Application of GIS-based fuzzy logic and rock engineering system (RES) approaches for landslide susceptibility mapping in Selelkula area of the Lower Jema River Gorge, Central Ethiopia

Landslide susceptibility mapping is an important tool for disaster management and development activities such as planning of transportation infrastructure, settlement and agriculture. Selelkula area of the Jema River Gorge in Central Ethiopian Highland was chosen as a study area. Fuzzy logic (FL) an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental earth sciences 2015-08, Vol.74 (4), p.3395-3416
Hauptverfasser: Meten, Matebie, Bhandary, Netra Prakash, Yatabe, Ryuichi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3416
container_issue 4
container_start_page 3395
container_title Environmental earth sciences
container_volume 74
creator Meten, Matebie
Bhandary, Netra Prakash
Yatabe, Ryuichi
description Landslide susceptibility mapping is an important tool for disaster management and development activities such as planning of transportation infrastructure, settlement and agriculture. Selelkula area of the Jema River Gorge in Central Ethiopian Highland was chosen as a study area. Fuzzy logic (FL) and rock engineering system (RES) in a GIS environment were employed to prepare landslide susceptibility maps for this area. Data sets including slope, aspect, profile curvature, plan curvature, lithology, land use, distance from river and distance from lineament were generated using the field data, remote sensing and GIS. In FL, the fuzzy membership values were calculated by normalizing the frequency ratio values of each factor’s class in a range between 0 and 1. Then, the fuzzy membership values were combined by fuzzy AND, fuzzy OR, fuzzy gamma, fuzzy sum and fuzzy product operators. A total of twelve landslide susceptibility maps were produced using FL and the best map was chosen based on area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the highest difference between minimum and maximum susceptibility index values. Based on these criteria, the landslide susceptibility map produced using fuzzy gamma (γ = 0.8) operator was selected. RES is a semi-quantitative method which assigns each factor’s classes a value between 0 and 4 based on the principles of Hudson (Rock engineering systems, theory and practice. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1992) and uses an interaction matrix through a coding system of five values in previous researches but a coding system of nine values has been used in this study to provide a wider range of values for interactions among each pair of landslide factors and each landslide factor with a landslide. Unlike other methods, RES has a freedom to evaluate and assign each interaction based on expert’s knowledge and experience. But it also bears the problem of subjectivity in assigning the interaction values. On the other hand, FL is completely data driven and does not show any subjectivity in assigning values for each factor class. The prediction accuracies of FL and RES, which can be determined from ROC curves, were found to be 87.2 and 88.6 %, respectively. For validation purpose, the existing landslides were overlaid over the two landslide susceptibility maps and the percentage of landslides in each susceptibility class was calculated. The percentages of landslides that fall in the high and very high susceptib
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12665-015-4377-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808371850</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3981165901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a532t-dc19d32ae76affb13d29d1b6770ecfb99a9b909b3c378566176b38bcfe605cb43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhiMEElXbB-DESFyKRMCON3Z8rFbL0molpC49W44zybr1xsFOirZPxuPhKAghDvjiOXzfeMZ_lr2h5CMlRHyKtOC8zAkt8xUTIq9eZGe04jznhZQv_9QVeZ1dxvhA0mGUScLPsp_Xw-Cs0aP1PfgWtjf7vNYRG2in5-cTON9ZA7pvIHjzCNh3tkcMtu8gnuKIR7i62-zfgx6G4LU5YITWB3DJiM42CHGKBofR1tbZ8QTHBM6y7WGPDt3j5DTogHp-fDwg7PwPDHCLRw139imVWx86_ABr7MegHWzGg_WD1RfZq1a7iJe_7_Ps_vPm2_pLvvu6vVlf73JdsmLMG0NlwwqNguu2rSlrCtnQmgtB0LS1lFrWksiaGSaqknMqeM2q2rTISWnqFTvPrpa-ab_vE8ZRHW3ayKUN0U9R0YpUTNCqJAl99w_64KfQp-kUFaJgVBZspuhCmeBjDNiqIdijDidFiZrjVEucKsWp5jhVlZxiceIwfz2Gvzr_R3q7SK32SnfBRnW_LxJASEEZq1bsFxSYrdE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1772319230</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Application of GIS-based fuzzy logic and rock engineering system (RES) approaches for landslide susceptibility mapping in Selelkula area of the Lower Jema River Gorge, Central Ethiopia</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Meten, Matebie ; Bhandary, Netra Prakash ; Yatabe, Ryuichi</creator><creatorcontrib>Meten, Matebie ; Bhandary, Netra Prakash ; Yatabe, Ryuichi</creatorcontrib><description>Landslide susceptibility mapping is an important tool for disaster management and development activities such as planning of transportation infrastructure, settlement and agriculture. Selelkula area of the Jema River Gorge in Central Ethiopian Highland was chosen as a