Development and validation of the Patient Benefit Index for the dermatocosmetic treatment of aged skin
This study aimed to develop and validate an instrument for the assessment of patient-relevant benefit in dermatocosmetic treatment, i.e., skin care, of aged skin. Based on an open item collection with 33 elderly persons, items on patient-relevant treatment goals were collected. An expert panel selec...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of Dermatological Research 2016-07, Vol.308 (5), p.319-324 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 324 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 319 |
| container_title | Archives of Dermatological Research |
| container_volume | 308 |
| creator | Lohrberg, David Blaak, Jürgen Liebsch, Juliane Staib, Peter Wohlfart, Rainer Lüttje, Dieter Schürer, Nanna Y. Augustin, Matthias Blome, Christine |
| description | This study aimed to develop and validate an instrument for the assessment of patient-relevant benefit in dermatocosmetic treatment, i.e., skin care, of aged skin. Based on an open item collection with 33 elderly persons, items on patient-relevant treatment goals were collected. An expert panel selected 20 items to be most relevant and feasible for the questionnaire named Patient Benefit Index for Aged Skin (PBI-AS). The instrument, which assesses goal importance and achievement, was tested in a cognitive debriefing and validated in a longitudinal study (
n
= 80) along with the Dry Skin Area and Severity Index (DASI) and the Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI) as convergent validation criteria. The cognitive debriefing showed the good practicability and feasibility of the instrument. Significant correlation with change in DASI (
r
= −0.527;
p
|
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00403-016-1648-5 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808611190</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1808611190</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-dc6888fcc6573ba06006f0c498d11cb62500436ac49352a351598b9930f312343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUuLFDEUhYMoTjPOD3AjATduSu-tPCq11BkfAwO6UHAX0qmbscaqSpukB_33prpHEUHMJiTnO-dyOYw9RniOAN2LDCBBNIC6QS1No-6xDUrRNqD7z_fZBoSERuhen7CznG-gng5kC91DdtJ2iJ2UZsPCBd3SFHczLYW7ZeC3bhoHV8a48Bh4-UL8Q32t6itaKIyFXy4DfechpoM6UJpdiT7mmcroeUnkyiGt2t01DTx_HZdH7EFwU6azu_uUfXrz-uP5u-bq_dvL85dXjZegSjN4bYwJ3mvVia0DDaADeNmbAdFvdavq0kK7-iNU64RC1Ztt3wsIAlshxSl7dszdpfhtT7nYecyepsktFPfZogGjEbGH_6Ndr4wBKdfUp3-hN3GflrrIgdKolVkpPFI-xZwTBbtL4-zSD4tg18rssTJbK7NrZVZVz5O75P12puG341dBFWiPQK7Sck3pj9H_TP0JLmKeuQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1795616584</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and validation of the Patient Benefit Index for the dermatocosmetic treatment of aged skin</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Lohrberg, David ; Blaak, Jürgen ; Liebsch, Juliane ; Staib, Peter ; Wohlfart, Rainer ; Lüttje, Dieter ; Schürer, Nanna Y. ; Augustin, Matthias ; Blome, Christine</creator><creatorcontrib>Lohrberg, David ; Blaak, Jürgen ; Liebsch, Juliane ; Staib, Peter ; Wohlfart, Rainer ; Lüttje, Dieter ; Schürer, Nanna Y. ; Augustin, Matthias ; Blome, Christine</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to develop and validate an instrument for the assessment of patient-relevant benefit in dermatocosmetic treatment, i.e., skin care, of aged skin. Based on an open item collection with 33 elderly persons, items on patient-relevant treatment goals were collected. An expert panel selected 20 items to be most relevant and feasible for the questionnaire named Patient Benefit Index for Aged Skin (PBI-AS). The instrument, which assesses goal importance and achievement, was tested in a cognitive debriefing and validated in a longitudinal study (
n
= 80) along with the Dry Skin Area and Severity Index (DASI) and the Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI) as convergent validation criteria. The cognitive debriefing showed the good practicability and feasibility of the instrument. Significant correlation with change in DASI (
r
= −0.527;
p
< 0.001) supports convergent validity of the PBI-AS. By contrast, correlation with DLQI was poor, indicating the different constructs. The PBI-AS is a valid and feasible tool for the patient-centered assessment of dermatocosmetic treatment benefit in aged skin.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-3696</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-069X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00403-016-1648-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27117448</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Dermatology ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original Paper ; Patient Outcome Assessment ; Patient Satisfaction ; Quality of Life ; Skin Aging ; Skin Care - statistics & numerical data ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Archives of Dermatological Research, 2016-07, Vol.308 (5), p.319-324</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-dc6888fcc6573ba06006f0c498d11cb62500436ac49352a351598b9930f312343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-dc6888fcc6573ba06006f0c498d11cb62500436ac49352a351598b9930f312343</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00403-016-1648-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00403-016-1648-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27117448$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lohrberg, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blaak, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebsch, Juliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staib, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wohlfart, Rainer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lüttje, Dieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schürer, Nanna Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augustin, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blome, Christine</creatorcontrib><title>Development and validation of the Patient Benefit Index for the dermatocosmetic treatment of aged skin</title><title>Archives of Dermatological Research</title><addtitle>Arch Dermatol Res</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Dermatol Res</addtitle><description>This study aimed to develop and validate an instrument for the assessment of patient-relevant benefit in dermatocosmetic treatment, i.e., skin care, of aged skin. Based on an open item collection with 33 elderly persons, items on patient-relevant treatment goals were collected. An expert panel selected 20 items to be most relevant and feasible for the questionnaire named Patient Benefit Index for Aged Skin (PBI-AS). The instrument, which assesses goal importance and achievement, was tested in a cognitive debriefing and validated in a longitudinal study (
