How do we want Satellite Remote Sensing to support biodiversity conservation globally?
Summary 1. Essential Biodiversity Variable, Natural Capital, Biodiversity Indicator and Ecosystem Service are four concepts that underpin the most popular frameworks currently considered for helping to coordinate and structure biodiversity monitoring efforts worldwide. Satellite Remote Sensing (SRS)...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Methods in ecology and evolution 2016-06, Vol.7 (6), p.656-665 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 665 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 656 |
| container_title | Methods in ecology and evolution |
| container_volume | 7 |
| creator | Pettorelli, Nathalie Owen, Harry Jon Foord Duncan, Clare Freckleton, Robert |
| description | Summary
1. Essential Biodiversity Variable, Natural Capital, Biodiversity Indicator and Ecosystem Service are four concepts that underpin the most popular frameworks currently considered for helping to coordinate and structure biodiversity monitoring efforts worldwide. Satellite Remote Sensing (SRS) has considerable potential to inform these initiatives. To date, however, discussions on the role of SRS in supporting these frameworks have mostly evolved independently; tend to be led by different groups; sometimes target slightly different scales; and are likely to reach different audiences. Because of this, there is some confusion among environmental managers and policymakers as to what the potential of SRS is or whether there is prospect in considering and promoting the use of satellite data for biodiversity conservation.
2. Here, we provide a brief overview of the role of SRS to date in informing these frameworks. Through a case study focused on the Sahara Desert ecosystem, we also demonstrate the current potential for SRS‐based methodologies to support conservation in data‐deficient areas and discuss the relative applicability of SRS‐based metrics to each of these frameworks.
3. The relevance and use of SRS across the four frameworks are clearly variable, due to differences and ambiguity in definitions, and due to differences in monitoring priorities. Our case study illustrates the particularly high potential for SRS approaches to provide key information relevant to the Biodiversity Indicators framework in desert ecosystems; it also identifies SRS‐based metrics relevant to all frameworks.
4. Altogether, this work highlights how more dialogue is required within the biodiversity‐monitoring community for SRS to reach its full potential in conservation. In particular, agreement on what is needed in priority, given the realm of what is possible, will be of paramount importance to developing SRS‐based products that are used by policymakers and international conventions. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/2041-210X.12545 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808611273</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2061299432</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4185-e8e138ba971b6b47e4dddfa9985f6f8da881c3eacabeb18eebfc18e3e150a3f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1Lw0AQhoMoWLRnrwtevLTd2c3H5iRSqhUqglXxtuwmk7IlzcbdtCH_3tSKiAedyzsMzzvMRxBcAB1DHxNGQxgxoG9jYFEYHQWD78rxj_w0GHq_pn1wkVIWDoLXuW1JbkmLpFVVQ5aqwbI0DZIn3Nhellh5U61IY4nf1rV1DdHG5maHzpumI5mtPLqdaoytyKq0WpVld30enBSq9Dj80rPg5Xb2PJ2PFo9399ObxSgLQUQjFAhcaJUmoGMdJhjmeV6oNBVRERciV0JAxlFlSqMGgaiLrBeOEFHFi4SfBVeHvrWz71v0jdwYn_UbqArt1ksQVMQALOE9evkLXdutq_rpJKMxsDQNOfuLgiSNBIviaN9rcqAyZ713WMjamY1ynQQq9w-R-5PL_cnl50N6R3xwtKbE7j9cPsxm_GD8AHtrjXE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1795825653</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How do we want Satellite Remote Sensing to support biodiversity conservation globally?</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Pettorelli, Nathalie ; Owen, Harry Jon Foord ; Duncan, Clare ; Freckleton, Robert</creator><contributor>Freckleton, Robert</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pettorelli, Nathalie ; Owen, Harry Jon Foord ; Duncan, Clare ; Freckleton, Robert ; Freckleton, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
1. Essential Biodiversity Variable, Natural Capital, Biodiversity Indicator and Ecosystem Service are four concepts that underpin the most popular frameworks currently considered for helping to coordinate and structure biodiversity monitoring efforts worldwide. Satellite Remote Sensing (SRS) has considerable potential to inform these initiatives. To date, however, discussions on the role of SRS in supporting these frameworks have mostly evolved independently; tend to be led by different groups; sometimes target slightly different scales; and are likely to reach different audiences. Because of this, there is some confusion among environmental managers and policymakers as to what the potential of SRS is or whether there is prospect in considering and promoting the use of satellite data for biodiversity conservation.