study area. Fuzzy logic (FL) and rock engineering system (RES) in a GIS environment were employed to prepare landslide susceptibility maps for this area. Data sets including slope, aspect, profile curvature, plan curvature, lithology, land use, distance from river and distance from lineament were generated using the field data, remote sensing and GIS. In FL, the fuzzy membership values were calculated by normalizing the frequency ratio values of each factor’s class in a range between 0 and 1. Then, the fuzzy membership values were combined by fuzzy AND, fuzzy OR, fuzzy gamma, fuzzy sum and fuzzy product operators. A total of twelve landslide susceptibility maps were produced using FL and the best map was chosen based on area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the highest difference between minimum and maximum susceptibility index values. Based on these criteria, the landslide susceptibility map produced using fuzzy gamma (γ = 0.8) operator was selected. RES is a semi-quantitative method which assigns each factor’s classes a value between 0 and 4 based on the principles of Hudson (Rock engineering systems, theory and practice. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1992) and uses an interaction matrix through a coding system of five values in previous researches but a coding system of nine values has been used in this study to provide a wider range of values for interactions among each pair of landslide factors and each landslide factor with a landslide. Unlike other methods, RES has a freedom to evaluate and assign each interaction based on expert’s knowledge and experience. But it also bears the problem of subjectivity in assigning the interaction values. On the other hand, FL is completely data driven and does not show any subjectivity in assigning values for each factor class. The prediction accuracies of FL and RES, which can be determined from ROC curves, were found to be 87.2 and 88.6 %, respectively. For validation purpose, the existing landslides were overlaid over the two landslide susceptibility maps and the percentage of landslides in each susceptibility class was calculated. The percentages of landslides that fall in the high and very high susceptibility classes are slightly higher in RES than FL method and hence the former is more accurate in predicting the future landslide occurrence than the later.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1866-6280</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1866-6299</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12665-015-4377-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Biogeosciences ; data collection ; Disaster management ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Emergency preparedness ; engineering ; Environmental Science and Engineering ; Fuzzy logic ; Geochemistry ; Geographic information systems ; Geology ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; infrastructure ; Land use ; Landslides ; Landslides &amp; mudslides ; Lithology ; Original Article ; planning ; prediction ; Remote sensing ; Risk assessment ; Rivers ; Rocks ; systems engineering ; Terrestrial Pollution ; transportation</subject><ispartof>Environmental earth sciences, 2015-08, Vol.74 (4), p.3395-3416</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a532t-dc19d32ae76affb13d29d1b6770ecfb99a9b909b3c378566176b38bcfe605cb43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a532t-dc19d32ae76affb13d29d1b6770ecfb99a9b909b3c378566176b38bcfe605cb43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1529-190X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12665-015-4377-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12665-015-4377-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meten, Matebie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhandary, Netra Prakash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yatabe, Ryuichi</creatorcontrib><title>Application of GIS-based fuzzy logic and rock engineering system (RES) approaches for landslide susceptibility mapping in Selelkula area of the Lower Jema River Gorge, Central Ethiopia</title><title>Environmental earth sciences</title><addtitle>Environ Earth Sci</addtitle><description>Landslide susceptibility mapping is an important tool for disaster management and development activities such as planning of transportation infrastructure, settlement and agriculture. Selelkula area of the Jema River Gorge in Central Ethiopian Highland was chosen as a study area. Fuzzy logic (FL) and rock engineering system (RES) in a GIS environment were employed to prepare landslide susceptibility maps for this area. Data sets including slope, aspect, profile curvature, plan curvature, lithology, land use, distance from river and distance from lineament were generated using the field data, remote sensing and GIS. In FL, the fuzzy membership values were calculated by normalizing the frequency ratio values of each factor’s class in a range between 0 and 1. Then, the fuzzy membership values were combined by fuzzy AND, fuzzy OR, fuzzy gamma, fuzzy sum and fuzzy product operators. A total of twelve landslide susceptibility maps were produced using FL and the best map was chosen based on area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the highest difference between minimum and maximum susceptibility index values. Based on these criteria, the landslide susceptibility map produced using fuzzy gamma (γ = 0.8) operator was selected. RES is a semi-quantitative method which assigns each factor’s classes a value between 0 and 4 based on the principles of Hudson (Rock engineering systems, theory and practice. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1992) and uses an interaction matrix through a coding system of five values in previous researches but a coding system of nine values has been used in this study to provide a wider range of values for interactions among each pair of landslide factors and each landslide factor with a landslide. Unlike other methods, RES has a freedom to evaluate and assign each interaction based on expert’s knowledge and experience. But it also bears the problem of subjectivity in assigning the interaction values. On the other hand, FL is completely data driven and does not show any subjectivity in assigning values for each factor class. The prediction accuracies of FL and RES, which can be determined from ROC curves, were found to be 87.2 and 88.6 %, respectively. For validation purpose, the existing landslides were overlaid over the two landslide susceptibility maps and the percentage of landslides in each susceptibility class was calculated. The percentages of landslides that fall in the high and very high susceptibility classes are slightly higher in RES than FL method and hence the former is more accurate in predicting the future landslide occurrence than the later.</description><subject>Biogeosciences</subject><subject>data collection</subject><subject>Disaster management</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Emergency preparedness</subject><subject>engineering</subject><subject>Environmental Science and Engineering</subject><subject>Fuzzy logic</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Geographic information systems</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>infrastructure</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Landslides</subject><subject>Landslides &amp; mudslides</subject><subject>Lithology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>planning</subject><subject>prediction</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>systems engineering</subject><subject>Terrestrial Pollution</subject><subject>transportation</subject><issn>1866-6280</issn><issn>1866-6299</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhiMEElXbB-DESFyKRMCON3Z8rFbL0molpC49W44zybr1xsFOirZPxuPhKAghDvjiOXzfeMZ_lr2h5CMlRHyKtOC8zAkt8xUTIq9eZGe04jznhZQv_9QVeZ1dxvhA0mGUScLPsp_Xw-Cs0aP1PfgWtjf7vNYRG2in5-cTON9ZA7pvIHjzCNh3tkcMtu8gnuKIR7i62-zfgx6G4LU5YITWB3DJiM42CHGKBofR1tbZ8QTHBM6y7WGPDt3j5DTogHp-fDwg7PwPDHCLRw139imVWx86_ABr7MegHWzGg_WD1RfZq1a7iJe_7_Ps_vPm2_pLvvu6vVlf73JdsmLMG0NlwwqNguu2rSlrCtnQmgtB0LS1lFrWksiaGSaqknMqeM2q2rTISWnqFTvPrpa-ab_vE8ZRHW3ayKUN0U9R0YpUTNCqJAl99w_64KfQp-kUFaJgVBZspuhCmeBjDNiqIdijDidFiZrjVEucKsWp5jhVlZxiceIwfz2Gvzr_R3q7SK32SnfBRnW_LxJASEEZq1bsFxSYrdE</recordid><startdate>20150801</startdate><enddate>20150801</enddate><creator>Meten, Matebie</creator><creator>Bhandary, Netra Prakash</creator><creator>Yatabe, Ryuichi</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1529-190X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150801</creationdate><title>Application of GIS-based fuzzy logic and rock engineering system (RES) approaches for landslide susceptibility mapping in Selelkula area of the Lower Jema River Gorge, Central Ethiopia</title><author>Meten, Matebie ; Bhandary, Netra Prakash ; Yatabe, Ryuichi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a532t-dc19d32ae76affb13d29d1b6770ecfb99a9b909b3c378566176b38bcfe605cb43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Biogeosciences</topic><topic>data collection</topic><topic>Disaster management</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Emergency preparedness</topic><topic>engineering</topic><topic>Environmental Science and Engineering</topic><topic>Fuzzy logic</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Geographic information systems</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>infrastructure</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Landslides</topic><topic>Landslides &amp; mudslides</topic><topic>Lithology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>planning</topic><topic>prediction</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>systems engineering</topic><topic>Terrestrial Pollution</topic><topic>transportation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meten, Matebie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhandary, Netra Prakash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yatabe, Ryuichi</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental earth sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meten, Matebie</au><au>Bhandary, Netra