n
= 80) along with the Dry Skin Area and Severity Index (DASI) and the Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI) as convergent validation criteria. The cognitive debriefing showed the good practicability and feasibility of the instrument. Significant correlation with change in DASI (
r
= −0.527;
p
< 0.001) supports convergent validity of the PBI-AS. By contrast, correlation with DLQI was poor, indicating the different constructs. The PBI-AS is a valid and feasible tool for the patient-centered assessment of dermatocosmetic treatment benefit in aged skin.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Patient Outcome Assessment</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Skin Aging</subject><subject>Skin Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0340-3696</issn><issn>1432-069X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUuLFDEUhYMoTjPOD3AjATduSu-tPCq11BkfAwO6UHAX0qmbscaqSpukB_33prpHEUHMJiTnO-dyOYw9RniOAN2LDCBBNIC6QS1No-6xDUrRNqD7z_fZBoSERuhen7CznG-gng5kC91DdtJ2iJ2UZsPCBd3SFHczLYW7ZeC3bhoHV8a48Bh4-UL8Q32t6itaKIyFXy4DfechpoM6UJpdiT7mmcroeUnkyiGt2t01DTx_HZdH7EFwU6azu_uUfXrz-uP5u-bq_dvL85dXjZegSjN4bYwJ3mvVia0DDaADeNmbAdFvdavq0kK7-iNU64RC1Ztt3wsIAlshxSl7dszdpfhtT7nYecyepsktFPfZogGjEbGH_6Ndr4wBKdfUp3-hN3GflrrIgdKolVkpPFI-xZwTBbtL4-zSD4tg18rssTJbK7NrZVZVz5O75P12puG341dBFWiPQK7Sck3pj9H_TP0JLmKeuQ</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Lohrberg, David</creator><creator>Blaak, Jürgen</creator><creator>Liebsch, Juliane</creator><creator>Staib, Peter</creator><creator>Wohlfart, Rainer</creator><creator>Lüttje, Dieter</creator><creator>Schürer, Nanna Y.</creator><creator>Augustin, Matthias</creator><creator>Blome, Christine</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Development and validation of the Patient Benefit Index for the dermatocosmetic treatment of aged skin</title><author>Lohrberg, David ; Blaak, Jürgen ; Liebsch, Juliane ; Staib, Peter ; Wohlfart, Rainer ; Lüttje, Dieter ; Schürer, Nanna Y. ; Augustin, Matthias ; Blome, Christine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-dc6888fcc6573ba06006f0c498d11cb62500436ac49352a351598b9930f312343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Patient Outcome Assessment</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Skin Aging</topic><topic>Skin Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lohrberg, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blaak, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebsch, Juliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staib, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wohlfart, Rainer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lüttje, Dieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schürer, Nanna Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augustin, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blome, Christine</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of Dermatological Research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lohrberg, David</au><au>Blaak, Jürgen</au><au>Liebsch, Juliane</au><au>Staib, Peter</au><au>Wohlfart, Rainer</au><au>Lüttje, Dieter</au><au>Schürer, Nanna Y.</au><au>Augustin, Matthias</au><au>Blome, Christine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development and validation of the Patient Benefit Index for the dermatocosmetic treatment of aged skin</atitle><jtitle>Archives of Dermatological Research</jtitle><stitle>Arch Dermatol Res</stitle><addtitle>Arch Dermatol Res</addtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>308</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>319</spage><epage>324</epage><pages>319-324</pages><issn>0340-3696</issn><eissn>1432-069X</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to develop and validate an instrument for the assessment of patient-relevant benefit in dermatocosmetic treatment, i.e., skin care, of aged skin. Based on an open item collection with 33 elderly persons, items on patient-relevant treatment goals were collected. An expert panel selected 20 items to be most relevant and feasible for the questionnaire named Patient Benefit Index for Aged Skin (PBI-AS). The instrument, which assesses goal importance and achievement, was tested in a cognitive debriefing and validated in a longitudinal study (
n
= 80) along with the Dry Skin Area and Severity Index (DASI) and the Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI) as convergent validation criteria. The cognitive debriefing showed the good practicability and feasibility of the instrument. Significant correlation with change in DASI (
r
= −0.527;
p
< 0.001) supports convergent validity of the PBI-AS. By contrast, correlation with DLQI was poor, indicating the different constructs. The PBI-AS is a valid and feasible tool for the patient-centered assessment of dermatocosmetic treatment benefit in aged skin.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>27117448</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00403-016-1648-5</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0340-3696 |
| ispartof | Archives of Dermatological Research, 2016-07, Vol.308 (5), p.319-324 |
| issn | 0340-3696 1432-069X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808611190 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Dermatology Feasibility Studies Female Humans Longitudinal Studies Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Paper Patient Outcome Assessment Patient Satisfaction Quality of Life Skin Aging Skin Care - statistics & numerical data Surveys and Questionnaires |
| title | Development and validation of the Patient Benefit Index for the dermatocosmetic treatment of aged skin |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T21%3A29%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20validation%20of%20the%20Patient%20Benefit%20Index%20for%20the%20dermatocosmetic%20treatment%20of%20aged%20skin&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20Dermatological%20Research&rft.au=Lohrberg,%20David&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=308&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=319&rft.epage=324&rft.pages=319-324&rft.issn=0340-3696&rft.eissn=1432-069X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00403-016-1648-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1808611190%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1795616584&rft_id=info:pmid/27117448&rfr_iscdi=true |