Using Lithium (Li+)as a Conservative Tracer Does Not Prevent Algal Uptake of Phosphate in an Acid Mine Drainage Stream (Reply to the Comment by Stewart and Kszos)
In their comment, "Caution on using lithium (Li super(+)) as a conservative tracer in hydrological studies," Stewart and Kszos (1996) make some interesting points about using Li super(+) as a conservative tracer. First, Li super(+) can be hydrologically conservative, but it is not biologic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Limnology and oceanography 1996-01, Vol.41 (1), p.191-192 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 192 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 191 |
container_title | Limnology and oceanography |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Tate, C. M. McKnight, D. M. Broshears, R. E. |
description | In their comment, "Caution on using lithium (Li super(+)) as a conservative tracer in hydrological studies," Stewart and Kszos (1996) make some interesting points about using Li super(+) as a conservative tracer. First, Li super(+) can be hydrologically conservative, but it is not biologically inactive. Second, Li super(+) can be toxic to some organisms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4319/lo.1996.41.1.0191 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808627889</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2838852</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2838852</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4251-d1d1333904911e38b79c364475bac2ea7fbd31f8211b5e8a5d824e6dc94841f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU-P0zAQxSMEEmXhAyBxmBPaFUrxxHZrHzhUXf6JsLuC7tlyk0nrJYmD7XZVPg6flFRdcYTTjGbe773Dy7KXyKaCo37b-ilqPZsKnOKUocZH2QQ117mUmj3OJowVIufj_jR7FuMdY0xLKSfZ79vo-g2ULm3droPz0r25sBEsLH0fKextcnuCVbAVBbj0FOHKJ7gJtKc-waLd2BZuh2R_EPgGbrY-DlubCFwPtodF5Wr46nqCy2BdbzcE31MgOwZ9o6E9QPKQtjSGdd3Rb30Y_3RvQxrpGr7EXz5ePM-eNLaN9OJhnmWrD-9Xy095ef3x83JR5pUoJOY11sg510xoROJqPdcVnwkxl2tbFWTnzbrm2KgCcS1JWVmrQtCsrrRQAht-lp2fbIfgf-4oJtO5WFHb2p78LhpUTM2KuVJ6lL7-t1RKJRWfjUI8CavgYwzUmCG4zoaDQWaOvZnWm2NvRqBBc-xtZN6dmHvX0uH_gCmvro8XgfjAvzrxdzH58JcvFFdKFvwPofamfg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15585836</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using Lithium (Li+)as a Conservative Tracer Does Not Prevent Algal Uptake of Phosphate in an Acid Mine Drainage Stream (Reply to the Comment by Stewart and Kszos)</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tate, C. M. ; McKnight, D. M. ; Broshears, R. E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tate, C. M. ; McKnight, D. M. ; Broshears, R. E.</creatorcontrib><description>In their comment, "Caution on using lithium (Li super(+)) as a conservative tracer in hydrological studies," Stewart and Kszos (1996) make some interesting points about using Li super(+) as a conservative tracer. First, Li super(+) can be hydrologically conservative, but it is not biologically inactive. Second, Li super(+) can be toxic to some organisms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0024-3590</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5590</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4319/lo.1996.41.1.0191</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Society of Limnology and Oceanography</publisher><subject>Acid mine drainage ; Algae ; Ceriodaphnia dubia ; Comment ; Elimia clavaeformis ; Freshwater ; Lithium ; Marine ; Nitrates ; Periphyton ; Phosphates ; Streams</subject><ispartof>Limnology and oceanography, 1996-01, Vol.41 (1), p.191-192</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, Inc.</rights><rights>1996, by the Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4251-d1d1333904911e38b79c364475bac2ea7fbd31f8211b5e8a5d824e6dc94841f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2838852$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2838852$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tate, C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKnight, D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broshears, R. E.</creatorcontrib><title>Using Lithium (Li+)as a Conservative Tracer Does Not Prevent Algal Uptake of Phosphate in an Acid Mine Drainage Stream (Reply to the Comment by Stewart and Kszos)</title><title>Limnology and oceanography</title><description>In their comment, "Caution on using lithium (Li super(+)) as a conservative tracer in hydrological studies," Stewart and Kszos (1996) make some interesting points about using Li super(+) as a conservative tracer. First, Li super(+) can be hydrologically conservative, but it is not biologically inactive. Second, Li super(+) can be toxic to some organisms.