Indifference to dissonance in native Amazonians reveals cultural variation in music perception

A native Amazonian society rated consonant and dissonant chords and vocal harmonies as equally pleasant, whereas Bolivian city- and town-dwellers preferred consonance, indicating that preference for consonance over dissonance is not universal and probably develops from exposure to particular types o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nature (London) 2016-07, Vol.535 (7613), p.547-550
Hauptverfasser: McDermott, Josh H., Schultz, Alan F., Undurraga, Eduardo A., Godoy, Ricardo A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 550
container_issue 7613
container_start_page 547
container_title Nature (London)
container_volume 535
creator McDermott, Josh H.
Schultz, Alan F.
Undurraga, Eduardo A.
Godoy, Ricardo A.
description A native Amazonian society rated consonant and dissonant chords and vocal harmonies as equally pleasant, whereas Bolivian city- and town-dwellers preferred consonance, indicating that preference for consonance over dissonance is not universal and probably develops from exposure to particular types of polyphonic music. Cultural variation in music perception In Western cultures, some combinations of musical notes are perceived as pleasant, or consonant, and others as unpleasant, or dissonant. The aesthetic contrast between consonance and dissonance is commonly thought to be biologically determined and thus to be universally present in humans. Josh McDermott and colleagues put this idea to the test by conducting experiments in remote areas of the Bolivian Amazon rainforest, working with the Tsimane', an indigenous society that has remained relatively isolated from Western culture. They found that the Tsimane' rated consonant and dissonant chords and vocal harmonies as equally pleasant. By contrast, Bolivian city- and town-dwellers preferred consonance, albeit to a lesser degree than US residents. These findings suggest that the preference for consonance over dissonance is not universal, and probably develops from exposure to particular types of polyphonic music. Music is present in every culture, but the degree to which it is shaped by biology remains debated. One widely discussed phenomenon is that some combinations of notes are perceived by Westerners as pleasant, or consonant, whereas others are perceived as unpleasant, or dissonant 1 . The contrast between consonance and dissonance is central to Western music 2 , 3 , and its origins have fascinated scholars since the ancient Greeks 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 . Aesthetic responses to consonance are commonly assumed by scientists to have biological roots 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , and thus to be universally present in humans 15 , 16 . Ethnomusicologists 17 and composers 8 , in contrast, have argued that consonance is a creation of Western musical culture 6 . The issue has remained unresolved, partly because little is known about the extent of cross-cultural variation in consonance preferences 18 . Here we report experiments with the Tsimane’—a native Amazonian society with minimal exposure to Western culture—and comparison populations in Bolivia and the United States that varied in exposure to Western music. Participants rated the pleasantness of sounds. Despite exhibiting Western-like discrimination abilities and
doi_str_mv 10.1038/nature18635
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808606471</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A459508766</galeid><sourcerecordid>A459508766</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-686e5bcbb482ee6c28c63a599ae98b6ca25297358a214e14f39c981bdd9529aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10s-P1CAUB3BiNO64evJuGr1otCtQoPQ4mfhjko0musabhNLXCZsWutBO3P3rpdlVZ0wNBwJ8-EJeHkJPCT4juJBvnR6nAESKgt9DK8JKkTMhy_tohTGVOZaFOEGPYrzEGHNSsofohJYMV5KIFfqxdY1tWwjgDGSjzxobo3d6XlmXpWy7h2zd6xvvrHYxC7AH3cXMTF16VnfZXgeblHez76doTTZAMDDMe4_RgzZpeHI3n6Jv799dbD7m558_bDfr89wISsdcSAG8NnXNJAUQhkojCs2rSkMla2E05bQqCy41JQwIa4vKpP_XTVOlA62LU_TyNncI_mqCOKreRgNdpx34KSoisRRYsJIk-uIfeumn4NLvZlWKinBO_6qd7kBZ1_oxaDOHqjXjFceyFCKpfEHtwEGqjHfQ2rR95J8veDPYK3WIzhZQGg301iymvjq6kMwIP8ednmJU269fju3r_9v1xffNp0Vtgo8xQKuGYHsdrhXBam4-ddB8ST-7q-xU99D8sb-7LYE3tyCmI7eDcFD6hbxfwi_gvw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1807691552</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Indifference to dissonance in native Amazonians reveals cultural variation in music perception</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Nature Journals Online</source><creator>McDermott, Josh H. ; Schultz, Alan F. ; Undurraga, Eduardo A. ; Godoy, Ricardo A.</creator><creatorcontrib>McDermott, Josh H. ; Schultz, Alan F. ; Undurraga, Eduardo A. ; Godoy, Ricardo A.