Using Lithium (Li+)as a Conservative Tracer Does Not Prevent Algal Uptake of Phosphate in an Acid Mine Drainage Stream (Reply to the Comment by Stewart and Kszos)

In their comment, "Caution on using lithium (Li super(+)) as a conservative tracer in hydrological studies," Stewart and Kszos (1996) make some interesting points about using Li super(+) as a conservative tracer. First, Li super(+) can be hydrologically conservative, but it is not biologic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Limnology and oceanography 1996-01, Vol.41 (1), p.191-192
Hauptverfasser: Tate, C. M., McKnight, D. M., Broshears, R. E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 192
container_issue 1
container_start_page 191
container_title Limnology and oceanography
container_volume 41
creator Tate, C. M.
McKnight, D. M.
Broshears, R. E.
description In their comment, "Caution on using lithium (Li super(+)) as a conservative tracer in hydrological studies," Stewart and Kszos (1996) make some interesting points about using Li super(+) as a conservative tracer. First, Li super(+) can be hydrologically conservative, but it is not biologically inactive. Second, Li super(+) can be toxic to some organisms.
doi_str_mv 10.4319/lo.1996.41.1.0191
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808627889</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2838852</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2838852</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4251-d1d1333904911e38b79c364475bac2ea7fbd31f8211b5e8a5d824e6dc94841f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU-P0zAQxSMEEmXhAyBxmBPaFUrxxHZrHzhUXf6JsLuC7tlyk0nrJYmD7XZVPg6flFRdcYTTjGbe773Dy7KXyKaCo37b-ilqPZsKnOKUocZH2QQ117mUmj3OJowVIufj_jR7FuMdY0xLKSfZ79vo-g2ULm3droPz0r25sBEsLH0fKextcnuCVbAVBbj0FOHKJ7gJtKc-waLd2BZuh2R_EPgGbrY-DlubCFwPtodF5Wr46nqCy2BdbzcE31MgOwZ9o6E9QPKQtjSGdd3Rb30Y_3RvQxrpGr7EXz5ePM-eNLaN9OJhnmWrD-9Xy095ef3x83JR5pUoJOY11sg510xoROJqPdcVnwkxl2tbFWTnzbrm2KgCcS1JWVmrQtCsrrRQAht-lp2fbIfgf-4oJtO5WFHb2p78LhpUTM2KuVJ6lL7-t1RKJRWfjUI8CavgYwzUmCG4zoaDQWaOvZnWm2NvRqBBc-xtZN6dmHvX0uH_gCmvro8XgfjAvzrxdzH58JcvFFdKFvwPofamfg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15585836</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using Lithium (Li+)as a Conservative Tracer Does Not Prevent Algal Uptake of Phosphate in an Acid Mine Drainage Stream (Reply to the Comment by Stewart and Kszos)</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tate, C. M. ; McKnight, D. M. ; Broshears, R. E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tate, C. M. ; McKnight, D. M. ; Broshears, R. E.</creatorcontrib><description>In their comment, "Caution on using lithium (Li super(+)) as a conservative tracer in hydrological studies," Stewart and Kszos (1996) make some interesting points about using Li super(+) as a conservative tracer. First, Li super(+) can be hydrologically conservative, but it is not biologically inactive. Second, Li super(+) can be toxic to some organisms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0024-3590</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5590</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4319/lo.1996.41.1.0191</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Society of Limnology and Oceanography</publisher><subject>Acid mine drainage ; Algae ; Ceriodaphnia dubia ; Comment ; Elimia clavaeformis ; Freshwater ; Lithium ; Marine ; Nitrates ; Periphyton ; Phosphates ; Streams</subject><ispartof>Limnology and oceanography, 1996-01, Vol.41 (1), p.191-192</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, Inc.</rights><rights>1996, by the Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4251-d1d1333904911e38b79c364475bac2ea7fbd31f8211b5e8a5d824e6dc94841f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2838852$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2838852$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tate, C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKnight, D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broshears, R. E.</creatorcontrib><title>Using Lithium (Li+)as a Conservative Tracer Does Not Prevent Algal Uptake of Phosphate in an Acid Mine Drainage Stream (Reply to the Comment by Stewart and Kszos)</title><title>Limnology and oceanography</title><description>In their comment, "Caution on using lithium (Li super(+)) as a conservative tracer in hydrological studies," Stewart and Kszos (1996) make some interesting points about using Li super(+) as a conservative tracer. First, Li super(+) can be hydrologically conservative, but it is not biologically inactive. Second, Li super(+) can be toxic to some organisms.