Modelling marine protected areas: insights and hurdles

Models provide useful insights into conservation and resource management issues and solutions. Their use to date has highlighted conditions under which no-take marine protected areas (MPAs) may help us to achieve the goals of ecosystem-based management by reducing pressures, and where they might fai...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences 2015-11, Vol.370 (1681), p.1-17
Hauptverfasser: Fulton, Elizabeth A., Bax, Nicholas J., Bustamante, Rodrigo H., Dambacher, Jeffrey M., Dichmont, Catherine, Dunstan, Piers K., Hayes, Keith R., Hobday, Alistair J., Pitcher, Roland, Plagányi, Éva E., Punt, André E., Savina-Rolland, Marie, Smith, Anthony D. M., Smith, David C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 17
container_issue 1681
container_start_page 1
container_title Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences
container_volume 370
creator Fulton, Elizabeth A.
Bax, Nicholas J.
Bustamante, Rodrigo H.
Dambacher, Jeffrey M.
Dichmont, Catherine
Dunstan, Piers K.
Hayes, Keith R.
Hobday, Alistair J.
Pitcher, Roland
Plagányi, Éva E.
Punt, André E.
Savina-Rolland, Marie
Smith, Anthony D. M.
Smith, David C.
description Models provide useful insights into conservation and resource management issues and solutions. Their use to date has highlighted conditions under which no-take marine protected areas (MPAs) may help us to achieve the goals of ecosystem-based management by reducing pressures, and where they might fail to achieve desired goals. For example, static reserve designs are unlikely to achieve desired objectives when applied to mobile species or when compromised by climate-related ecosystem restructuring and range shifts. Modelling tools allow planners to explore a range of options, such as basing MPAs on the presence of dynamic oceanic features, and to evaluate the potential future impacts of alternative interventions compared with 'no-action' counterfactuals, under a range of environmental and development scenarios. The modelling environment allows the analyst to test if indicators and management strategies are robust to uncertainties in how the ecosystem (and the broader human–ecosystem combination) operates, including the direct and indirect ecological effects of protection. Moreover, modelling results can be presented at multiple spatial and temporal scales, and relative to ecological, economic and social objectives. This helps to reveal potential 'surprises', such as regime shifts, trophic cascades and bottlenecks in human responses. Using illustrative examples, this paper briefly covers the history of the use of simulation models for evaluating MPA options, and discusses their utility and limitations for informing protected area management in the marine realm.
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rstb.2014.0278
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808632720</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24768288</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24768288</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c623t-9af02769687f3cf0001215943b229dc6271e94f6922e53d7bfd30148f29173493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1v1DAQxS0Eokvhyg2UIxyyzNiOPzgglQraSouQoJytbOLsesnGi52stPz1OE0pLQg4WbZ_8-bNPEKeIswRtHoVYr-cU0A-ByrVPTJDLjGnWsJ9MgMtaK44E0fkUYwbANCF5A_JERVcADKcEfHB17ZtXbfKtmVwnc12wfe26m2dlcGW8XXmuuhW6z5mZVdn6yHUrY2PyYOmbKN9cn0eky_v312enueLj2cXpyeLvBKU9bkum2RLaKFkw6omGUCKheZsSamuEyPRat4ITaktWC2XTc3SLKqhGiXjmh2TN5PublhubV3Zrg9la3bBJbcH40tn7v50bm1Wfm-4SItgRRJ4OQmsfys7P1mY8Q04BZCg9pjYF9fNgv822NibrYtV2k7ZWT9EgwqUYFRS-D8qKUVVaMkSOp_QKvgYg21ubCCYMUMzZmjGDM2YYSp4fnvmG_xnaAlgExD8IS3fV872B7PxQ-jS9e-yX_9V9enz5ds9k-BQKDSgGIIoEJn57naTVPo0LsbBmivkrvyf3Z5N3Tax9-HXDFwKRZViPwD67NOC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1722185973</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modelling marine protected areas: insights and hurdles</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Fulton, Elizabeth A. ; Bax, Nicholas J. ; Bustamante, Rodrigo H. ; Dambacher, Jeffrey M. ; Dichmont, Catherine ; Dunstan, Piers K. ; Hayes, Keith R. ; Hobday, Alistair J. ; Pitcher, Roland ; Plagányi, Éva E. ; Punt, André E. ; Savina-Rolland, Marie ; Smith, Anthony D. M. ; Smith, David C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fulton, Elizabeth A. ; Bax, Nicholas J. ; Bustamante, Rodrigo H. ; Dambacher, Jeffrey M. ; Dichmont, Catherine ; Dunstan, Piers K. ; Hayes, Keith R. ; Hobday, Alistair J. ; Pitcher, Roland ; Plagányi, Éva E. ; Punt, André E. ; Savina-Rolland, Marie ; Smith, Anthony D. M. ; Smith, David C.</creatorcontrib><description>Models provide useful insights into conservation and resource management issues and solutions. Their use to date has highlighted conditions under which no-take marine protected areas (MPAs) may help us to achieve the goals of ecosystem-based management by reducing pressures, and where they might fail to achieve desired goals. For example, static reserve designs are unlikely to achieve desired objectives when applied to mobile species or when compromised by climate-related ecosystem restructuring and range shifts. Modelling tools allow planners to explore a range of options, such as basing MPAs on the presence of dynamic oceanic features, and to evaluate the potential future impacts of alternative interventions compared with 'no-action' counterfactuals, under a range of environmental and development scenarios. The modelling environment allows the analyst to test if indicators and management strategies are robust to uncertainties in how the ecosystem (and the broader human–ecosystem combination) operates, including the direct and indirect ecological effects of protection. Moreover, modelling results can be presented at multiple spatial and temporal scales, and relative to ecological, economic and social objectives. This helps to reveal potential 'surprises', such as regime shifts, trophic cascades and bottlenecks in human responses. Using illustrative examples, this paper briefly covers the history of the use of simulation models for evaluating MPA options, and discusses their utility and limitations for informing protected area management in the marine realm.