The usefulness of a mobile device-based system for patient-reported outcomes in a spine outpatient clinic
Abstract Background Context Patient reported outcomes (PRO) are typically collected using a paper form, but this format is cumbersome to incorporate into outpatient clinic visits as well as in research. Therefore, we developed a mobile device-based system (mobile system) for spinal PRO. We hypothesi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The spine journal 2016-07, Vol.16 (7), p.843-850 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 850 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 843 |
container_title | The spine journal |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Kim, Chi Heon, MD, PhD Chung, Chun Kee, MD, PhD Choi, Yunhee, PhD Shin, HyunJeong, MS Woo, Ji Won, RN Kim, Sung-Mi, RN Lee, Hyuk-Joon, MD, PhD |
description | Abstract Background Context Patient reported outcomes (PRO) are typically collected using a paper form, but this format is cumbersome to incorporate into outpatient clinic visits as well as in research. Therefore, we developed a mobile device-based system (mobile system) for spinal PRO. We hypothesized that this system may improve the quality of care in an outpatient clinic. Purpose To analyze the patient-reported efficacy of a mobile system through a survey of patients' responses compared to a paper system. Study Design/Setting Prospective observational study Patient Sample Surveys were conducted for 103 patients who had experience using both the paper and electronic systems in the outpatient clinic. Outcome Measures Patient-reported positive response score (PRS) Methods The survey included the characteristics of the patients (sex, age, use of smartphone, familiarity with smartphone applications, proficiency of typing with mobile device, site of pain and education level) and eight questions in four domains: 1) efficacy in the waiting room, 2) efficacy during the clinic visit, 3) overall satisfaction and 4) opinion about the use of this system. The response to each question was scored from 1–5 (1, negative; 5, positive response). The patient-reported PRS was calculated by adding the scores of the 8 questions and converting the total range to 0 to 100 (60, neutral). Results The mean PRS of the 8 questions was 79.8 (95% CI, 76.7–83.9). The mean PRS was 78.9 (75.6-82.2) at the waiting room and was 80.5 (77.1–83.9) during the clinic. The PRS for overall satisfaction and use of this system were 83.3 (79.6–87.0) and 77.1 (71.9–82.3), respectively. The use of smartphones and the proficiency of typing were independently significant predictors of PRS with an R2 value of 0.325. Conclusions The mobile device-based system improved the patient-reported efficacy in spine outpatient clinics. However, various factors such as the use of smartphones need to be considered when developing and applying mobile systems. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.02.048 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808605679</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1529943016004381</els_id><sourcerecordid>1808605679</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-41cc398840863a3e40fb404706c1d9aba3a3a317adbddd21c73ced5913756cf33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctu1TAQhiMEoqXtGyDkJZuE8eUkzgYJVdykSixa1pZjT4QPSRw8SaXz9nXIgQUb5IU99v_PjL8pitccKg68fnesaA4TYiVyVIGoQOlnxSXXjS55LcXzfD6ItmyVhIviFdERAHTDxcviQtRtzQXAZREefiBbCft1mJCIxZ5ZNsYuDMg8PgaHZWcJPaMTLTiyPiY22yXgtJQJ55iW_BbXxcURiYUpu3-3td2ddcwNYQruunjR24Hw5rxfFd8_fXy4_VLeffv89fbDXekUb5ZScedkq7UCXUsrUUHfKVAN1I771nZWbos31nfee8FdIx36Q8tlc6hdL-VV8XbPO6f4a0VazBjI4TDYCeNKhuucGQ5102ap2qUuRaKEvZlTGG06GQ5mg2yOZodsNsgGhMmQs-3NucLajej_mv5QzYL3uwDzPx8DJkMuk8h9hoRuMT6G_1X4N8HO0A4_8YR0jGuaMkPDDWWDud8Gvc2Z1wBKai6fABSFpZw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1808605679</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The usefulness of a mobile device-based system for patient-reported outcomes in a spine outpatient clinic</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kim, Chi Heon, MD, PhD ; Chung, Chun Kee, MD, PhD ; Choi, Yunhee, PhD ; Shin, HyunJeong, MS ; Woo, Ji Won, RN ; Kim, Sung-Mi, RN ; Lee, Hyuk-Joon, MD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Chi Heon, MD, PhD ; Chung, Chun Kee, MD, PhD ; Choi, Yunhee, PhD ; Shin, HyunJeong, MS ; Woo, Ji Won, RN ; Kim, Sung-Mi, RN ; Lee, Hyuk-Joon, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Context Patient reported outcomes (PRO) are typically collected using a paper form, but this format is cumbersome to incorporate into outpatient clinic visits as well as in research. Therefore, we developed a mobile device-based system (mobile system) for spinal PRO. We hypothesized that this system may improve the quality of care in an outpatient clinic. Purpose To analyze the patient-reported efficacy of a mobile system through a survey of patients' responses compared to a paper system. Study Design/Setting Prospective observational study Patient Sample Surveys were conducted for 103 patients who had experience using both the paper and electronic systems in the outpatient clinic. Outcome Measures Patient-reported positive response score (PRS) Methods The survey included the characteristics of the patients (sex, age, use of smartphone, familiarity with smartphone applications, proficiency of typing with mobile device, site of pain and education level) and eight questions in four domains: 1) efficacy in the waiting room, 2) efficacy during the clinic visit, 3) overall satisfaction and 4) opinion about the use of this system. The response to each question was scored from 1–5 (1, negative; 5, positive response). The patient-reported PRS was calculated by adding the scores of the 8 questions and converting the total range to 0 to 100 (60, neutral). Results The mean PRS of