Where is the UK's pollinator biodiversity? The importance of urban areas for flower-visiting insects

Insect pollinators provide a crucial ecosystem service, but are under threat. Urban areas could be important for pollinators, though their value relative to other habitats is poorly known. We compared pollinator communities using quantified flower-visitation networks in 36 sites (each 1 km2) in thre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Biological sciences, 2015-03, Vol.282 (1803), p.20142849-20142849
Hauptverfasser: Baldock, Katherine C. R., Goddard, Mark A., Hicks, Damien M., Kunin, William E., Mitschunas, Nadine, Osgathorpe, Lynne M., Potts, Simon G., Robertson, Kirsty M., Scott, Anna V., Stone, Graham N., Vaughan, Ian P., Memmott, Jane
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 20142849
container_issue 1803
container_start_page 20142849
container_title Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences
container_volume 282
creator Baldock, Katherine C. R.
Goddard, Mark A.
Hicks, Damien M.
Kunin, William E.
Mitschunas, Nadine
Osgathorpe, Lynne M.
Potts, Simon G.
Robertson, Kirsty M.
Scott, Anna V.
Stone, Graham N.
Vaughan, Ian P.
Memmott, Jane
description Insect pollinators provide a crucial ecosystem service, but are under threat. Urban areas could be important for pollinators, though their value relative to other habitats is poorly known. We compared pollinator communities using quantified flower-visitation networks in 36 sites (each 1 km2) in three landscapes: urban, farmland and nature reserves. Overall, flower-visitor abundance and species richness did not differ significantly between the three landscape types. Bee abundance did not differ between landscapes, but bee species richness was higher in urban areas than farmland. Hoverfly abundance was higher in farmland and nature reserves than urban sites, but species richness did not differ significantly. While urban pollinator assemblages were more homogeneous across space than those in farmland or nature reserves, there was no significant difference in the numbers of rarer species between the three landscapes. Network-level specialization was higher in farmland than urban sites. Relative to other habitats, urban visitors foraged from a greater number of plant species (higher generality) but also visited a lower proportion of available plant species (higher specialization), both possibly driven by higher urban plant richness. Urban areas are growing, and improving their value for pollinators should be part of any national strategy to conserve and restore pollinators.
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rspb.2014.2849
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808619416</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1808619416</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c703t-9ab0f7d6b19cff76841c80cc22ee8d3e7f4dd967b22641acad6ac4f55f52a033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2PFCEQxYnRuOPq1aPhppcegQaavmh041fcRKNjPBKaLnZYe5oW6DHjXy_jjBvXRIUDIfzeK6oeQvcpWVLSqscxTd2SEcqXTPH2BlpQ3tCKtYLfRAvSSlYpLtgJupPSJSGkFUrcRidMyKaWSi5Q_3kNEbBPOK8Bf3r7MOEpDIMfTQ4Rdz70fgsx-bx7ileF8JspxGxGCzg4PMfOjNhEMAm7wrshfINYbX0R-PEC-zGBzekuuuXMkODe8TxFq5cvVmevq_N3r96cPTuvbEPqXLWmI67pZUdb61wjFadWEWsZA1B9DY3jfd_KpmNMcmqs6aWx3AnhBDOkrk_Rk4PtNHcb6C2MOZpBT9FvTNzpYLy-_jL6tb4IW81rLsouBo-OBjF8nSFlvfHJwjCYEcKcNFVESdpyKv-PSiFYGXZDC7o8oDaGlCK4qx9Rovch6n2Ieh-i3odYBA9-7-MK_5VaAeoDEMOuzDNYD3mnL8Mcx3L9u-2Xf6k-fHz_fMsU86XLWhNVUyLKYvq7n45Wimmf0gz6J3Ld_s9qPwAZos-I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1655258571</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Where is the UK's pollinator biodiversity? The importance of urban areas for flower-visiting insects</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Baldock, Katherine C. R. ; Goddard, Mark A. ; Hicks, Damien M. ; Kunin, William E. ; Mitschunas, Nadine ; Osgathorpe, Lynne M. ; Potts, Simon G. ; Robertson, Kirsty M. ; Scott, Anna V. ; Stone, Graham N. ; Vaughan, Ian P. ; Memmott, Jane</creator><creatorcontrib>Baldock, Katherine C. R. ; Goddard, Mark A. ; Hicks, Damien M. ; Kunin, William E. ; Mitschunas, Nadine ; Osgathorpe, Lynne M. ; Potts, Simon G. ; Robertson, Kirsty M. ; Scott, Anna V. ; Stone, Graham N. ; Vaughan, Ian P. ; Memmott, Jane</creatorcontrib><description>Insect pollinators provide a crucial ecosystem service, but are under threat. Urban areas could be important for pollinators, though their value relative to other habitats is poorly known. We compared pollinator communities using quantified flower-visitation networks in 36 sites (each 1 km2) in three landscapes: urban, farmland and nature reserves. Overall, flower-visitor abundance and species richness did not differ significantly between the three landscape types. Bee abundance did not differ between landscapes, but bee species richness was higher in urban areas than farmland. Hoverfly abundance was higher in farmland and nature reserves than urban sites, but species richness did not differ significantly. While urban pollinator assemblages were more homogeneous across space than those in farmland or nature reserves, there was no significant difference in the numbers of rarer species between the three landscapes. Network-level specialization was higher in farmland than urban sites. Relative to other habitats, urban visitors foraged from a greater number of plant species (higher generality) but also visited a lower proportion of available plant species (higher specialization), both possibly driven by higher urban plant richness. Urban areas are growing, and improving their value for pollinators should be part of any national strategy to conserve and restore pollinators.