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2970</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0278</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26460131</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Royal Society</publisher><subject>Animals ; Climate ; Conservation of Natural Resources - methods ; Coral Reefs ; Counterfactual ; Ecosystem ; Humans ; Life Sciences ; Marine Biology ; Modelling ; Models, Biological ; Mpa ; Review ; Sciences of the Universe ; Spatial Management</subject><ispartof>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2015-11, Vol.370 (1681), p.1-17</ispartof><rights>The Royal Society 2015</rights><rights>2015 The Author(s)</rights><rights>2015 The Author(s).</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><rights>2015 The Author(s) 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c623t-9af02769687f3cf0001215943b229dc6271e94f6922e53d7bfd30148f29173493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c623t-9af02769687f3cf0001215943b229dc6271e94f6922e53d7bfd30148f29173493</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9787-338X ; 0000-0002-4740-4200 ; 0000-0001-9762-3295</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24768288$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24768288$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,799,881,27901,27902,53766,53768,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26460131$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04200708$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fulton, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bax, Nicholas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bustamante, Rodrigo H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dambacher, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dichmont, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunstan, Piers K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Keith R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hobday, Alistair J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitcher, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plagányi, Éva E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Punt, André E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savina-Rolland, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Anthony D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, David C.</creatorcontrib><title>Modelling marine protected areas: insights and hurdles</title><title>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B</addtitle><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><description>Models provide useful insights into conservation and resource management issues and solutions. Their use to date has highlighted conditions under which no-take marine protected areas (MPAs) may help us to achieve the goals of ecosystem-based management by reducing pressures, and where they might fail to achieve desired goals. For example, static reserve designs are unlikely to achieve desired objectives when applied to mobile species or when compromised by climate-related ecosystem restructuring and range shifts. Modelling tools allow planners to explore a range of options, such as basing MPAs on the presence of dynamic oceanic features, and to evaluate the potential future impacts of alternative interventions compared with 'no-action' counterfactuals, under a range of environmental and development scenarios. The modelling environment allows the analyst to test if indicators and management strategies are robust to uncertainties in how the ecosystem (and the broader human–ecosystem combination) operates, including the direct and indirect ecological effects of protection. Moreover, modelling results can be presented at multiple spatial and temporal scales, and relative to ecological, economic and social objectives. This helps to reveal potential 'surprises', such as regime shifts, trophic cascades and bottlenecks in human responses. Using illustrative examples, this paper briefly covers the history of the use of simulation models for evaluating MPA options, and discusses their utility and limitations for informing protected area management in the marine realm.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</subject><subject>Coral Reefs</subject><subject>Counterfactual</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine Biology</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Mpa</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Sciences of the Universe</subject><subject>Spatial Management</subject><issn>0962-8436</issn><issn>1471-2970</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1v1DAQxS0Eokvhyg2UIxyyzNiOPzgglQraSouQoJytbOLsesnGi52stPz1OE0pLQg4WbZ_8-bNPEKeIswRtHoVYr-cU0A-ByrVPTJDLjGnWsJ9MgMtaK44E0fkUYwbANCF5A_JERVcADKcEfHB17ZtXbfKtmVwnc12wfe26m2dlcGW8XXmuuhW6z5mZVdn6yHUrY2PyYOmbKN9cn0eky_v312enueLj2cXpyeLvBKU9bkum2RLaKFkw6omGUCKheZsSamuEyPRat4ITaktWC2XTc3SLKqhGiXjmh2TN5PublhubV3Zrg9la3bBJbcH40tn7v50bm1Wfm-4SItgRRJ4OQmsfys7P1mY8Q04BZCg9pjYF9fNgv822NibrYtV2k7ZWT9EgwqUYFRS-D8qKUVVaMkSOp_QKvgYg21ubCCYMUMzZmjGDM2YYSp4fnvmG_xnaAlgExD8IS3fV872B7PxQ-jS9e-yX_9V9enz5ds9k-BQKDSgGIIoEJn57naTVPo0LsbBmivkrvyf3Z5N3Tax9-HXDFwKRZViPwD67NOC</recordid><startdate>20151105</startdate><enddate>20151105</enddate><creator>Fulton, Elizabeth A.</creator><creator>Bax, Nicholas J.</creator><creator>Bustamante, Rodrigo H.</creator><creator>Dambacher, Jeffrey M.</creator><creator>Dichmont, Catherine</creator><creator>Dunstan, Piers K.</creator><creator>Hayes, Keith R.</creator><creator>Hobday, Alistair J.</creator><creator>Pitcher, Roland</creator><creator>Plagányi, Éva E.</creator><creator>Punt, André E.</creator><creator>Savina-Rolland, Marie</creator><creator>Smith, Anthony D. M.</creator><creator>Smith, David C.