2. Here, we provide a brief overview of the role of SRS to date in informing these frameworks. Through a case study focused on the Sahara Desert ecosystem, we also demonstrate the current potential for SRS‐based methodologies to support conservation in data‐deficient areas and discuss the relative applicability of SRS‐based metrics to each of these frameworks.
3. The relevance and use of SRS across the four frameworks are clearly variable, due to differences and ambiguity in definitions, and due to differences in monitoring priorities. Our case study illustrates the particularly high potential for SRS approaches to provide key information relevant to the Biodiversity Indicators framework in desert ecosystems; it also identifies SRS‐based metrics relevant to all frameworks.
4. Altogether, this work highlights how more dialogue is required within the biodiversity‐monitoring community for SRS to reach its full potential in conservation. In particular, agreement on what is needed in priority, given the realm of what is possible, will be of paramount importance to developing SRS‐based products that are used by policymakers and international conventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2041-210X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2041-210X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12545</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; biodiversity indicator ; Case studies ; Conservation ; Desert environments ; Deserts ; earth observations ; ecosystem service ; Ecosystems ; Environmental management ; essential biodiversity variable ; natural capital ; Remote monitoring ; Remote sensing ; Satellites ; technology ; Wildlife conservation ; wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Methods in ecology and evolution, 2016-06, Vol.7 (6), p.656-665</ispartof><rights>2016 The Authors. Methods in Ecology and Evolution © 2016 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>Methods in Ecology and Evolution © 2016 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4185-e8e138ba971b6b47e4dddfa9985f6f8da881c3eacabeb18eebfc18e3e150a3f73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4185-e8e138ba971b6b47e4dddfa9985f6f8da881c3eacabeb18eebfc18e3e150a3f73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F2041-210X.12545$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F2041-210X.12545$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Freckleton, Robert</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pettorelli, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, Harry Jon Foord</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freckleton, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>How do we want Satellite Remote Sensing to support biodiversity conservation globally?</title><title>Methods in ecology and evolution</title><description>Summary
1. Essential Biodiversity Variable, Natural Capital, Biodiversity Indicator and Ecosystem Service are four concepts that underpin the most popular frameworks currently considered for helping to coordinate and structure biodiversity monitoring efforts worldwide. Satellite Remote Sensing (SRS) has considerable potential to inform these initiatives. To date, however, discussions on the role of SRS in supporting these frameworks have mostly evolved independently; tend to be led by different groups; sometimes target slightly different scales; and are likely to reach different audiences. Because of this, there is some confusion among environmental managers and policymakers as to what the potential of SRS is or whether there is prospect in considering and promoting the use of satellite data for biodiversity conservation.
2. Here, we provide a brief overview of the role of SRS to date in informing these frameworks. Through a case study focused on the Sahara Desert ecosystem, we also demonstrate the current potential for SRS‐based methodologies to support conservation in data‐deficient areas and discuss the relative applicability of SRS‐based metrics to each of these frameworks.
3. The relevance and use of SRS across the four frameworks are clearly variable, due to differences and ambiguity in definitions, and due to differences in monitoring priorities. Our case study illustrates the particularly high potential for SRS approaches to provide key information relevant to the Biodiversity Indicators framework in desert ecosystems; it also identifies SRS‐based metrics relevant to all frameworks.