</creatorcontrib><description>A native Amazonian society rated consonant and dissonant chords and vocal harmonies as equally pleasant, whereas Bolivian city- and town-dwellers preferred consonance, indicating that preference for consonance over dissonance is not universal and probably develops from exposure to particular types of polyphonic music. Cultural variation in music perception In Western cultures, some combinations of musical notes are perceived as pleasant, or consonant, and others as unpleasant, or dissonant. The aesthetic contrast between consonance and dissonance is commonly thought to be biologically determined and thus to be universally present in humans. Josh McDermott and colleagues put this idea to the test by conducting experiments in remote areas of the Bolivian Amazon rainforest, working with the Tsimane', an indigenous society that has remained relatively isolated from Western culture. They found that the Tsimane' rated consonant and dissonant chords and vocal harmonies as equally pleasant. By contrast, Bolivian city- and town-dwellers preferred consonance, albeit to a lesser degree than US residents. These findings suggest that the preference for consonance over dissonance is not universal, and probably develops from exposure to particular types of polyphonic music. Music is present in every culture, but the degree to which it is shaped by biology remains debated. One widely discussed phenomenon is that some combinations of notes are perceived by Westerners as pleasant, or consonant, whereas others are perceived as unpleasant, or dissonant 1 . The contrast between consonance and dissonance is central to Western music 2 , 3 , and its origins have fascinated scholars since the ancient Greeks 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 . Aesthetic responses to consonance are commonly assumed by scientists to have biological roots 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , and thus to be universally present in humans 15 , 16 . Ethnomusicologists 17 and composers 8 , in contrast, have argued that consonance is a creation of Western musical culture 6 . The issue has remained unresolved, partly because little is known about the extent of cross-cultural variation in consonance preferences 18 . Here we report experiments with the Tsimane’—a native Amazonian society with minimal exposure to Western culture—and comparison populations in Bolivia and the United States that varied in exposure to Western music. Participants rated the pleasantness of sounds. Despite exhibiting Western-like discrimination abilities and Western-like aesthetic responses to familiar sounds and acoustic roughness, the Tsimane’ rated consonant and dissonant chords and vocal harmonies as equally pleasant. By contrast, Bolivian city- and town-dwellers exhibited significant preferences for consonance, albeit to a lesser degree than US residents. The results indicate that consonance preferences can be absent in cultures sufficiently isolated from Western music, and are thus unlikely to reflect innate biases or exposure to harmonic natural sounds. The observed variation in preferences is presumably determined by exposure to musical harmony, suggesting that culture has a dominant role in shaping aesthetic responses to music.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-0836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-4687</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/nature18635</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27409816</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NATUAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/378/2619 ; 631/477/2811 ; Acoustic Stimulation ; Acoustics ; Adult ; Auditory Perception ; Bolivia - ethnology ; Culture ; Esthetics - psychology ; Female ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; Indians, South American - psychology ; letter ; Male ; multidisciplinary ; Music ; Music - psychology ; Musical ability ; Native peoples ; Pleasure ; Psychological aspects ; Rainforest ; Science ; Sensory perception ; Singing ; Social aspects ; Sound ; United States - ethnology ; Urban Population ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Nature (London), 2016-07, Vol.535 (7613), p.547-550</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Limited 2016</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Jul 28, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-686e5bcbb482ee6c28c63a599ae98b6ca25297358a214e14f39c981bdd9529aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-686e5bcbb482ee6c28c63a599ae98b6ca25297358a214e14f39c981bdd9529aa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/nature18635$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/nature18635$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916,41479,42548,51310</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27409816$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McDermott, Josh H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultz, Alan F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Undurraga, Eduardo A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godoy, Ricardo A.</creatorcontrib><title>Indifference to dissonance in native Amazonians reveals cultural variation in music perception</title><title>Nature (London)</title><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><description>A native Amazonian society rated consonant and dissonant chords and vocal harmonies as equally pleasant, whereas Bolivian city- and town-dwellers preferred consonance, indicating that preference for consonance over dissonance is not universal and probably develops from exposure to particular types of polyphonic music. Cultural variation in music perception In Western cultures, some combinations of musical notes are perceived as pleasant, or consonant, and others as unpleasant, or dissonant. The aesthetic contrast between consonance and dissonance is commonly thought to be biologically determined and thus to be universally present in humans. Josh McDermott and colleagues put this idea to the test by conducting experiments in remote areas of the Bolivian Amazon rainforest, working with the Tsimane', an indigenous society that has remained relatively isolated from Western culture. They found that the Tsimane' rated consonant and dissonant chords and vocal harmonies as equally