the 8 questions was 79.8 (95% CI, 76.7–83.9). The mean PRS was 78.9 (75.6-82.2) at the waiting room and was 80.5 (77.1–83.9) during the clinic. The PRS for overall satisfaction and use of this system were 83.3 (79.6–87.0) and 77.1 (71.9–82.3), respectively. The use of smartphones and the proficiency of typing were independently significant predictors of PRS with an R2 value of 0.325. Conclusions The mobile device-based system improved the patient-reported efficacy in spine outpatient clinics. However, various factors such as the use of smartphones need to be considered when developing and applying mobile systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1529-9430</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.02.048</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26961200</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Ambulatory Care Facilities ; Cell Phone ; Computer ; Disability ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mobile applications ; Mobile telephone ; Orthopedics ; Outcome assessment ; Pain ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Spinal Diseases - rehabilitation ; Spinal Diseases - therapy ; Spine ; Telemedicine - instrumentation ; Telemedicine - methods</subject><ispartof>The spine journal, 2016-07, Vol.16 (7), p.843-850</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-41cc398840863a3e40fb404706c1d9aba3a3a317adbddd21c73ced5913756cf33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-41cc398840863a3e40fb404706c1d9aba3a3a317adbddd21c73ced5913756cf33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3485-2327</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1529943016004381$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26961200$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Chi Heon, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Chun Kee, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Yunhee, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, HyunJeong, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woo, Ji Won, RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sung-Mi, RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyuk-Joon, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>The usefulness of a mobile device-based system for patient-reported outcomes in a spine outpatient clinic</title><title>The spine journal</title><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Context Patient reported outcomes (PRO) are typically collected using a paper form, but this format is cumbersome to incorporate into outpatient clinic visits as well as in research. Therefore, we developed a mobile device-based system (mobile system) for spinal PRO. We hypothesized that this system may improve the quality of care in an outpatient clinic. Purpose To analyze the patient-reported efficacy of a mobile system through a survey of patients' responses compared to a paper system. Study Design/Setting Prospective observational study Patient Sample Surveys were conducted for 103 patients who had experience using both the paper and electronic systems in the outpatient clinic. Outcome Measures Patient-reported positive response score (PRS) Methods The survey included the characteristics of the patients (sex, age, use of smartphone, familiarity with smartphone applications, proficiency of typing with mobile device, site of pain and education level) and eight questions in four domains: 1) efficacy in the waiting room, 2) efficacy during the clinic visit, 3) overall satisfaction and 4) opinion about the use of this system. The response to each question was scored from 1–5 (1, negative; 5, positive response). The patient-reported PRS was calculated by adding the scores of the 8 questions and converting the total range to 0 to 100 (60, neutral). Results The mean PRS of the 8 questions was 79.8 (95% CI, 76.7–83.9). The mean PRS was 78.9 (75.6-82.2) at the waiting room and was 80.5 (77.1–83.9) during the clinic. The PRS for overall satisfaction and use of this system were 83.3 (79.6–87.0) and 77.1 (71.9–82.3), respectively. The use of smartphones and the proficiency of typing were independently significant predictors of PRS with an R2 value of 0.325. Conclusions The mobile device-based system improved the patient-reported efficacy in spine outpatient clinics. However, various factors such as the use of smartphones need to be considered when developing and applying mobile systems.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care Facilities</subject><subject>Cell Phone</subject><subject>Computer</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mobile applications</subject><subject>Mobile telephone</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Outcome assessment</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Spinal Diseases - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Spinal Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Telemedicine - instrumentation</subject><subject>Telemedicine - methods</subject><issn>1529-9430</issn><issn>1878-1632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctu1TAQhiMEoqXtGyDkJZuE8eUkzgYJVdykSixa1pZjT4QPSRw8SaXz9nXIgQUb5IU99v_PjL8pitccKg68fnesaA4TYiVyVIGoQOlnxSXXjS55LcXzfD6ItmyVhIviFdERAHTDxcviQtRtzQXAZREefiBbCft1mJCIxZ5ZNsYuDMg8PgaHZWcJPaMTLTiyPiY22yXgtJQJ55iW_BbXxcURiYUpu3-3td2ddcwNYQruunjR24Hw5rxfFd8_fXy4_VLeffv89fbDXekUb5ZScedkq7UCXUsrUUHfKVAN1I771nZWbos31nfee8FdIx36Q8tlc6hdL-VV8XbPO6f4a0VazBjI4TDYCeNKhuucGQ5102ap2qUuRaKEvZlTGG06GQ5mg2yOZodsNsgGhMmQs-3NucLajej_mv5QzYL3uwDzPx8DJkMuk8h9hoRuMT6G_1X4N8HO0A4_8YR0jGuaMkPDDWWDud8Gvc2Z1wBKai6fABSFpZw</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Kim, Chi Heon, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Chung, Chun Kee, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Choi, Yunhee, PhD</creator><creator>Shin, HyunJeong, MS</creator><creator>Woo, Ji