Latent constructs of the students' assessment of their learning gains instrument following instruction in stereochemistry

Pedagogical practitioners who emphasise active learning in undergraduate chemistry courses widely use the Student Assessment of Learning Gains (SALG) instrument to measure students' perceptions of their gains in knowledge and skills in chemistry. Although numerous studies have reported SALG res...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chemistry Education Research and Practice 2016-01, Vol.17 (2), p.39-319
Hauptverfasser: Vishnumolakala, Venkat Rao, Southam, Daniel C, Treagust, David F, Mocerino, Mauro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 319
container_issue 2
container_start_page 39
container_title Chemistry Education Research and Practice
container_volume 17
creator Vishnumolakala, Venkat Rao
Southam, Daniel C
Treagust, David F
Mocerino, Mauro
description Pedagogical practitioners who emphasise active learning in undergraduate chemistry courses widely use the Student Assessment of Learning Gains (SALG) instrument to measure students' perceptions of their gains in knowledge and skills in chemistry. Although numerous studies have reported SALG results in support of successful pedagogical interventions, a comprehensive construct-verified version measuring students' perceptions of their chemistry learning is lacking. This paper aims to identify latent constructs of the SALG instrument that was administered in Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) classes by using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. When the SALG was administered on two separate occasions with two different groups of students following four weeks of instruction on topics in stereochemistry, the results revealed a four-factor structure consisting of 32 items that included Active Learning, Concept Learning, Resources, and Process Skills. These findings demonstrate an approach to collect evidence to support the match between intended constructs and measured variables in light of a targeted pedagogical intervention.
doi_str_mv 10.1039/c5rp00214a
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808104318</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1096269</ericid><sourcerecordid>1808104318</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-c00590c460afc4e6fe6625df0ec18956f1ce060d04be1cdf924457991581f6333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkV1LwzAUhosoOKc33gu9U4TqSduk6eUY84uBInpdYnqyRbpm5rTI_r3ZOtxVDnmevAlvouiSwR2DrLzX3K8BUparo2jECi4SxkAeh5lBmeSQytPojOgbgPOikKNoM1cdtl2sXUud73VHsTNxt8SYur4OhK5jRYREq602MOvjBpVvbbuIF8q2FNvd6Z1iXNO43y2y-0jr2jCHQPTo9BJXNuxvzqMToxrCi_06jj4fZh_Tp2T--vg8ncwTnYHsEh2eWoLOBSijcxQGhUh5bQA1kyUXhmkEATXkX8h0bco0z3lRloxLZkSWZePoZshde_fTI3VVuF9j06gWXU8VkyAZ5BmTQb0dVO0dkUdTrb1dKb-pGFTbfqspf3_b9TsJ8tUgo7f6X5y9hKJFKsoD93TAh__J_gAAWYP6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1808104318</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Latent constructs of the students' assessment of their learning gains instrument following instruction in stereochemistry</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Vishnumolakala, Venkat Rao ; Southam, Daniel C ; Treagust, David F ; Mocerino, Mauro</creator><creatorcontrib>Vishnumolakala, Venkat Rao ; Southam, Daniel C ; Treagust, David F ; Mocerino, Mauro</creatorcontrib><description>Pedagogical practitioners who emphasise active learning in undergraduate chemistry courses widely use the Student Assessment of Learning Gains (SALG) instrument to measure students' perceptions of their gains in knowledge and skills in chemistry. Although numerous studies have reported SALG results in support of successful pedagogical interventions, a comprehensive construct-verified version measuring students' perceptions of their chemistry learning is lacking. This paper aims to identify latent constructs of the SALG instrument that was administered in Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) classes by using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. When the SALG was administered on two separate occasions with two different groups of students following four weeks of instruction on topics in stereochemistry, the results revealed a four-factor structure consisting of 32 items that included Active Learning, Concept Learning, Resources, and Process Skills. These findings demonstrate an approach to collect evidence to support the match between intended constructs and measured variables in light of a targeted pedagogical intervention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1109-4028</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1756-1108</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-1108</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1109-4028</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/c5rp00214a</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Royal Society of Chemistry</publisher><subject>Assessments ; Australia ; Chemistry ; College Science ; Construction ; Factor Analysis ; Foreign Countries ; Gain ; Learning ; Likert Scales ; Measuring instruments ; Perception ; Science Instruction ; Science Tests ; Scientific Concepts ; Stereochemistry ; Student Attitudes ; Students ; Test Reliability ; Test Validity ; Undergraduate Students</subject><ispartof>Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2016-01, Vol.17 (2), p.39-319</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-c00590c460afc4e6fe6625df0ec18956f1ce060d04be1cdf924457991581f6333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-c00590c460afc4e6fe6625df0ec18956f1ce060d04be1cdf924457991581f6333</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1096269$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vishnumolakala, Venkat Rao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Southam, Daniel C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treagust, David F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mocerino, Mauro</creatorcontrib><title>Latent constructs of the students' assessment of their learning gains instrument following instruction in stereochemistry</title><title>Chemistry Education Research and Practice</title><description>Pedagogical practitioners who emphasise active learning in undergraduate chemistry courses widely use the Student Assessment of Learning Gains (SALG) instrument to measure students' perceptions of their gains in knowledge and skills in chemistry. Although numerous studies have reported SALG results in support of successful pedagogical interventions, a comprehensive construct-verified version measuring students' perceptions of their chemistry learning is lacking. This paper aims to identify latent constructs of the SALG instrument that was administered in Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) classes by using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. When the SALG was administered on two separate occasions with two different groups of students following four weeks of instruction on topics in stereochemistry, the results revealed a four-factor structure consisting of 32 items that included Active Learning, Concept Learning, Resources, and Process Skills. These findings demonstrate an approach to collect evidence to support the match between intended constructs and measured variables in light of a targeted pedagogical intervention.