The importance of ENSO phase during volcanic eruptions for detection and attribution

Comparisons of the observed global‐scale cooling following recent volcanic eruptions to that simulated by climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) indicate that the models overestimate the magnitude of the global temperature response to volcanic eruptions. Here we show...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geophysical research letters 2016-03, Vol.43 (6), p.2851-2858
Hauptverfasser: Lehner, Flavio, Schurer, Andrew P., Hegerl, Gabriele C., Deser, Clara, Frölicher, Thomas L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2858
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2851
container_title Geophysical research letters
container_volume 43
creator Lehner, Flavio
Schurer, Andrew P.
Hegerl, Gabriele C.
Deser, Clara
Frölicher, Thomas L.
description Comparisons of the observed global‐scale cooling following recent volcanic eruptions to that simulated by climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) indicate that the models overestimate the magnitude of the global temperature response to volcanic eruptions. Here we show that this overestimation can be explained as a sampling issue, arising because all large eruptions since 1951 coincided with El Niño events, which cause global‐scale warming that partially counteracts the volcanically induced cooling. By subsampling the CMIP5 models according to the observed El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) phase during each eruption, we find that the simulated global temperature response to volcanic forcing is consistent with observations. Volcanic eruptions pose a particular challenge for the detection and attribution methodology, as their surface impacts are short‐lived and hence can be confounded by ENSO. Our results imply that detection and attribution studies must carefully consider sampling biases due to internal climate variability. Key Points There is disagreement between observed and simulated global mean cooling response to recent volcanic eruptions Accounting for the observed coincidence of El Niño events with recent eruptions resolves this bias Detection and attribution studies must consider sampling biases arising from internal variability
doi_str_mv 10.1002/2016GL067935
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808097587</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1911177475</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5316-95fa821e9a9f0d6afce9d9edb2a1fb8ca6270f80665053408124144aab8a4ecb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U2L1EAQBuBGFBxXb_6ABi8enLWqv_soyzouDC7oeA6VTrebJZOO3Ymy_94M40E8rKeqFx4Kipex1wiXCCDeC0Cz24OxXuonbINeqa0DsE_ZBsCvu7DmOXtR6z0ASJC4YYfDXeT9ccplpjFEnhO__vz1lk93VCPvltKP3_nPPAQa-8BjWaa5z2PlKRfexTmGU-Q0dpzmufTtcsov2bNEQ42v_swL9u3j9eHq03Z_u7u5-rDfkpZotl4ncgKjJ5-gM5RC9J2PXSsIU-sCGWEhOTBGg5YKHAqFShG1jlQMrbxgb893p5J_LLHOzbGvIQ4DjTEvtUEHDrzVzv6fWg9eSyfVSt_8Q-_zUsb1kQY9IlqrrH5UWSekctK7Vb07q1ByrSWmZir9kcpDg9CcOmv-7mzl4sx_9UN8eNQ2uy97rdAa-RspV5XH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1782348398</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The importance of ENSO phase during volcanic eruptions for detection and attribution</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><creator>Lehner, Flavio ; Schurer, Andrew P. ; Hegerl, Gabriele C. ; Deser, Clara ; Frölicher, Thomas L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lehner, Flavio ; Schurer, Andrew P. ; Hegerl, Gabriele C. ; Deser, Clara ; Frölicher, Thomas L.</creatorcontrib><description>Comparisons of the observed global‐scale cooling following recent volcanic eruptions to that simulated by climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) indicate that the models overestimate the magnitude of the global temperature response to volcanic eruptions. Here we show that this overestimation can be explained as a sampling issue, arising because all large eruptions since 1951 coincided with El Niño events, which cause global‐scale warming that partially counteracts the volcanically induced cooling. By subsampling the CMIP5 models according to the observed El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) phase during each eruption, we find that the simulated global temperature response to volcanic forcing is consistent with observations. Volcanic eruptions pose a particular challenge for the detection and attribution methodology, as their surface impacts are short‐lived and hence can be confounded by ENSO. Our results imply that detection and attribution studies must carefully consider sampling biases due to internal climate variability. Key Points There is disagreement between observed and simulated global mean cooling response to recent volcanic eruptions Accounting for the observed coincidence of El Niño events with recent eruptions resolves this bias Detection and attribution studies must consider sampling biases arising