</creator><general>Royal Society</general><general>The Royal Society</general><general>Royal Society, The</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9787-338X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4740-4200</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9762-3295</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20151105</creationdate><title>Modelling marine protected areas: insights and hurdles</title><author>Fulton, Elizabeth A. ; Bax, Nicholas J. ; Bustamante, Rodrigo H. ; Dambacher, Jeffrey M. ; Dichmont, Catherine ; Dunstan, Piers K. ; Hayes, Keith R. ; Hobday, Alistair J. ; Pitcher, Roland ; Plagányi, Éva E. ; Punt, André E. ; Savina-Rolland, Marie ; Smith, Anthony D. M. ; Smith, David C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c623t-9af02769687f3cf0001215943b229dc6271e94f6922e53d7bfd30148f29173493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</topic><topic>Coral Reefs</topic><topic>Counterfactual</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine Biology</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Mpa</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Sciences of the Universe</topic><topic>Spatial Management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fulton, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bax, Nicholas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bustamante, Rodrigo H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dambacher, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dichmont, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunstan, Piers K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Keith R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hobday, Alistair J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitcher, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plagányi, Éva E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Punt, André E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savina-Rolland, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Anthony D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, David C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fulton, Elizabeth A.</au><au>Bax, Nicholas J.</au><au>Bustamante, Rodrigo H.</au><au>Dambacher, Jeffrey M.</au><au>Dichmont, Catherine</au><au>Dunstan, Piers K.</au><au>Hayes, Keith R.</au><au>Hobday, Alistair J.</au><au>Pitcher, Roland</au><au>Plagányi, Éva E.</au><au>Punt, André E.</au><au>Savina-Rolland, Marie</au><au>Smith, Anthony D. M.</au><au>Smith, David C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modelling marine protected areas: insights and hurdles</atitle><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle><stitle>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B</stitle><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2015-11-05</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>370</volume><issue>1681</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>1-17</pages><issn>0962-8436</issn><eissn>1471-2970</eissn><abstract>Models provide useful insights into conservation and resource management issues and solutions. Their use to date has highlighted conditions under which no-take marine protected areas (MPAs) may help us to achieve the goals of ecosystem-based management by reducing pressures, and where they might fail to achieve desired goals. For example, static reserve designs are unlikely to achieve desired objectives when applied to mobile species or when compromised by climate-related ecosystem restructuring and range shifts. Modelling tools allow planners to explore a range of options, such as basing MPAs on the presence of dynamic oceanic features, and to evaluate the potential future impacts of alternative interventions compared with 'no-action' counterfactuals, under a range of environmental and development scenarios. The modelling environment allows the analyst to test if indicators and management strategies are robust to uncertainties in how the ecosystem (and the broader human–ecosystem combination) operates, including the direct and indirect ecological effects of protection. Moreover, modelling results can be presented at multiple spatial and temporal scales, and relative to ecological, economic and social objectives. This helps to reveal potential 'surprises', such as regime shifts, trophic cascades and bottlenecks in human responses. Using illustrative examples, this paper briefly covers the history of the use of simulation models for evaluating MPA options, and discusses their utility and limitations for informing protected area management in the marine realm.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Royal Society</pub><pmid>26460131</pmid><doi>10.1098/rstb.2014.0278</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9787-338X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4740-4200</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9762-3295</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-8436
ispartof Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2015-11, Vol.370 (1681), p.1-17
issn 0962-8436
1471-2970
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808632720
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; PubMed Central
subjects Animals
Climate
Conservation of Natural Resources - methods
Coral Reefs
Counterfactual
Ecosystem
Humans
Life Sciences
Marine Biology
Modelling
Models, Biological
Mpa
Review
Sciences of the Universe
Spatial Management
title Modelling marine protected areas: insights and hurdles
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T22%3A47%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modelling%20marine%20protected%20areas:%20insights%20and%20hurdles&rft.jtitle=Philosophical%20transactions%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society%20of%20London.%20Series%20B.%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Fulton,%20Elizabeth%20A.&rft.date=2015-11-05&rft.volume=370&rft.issue=1681&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=1-17&rft.issn=0962-8436&rft.eissn=1471-2970&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rstb.2014.0278&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24768288%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1722185973&rft_id=info:pmid/26460131&rft_jstor_id=24768288&rfr_iscdi=true