pleasant. By contrast, Bolivian city- and town-dwellers preferred consonance, albeit to a lesser degree than US residents. These findings suggest that the preference for consonance over dissonance is not universal, and probably develops from exposure to particular types of polyphonic music. Music is present in every culture, but the degree to which it is shaped by biology remains debated. One widely discussed phenomenon is that some combinations of notes are perceived by Westerners as pleasant, or consonant, whereas others are perceived as unpleasant, or dissonant 1 . The contrast between consonance and dissonance is central to Western music 2 , 3 , and its origins have fascinated scholars since the ancient Greeks 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 . Aesthetic responses to consonance are commonly assumed by scientists to have biological roots 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , and thus to be universally present in humans 15 , 16 . Ethnomusicologists 17 and composers 8 , in contrast, have argued that consonance is a creation of Western musical culture 6 . The issue has remained unresolved, partly because little is known about the extent of cross-cultural variation in consonance preferences 18 . Here we report experiments with the Tsimane’—a native Amazonian society with minimal exposure to Western culture—and comparison populations in Bolivia and the United States that varied in exposure to Western music. Participants rated the pleasantness of sounds. Despite exhibiting Western-like discrimination abilities and Western-like aesthetic responses to familiar sounds and acoustic roughness, the Tsimane’ rated consonant and dissonant chords and vocal harmonies as equally pleasant. By contrast, Bolivian city- and town-dwellers exhibited significant preferences for consonance, albeit to a lesser degree than US residents. The results indicate that consonance preferences can be absent in cultures sufficiently isolated from Western music, and are thus unlikely to reflect innate biases or exposure to harmonic natural sounds. The observed variation in preferences is presumably determined by exposure to musical harmony, suggesting that culture has a dominant role in shaping aesthetic responses to music.</description><subject>631/378/2619</subject><subject>631/477/2811</subject><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Bolivia - ethnology</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Esthetics - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Indians, South American - psychology</subject><subject>letter</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Music</subject><subject>Music - psychology</subject><subject>Musical ability</subject><subject>Native peoples</subject><subject>Pleasure</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Rainforest</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Sensory perception</subject><subject>Singing</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Sound</subject><subject>United States - ethnology</subject><subject>Urban Population</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0028-0836</issn><issn>1476-4687</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp10s-P1CAUB3BiNO64evJuGr1otCtQoPQ4mfhjko0musabhNLXCZsWutBO3P3rpdlVZ0wNBwJ8-EJeHkJPCT4juJBvnR6nAESKgt9DK8JKkTMhy_tohTGVOZaFOEGPYrzEGHNSsofohJYMV5KIFfqxdY1tWwjgDGSjzxobo3d6XlmXpWy7h2zd6xvvrHYxC7AH3cXMTF16VnfZXgeblHez76doTTZAMDDMe4_RgzZpeHI3n6Jv799dbD7m558_bDfr89wISsdcSAG8NnXNJAUQhkojCs2rSkMla2E05bQqCy41JQwIa4vKpP_XTVOlA62LU_TyNncI_mqCOKreRgNdpx34KSoisRRYsJIk-uIfeumn4NLvZlWKinBO_6qd7kBZ1_oxaDOHqjXjFceyFCKpfEHtwEGqjHfQ2rR95J8veDPYK3WIzhZQGg301iymvjq6kMwIP8ednmJU269fju3r_9v1xffNp0Vtgo8xQKuGYHsdrhXBam4-ddB8ST-7q-xU99D8sb-7LYE3tyCmI7eDcFD6hbxfwi_gvw</recordid><startdate>20160728</startdate><enddate>20160728</enddate><creator>McDermott, Josh H.</creator><creator>Schultz, Alan F.</creator><creator>Undurraga, Eduardo A.</creator><creator>Godoy, Ricardo A.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ATWCN</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160728</creationdate><title>Indifference to dissonance in native Amazonians reveals cultural variation in music perception</title><author>McDermott, Josh H. ; Schultz, Alan F. ; Undurraga, Eduardo A. ; Godoy, Ricardo A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-686e5bcbb482ee6c28c63a599ae98b6ca25297358a214e14f39c981bdd9529aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>631/378/2619</topic><topic>631/477/2811</topic><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Bolivia - ethnology</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Esthetics - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Indians, South American - psychology</topic><topic>letter</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Music</topic><topic>Music - psychology</topic><topic>Musical ability</topic><topic>Native peoples</topic><topic>Pleasure</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Rainforest</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Sensory perception</topic><topic>Singing</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Sound</topic><topic>United States - ethnology</topic><topic>Urban Population</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McDermott, Josh H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultz, Alan F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Undurraga, Eduardo A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godoy, Ricardo A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Middle School</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nature (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McDermott, Josh H.