How Effective Is Thermal Remediation of DNAPL Source Zones in Reducing Groundwater Concentrations?

Dense nonaqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) source areas containing chlorinated volatile organic compounds (cVOCs) such as trichloroethene (TCE) and perchloroethene (PCE) often give rise to significant dissolved plumes in groundwater, leading to the closure of downgradient water supply wells and creating...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ground water monitoring & remediation 2016-02, Vol.36 (1), p.38-53
Hauptverfasser: Baker, Ralph S., Nielsen, Steffen G., Heron, Gorm, Ploug, Niels
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 53
container_issue 1
container_start_page 38
container_title Ground water monitoring & remediation
container_volume 36
creator Baker, Ralph S.
Nielsen, Steffen G.
Heron, Gorm
Ploug, Niels
description Dense nonaqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) source areas containing chlorinated volatile organic compounds (cVOCs) such as trichloroethene (TCE) and perchloroethene (PCE) often give rise to significant dissolved plumes in groundwater, leading to the closure of downgradient water supply wells and creating vapor intrusion issues in buildings located above the plume. Hydraulic containment via pump‐and‐treat has often been implemented to limit migration but must continue indefinitely. Removal of the DNAPL source area by means such as in situ thermal remediation (ISTR) offers the potential to diminish or end the need for hydraulic containment if the associated dissolved plume attenuates sufficiently following source removal. A question often raised is whether this occurs or whether the back diffusion of contaminants from secondary sources such as low‐permeability lenses in the dissolved plume precludes it. The authors conducted DNAPL source removal using ISTR at dozens of sites. This paper presents a compilation of cases—10 separate DNAPL source areas at five project sites—where data indicate that the implementation of a thorough ISTR in a DNAPL source area can result in the attenuation of the associated dissolved plume, such that in several cases, long‐standing pump‐and‐treat systems could be turned off. Our findings contrast with recent assertions that aggressive source remediation may not be justifiable because dissolved plume concentrations will not decline sufficiently. We show that the application of ISTR can result in the thorough removal of the DNAPL source, effective diminution of dissolved plume groundwater concentrations, and achievement of drinking water standards.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/gwmr.12149
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808075760</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4009100981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5599-d67bdde1b75fce87f4fa4a1ae026d10924e41317ca67de48b5fbf6c4e8d980533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U9v0zAYBnALgcQoXPgCWOKCkDLsxP9yQlM3uk2ljG5jEhfLSV4Xb0k87IRu3x53AQ4cwBf78Htey34QeknJPk3r3WbbhX2aU1Y-QntUMp4JXuaP05mIMitEXj5Fz2K8JqQQXPE9VB37LT6yFurB_QB8EvHFNwidafEaOmicGZzvsbf4cHVwtsTnfgw14K--h4hdn1Az1q7f4EXwY99szQABz31fQz-Eh2x8_xw9saaN8OLXPkOXH44u5sfZ8tPiZH6wzAznZZk1QlZNA7SS3NagpGXWMEMNkFw0lJQ5A0YLKmsjZANMVdxWVtQMVFMqwotiht5Mc2-D_z5CHHTnYg1ta3rwY9RUEUUkl4L8n8o0MedK7aa-_otepz_o00OSSkwVNF0-Q28nVQcfYwCrb4PrTLjXlOhdM3rXjH5oJmE64a1r4f4fUi-uPq5_Z7Ip4-IAd38yJtxoIQvJ9dVqoQ_XxeezL6dSr5J_NXlrvDab4KK-PM8JFYRQJoUSxU8AAqh7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1778083105</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Effective Is Thermal Remediation of DNAPL Source Zones in Reducing Groundwater Concentrations?</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Baker, Ralph S. ; Nielsen, Steffen G. ; Heron, Gorm ; Ploug, Niels</creator><creatorcontrib>Baker, Ralph S. ; Nielsen, Steffen G. ; Heron, Gorm ; Ploug, Niels</creatorcontrib><description>Dense nonaqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) source areas containing chlorinated volatile organic compounds (cVOCs) such as trichloroethene (TCE) and perchloroethene (PCE) often give rise to significant dissolved plumes in groundwater, leading to the closure of downgradient water supply wells and creating vapor intrusion issues in buildings located above the plume. Hydraulic containment via pump‐and‐treat has often been implemented to limit migration but must continue indefinitely. Removal of the DNAPL source area by means such as in situ thermal remediation (ISTR) offers the potential to diminish or end the need for hydraulic containment if the associated dissolved plume attenuates sufficiently following source removal. A question often raised is whether this occurs or whether the back diffusion of