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2954</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2849</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25673686</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Animals ; Bees - physiology ; Biodiversity ; Cities ; Diptera - physiology ; Ecosystem ; Insecta - physiology ; Magnoliopsida - physiology ; Networks ; Pollination - physiology ; Pollinators ; Syrphidae ; United Kingdom ; Urban</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2015-03, Vol.282 (1803), p.20142849-20142849</ispartof><rights>2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c703t-9ab0f7d6b19cff76841c80cc22ee8d3e7f4dd967b22641acad6ac4f55f52a033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c703t-9ab0f7d6b19cff76841c80cc22ee8d3e7f4dd967b22641acad6ac4f55f52a033</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6849-8747</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4345454/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4345454/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25673686$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baldock, Katherine C. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goddard, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hicks, Damien M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunin, William E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitschunas, Nadine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osgathorpe, Lynne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potts, Simon G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Kirsty M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Anna V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stone, Graham N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaughan, Ian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Memmott, Jane</creatorcontrib><title>Where is the UK's pollinator biodiversity? The importance of urban areas for flower-visiting insects</title><title>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Proc. R. Soc. B</addtitle><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><description>Insect pollinators provide a crucial ecosystem service, but are under threat. Urban areas could be important for pollinators, though their value relative to other habitats is poorly known. We compared pollinator communities using quantified flower-visitation networks in 36 sites (each 1 km2) in three landscapes: urban, farmland and nature reserves. Overall, flower-visitor abundance and species richness did not differ significantly between the three landscape types. Bee abundance did not differ between landscapes, but bee species richness was higher in urban areas than farmland. Hoverfly abundance was higher in farmland and nature reserves than urban sites, but species richness did not differ significantly. While urban pollinator assemblages were more homogeneous across space than those in farmland or nature reserves, there was no significant difference in the numbers of rarer species between the three landscapes. Network-level specialization was higher in farmland than urban sites. Relative to other habitats, urban visitors foraged from a greater number of plant species (higher generality) but also visited a lower proportion of available plant species (higher specialization), both possibly driven by higher urban plant richness. Urban areas are growing, and improving their value for pollinators should be part of any national strategy to conserve and restore pollinators.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bees - physiology</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Diptera - physiology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Insecta - physiology</subject><subject>Magnoliopsida - physiology</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Pollination - physiology</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Syrphidae</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Urban</subject><issn>0962-8452</issn><issn>1471-2954</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc2PFCEQxYnRuOPq1aPhppcegQaavmh041fcRKNjPBKaLnZYe5oW6DHjXy_jjBvXRIUDIfzeK6oeQvcpWVLSqscxTd2SEcqXTPH2BlpQ3tCKtYLfRAvSSlYpLtgJupPSJSGkFUrcRidMyKaWSi5Q_3kNEbBPOK8Bf3r7MOEpDIMfTQ4Rdz70fgsx-bx7ileF8JspxGxGCzg4PMfOjNhEMAm7wrshfINYbX0R-PEC-zGBzekuuuXMkODe8TxFq5cvVmevq_N3r96cPTuvbEPqXLWmI67pZUdb61wjFadWEWsZA1B9DY3jfd_KpmNMcmqs6aWx3AnhBDOkrk_Rk4PtNHcb6C2MOZpBT9FvTNzpYLy-_jL6tb4IW81rLsouBo-OBjF8nSFlvfHJwjCYEcKcNFVESdpyKv-PSiFYGXZDC7o8oDaGlCK4qx9Rovch6n2Ieh-i3odYBA9-7-MK_5VaAeoDEMOuzDNYD3mnL8Mcx3L9u-2Xf6k-fHz_fMsU86XLWhNVUyLKYvq7n45Wimmf0gz6J3Ld_s9qPwAZos-I</recordid><startdate>20150322</startdate><enddate>20150322</enddate><creator>Baldock, Katherine C. R.</creator><creator>Goddard, Mark A.</creator><creator>Hicks, Damien M.</creator><creator>Kunin, William E.</creator><creator>Mitschunas, Nadine</creator><creator>Osgathorpe, Lynne M.</creator><creator>Potts, Simon G.</creator><creator>Robertson, Kirsty M.</creator><creator>Scott, Anna V.</creator><creator>Stone, Graham N.</creator><creator>Vaughan, Ian P.