</description><subject>Acid mine drainage</subject><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Ceriodaphnia dubia</subject><subject>Comment</subject><subject>Elimia clavaeformis</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Lithium</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>Periphyton</subject><subject>Phosphates</subject><subject>Streams</subject><issn>0024-3590</issn><issn>1939-5590</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU-P0zAQxSMEEmXhAyBxmBPaFUrxxHZrHzhUXf6JsLuC7tlyk0nrJYmD7XZVPg6flFRdcYTTjGbe773Dy7KXyKaCo37b-ilqPZsKnOKUocZH2QQ117mUmj3OJowVIufj_jR7FuMdY0xLKSfZ79vo-g2ULm3droPz0r25sBEsLH0fKextcnuCVbAVBbj0FOHKJ7gJtKc-waLd2BZuh2R_EPgGbrY-DlubCFwPtodF5Wr46nqCy2BdbzcE31MgOwZ9o6E9QPKQtjSGdd3Rb30Y_3RvQxrpGr7EXz5ePM-eNLaN9OJhnmWrD-9Xy095ef3x83JR5pUoJOY11sg510xoROJqPdcVnwkxl2tbFWTnzbrm2KgCcS1JWVmrQtCsrrRQAht-lp2fbIfgf-4oJtO5WFHb2p78LhpUTM2KuVJ6lL7-t1RKJRWfjUI8CavgYwzUmCG4zoaDQWaOvZnWm2NvRqBBc-xtZN6dmHvX0uH_gCmvro8XgfjAvzrxdzH58JcvFFdKFvwPofamfg</recordid><startdate>19960101</startdate><enddate>19960101</enddate><creator>Tate, C. M.</creator><creator>McKnight, D. M.</creator><creator>Broshears, R. E.</creator><general>American Society of Limnology and Oceanography</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>H95</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960101</creationdate><title>Using Lithium (Li+)as a Conservative Tracer Does Not Prevent Algal Uptake of Phosphate in an Acid Mine Drainage Stream (Reply to the Comment by Stewart and Kszos)</title><author>Tate, C. M. ; McKnight, D. M. ; Broshears, R. E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4251-d1d1333904911e38b79c364475bac2ea7fbd31f8211b5e8a5d824e6dc94841f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Acid mine drainage</topic><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Ceriodaphnia dubia</topic><topic>Comment</topic><topic>Elimia clavaeformis</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Lithium</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>Periphyton</topic><topic>Phosphates</topic><topic>Streams</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tate, C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKnight, D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broshears, R. E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><jtitle>Limnology and oceanography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tate, C. M.</au><au>McKnight, D. M.</au><au>Broshears, R. E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using Lithium (Li+)as a Conservative Tracer Does Not Prevent Algal Uptake of Phosphate in an Acid Mine Drainage Stream (Reply to the Comment by Stewart and Kszos)</atitle><jtitle>Limnology and oceanography</jtitle><date>1996-01-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>191</spage><epage>192</epage><pages>191-192</pages><issn>0024-3590</issn><eissn>1939-5590</eissn><abstract>In their comment, "Caution on using lithium (Li super(+)) as a conservative tracer in hydrological studies," Stewart and Kszos (1996) make some interesting points about using Li super(+) as a conservative tracer. First, Li super(+) can be hydrologically conservative, but it is not biologically inactive. Second, Li super(+) can be toxic to some organisms.</abstract><pub>American Society of Limnology and Oceanography</pub><doi>10.4319/lo.1996.41.1.0191</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0024-3590
ispartof Limnology and oceanography, 1996-01, Vol.41 (1), p.191-192
issn 0024-3590
1939-5590
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808627889
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Acid mine drainage
Algae
Ceriodaphnia dubia
Comment
Elimia clavaeformis
Freshwater
Lithium
Marine
Nitrates
Periphyton
Phosphates
Streams
title Using Lithium (Li+)as a Conservative Tracer Does Not Prevent Algal Uptake of Phosphate in an Acid Mine Drainage Stream (Reply to the Comment by Stewart and Kszos)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T14%3A19%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20Lithium%20(Li+)as%20a%20Conservative%20Tracer%20Does%20Not%20Prevent%20Algal%20Uptake%20of%20Phosphate%20in%20an%20Acid%20Mine%20Drainage%20Stream%20(Reply%20to%20the%20Comment%20by%20Stewart%20and%20Kszos)&rft.jtitle=Limnology%20and%20oceanography&rft.au=Tate,%20C.%20M.&rft.date=1996-01-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=191&rft.epage=192&rft.pages=191-192&rft.issn=0024-3590&rft.eissn=1939-5590&rft_id=info:doi/10.4319/lo.1996.41.1.0191&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2838852%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15585836&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2838852&rfr_iscdi=true