contaminants from secondary sources such as low‐permeability lenses in the dissolved plume precludes it. The authors conducted DNAPL source removal using ISTR at dozens of sites. This paper presents a compilation of cases—10 separate DNAPL source areas at five project sites—where data indicate that the implementation of a thorough ISTR in a DNAPL source area can result in the attenuation of the associated dissolved plume, such that in several cases, long‐standing pump‐and‐treat systems could be turned off. Our findings contrast with recent assertions that aggressive source remediation may not be justifiable because dissolved plume concentrations will not decline sufficiently. We show that the application of ISTR can result in the thorough removal of the DNAPL source, effective diminution of dissolved plume groundwater concentrations, and achievement of drinking water standards.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-3629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-6592</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/gwmr.12149</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GWMREV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Containment ; Dissolution ; Fluid dynamics ; Fluid flow ; Groundwater ; Hydraulics ; Plumes ; Remediation</subject><ispartof>Ground water monitoring &amp; remediation, 2016-02, Vol.36 (1), p.38-53</ispartof><rights>2016, National Ground Water Association</rights><rights>Groundwater Monitoring &amp; Remediation © 2016, National Ground Water Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5599-d67bdde1b75fce87f4fa4a1ae026d10924e41317ca67de48b5fbf6c4e8d980533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5599-d67bdde1b75fce87f4fa4a1ae026d10924e41317ca67de48b5fbf6c4e8d980533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fgwmr.12149$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fgwmr.12149$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baker, Ralph S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Steffen G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heron, Gorm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ploug, Niels</creatorcontrib><title>How Effective Is Thermal Remediation of DNAPL Source Zones in Reducing Groundwater Concentrations?</title><title>Ground water monitoring &amp; remediation</title><addtitle>Groundwater Monit R</addtitle><description>Dense nonaqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) source areas containing chlorinated volatile organic compounds (cVOCs) such as trichloroethene (TCE) and perchloroethene (PCE) often give rise to significant dissolved plumes in groundwater, leading to the closure of downgradient water supply wells and creating vapor intrusion issues in buildings located above the plume. Hydraulic containment via pump‐and‐treat has often been implemented to limit migration but must continue indefinitely. Removal of the DNAPL source area by means such as in situ thermal remediation (ISTR) offers the potential to diminish or end the need for hydraulic containment if the associated dissolved plume attenuates sufficiently following source removal. A question often raised is whether this occurs or whether the back diffusion of contaminants from secondary sources such as low‐permeability lenses in the dissolved plume precludes it. The authors conducted DNAPL source removal using ISTR at dozens of sites. This paper presents a compilation of cases—10 separate DNAPL source areas at five project sites—where data indicate that the implementation of a thorough ISTR in a DNAPL source area can result in the attenuation of the associated dissolved plume, such that in several cases, long‐standing pump‐and‐treat systems could be turned off. Our findings contrast with recent assertions that aggressive source remediation may not be justifiable because dissolved plume concentrations will not decline sufficiently. We show that the application of ISTR can result in the thorough removal of the DNAPL source, effective diminution of dissolved plume groundwater concentrations, and achievement of drinking water standards.</description><subject>Containment</subject><subject>Dissolution</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Hydraulics</subject><subject>Plumes</subject><subject>Remediation</subject><issn>1069-3629</issn><issn>1745-6592</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0U9v0zAYBnALgcQoXPgCWOKCkDLsxP9yQlM3uk2ljG5jEhfLSV4Xb0k87IRu3x53AQ4cwBf78Htey34QeknJPk3r3WbbhX2aU1Y-QntUMp4JXuaP05mIMitEXj5Fz2K8JqQQXPE9VB37LT6yFurB_QB8EvHFNwidafEaOmicGZzvsbf4cHVwtsTnfgw14K--h4hdn1Az1q7f4EXwY99szQABz31fQz-Eh2x8_xw9saaN8OLXPkOXH44u5sfZ8tPiZH6wzAznZZk1QlZNA7SS3NagpGXWMEMNkFw0lJQ5A0YLKmsjZANMVdxWVtQMVFMqwotiht5Mc2-D_z5CHHTnYg1ta3rwY9RUEUUkl4L8n8o0MedK7aa-_otepz_o00OSSkwVNF0-Q28nVQcfYwCrb4PrTLjXlOhdM3rXjH5oJmE64a1r4f4fUi-uPq5_Z7Ip4-IAd38yJtxoIQvJ9dVqoQ_XxeezL6dSr5J_NXlrvDab4KK-PM8JFYRQJoUSxU8AAqh7</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Baker, Ralph S.