</creator><creator>Memmott, Jane</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6849-8747</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150322</creationdate><title>Where is the UK's pollinator biodiversity? The importance of urban areas for flower-visiting insects</title><author>Baldock, Katherine C. R. ; Goddard, Mark A. ; Hicks, Damien M. ; Kunin, William E. ; Mitschunas, Nadine ; Osgathorpe, Lynne M. ; Potts, Simon G. ; Robertson, Kirsty M. ; Scott, Anna V. ; Stone, Graham N. ; Vaughan, Ian P. ; Memmott, Jane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c703t-9ab0f7d6b19cff76841c80cc22ee8d3e7f4dd967b22641acad6ac4f55f52a033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bees - physiology</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Diptera - physiology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Insecta - physiology</topic><topic>Magnoliopsida - physiology</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Pollination - physiology</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Syrphidae</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Urban</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baldock, Katherine C. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goddard, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hicks, Damien M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunin, William E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitschunas, Nadine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osgathorpe, Lynne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potts, Simon G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Kirsty M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Anna V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stone, Graham N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaughan, Ian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Memmott, Jane</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baldock, Katherine C. R.</au><au>Goddard, Mark A.</au><au>Hicks, Damien M.</au><au>Kunin, William E.</au><au>Mitschunas, Nadine</au><au>Osgathorpe, Lynne M.</au><au>Potts, Simon G.</au><au>Robertson, Kirsty M.</au><au>Scott, Anna V.</au><au>Stone, Graham N.</au><au>Vaughan, Ian P.</au><au>Memmott, Jane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Where is the UK's pollinator biodiversity? The importance of urban areas for flower-visiting insects</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle><stitle>Proc. R. Soc. B</stitle><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2015-03-22</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>282</volume><issue>1803</issue><spage>20142849</spage><epage>20142849</epage><pages>20142849-20142849</pages><issn>0962-8452</issn><eissn>1471-2954</eissn><abstract>Insect pollinators provide a crucial ecosystem service, but are under threat. Urban areas could be important for pollinators, though their value relative to other habitats is poorly known. We compared pollinator communities using quantified flower-visitation networks in 36 sites (each 1 km2) in three landscapes: urban, farmland and nature reserves. Overall, flower-visitor abundance and species richness did not differ significantly between the three landscape types. Bee abundance did not differ between landscapes, but bee species richness was higher in urban areas than farmland. Hoverfly abundance was higher in farmland and nature reserves than urban sites, but species richness did not differ significantly. While urban pollinator assemblages were more homogeneous across space than those in farmland or nature reserves, there was no significant difference in the numbers of rarer species between the three landscapes. Network-level specialization was higher in farmland than urban sites. Relative to other habitats, urban visitors foraged from a greater number of plant species (higher generality) but also visited a lower proportion of available plant species (higher specialization), both possibly driven by higher urban plant richness. Urban areas are growing, and improving their value for pollinators should be part of any national strategy to conserve and restore pollinators.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>25673686</pmid><doi>10.1098/rspb.2014.2849</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6849-8747</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-8452
ispartof Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2015-03, Vol.282 (1803), p.20142849-20142849
issn 0962-8452
1471-2954
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808619416
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; PubMed Central
subjects Agriculture
Animals
Bees - physiology
Biodiversity
Cities
Diptera - physiology
Ecosystem
Insecta - physiology
Magnoliopsida - physiology
Networks
Pollination - physiology
Pollinators
Syrphidae
United Kingdom
Urban
title Where is the UK's pollinator biodiversity? The importance of urban areas for flower-visiting insects
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T07%3A47%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Where%20is%20the%20UK's%20pollinator%20biodiversity?%20The%20importance%20of%20urban%20areas%20for%20flower-visiting%20insects&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society.%20B,%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Baldock,%20Katherine%20C.%20R.&rft.date=2015-03-22&rft.volume=282&rft.issue=1803&rft.spage=20142849&rft.epage=20142849&rft.pages=20142849-20142849&rft.issn=0962-8452&rft.eissn=1471-2954&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rspb.2014.2849&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1808619416%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1655258571&rft_id=info:pmid/25673686&rfr_iscdi=true