from internal variability</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8007</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2016GL067935</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Climate ; Climate models ; Climate variability ; Computer simulation ; Cooling ; Detection ; detection and attribution ; El Nino ; El Nino events ; El Nino phenomena ; El Nino-Southern Oscillation event ; ENSO phase ; Global temperatures ; Intercomparison ; Loads (forces) ; Methods ; model climate sensitivity ; Sampling ; Scale (ratio) ; Southern Oscillation ; Temperature ; Temperature effects ; Variability ; Volcanic eruptions ; volcanic response</subject><ispartof>Geophysical research letters, 2016-03, Vol.43 (6), p.2851-2858</ispartof><rights>2016. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5316-95fa821e9a9f0d6afce9d9edb2a1fb8ca6270f80665053408124144aab8a4ecb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5316-95fa821e9a9f0d6afce9d9edb2a1fb8ca6270f80665053408124144aab8a4ecb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2016GL067935$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2016GL067935$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,1432,11505,27915,27916,45565,45566,46400,46459,46824,46883</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lehner, Flavio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schurer, Andrew P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hegerl, Gabriele C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deser, Clara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frölicher, Thomas L.</creatorcontrib><title>The importance of ENSO phase during volcanic eruptions for detection and attribution</title><title>Geophysical research letters</title><description>Comparisons of the observed global‐scale cooling following recent volcanic eruptions to that simulated by climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) indicate that the models overestimate the magnitude of the global temperature response to volcanic eruptions. Here we show that this overestimation can be explained as a sampling issue, arising because all large eruptions since 1951 coincided with El Niño events, which cause global‐scale warming that partially counteracts the volcanically induced cooling. By subsampling the CMIP5 models according to the observed El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) phase during each eruption, we find that the simulated global temperature response to volcanic forcing is consistent with observations. Volcanic eruptions pose a particular challenge for the detection and attribution methodology, as their surface impacts are short‐lived and hence can be confounded by ENSO. Our results imply that detection and attribution studies must carefully consider sampling biases due to internal climate variability. Key Points There is disagreement between observed and simulated global mean cooling response to recent volcanic eruptions Accounting for the observed coincidence of El Niño events with recent eruptions resolves this bias Detection and attribution studies must consider sampling biases arising from internal variability</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Climate variability</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Cooling</subject><subject>Detection</subject><subject>detection and attribution</subject><subject>El Nino</subject><subject>El Nino events</subject><subject>El Nino phenomena</subject><subject>El Nino-Southern Oscillation event</subject><subject>ENSO phase</subject><subject>Global temperatures</subject><subject>Intercomparison</subject><subject>Loads (forces)</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>model climate sensitivity</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Scale (ratio)</subject><subject>Southern Oscillation</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Temperature effects</subject><subject>Variability</subject><subject>Volcanic eruptions</subject><subject>volcanic response</subject><issn>0094-8276</issn><issn>1944-8007</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0U2L1EAQBuBGFBxXb_6ABi8enLWqv_soyzouDC7oeA6VTrebJZOO3Ymy_94M40E8rKeqFx4Kipex1wiXCCDeC0Cz24OxXuonbINeqa0DsE_ZBsCvu7DmOXtR6z0ASJC4YYfDXeT9ccplpjFEnhO__vz1lk93VCPvltKP3_nPPAQa-8BjWaa5z2PlKRfexTmGU-Q0dpzmufTtcsov2bNEQ42v_swL9u3j9eHq03Z_u7u5-rDfkpZotl4ncgKjJ5-gM5RC9J2PXSsIU-sCGWEhOTBGg5YKHAqFShG1jlQMrbxgb893p5J_LLHOzbGvIQ4DjTEvtUEHDrzVzv6fWg9eSyfVSt_8Q-_zUsb1kQY9IlqrrH5UWSekctK7Vb07q1ByrSWmZir9kcpDg9CcOmv-7mzl4sx_9UN8eNQ2uy97rdAa-RspV5XH</recordid><startdate>20160328</startdate><enddate>20160328</enddate><creator>Lehner, Flavio</creator><creator>Schurer, Andrew P.</creator><creator>Hegerl, Gabriele C.</creator><creator>Deser, Clara</creator><creator>Frölicher, Thomas L.