</creator><creator>Nielsen, Steffen G.</creator><creator>Heron, Gorm</creator><creator>Ploug, Niels</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>How Effective Is Thermal Remediation of DNAPL Source Zones in Reducing Groundwater Concentrations?</title><author>Baker, Ralph S. ; Nielsen, Steffen G. ; Heron, Gorm ; Ploug, Niels</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5599-d67bdde1b75fce87f4fa4a1ae026d10924e41317ca67de48b5fbf6c4e8d980533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Containment</topic><topic>Dissolution</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Hydraulics</topic><topic>Plumes</topic><topic>Remediation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baker, Ralph S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Steffen G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heron, Gorm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ploug, Niels</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ground water monitoring &amp; remediation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baker, Ralph S.</au><au>Nielsen, Steffen G.</au><au>Heron, Gorm</au><au>Ploug, Niels</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Effective Is Thermal Remediation of DNAPL Source Zones in Reducing Groundwater Concentrations?</atitle><jtitle>Ground water monitoring &amp; remediation</jtitle><addtitle>Groundwater Monit R</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>38</spage><epage>53</epage><pages>38-53</pages><issn>1069-3629</issn><eissn>1745-6592</eissn><coden>GWMREV</coden><abstract>Dense nonaqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) source areas containing chlorinated volatile organic compounds (cVOCs) such as trichloroethene (TCE) and perchloroethene (PCE) often give rise to significant dissolved plumes in groundwater, leading to the closure of downgradient water supply wells and creating vapor intrusion issues in buildings located above the plume. Hydraulic containment via pump‐and‐treat has often been implemented to limit migration but must continue indefinitely. Removal of the DNAPL source area by means such as in situ thermal remediation (ISTR) offers the potential to diminish or end the need for hydraulic containment if the associated dissolved plume attenuates sufficiently following source removal. A question often raised is whether this occurs or whether the back diffusion of contaminants from secondary sources such as low‐permeability lenses in the dissolved plume precludes it. The authors conducted DNAPL source removal using ISTR at dozens of sites. This paper presents a compilation of cases—10 separate DNAPL source areas at five project sites—where data indicate that the implementation of a thorough ISTR in a DNAPL source area can result in the attenuation of the associated dissolved plume, such that in several cases, long‐standing pump‐and‐treat systems could be turned off. Our findings contrast with recent assertions that aggressive source remediation may not be justifiable because dissolved plume concentrations will not decline sufficiently. We show that the application of ISTR can result in the thorough removal of the DNAPL source, effective diminution of dissolved plume groundwater concentrations, and achievement of drinking water standards.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/gwmr.12149</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1069-3629
ispartof Ground water monitoring & remediation, 2016-02, Vol.36 (1), p.38-53
issn 1069-3629
1745-6592
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808075760
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
subjects Containment
Dissolution
Fluid dynamics
Fluid flow
Groundwater
Hydraulics
Plumes
Remediation
title How Effective Is Thermal Remediation of DNAPL Source Zones in Reducing Groundwater Concentrations?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T02%3A47%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Effective%20Is%20Thermal%20Remediation%20of%20DNAPL%20Source%20Zones%20in%20Reducing%20Groundwater%20Concentrations?&rft.jtitle=Ground%20water%20monitoring%20&%20remediation&rft.au=Baker,%20Ralph%20S.&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=38&rft.epage=53&rft.pages=38-53&rft.issn=1069-3629&rft.eissn=1745-6592&rft.coden=GWMREV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/gwmr.12149&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4009100981%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1778083105&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true