Dichmont, Catherine</creator><creator>Dunstan, Piers K.</creator><creator>Hayes, Keith R.</creator><creator>Hobday, Alistair J.</creator><creator>Pitcher, Roland</creator><creator>Plagányi, Éva E.</creator><creator>Punt, André E.</creator><creator>Savina-Rolland, Marie</creator><creator>Smith, Anthony D. M.</creator><creator>Smith, David C.</creator><general>Royal Society</general><general>The Royal Society</general><general>Royal Society, The</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9787-338X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4740-4200</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9762-3295</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20151105</creationdate><title>Modelling marine protected areas: insights and hurdles</title><author>Fulton, Elizabeth A. ; Bax, Nicholas J. ; Bustamante, Rodrigo H. ; Dambacher, Jeffrey M. ; Dichmont, Catherine ; Dunstan, Piers K. ; Hayes, Keith R. ; Hobday, Alistair J. ; Pitcher, Roland ; Plagányi, Éva E. ; Punt, André E. ; Savina-Rolland, Marie ; Smith, Anthony D. M. ; Smith, David C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c623t-9af02769687f3cf0001215943b229dc6271e94f6922e53d7bfd30148f29173493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</topic><topic>Coral Reefs</topic><topic>Counterfactual</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine Biology</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Mpa</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Sciences of the Universe</topic><topic>Spatial Management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fulton, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bax, Nicholas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bustamante, Rodrigo H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dambacher, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dichmont, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunstan, Piers K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Keith R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hobday, Alistair J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitcher, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plagányi, Éva E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Punt, André E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savina-Rolland, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Anthony D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, David C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fulton, Elizabeth A.</au><au>Bax, Nicholas J.</au><au>Bustamante, Rodrigo H.</au><au>Dambacher, Jeffrey M.</au><au>Dichmont, Catherine</au><au>Dunstan, Piers K.</au><au>Hayes, Keith R.</au><au>Hobday, Alistair J.</au><au>Pitcher, Roland</au><au>Plagányi, Éva E.</au><au>Punt, André E.</au><au>Savina-Rolland, Marie</au><au>Smith, Anthony D. M.</au><au>Smith, David C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modelling marine protected areas: insights and hurdles</atitle><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle><stitle>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B</stitle><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2015-11-05</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>370</volume><issue>1681</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>1-17</pages><issn>0962-8436</issn><eissn>1471-2970</eissn><abstract>Models provide useful insights into conservation and resource management issues and solutions. Their use to date has highlighted conditions under which no-take marine protected areas (MPAs) may help us to achieve the goals of ecosystem-based management by reducing pressures, and where they might fail to achieve desired goals. For example, static reserve designs are unlikely to achieve desired objectives when applied to mobile species or when compromised by climate-related ecosystem restructuring and range shifts. Modelling tools allow planners to explore a range of options, such as basing MPAs on the presence of dynamic oceanic features, and to evaluate the potential future impacts of alternative interventions compared with 'no-action' counterfactuals, under a range of environmental and development scenarios. The modelling environment allows the analyst to test if indicators and management strategies are robust to uncertainties in how the ecosystem (and the broader human–ecosystem combination) operates, including the direct and indirect ecological effects of protection. Moreover, modelling results can be presented at multiple spatial and temporal scales, and relative to ecological, economic and social objectives. This helps to reveal potential 'surprises', such as regime shifts, trophic cascades and bottlenecks in human responses. Using illustrative examples, this paper briefly covers the history of the use of simulation models for evaluating MPA options, and discusses their utility and limitations for informing protected area management in the marine realm.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Royal Society</pub><pmid>26460131</pmid><doi>10.1098/rstb.2014.0278</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9787-338X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4740-4200</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9762-3295</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0962-8436 |
ispartof | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2015-11, Vol.370 (1681), p.1-17 |
issn | 0962-8436 1471-2970 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808632720 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; PubMed Central |
subjects | Animals Climate Conservation of Natural Resources - methods Coral Reefs Counterfactual Ecosystem Humans Life Sciences Marine Biology Modelling Models, Biological Mpa Review Sciences of the Universe Spatial Management |
title | Modelling marine protected areas: insights and hurdles |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T22%3A47%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modelling%20marine%20protected%20areas:%20insights%20and%20hurdles&rft.jtitle=Philosophical%20transactions%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society%20of%20London.%20Series%20B.%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Fulton,%20Elizabeth%20A.&rft.date=2015-11-05&rft.volume=370&rft.issue=1681&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=1-17&rft.issn=0962-8436&rft.eissn=1471-2970&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rstb.2014.0278&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24768288%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1722185973&rft_id=info:pmid/26460131&rft_jstor_id=24768288&rfr_iscdi=true |