</description><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>College Science</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Gain</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Likert Scales</subject><subject>Measuring instruments</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Science Instruction</subject><subject>Science Tests</subject><subject>Scientific Concepts</subject><subject>Stereochemistry</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Test Reliability</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><issn>1109-4028</issn><issn>1756-1108</issn><issn>1756-1108</issn><issn>1109-4028</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkV1LwzAUhosoOKc33gu9U4TqSduk6eUY84uBInpdYnqyRbpm5rTI_r3ZOtxVDnmevAlvouiSwR2DrLzX3K8BUparo2jECi4SxkAeh5lBmeSQytPojOgbgPOikKNoM1cdtl2sXUud73VHsTNxt8SYur4OhK5jRYREq602MOvjBpVvbbuIF8q2FNvd6Z1iXNO43y2y-0jr2jCHQPTo9BJXNuxvzqMToxrCi_06jj4fZh_Tp2T--vg8ncwTnYHsEh2eWoLOBSijcxQGhUh5bQA1kyUXhmkEATXkX8h0bco0z3lRloxLZkSWZePoZshde_fTI3VVuF9j06gWXU8VkyAZ5BmTQb0dVO0dkUdTrb1dKb-pGFTbfqspf3_b9TsJ8tUgo7f6X5y9hKJFKsoD93TAh__J_gAAWYP6</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Vishnumolakala, Venkat Rao</creator><creator>Southam, Daniel C</creator><creator>Treagust, David F</creator><creator>Mocerino, Mauro</creator><general>Royal Society of Chemistry</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Latent constructs of the students' assessment of their learning gains instrument following instruction in stereochemistry</title><author>Vishnumolakala, Venkat Rao ; Southam, Daniel C ; Treagust, David F ; Mocerino, Mauro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-c00590c460afc4e6fe6625df0ec18956f1ce060d04be1cdf924457991581f6333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>College Science</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Gain</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Likert Scales</topic><topic>Measuring instruments</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Science Instruction</topic><topic>Science Tests</topic><topic>Scientific Concepts</topic><topic>Stereochemistry</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Test Reliability</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vishnumolakala, Venkat Rao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Southam, Daniel C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treagust, David F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mocerino, Mauro</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Chemistry Education Research and Practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vishnumolakala, Venkat Rao</au><au>Southam, Daniel C</au><au>Treagust, David F</au><au>Mocerino, Mauro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1096269</ericid><atitle>Latent constructs of the students' assessment of their learning gains instrument following instruction in stereochemistry</atitle><jtitle>Chemistry Education Research and Practice</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>39</spage><epage>319</epage><pages>39-319</pages><issn>1109-4028</issn><issn>1756-1108</issn><eissn>1756-1108</eissn><eissn>1109-4028</eissn><abstract>Pedagogical practitioners who emphasise active learning in undergraduate chemistry courses widely use the Student Assessment of Learning Gains (SALG) instrument to measure students' perceptions of their gains in knowledge and skills in chemistry. Although numerous studies have reported SALG results in support of successful pedagogical interventions, a comprehensive construct-verified version measuring students' perceptions of their chemistry learning is lacking. This paper aims to identify latent constructs of the SALG instrument that was administered in Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) classes by using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. When the SALG was administered on two separate occasions with two different groups of students following four weeks of instruction on topics in stereochemistry, the results revealed a four-factor structure consisting of 32 items that included Active Learning, Concept Learning, Resources, and Process Skills. These findings demonstrate an approach to collect evidence to support the match between intended constructs and measured variables in light of a targeted pedagogical intervention.</abstract><pub>Royal Society of Chemistry</pub><doi>10.1039/c5rp00214a</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1109-4028
ispartof Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2016-01, Vol.17 (2), p.39-319
issn 1109-4028
1756-1108
1756-1108
1109-4028
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808104318
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Assessments
Australia
Chemistry
College Science
Construction
Factor Analysis
Foreign Countries
Gain
Learning
Likert Scales
Measuring instruments
Perception
Science Instruction
Science Tests
Scientific Concepts
Stereochemistry
Student Attitudes
Students
Test Reliability
Test Validity
Undergraduate Students
title Latent constructs of the students' assessment of their learning gains instrument following instruction in stereochemistry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T05%3A17%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Latent%20constructs%20of%20the%20students'%20assessment%20of%20their%20learning%20gains%20instrument%20following%20instruction%20in%20stereochemistry&rft.jtitle=Chemistry%20Education%20Research%20and%20Practice&rft.au=Vishnumolakala,%20Venkat%20Rao&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=39&rft.epage=319&rft.pages=39-319&rft.issn=1109-4028&rft.eissn=1756-1108&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/c5rp00214a&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E1808104318%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1808104318&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1096269&rfr_iscdi=true