</au><au>Schultz, Alan F.</au><au>Undurraga, Eduardo A.</au><au>Godoy, Ricardo A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Indifference to dissonance in native Amazonians reveals cultural variation in music perception</atitle><jtitle>Nature (London)</jtitle><stitle>Nature</stitle><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><date>2016-07-28</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>535</volume><issue>7613</issue><spage>547</spage><epage>550</epage><pages>547-550</pages><issn>0028-0836</issn><eissn>1476-4687</eissn><coden>NATUAS</coden><abstract>A native Amazonian society rated consonant and dissonant chords and vocal harmonies as equally pleasant, whereas Bolivian city- and town-dwellers preferred consonance, indicating that preference for consonance over dissonance is not universal and probably develops from exposure to particular types of polyphonic music. Cultural variation in music perception In Western cultures, some combinations of musical notes are perceived as pleasant, or consonant, and others as unpleasant, or dissonant. The aesthetic contrast between consonance and dissonance is commonly thought to be biologically determined and thus to be universally present in humans. Josh McDermott and colleagues put this idea to the test by conducting experiments in remote areas of the Bolivian Amazon rainforest, working with the Tsimane', an indigenous society that has remained relatively isolated from Western culture. They found that the Tsimane' rated consonant and dissonant chords and vocal harmonies as equally pleasant. By contrast, Bolivian city- and town-dwellers preferred consonance, albeit to a lesser degree than US residents. These findings suggest that the preference for consonance over dissonance is not universal, and probably develops from exposure to particular types of polyphonic music. Music is present in every culture, but the degree to which it is shaped by biology remains debated. One widely discussed phenomenon is that some combinations of notes are perceived by Westerners as pleasant, or consonant, whereas others are perceived as unpleasant, or dissonant 1 . The contrast between consonance and dissonance is central to Western music 2 , 3 , and its origins have fascinated scholars since the ancient Greeks 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 . Aesthetic responses to consonance are commonly assumed by scientists to have biological roots 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , and thus to be universally present in humans 15 , 16 . Ethnomusicologists 17 and composers 8 , in contrast, have argued that consonance is a creation of Western musical culture 6 . The issue has remained unresolved, partly because little is known about the extent of cross-cultural variation in consonance preferences 18 . Here we report experiments with the Tsimane’—a native Amazonian society with minimal exposure to Western culture—and comparison populations in Bolivia and the United States that varied in exposure to Western music. Participants rated the pleasantness of sounds. Despite exhibiting Western-like discrimination abilities and Western-like aesthetic responses to familiar sounds and acoustic roughness, the Tsimane’ rated consonant and dissonant chords and vocal harmonies as equally pleasant. By contrast, Bolivian city- and town-dwellers exhibited significant preferences for consonance, albeit to a lesser degree than US residents. The results indicate that consonance preferences can be absent in cultures sufficiently isolated from Western music, and are thus unlikely to reflect innate biases or exposure to harmonic natural sounds. The observed variation in preferences is presumably determined by exposure to musical harmony, suggesting that culture has a dominant role in shaping aesthetic responses to music.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>27409816</pmid><doi>10.1038/nature18635</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-0836
ispartof Nature (London), 2016-07, Vol.535 (7613), p.547-550
issn 0028-0836
1476-4687
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808606471
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Nature Journals Online
subjects 631/378/2619
631/477/2811
Acoustic Stimulation
Acoustics
Adult
Auditory Perception
Bolivia - ethnology
Culture
Esthetics - psychology
Female
Humanities and Social Sciences
Humans
Indians, South American - psychology
letter
Male
multidisciplinary
Music
Music - psychology
Musical ability
Native peoples
Pleasure
Psychological aspects
Rainforest
Science
Sensory perception
Singing
Social aspects
Sound
United States - ethnology
Urban Population
Young Adult
title Indifference to dissonance in native Amazonians reveals cultural variation in music perception
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T05%3A56%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Indifference%20to%20dissonance%20in%20native%20Amazonians%20reveals%20cultural%20variation%20in%20music%20perception&rft.jtitle=Nature%20(London)&rft.au=McDermott,%20Josh%20H.&rft.date=2016-07-28&rft.volume=535&rft.issue=7613&rft.spage=547&rft.epage=550&rft.pages=547-550&rft.issn=0028-0836&rft.eissn=1476-4687&rft.coden=NATUAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/nature18635&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA459508766%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1807691552&rft_id=info:pmid/27409816&rft_galeid=A459508766&rfr_iscdi=true