Won, RN</creator><creator>Kim, Sung-Mi, RN</creator><creator>Lee, Hyuk-Joon, MD, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3485-2327</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>The usefulness of a mobile device-based system for patient-reported outcomes in a spine outpatient clinic</title><author>Kim, Chi Heon, MD, PhD ; Chung, Chun Kee, MD, PhD ; Choi, Yunhee, PhD ; Shin, HyunJeong, MS ; Woo, Ji Won, RN ; Kim, Sung-Mi, RN ; Lee, Hyuk-Joon, MD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-41cc398840863a3e40fb404706c1d9aba3a3a317adbddd21c73ced5913756cf33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care Facilities</topic><topic>Cell Phone</topic><topic>Computer</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mobile applications</topic><topic>Mobile telephone</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Outcome assessment</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Spinal Diseases - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Spinal Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Telemedicine - instrumentation</topic><topic>Telemedicine - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Chi Heon, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Chun Kee, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Yunhee, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, HyunJeong, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woo, Ji Won, RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sung-Mi, RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyuk-Joon, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Chi Heon, MD, PhD</au><au>Chung, Chun Kee, MD, PhD</au><au>Choi, Yunhee, PhD</au><au>Shin, HyunJeong, MS</au><au>Woo, Ji Won, RN</au><au>Kim, Sung-Mi, RN</au><au>Lee, Hyuk-Joon, MD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The usefulness of a mobile device-based system for patient-reported outcomes in a spine outpatient clinic</atitle><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>843</spage><epage>850</epage><pages>843-850</pages><issn>1529-9430</issn><eissn>1878-1632</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Context Patient reported outcomes (PRO) are typically collected using a paper form, but this format is cumbersome to incorporate into outpatient clinic visits as well as in research. Therefore, we developed a mobile device-based system (mobile system) for spinal PRO. We hypothesized that this system may improve the quality of care in an outpatient clinic. Purpose To analyze the patient-reported efficacy of a mobile system through a survey of patients' responses compared to a paper system. Study Design/Setting Prospective observational study Patient Sample Surveys were conducted for 103 patients who had experience using both the paper and electronic systems in the outpatient clinic. Outcome Measures Patient-reported positive response score (PRS) Methods The survey included the characteristics of the patients (sex, age, use of smartphone, familiarity with smartphone applications, proficiency of typing with mobile device, site of pain and education level) and eight questions in four domains: 1) efficacy in the waiting room, 2) efficacy during the clinic visit, 3) overall satisfaction and 4) opinion about the use of this system. The response to each question was scored from 1–5 (1, negative; 5, positive response). The patient-reported PRS was calculated by adding the scores of the 8 questions and converting the total range to 0 to 100 (60, neutral). Results The mean PRS of the 8 questions was 79.8 (95% CI, 76.7–83.9). The mean PRS was 78.9 (75.6-82.2) at the waiting room and was 80.5 (77.1–83.9) during the clinic. The PRS for overall satisfaction and use of this system were 83.3 (79.6–87.0) and 77.1 (71.9–82.3), respectively. The use of smartphones and the proficiency of typing were independently significant predictors of PRS with an R2 value of 0.325. Conclusions The mobile device-based system improved the patient-reported efficacy in spine outpatient clinics. However, various factors such as the use of smartphones need to be considered when developing and applying mobile systems.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26961200</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.spinee.2016.02.048</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3485-2327</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1529-9430 |
ispartof | The spine journal, 2016-07, Vol.16 (7), p.843-850 |
issn | 1529-9430 1878-1632 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808605679 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Ambulatory Care Facilities Cell Phone Computer Disability Female Humans Male Middle Aged Mobile applications Mobile telephone Orthopedics Outcome assessment Pain Patient Reported Outcome Measures Spinal Diseases - rehabilitation Spinal Diseases - therapy Spine Telemedicine - instrumentation Telemedicine - methods |
title | The usefulness of a mobile device-based system for patient-reported outcomes in a spine outpatient clinic |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T17%3A02%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20usefulness%20of%20a%20mobile%20device-based%20system%20for%20patient-reported%20outcomes%20in%20a%20spine%20outpatient%20clinic&rft.jtitle=The%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Kim,%20Chi%20Heon,%20MD,%20PhD&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=843&rft.epage=850&rft.pages=843-850&rft.issn=1529-9430&rft.eissn=1878-1632&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.spinee.2016.02.048&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1808605679%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1808605679&rft_id=info:pmid/26961200&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1529943016004381&rfr_iscdi=true |