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160328</creationdate><title>The importance of ENSO phase during volcanic eruptions for detection and attribution</title><author>Lehner, Flavio ; Schurer, Andrew P. ; Hegerl, Gabriele C. ; Deser, Clara ; Frölicher, Thomas L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5316-95fa821e9a9f0d6afce9d9edb2a1fb8ca6270f80665053408124144aab8a4ecb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Climate variability</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Cooling</topic><topic>Detection</topic><topic>detection and attribution</topic><topic>El Nino</topic><topic>El Nino events</topic><topic>El Nino phenomena</topic><topic>El Nino-Southern Oscillation event</topic><topic>ENSO phase</topic><topic>Global temperatures</topic><topic>Intercomparison</topic><topic>Loads (forces)</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>model climate sensitivity</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Scale (ratio)</topic><topic>Southern Oscillation</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Temperature effects</topic><topic>Variability</topic><topic>Volcanic eruptions</topic><topic>volcanic response</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lehner, Flavio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schurer, Andrew P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hegerl, Gabriele C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deser, Clara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frölicher, Thomas L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lehner, Flavio</au><au>Schurer, Andrew P.</au><au>Hegerl, Gabriele C.</au><au>Deser, Clara</au><au>Frölicher, Thomas L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The importance of ENSO phase during volcanic eruptions for detection and attribution</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle><date>2016-03-28</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2851</spage><epage>2858</epage><pages>2851-2858</pages><issn>0094-8276</issn><eissn>1944-8007</eissn><abstract>Comparisons of the observed global‐scale cooling following recent volcanic eruptions to that simulated by climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) indicate that the models overestimate the magnitude of the global temperature response to volcanic eruptions. Here we show that this overestimation can be explained as a sampling issue, arising because all large eruptions since 1951 coincided with El Niño events, which cause global‐scale warming that partially counteracts the volcanically induced cooling. By subsampling the CMIP5 models according to the observed El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) phase during each eruption, we find that the simulated global temperature response to volcanic forcing is consistent with observations. Volcanic eruptions pose a particular challenge for the detection and attribution methodology, as their surface impacts are short‐lived and hence can be confounded by ENSO. Our results imply that detection and attribution studies must carefully consider sampling biases due to internal climate variability. Key Points There is disagreement between observed and simulated global mean cooling response to recent volcanic eruptions Accounting for the observed coincidence of El Niño events with recent eruptions resolves this bias Detection and attribution studies must consider sampling biases arising from internal variability</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/2016GL067935</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-8276
ispartof Geophysical research letters, 2016-03, Vol.43 (6), p.2851-2858
issn 0094-8276
1944-8007
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808097587
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Free Content; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library
subjects Accounting
Climate
Climate models
Climate variability
Computer simulation
Cooling
Detection
detection and attribution
El Nino
El Nino events
El Nino phenomena
El Nino-Southern Oscillation event
ENSO phase
Global temperatures
Intercomparison
Loads (forces)
Methods
model climate sensitivity
Sampling
Scale (ratio)
Southern Oscillation
Temperature
Temperature effects
Variability
Volcanic eruptions
volcanic response
title The importance of ENSO phase during volcanic eruptions for detection and attribution
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T05%3A05%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20importance%20of%20ENSO%20phase%20during%20volcanic%20eruptions%20for%20detection%20and%20attribution&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20research%20letters&rft.au=Lehner,%20Flavio&rft.date=2016-03-28&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2851&rft.epage=2858&rft.pages=2851-2858&rft.issn=0094-8276&rft.eissn=1944-8007&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2016GL067935&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1911177475%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1782348398&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true