Prakash</au><au>Yatabe, Ryuichi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Application of GIS-based fuzzy logic and rock engineering system (RES) approaches for landslide susceptibility mapping in Selelkula area of the Lower Jema River Gorge, Central Ethiopia</atitle><jtitle>Environmental earth sciences</jtitle><stitle>Environ Earth Sci</stitle><date>2015-08-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>3395</spage><epage>3416</epage><pages>3395-3416</pages><issn>1866-6280</issn><eissn>1866-6299</eissn><abstract>Landslide susceptibility mapping is an important tool for disaster management and development activities such as planning of transportation infrastructure, settlement and agriculture. Selelkula area of the Jema River Gorge in Central Ethiopian Highland was chosen as a study area. Fuzzy logic (FL) and rock engineering system (RES) in a GIS environment were employed to prepare landslide susceptibility maps for this area. Data sets including slope, aspect, profile curvature, plan curvature, lithology, land use, distance from river and distance from lineament were generated using the field data, remote sensing and GIS. In FL, the fuzzy membership values were calculated by normalizing the frequency ratio values of each factor’s class in a range between 0 and 1. Then, the fuzzy membership values were combined by fuzzy AND, fuzzy OR, fuzzy gamma, fuzzy sum and fuzzy product operators. A total of twelve landslide susceptibility maps were produced using FL and the best map was chosen based on area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the highest difference between minimum and maximum susceptibility index values. Based on these criteria, the landslide susceptibility map produced using fuzzy gamma (γ = 0.8) operator was selected. RES is a semi-quantitative method which assigns each factor’s classes a value between 0 and 4 based on the principles of Hudson (Rock engineering systems, theory and practice. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1992) and uses an interaction matrix through a coding system of five values in previous researches but a coding system of nine values has been used in this study to provide a wider range of values for interactions among each pair of landslide factors and each landslide factor with a landslide. Unlike other methods, RES has a freedom to evaluate and assign each interaction based on expert’s knowledge and experience. But it also bears the problem of subjectivity in assigning the interaction values. On the other hand, FL is completely data driven and does not show any subjectivity in assigning values for each factor class. The prediction accuracies of FL and RES, which can be determined from ROC curves, were found to be 87.2 and 88.6 %, respectively. For validation purpose, the existing landslides were overlaid over the two landslide susceptibility maps and the percentage of landslides in each susceptibility class was calculated. The percentages of landslides that fall in the high and very high susceptibility classes are slightly higher in RES than FL method and hence the former is more accurate in predicting the future landslide occurrence than the later.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s12665-015-4377-8</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1529-190X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1866-6280
ispartof Environmental earth sciences, 2015-08, Vol.74 (4), p.3395-3416
issn 1866-6280
1866-6299
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808371850
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Biogeosciences
data collection
Disaster management
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Emergency preparedness
engineering
Environmental Science and Engineering
Fuzzy logic
Geochemistry
Geographic information systems
Geology
Hydrology/Water Resources
infrastructure
Land use
Landslides
Landslides & mudslides
Lithology
Original Article
planning
prediction
Remote sensing
Risk assessment
Rivers
Rocks
systems engineering
Terrestrial Pollution
transportation
title Application of GIS-based fuzzy logic and rock engineering system (RES) approaches for landslide susceptibility mapping in Selelkula area of the Lower Jema River Gorge, Central Ethiopia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T06%3A06%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Application%20of%20GIS-based%20fuzzy%20logic%20and%20rock%20engineering%20system%20(RES)%20approaches%20for%20landslide%20susceptibility%20mapping%20in%20Selelkula%20area%20of%20the%20Lower%20Jema%20River%20Gorge,%20Central%20Ethiopia&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20earth%20sciences&rft.au=Meten,%20Matebie&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=3395&rft.epage=3416&rft.pages=3395-3416&rft.issn=1866-6280&rft.eissn=1866-6299&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12665-015-4377-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3981165901%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1772319230&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true