</description><subject>Acid mine drainage</subject><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Ceriodaphnia dubia</subject><subject>Comment</subject><subject>Elimia clavaeformis</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Lithium</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>Periphyton</subject><subject>Phosphates</subject><subject>Streams</subject><issn>0024-3590</issn><issn>1939-5590</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU-P0zAQxSMEEmXhAyBxmBPaFUrxxHZrHzhUXf6JsLuC7tlyk0nrJYmD7XZVPg6flFRdcYTTjGbe773Dy7KXyKaCo37b-ilqPZsKnOKUocZH2QQ117mUmj3OJowVIufj_jR7FuMdY0xLKSfZ79vo-g2ULm3droPz0r25sBEsLH0fKextcnuCVbAVBbj0FOHKJ7gJtKc-waLd2BZuh2R_EPgGbrY-DlubCFwPtodF5Wr46nqCy2BdbzcE31MgOwZ9o6E9QPKQtjSGdd3Rb30Y_3RvQxrpGr7EXz5ePM-eNLaN9OJhnmWrD-9Xy095ef3x83JR5pUoJOY11sg510xoROJqPdcVnwkxl2tbFWTnzbrm2KgCcS1JWVmrQtCsrrRQAht-lp2fbIfgf-4oJtO5WFHb2p78LhpUTM2KuVJ6lL7-t1RKJRWfjUI8CavgYwzUmCG4zoaDQWaOvZnWm2NvRqBBc-xtZN6dmHvX0uH_gCmvro8XgfjAvzrxdzH58JcvFFdKFvwPofamfg</recordid><startdate>19960101</startdate><enddate>19960101</enddate><creator>Tate, C. M.</creator><creator>McKnight, D. M.</creator><creator>Broshears, R. E.</creator><general>American Society of Limnology and Oceanography</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>H95</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960101</creationdate><title>Using Lithium (Li+)as a Conservative Tracer Does Not Prevent Algal Uptake of Phosphate in an Acid Mine Drainage Stream (Reply to the Comment by Stewart and Kszos)</title><author>Tate, C. M. ; McKnight, D. M. ; Broshears, R. E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4251-d1d1333904911e38b79c364475bac2ea7fbd31f8211b5e8a5d824e6dc94841f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Acid mine drainage</topic><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Ceriodaphnia dubia</topic><topic>Comment</topic><topic>Elimia clavaeformis</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Lithium</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>Periphyton</topic><topic>Phosphates</topic><topic>Streams</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tate, C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKnight, D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broshears, R. E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><jtitle>Limnology and oceanography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tate, C. M.</au><au>McKnight, D. M.</au><au>Broshears, R. E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using Lithium (Li+)as a Conservative Tracer Does Not Prevent Algal Uptake of Phosphate in an Acid Mine Drainage Stream (Reply to the Comment by Stewart and Kszos)</atitle><jtitle>Limnology and oceanography</jtitle><date>1996-01-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>191</spage><epage>192</epage><pages>191-192</pages><issn>0024-3590</issn><eissn>1939-5590</eissn><abstract>In their comment, "Caution on using lithium (Li super(+)) as a conservative tracer in hydrological studies," Stewart and Kszos (1996) make some interesting points about using Li super(+) as a conservative tracer. First, Li super(+) can be hydrologically conservative, but it is not biologically inactive. Second, Li super(+) can be toxic to some organisms.</abstract><pub>American Society of Limnology and Oceanography</pub><doi>10.4319/lo.1996.41.1.0191</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0024-3590 |
ispartof | Limnology and oceanography, 1996-01, Vol.41 (1), p.191-192 |
issn | 0024-3590 1939-5590 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808627889 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Acid mine drainage Algae Ceriodaphnia dubia Comment Elimia clavaeformis Freshwater Lithium Marine Nitrates Periphyton Phosphates Streams |
title | Using Lithium (Li+)as a Conservative Tracer Does Not Prevent Algal Uptake of Phosphate in an Acid Mine Drainage Stream (Reply to the Comment by Stewart and Kszos) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T14%3A19%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20Lithium%20(Li+)as%20a%20Conservative%20Tracer%20Does%20Not%20Prevent%20Algal%20Uptake%20of%20Phosphate%20in%20an%20Acid%20Mine%20Drainage%20Stream%20(Reply%20to%20the%20Comment%20by%20Stewart%20and%20Kszos)&rft.jtitle=Limnology%20and%20oceanography&rft.au=Tate,%20C.%20M.&rft.date=1996-01-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=191&rft.epage=192&rft.pages=191-192&rft.issn=0024-3590&rft.eissn=1939-5590&rft_id=info:doi/10.4319/lo.1996.41.1.0191&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2838852%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15585836&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2838852&rfr_iscdi=true |