Adjuvant chemotherapy of S-1 versus gemcitabine for resected pancreatic cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial (JASPAC 01)

Summary Background Although adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine is standard care for resected pancreatic cancer, S-1 has shown non-inferiority to gemcitabine for advanced disease. We aimed to investigate the non-inferiority of S-1 to gemcitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer in t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Lancet (British edition) 2016-07, Vol.388 (10041), p.248-257
Hauptverfasser: Uesaka, Katsuhiko, MD, Boku, Narikazu, Dr, Fukutomi, Akira, MD, Okamura, Yukiyasu, MD, Konishi, Masaru, MD, Matsumoto, Ippei, MD, Kaneoka, Yuji, MD, Shimizu, Yasuhiro, MD, Nakamori, Shoji, MD, Sakamoto, Hirohiko, MD, Morinaga, Soichiro, MD, Kainuma, Osamu, MD, Imai, Koji, MD, Sata, Naohiro, Prof, Hishinuma, Shoichi, MD, Ojima, Hitoshi, MD, Yamaguchi, Ryuzo, MD, Hirano, Satoshi, Prof, Sudo, Takeshi, MD, Ohashi, Yasuo, Prof
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 257
container_issue 10041
container_start_page 248
container_title The Lancet (British edition)
container_volume 388
creator Uesaka, Katsuhiko, MD
Boku, Narikazu, Dr
Fukutomi, Akira, MD
Okamura, Yukiyasu, MD
Konishi, Masaru, MD
Matsumoto, Ippei, MD
Kaneoka, Yuji, MD
Shimizu, Yasuhiro, MD
Nakamori, Shoji, MD
Sakamoto, Hirohiko, MD
Morinaga, Soichiro, MD
Kainuma, Osamu, MD
Imai, Koji, MD
Sata, Naohiro, Prof
Hishinuma, Shoichi, MD
Ojima, Hitoshi, MD
Yamaguchi, Ryuzo, MD
Hirano, Satoshi, Prof
Sudo, Takeshi, MD
Ohashi, Yasuo, Prof
description Summary Background Although adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine is standard care for resected pancreatic cancer, S-1 has shown non-inferiority to gemcitabine for advanced disease. We aimed to investigate the non-inferiority of S-1 to gemcitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer in terms of overall survival. Methods We did a randomised, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority phase 3 trial undertaken at 33 hospitals in Japan. Patients who had histologically proven invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas, pathologically documented stage I–III, and no local residual or microscopic residual tumour, and were aged 20 years or older were eligible. Patients with resected pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 , intravenously administered on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks [one cycle], for up to six cycles) or S-1 (40 mg, 50 mg, or 60 mg according to body-surface area, orally administered twice a day for 28 days followed by a 14 day rest, every 6 weeks [one cycle], for up to four cycles) at the data centre by a modified minimisation method, balancing residual tumour status, nodal status, and institutions. The primary outcome was overall survival in the two treatment groups, assessed in the per-protocol population, excluding ineligible patients and those not receiving the allocated treatment. The protocol prespecified that the superiority of S-1 with respect to overall survival was also to be assessed in the per-protocol population by a log-rank test, if the non-inferiority of S-1 was verified. We estimated overall and relapse-free survival using the Kaplan-Meier methods, and assessed non-inferiority of S-1 to gemcitabine using the Cox proportional hazard model. The expected hazard ratio (HR) for mortality was 0·87 with a non-inferiority margin of 1·25 (power 80%; one-sided type I error 2·5%). This trial is registered at UMIN CTR (UMIN000000655). Findings 385 patients were randomly assigned to treatment between April 11, 2007, and June 29, 2010 (193 to the gemcitabine group and 192 to the S-1 group). Of these, three were exlcuded because of ineligibility and five did not receive chemotherapy. The per-protocol population therefore consisted of 190 patients in the gemcitabine group and 187 patients in the S-1 group. On Sept 15, 2012, following the recommendation from the independent data and safety monitoring committee, this study was discontinued because the prespecified criteria for early dis
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30583-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808603688</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140673616305839</els_id><sourcerecordid>1808603688</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-db2c021d89ea8bfbe71d9a2b84bc22d2d47239f517ea46dcf5b592bdcb7a3dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV2LEzEUhoMobl39CUrAmy50NMlkJjNeKKX4yYJC98K7kI8zNnWajMlMof_DH2zarivsjVdJ4DlvzjkPQs8peUUJrV-vCeWkqEVZz2l9VZKqKYv2AZpRLnhRcfH9IZrdIRfoSUpbQgivSfUYXTDB6qrkYoZ-L-122is_YrOBXRg3ENVwwKHD64LiPcQ0JfwDdsaNSjsPuAsRR0hgRrB4UN5EUKMz2OQrxDdY4WGjEuBygcMAvuiVhn6Bo_I27FwCu8A--ML5DqIL0Y0HPEanejz_slx_W64woVdP0aNO9Qme3Z6X6ObD-5vVp-L668fPq-V1YSpBxsJqZgijtmlBNbrTIKhtFdMN14YxyywXrGy7igpQvLamq3TVMm2NFqq0trxE83PsEMOvCdIoc4MG-l55CFOStCFNTcq6aTL68h66DVP0ubkjVXHOuBCZqs6UiSGlCJ0cotupeJCUyKM1ebImj0pkfp2syTbXvbhNn_QO7F3VX00ZeHcGIG9j7yDKZBzkhVsXswlpg_vvF2_vJZjeeWdU_xMOkP5NIxOT5BxyzKD1KaEt_wCt6bwa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1805442477</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adjuvant chemotherapy of S-1 versus gemcitabine for resected pancreatic cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial (JASPAC 01)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Uesaka, Katsuhiko, MD ; Boku, Narikazu, Dr ; Fukutomi, Akira, MD ; Okamura, Yukiyasu, MD ; Konishi, Masaru, MD ; Matsumoto, Ippei, MD ; Kaneoka, Yuji, MD ; Shimizu, Yasuhiro, MD ; Nakamori, Shoji, MD ; Sakamoto, Hirohiko, MD ; Morinaga, Soichiro, MD ; Kainuma, Osamu, MD ; Imai, Koji, MD ; Sata, Naohiro, Prof ; Hishinuma, Shoichi, MD ; Ojima, Hitoshi, MD ; Yamaguchi, Ryuzo, MD ; Hirano, Satoshi, Prof ; Sudo, Takeshi, MD ; Ohashi, Yasuo, Prof</creator><creatorcontrib>Uesaka, Katsuhiko, MD ; Boku, Narikazu, Dr ; Fukutomi, Akira, MD ; Okamura, Yukiyasu, MD ; Konishi, Masaru, MD ; Matsumoto, Ippei, MD ; Kaneoka, Yuji, MD ; Shimizu, Yasuhiro, MD ; Nakamori, Shoji, MD ; Sakamoto, Hirohiko, MD ; Morinaga, Soichiro, MD ; Kainuma, Osamu, MD ; Imai, Koji, MD ; Sata, Naohiro, Prof ; Hishinuma, Shoichi, MD ; Ojima, Hitoshi, MD ; Yamaguchi, Ryuzo, MD ; Hirano, Satoshi, Prof ; Sudo, Takeshi, MD ; Ohashi, Yasuo, Prof ; JASPAC 01 Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background Although adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine is standard care for resected pancreatic cancer, S-1 has shown non-inferiority to gemcitabine for advanced disease. We aimed to investigate the non-inferiority of S-1 to gemcitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer in terms of overall survival. Methods We did a randomised, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority phase 3 trial undertaken at 33 hospitals in Japan. Patients who had histologically proven invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas, pathologically documented stage I–III, and no local residual or microscopic residual tumour, and were aged 20 years or older were eligible. Patients with resected pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 , intravenously administered on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks [one cycle], for up to six cycles) or S-1 (40 mg, 50 mg, or 60 mg according to body-surface area, orally administered twice a day for 28 days followed by a 14 day rest, every 6 weeks [one cycle], for up to four cycles) at the data centre by a modified minimisation method, balancing residual tumour status, nodal status, and institutions. The primary outcome was overall survival in the two treatment groups, assessed in the per-protocol population, excluding ineligible patients and those not receiving the allocated treatment. The protocol prespecified that the superiority of S-1 with respect to overall survival was also to be assessed in the per-protocol population by a log-rank test, if the non-inferiority of S-1 was verified. We estimated overall and relapse-free survival using the Kaplan-Meier methods, and assessed non-inferiority of S-1 to gemcitabine using the Cox proportional hazard model. The expected hazard ratio (HR) for mortality was 0·87 with a non-inferiority margin of 1·25 (power 80%; one-sided type I error 2·5%). This trial is registered at UMIN CTR (UMIN000000655). Findings 385 patients were randomly assigned to treatment between April 11, 2007, and June 29, 2010 (193 to the gemcitabine group and 192 to the S-1 group). Of these, three were exlcuded because of ineligibility and five did not receive chemotherapy. The per-protocol population therefore consisted of 190 patients in the gemcitabine group and 187 patients in the S-1 group. On Sept 15, 2012, following the recommendation from the independent data and safety monitoring committee, this study was discontinued because the prespecified criteria for early discontinuation were met at the interim analysis for efficacy, when all the protocol treatments had been finished. Analysis with the follow-up data on Jan 15, 2016, showed HR of mortality was 0·57 (95% CI 0·44–0·72, pnon-inferiority &lt;0·0001, p&lt;0·0001 for superiority), associated with 5-year overall survival of 24·4% (18·6–30·8) in the gemcitabine group and 44·1% (36·9–51·1) in the S-1 group. Grade 3 or 4 leucopenia, neutropenia, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase were observed more frequently in the gemcitabine group, whereas stomatitis and diarrhoea were more frequently experienced in the S-1 group. Interpretation Adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 can be a new standard care for resected pancreatic cancer in Japanese patients. These results should be assessed in non-Asian patients. Funding Pharma Valley Center, Shizuoka Industrial Foundation, Taiho Pharmaceutical.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30583-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27265347</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANCAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic - administration &amp; dosage ; Cancer therapies ; Carcinoma, Ductal - mortality ; Carcinoma, Ductal - pathology ; Carcinoma, Ductal - therapy ; Chemotherapy ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Clinical trials ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Deoxycytidine - administration &amp; dosage ; Deoxycytidine - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Drug Combinations ; Female ; Humans ; Injections, Intravenous ; Internal Medicine ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Oxonic Acid - administration &amp; dosage ; Pancreatectomy ; Pancreatic cancer ; Pancreatic Neoplasms - mortality ; Pancreatic Neoplasms - therapy ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Survival ; Tegafur - administration &amp; dosage</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 2016-07, Vol.388 (10041), p.248-257</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jul 16, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-db2c021d89ea8bfbe71d9a2b84bc22d2d47239f517ea46dcf5b592bdcb7a3dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-db2c021d89ea8bfbe71d9a2b84bc22d2d47239f517ea46dcf5b592bdcb7a3dd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1805442477?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976,64364,64366,64368,72218</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27265347$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Uesaka, Katsuhiko, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boku, Narikazu, Dr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukutomi, Akira, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okamura, Yukiyasu, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konishi, Masaru, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Ippei, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaneoka, Yuji, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, Yasuhiro, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamori, Shoji, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, Hirohiko, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morinaga, Soichiro, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kainuma, Osamu, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imai, Koji, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sata, Naohiro, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hishinuma, Shoichi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ojima, Hitoshi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamaguchi, Ryuzo, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirano, Satoshi, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sudo, Takeshi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohashi, Yasuo, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JASPAC 01 Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Adjuvant chemotherapy of S-1 versus gemcitabine for resected pancreatic cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial (JASPAC 01)</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><description>Summary Background Although adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine is standard care for resected pancreatic cancer, S-1 has shown non-inferiority to gemcitabine for advanced disease. We aimed to investigate the non-inferiority of S-1 to gemcitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer in terms of overall survival. Methods We did a randomised, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority phase 3 trial undertaken at 33 hospitals in Japan. Patients who had histologically proven invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas, pathologically documented stage I–III, and no local residual or microscopic residual tumour, and were aged 20 years or older were eligible. Patients with resected pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 , intravenously administered on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks [one cycle], for up to six cycles) or S-1 (40 mg, 50 mg, or 60 mg according to body-surface area, orally administered twice a day for 28 days followed by a 14 day rest, every 6 weeks [one cycle], for up to four cycles) at the data centre by a modified minimisation method, balancing residual tumour status, nodal status, and institutions. The primary outcome was overall survival in the two treatment groups, assessed in the per-protocol population, excluding ineligible patients and those not receiving the allocated treatment. The protocol prespecified that the superiority of S-1 with respect to overall survival was also to be assessed in the per-protocol population by a log-rank test, if the non-inferiority of S-1 was verified. We estimated overall and relapse-free survival using the Kaplan-Meier methods, and assessed non-inferiority of S-1 to gemcitabine using the Cox proportional hazard model. The expected hazard ratio (HR) for mortality was 0·87 with a non-inferiority margin of 1·25 (power 80%; one-sided type I error 2·5%). This trial is registered at UMIN CTR (UMIN000000655). Findings 385 patients were randomly assigned to treatment between April 11, 2007, and June 29, 2010 (193 to the gemcitabine group and 192 to the S-1 group). Of these, three were exlcuded because of ineligibility and five did not receive chemotherapy. The per-protocol population therefore consisted of 190 patients in the gemcitabine group and 187 patients in the S-1 group. On Sept 15, 2012, following the recommendation from the independent data and safety monitoring committee, this study was discontinued because the prespecified criteria for early discontinuation were met at the interim analysis for efficacy, when all the protocol treatments had been finished. Analysis with the follow-up data on Jan 15, 2016, showed HR of mortality was 0·57 (95% CI 0·44–0·72, pnon-inferiority &lt;0·0001, p&lt;0·0001 for superiority), associated with 5-year overall survival of 24·4% (18·6–30·8) in the gemcitabine group and 44·1% (36·9–51·1) in the S-1 group. Grade 3 or 4 leucopenia, neutropenia, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase were observed more frequently in the gemcitabine group, whereas stomatitis and diarrhoea were more frequently experienced in the S-1 group. Interpretation Adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 can be a new standard care for resected pancreatic cancer in Japanese patients. These results should be assessed in non-Asian patients. Funding Pharma Valley Center, Shizuoka Industrial Foundation, Taiho Pharmaceutical.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal - mortality</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal - therapy</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Deoxycytidine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Deoxycytidine - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Drug Combinations</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injections, Intravenous</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Oxonic Acid - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Pancreatectomy</subject><subject>Pancreatic cancer</subject><subject>Pancreatic Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Pancreatic Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tegafur - administration &amp; dosage</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV2LEzEUhoMobl39CUrAmy50NMlkJjNeKKX4yYJC98K7kI8zNnWajMlMof_DH2zarivsjVdJ4DlvzjkPQs8peUUJrV-vCeWkqEVZz2l9VZKqKYv2AZpRLnhRcfH9IZrdIRfoSUpbQgivSfUYXTDB6qrkYoZ-L-122is_YrOBXRg3ENVwwKHD64LiPcQ0JfwDdsaNSjsPuAsRR0hgRrB4UN5EUKMz2OQrxDdY4WGjEuBygcMAvuiVhn6Bo_I27FwCu8A--ML5DqIL0Y0HPEanejz_slx_W64woVdP0aNO9Qme3Z6X6ObD-5vVp-L668fPq-V1YSpBxsJqZgijtmlBNbrTIKhtFdMN14YxyywXrGy7igpQvLamq3TVMm2NFqq0trxE83PsEMOvCdIoc4MG-l55CFOStCFNTcq6aTL68h66DVP0ubkjVXHOuBCZqs6UiSGlCJ0cotupeJCUyKM1ebImj0pkfp2syTbXvbhNn_QO7F3VX00ZeHcGIG9j7yDKZBzkhVsXswlpg_vvF2_vJZjeeWdU_xMOkP5NIxOT5BxyzKD1KaEt_wCt6bwa</recordid><startdate>20160716</startdate><enddate>20160716</enddate><creator>Uesaka, Katsuhiko, MD</creator><creator>Boku, Narikazu, Dr</creator><creator>Fukutomi, Akira, MD</creator><creator>Okamura, Yukiyasu, MD</creator><creator>Konishi, Masaru, MD</creator><creator>Matsumoto, Ippei, MD</creator><creator>Kaneoka, Yuji, MD</creator><creator>Shimizu, Yasuhiro, MD</creator><creator>Nakamori, Shoji, MD</creator><creator>Sakamoto, Hirohiko, MD</creator><creator>Morinaga, Soichiro, MD</creator><creator>Kainuma, Osamu, MD</creator><creator>Imai, Koji, MD</creator><creator>Sata, Naohiro, Prof</creator><creator>Hishinuma, Shoichi, MD</creator><creator>Ojima, Hitoshi, MD</creator><creator>Yamaguchi, Ryuzo, MD</creator><creator>Hirano, Satoshi, Prof</creator><creator>Sudo, Takeshi, MD</creator><creator>Ohashi, Yasuo, Prof</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160716</creationdate><title>Adjuvant chemotherapy of S-1 versus gemcitabine for resected pancreatic cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial (JASPAC 01)</title><author>Uesaka, Katsuhiko, MD ; Boku, Narikazu, Dr ; Fukutomi, Akira, MD ; Okamura, Yukiyasu, MD ; Konishi, Masaru, MD ; Matsumoto, Ippei, MD ; Kaneoka, Yuji, MD ; Shimizu, Yasuhiro, MD ; Nakamori, Shoji, MD ; Sakamoto, Hirohiko, MD ; Morinaga, Soichiro, MD ; Kainuma, Osamu, MD ; Imai, Koji, MD ; Sata, Naohiro, Prof ; Hishinuma, Shoichi, MD ; Ojima, Hitoshi, MD ; Yamaguchi, Ryuzo, MD ; Hirano, Satoshi, Prof ; Sudo, Takeshi, MD ; Ohashi, Yasuo, Prof</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-db2c021d89ea8bfbe71d9a2b84bc22d2d47239f517ea46dcf5b592bdcb7a3dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal - mortality</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal - therapy</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Deoxycytidine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Deoxycytidine - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Drug Combinations</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injections, Intravenous</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Oxonic Acid - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Pancreatectomy</topic><topic>Pancreatic cancer</topic><topic>Pancreatic Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Pancreatic Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tegafur - administration &amp; dosage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Uesaka, Katsuhiko, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boku, Narikazu, Dr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukutomi, Akira, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okamura, Yukiyasu, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konishi, Masaru, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Ippei, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaneoka, Yuji, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, Yasuhiro, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamori, Shoji, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, Hirohiko, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morinaga, Soichiro, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kainuma, Osamu, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imai, Koji, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sata, Naohiro, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hishinuma, Shoichi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ojima, Hitoshi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamaguchi, Ryuzo, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirano, Satoshi, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sudo, Takeshi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohashi, Yasuo, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JASPAC 01 Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Uesaka, Katsuhiko, MD</au><au>Boku, Narikazu, Dr</au><au>Fukutomi, Akira, MD</au><au>Okamura, Yukiyasu, MD</au><au>Konishi, Masaru, MD</au><au>Matsumoto, Ippei, MD</au><au>Kaneoka, Yuji, MD</au><au>Shimizu, Yasuhiro, MD</au><au>Nakamori, Shoji, MD</au><au>Sakamoto, Hirohiko, MD</au><au>Morinaga, Soichiro, MD</au><au>Kainuma, Osamu, MD</au><au>Imai, Koji, MD</au><au>Sata, Naohiro, Prof</au><au>Hishinuma, Shoichi, MD</au><au>Ojima, Hitoshi, MD</au><au>Yamaguchi, Ryuzo, MD</au><au>Hirano, Satoshi, Prof</au><au>Sudo, Takeshi, MD</au><au>Ohashi, Yasuo, Prof</au><aucorp>JASPAC 01 Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Adjuvant chemotherapy of S-1 versus gemcitabine for resected pancreatic cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial (JASPAC 01)</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><date>2016-07-16</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>388</volume><issue>10041</issue><spage>248</spage><epage>257</epage><pages>248-257</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><coden>LANCAO</coden><abstract>Summary Background Although adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine is standard care for resected pancreatic cancer, S-1 has shown non-inferiority to gemcitabine for advanced disease. We aimed to investigate the non-inferiority of S-1 to gemcitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer in terms of overall survival. Methods We did a randomised, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority phase 3 trial undertaken at 33 hospitals in Japan. Patients who had histologically proven invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas, pathologically documented stage I–III, and no local residual or microscopic residual tumour, and were aged 20 years or older were eligible. Patients with resected pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 , intravenously administered on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks [one cycle], for up to six cycles) or S-1 (40 mg, 50 mg, or 60 mg according to body-surface area, orally administered twice a day for 28 days followed by a 14 day rest, every 6 weeks [one cycle], for up to four cycles) at the data centre by a modified minimisation method, balancing residual tumour status, nodal status, and institutions. The primary outcome was overall survival in the two treatment groups, assessed in the per-protocol population, excluding ineligible patients and those not receiving the allocated treatment. The protocol prespecified that the superiority of S-1 with respect to overall survival was also to be assessed in the per-protocol population by a log-rank test, if the non-inferiority of S-1 was verified. We estimated overall and relapse-free survival using the Kaplan-Meier methods, and assessed non-inferiority of S-1 to gemcitabine using the Cox proportional hazard model. The expected hazard ratio (HR) for mortality was 0·87 with a non-inferiority margin of 1·25 (power 80%; one-sided type I error 2·5%). This trial is registered at UMIN CTR (UMIN000000655). Findings 385 patients were randomly assigned to treatment between April 11, 2007, and June 29, 2010 (193 to the gemcitabine group and 192 to the S-1 group). Of these, three were exlcuded because of ineligibility and five did not receive chemotherapy. The per-protocol population therefore consisted of 190 patients in the gemcitabine group and 187 patients in the S-1 group. On Sept 15, 2012, following the recommendation from the independent data and safety monitoring committee, this study was discontinued because the prespecified criteria for early discontinuation were met at the interim analysis for efficacy, when all the protocol treatments had been finished. Analysis with the follow-up data on Jan 15, 2016, showed HR of mortality was 0·57 (95% CI 0·44–0·72, pnon-inferiority &lt;0·0001, p&lt;0·0001 for superiority), associated with 5-year overall survival of 24·4% (18·6–30·8) in the gemcitabine group and 44·1% (36·9–51·1) in the S-1 group. Grade 3 or 4 leucopenia, neutropenia, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase were observed more frequently in the gemcitabine group, whereas stomatitis and diarrhoea were more frequently experienced in the S-1 group. Interpretation Adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 can be a new standard care for resected pancreatic cancer in Japanese patients. These results should be assessed in non-Asian patients. Funding Pharma Valley Center, Shizuoka Industrial Foundation, Taiho Pharmaceutical.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27265347</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30583-9</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-6736
ispartof The Lancet (British edition), 2016-07, Vol.388 (10041), p.248-257
issn 0140-6736
1474-547X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808603688
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Aged
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic - administration & dosage
Cancer therapies
Carcinoma, Ductal - mortality
Carcinoma, Ductal - pathology
Carcinoma, Ductal - therapy
Chemotherapy
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Clinical trials
Combined Modality Therapy
Deoxycytidine - administration & dosage
Deoxycytidine - analogs & derivatives
Drug Combinations
Female
Humans
Injections, Intravenous
Internal Medicine
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Lymphatic Metastasis
Male
Middle Aged
Mortality
Oxonic Acid - administration & dosage
Pancreatectomy
Pancreatic cancer
Pancreatic Neoplasms - mortality
Pancreatic Neoplasms - therapy
Proportional Hazards Models
Survival
Tegafur - administration & dosage
title Adjuvant chemotherapy of S-1 versus gemcitabine for resected pancreatic cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial (JASPAC 01)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T10%3A07%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adjuvant%20chemotherapy%20of%20S-1%20versus%20gemcitabine%20for%20resected%20pancreatic%20cancer:%20a%20phase%203,%20open-label,%20randomised,%20non-inferiority%20trial%20(JASPAC%2001)&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=Uesaka,%20Katsuhiko,%20MD&rft.aucorp=JASPAC%2001%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2016-07-16&rft.volume=388&rft.issue=10041&rft.spage=248&rft.epage=257&rft.pages=248-257&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft.coden=LANCAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30583-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1808603688%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1805442477&rft_id=info:pmid/27265347&rft_els_id=S0140673616305839&rfr_iscdi=true