4. Altogether, this work highlights how more dialogue is required within the biodiversity‐monitoring community for SRS to reach its full potential in conservation. In particular, agreement on what is needed in priority, given the realm of what is possible, will be of paramount importance to developing SRS‐based products that are used by policymakers and international conventions.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>biodiversity indicator</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Desert environments</subject><subject>Deserts</subject><subject>earth observations</subject><subject>ecosystem service</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>essential biodiversity variable</subject><subject>natural capital</subject><subject>Remote monitoring</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>technology</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>wildlife management</subject><issn>2041-210X</issn><issn>2041-210X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1Lw0AQhoMoWLRnrwtevLTd2c3H5iRSqhUqglXxtuwmk7IlzcbdtCH_3tSKiAedyzsMzzvMRxBcAB1DHxNGQxgxoG9jYFEYHQWD78rxj_w0GHq_pn1wkVIWDoLXuW1JbkmLpFVVQ5aqwbI0DZIn3Nhellh5U61IY4nf1rV1DdHG5maHzpumI5mtPLqdaoytyKq0WpVld30enBSq9Dj80rPg5Xb2PJ2PFo9399ObxSgLQUQjFAhcaJUmoGMdJhjmeV6oNBVRERciV0JAxlFlSqMGgaiLrBeOEFHFi4SfBVeHvrWz71v0jdwYn_UbqArt1ksQVMQALOE9evkLXdutq_rpJKMxsDQNOfuLgiSNBIviaN9rcqAyZ713WMjamY1ynQQq9w-R-5PL_cnl50N6R3xwtKbE7j9cPsxm_GD8AHtrjXE</recordid><startdate>201606</startdate><enddate>201606</enddate><creator>Pettorelli, Nathalie</creator><creator>Owen, Harry Jon Foord</creator><creator>Duncan, Clare</creator><creator>Freckleton, Robert</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201606</creationdate><title>How do we want Satellite Remote Sensing to support biodiversity conservation globally?</title><author>Pettorelli, Nathalie ; Owen, Harry Jon Foord ; Duncan, Clare ; Freckleton, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4185-e8e138ba971b6b47e4dddfa9985f6f8da881c3eacabeb18eebfc18e3e150a3f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>biodiversity indicator</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Desert environments</topic><topic>Deserts</topic><topic>earth observations</topic><topic>ecosystem service</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>essential biodiversity variable</topic><topic>natural capital</topic><topic>Remote monitoring</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>technology</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pettorelli, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, Harry Jon Foord</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freckleton, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Methods in ecology and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pettorelli, Nathalie</au><au>Owen, Harry Jon Foord</au><au>Duncan, Clare</au><au>Freckleton, Robert</au><au>Freckleton, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How do we want Satellite Remote Sensing to support biodiversity conservation globally?</atitle><jtitle>Methods in ecology and evolution</jtitle><date>2016-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>656</spage><epage>665</epage><pages>656-665</pages><issn>2041-210X</issn><eissn>2041-210X</eissn><abstract>Summary
1. Essential Biodiversity Variable, Natural Capital, Biodiversity Indicator and Ecosystem Service are four concepts that underpin the most popular frameworks currently considered for helping to coordinate and structure biodiversity monitoring efforts worldwide. Satellite Remote Sensing (SRS) has considerable potential to inform these initiatives. To date, however, discussions on the role of SRS in supporting these frameworks have mostly evolved independently; tend to be led by different groups; sometimes target slightly different scales; and are likely to reach different audiences. Because of this, there is some confusion among environmental managers and policymakers as to what the potential of SRS is or whether there is prospect in considering and promoting the use of satellite data for biodiversity conservation.
2. Here, we provide a brief overview of the role of SRS to date in informing these frameworks. Through a case study focused on the Sahara Desert ecosystem, we also demonstrate the current potential for SRS‐based methodologies to support conservation in data‐deficient areas and discuss the relative applicability of SRS‐based metrics to each of these frameworks.
3. The relevance and use of SRS across the four frameworks are clearly variable, due to differences and ambiguity in definitions, and due to differences in monitoring priorities. Our case study illustrates the particularly high potential for SRS approaches to provide key information relevant to the Biodiversity Indicators framework in desert ecosystems; it also identifies SRS‐based metrics relevant to all frameworks.
4. Altogether, this work highlights how more dialogue is required within the biodiversity‐monitoring community for SRS to reach its full potential in conservation. In particular, agreement on what is needed in priority, given the realm of what is possible, will be of paramount importance to developing SRS‐based products that are used by policymakers and international conventions.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/2041-210X.12545</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2041-210X |
| ispartof | Methods in ecology and evolution, 2016-06, Vol.7 (6), p.656-665 |
| issn | 2041-210X 2041-210X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808611273 |
| source | Access via Wiley Online Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Biodiversity biodiversity indicator Case studies Conservation Desert environments Deserts earth observations ecosystem service Ecosystems Environmental management essential biodiversity variable natural capital Remote monitoring Remote sensing Satellites technology Wildlife conservation wildlife management |
| title | How do we want Satellite Remote Sensing to support biodiversity conservation globally? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T21%3A23%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20do%20we%20want%20Satellite%20Remote%20Sensing%20to%20support%20biodiversity%20conservation%20globally?&rft.jtitle=Methods%20in%20ecology%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Pettorelli,%20Nathalie&rft.date=2016-06&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=656&rft.epage=665&rft.pages=656-665&rft.issn=2041-210X&rft.eissn=2041-210X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/2041-210X.12545&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2061299432%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1795825653&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |