Negative Bias and Increased Variability in VOC Concentrations Using the HydraSleeve in Monitoring Wells
The HydraSleeve is a sampling device for collecting groundwater from the screened interval of a monitoring well without purging that uses a check valve to take in water over the first 3 to 5 feet of an upward pulling motion. If the check valve does not perform as expected, then the HydraSleeve has t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ground water monitoring & remediation 2016-02, Vol.36 (1), p.79-87 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 87 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 79 |
container_title | Ground water monitoring & remediation |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | McHugh, Thomas E. Kulkarni, Poonam R. Beckley, Lila M. Newell, Charles J. Zumbro, Marilyn |
description | The HydraSleeve is a sampling device for collecting groundwater from the screened interval of a monitoring well without purging that uses a check valve to take in water over the first 3 to 5 feet of an upward pulling motion. If the check valve does not perform as expected, then the HydraSleeve has the potential to collect water from an incorrect depth interval, possibly above the screened interval of the well. We have evaluated volatile organic chemical (VOC) results from groundwater samples collected with the HydraSleeve sampler compared to other methods for sampling monitoring wells at three sites. At all three sites, lower VOC concentration results were observed for samples collected using the HydraSleeve. At two of these three sites, the low concentration sample results were most strongly associated with monitoring wells with more than 10 feet of water above the monitoring well‐screened interval. At the site with the largest dataset, the median bias for samples collected with HydraSleeve was −20% (p < 0.001). At this site, a bias of −26% (p < 0.001) was observed for the subset of monitoring wells with greater than 10 feet of water above the screened interval compared to a bias of −7% (p = 0.21) for wells screened across the top of the water table. In addition to lower VOC concentrations, the monitoring records obtained using the HydraSleeve were more variable compared to monitoring records obtained using purge sampling methods, a characteristic that would make it more difficult to determine the long‐term concentration trend in the well. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/gwmr.12141 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808069526</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1808069526</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4861-653a5acf0351f850dfc0b794802dc07037742660af15f12ef196594afffba99c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0UtPGzEQB_AVAqlAe-knsMQFIS0dr9ePPbYBEiQeojzCzZrs2qlh4wV7A-Tb12mAQw_giy3597dmPFn2ncI-TevH9HkW9mlBS7qWbVJZ8lzwqlhPZxBVzkRRfcm2YrwDYIIrvplNz8wUe_dkyC-HkaBvyLGvg8FoGnKDweHEta5fEOfJzfmADDpfG9-HlOl8JNfR-Snp_xgyWjQBL1tj0lPJnnbe9V1Y3o5N28av2YbFNppvr_t2dn10eDUY5Sfnw-PBz5McSyVoqpYhx9oC49QqDo2tYSKrUkHR1CCBSVkWQgBayi0tjKVVarBEa-0Eq6pm29nu6t2H0D3OTez1zMU6VYDedPOoqQKVvoIX4nMqFfCCcwWJ7vxH77p58KmRpBJTrASa1N5K1aGLMRirH4KbYVhoCno5Hr0cj_43noTpCj-71iw-kHo4Pv39lslXGRd78_KewXCvhWSS6_HZUB_IW7gY81tdsb8E8aBT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1778083401</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Negative Bias and Increased Variability in VOC Concentrations Using the HydraSleeve in Monitoring Wells</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>McHugh, Thomas E. ; Kulkarni, Poonam R. ; Beckley, Lila M. ; Newell, Charles J. ; Zumbro, Marilyn</creator><creatorcontrib>McHugh, Thomas E. ; Kulkarni, Poonam R. ; Beckley, Lila M. ; Newell, Charles J. ; Zumbro, Marilyn</creatorcontrib><description>The HydraSleeve is a sampling device for collecting groundwater from the screened interval of a monitoring well without purging that uses a check valve to take in water over the first 3 to 5 feet of an upward pulling motion. If the check valve does not perform as expected, then the HydraSleeve has the potential to collect water from an incorrect depth interval, possibly above the screened interval of the well. We have evaluated volatile organic chemical (VOC) results from groundwater samples collected with the HydraSleeve sampler compared to other methods for sampling monitoring wells at three sites. At all three sites, lower VOC concentration results were observed for samples collected using the HydraSleeve. At two of these three sites, the low concentration sample results were most strongly associated with monitoring wells with more than 10 feet of water above the monitoring well‐screened interval. At the site with the largest dataset, the median bias for samples collected with HydraSleeve was −20% (p < 0.001). At this site, a bias of −26% (p < 0.001) was observed for the subset of monitoring wells with greater than 10 feet of water above the screened interval compared to a bias of −7% (p = 0.21) for wells screened across the top of the water table. In addition to lower VOC concentrations, the monitoring records obtained using the HydraSleeve were more variable compared to monitoring records obtained using purge sampling methods, a characteristic that would make it more difficult to determine the long‐term concentration trend in the well.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-3629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-6592</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/gwmr.12141</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GWMREV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Bias ; Groundwater ; Intervals ; Monitoring ; Organic chemicals ; Sampling ; Valves ; VOCs ; Volatile organic compounds ; Wells</subject><ispartof>Ground water monitoring & remediation, 2016-02, Vol.36 (1), p.79-87</ispartof><rights>2015, National Ground Water Association</rights><rights>Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation © 2016, National Ground Water Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4861-653a5acf0351f850dfc0b794802dc07037742660af15f12ef196594afffba99c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4861-653a5acf0351f850dfc0b794802dc07037742660af15f12ef196594afffba99c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fgwmr.12141$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fgwmr.12141$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McHugh, Thomas E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulkarni, Poonam R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckley, Lila M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newell, Charles J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zumbro, Marilyn</creatorcontrib><title>Negative Bias and Increased Variability in VOC Concentrations Using the HydraSleeve in Monitoring Wells</title><title>Ground water monitoring & remediation</title><addtitle>Groundwater Monit R</addtitle><description>The HydraSleeve is a sampling device for collecting groundwater from the screened interval of a monitoring well without purging that uses a check valve to take in water over the first 3 to 5 feet of an upward pulling motion. If the check valve does not perform as expected, then the HydraSleeve has the potential to collect water from an incorrect depth interval, possibly above the screened interval of the well. We have evaluated volatile organic chemical (VOC) results from groundwater samples collected with the HydraSleeve sampler compared to other methods for sampling monitoring wells at three sites. At all three sites, lower VOC concentration results were observed for samples collected using the HydraSleeve. At two of these three sites, the low concentration sample results were most strongly associated with monitoring wells with more than 10 feet of water above the monitoring well‐screened interval. At the site with the largest dataset, the median bias for samples collected with HydraSleeve was −20% (p < 0.001). At this site, a bias of −26% (p < 0.001) was observed for the subset of monitoring wells with greater than 10 feet of water above the screened interval compared to a bias of −7% (p = 0.21) for wells screened across the top of the water table. In addition to lower VOC concentrations, the monitoring records obtained using the HydraSleeve were more variable compared to monitoring records obtained using purge sampling methods, a characteristic that would make it more difficult to determine the long‐term concentration trend in the well.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Intervals</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Organic chemicals</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Valves</subject><subject>VOCs</subject><subject>Volatile organic compounds</subject><subject>Wells</subject><issn>1069-3629</issn><issn>1745-6592</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0UtPGzEQB_AVAqlAe-knsMQFIS0dr9ePPbYBEiQeojzCzZrs2qlh4wV7A-Tb12mAQw_giy3597dmPFn2ncI-TevH9HkW9mlBS7qWbVJZ8lzwqlhPZxBVzkRRfcm2YrwDYIIrvplNz8wUe_dkyC-HkaBvyLGvg8FoGnKDweHEta5fEOfJzfmADDpfG9-HlOl8JNfR-Snp_xgyWjQBL1tj0lPJnnbe9V1Y3o5N28av2YbFNppvr_t2dn10eDUY5Sfnw-PBz5McSyVoqpYhx9oC49QqDo2tYSKrUkHR1CCBSVkWQgBayi0tjKVVarBEa-0Eq6pm29nu6t2H0D3OTez1zMU6VYDedPOoqQKVvoIX4nMqFfCCcwWJ7vxH77p58KmRpBJTrASa1N5K1aGLMRirH4KbYVhoCno5Hr0cj_43noTpCj-71iw-kHo4Pv39lslXGRd78_KewXCvhWSS6_HZUB_IW7gY81tdsb8E8aBT</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>McHugh, Thomas E.</creator><creator>Kulkarni, Poonam R.</creator><creator>Beckley, Lila M.</creator><creator>Newell, Charles J.</creator><creator>Zumbro, Marilyn</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Negative Bias and Increased Variability in VOC Concentrations Using the HydraSleeve in Monitoring Wells</title><author>McHugh, Thomas E. ; Kulkarni, Poonam R. ; Beckley, Lila M. ; Newell, Charles J. ; Zumbro, Marilyn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4861-653a5acf0351f850dfc0b794802dc07037742660af15f12ef196594afffba99c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Intervals</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Organic chemicals</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Valves</topic><topic>VOCs</topic><topic>Volatile organic compounds</topic><topic>Wells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McHugh, Thomas E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulkarni, Poonam R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckley, Lila M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newell, Charles J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zumbro, Marilyn</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ground water monitoring & remediation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McHugh, Thomas E.</au><au>Kulkarni, Poonam R.</au><au>Beckley, Lila M.</au><au>Newell, Charles J.</au><au>Zumbro, Marilyn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Negative Bias and Increased Variability in VOC Concentrations Using the HydraSleeve in Monitoring Wells</atitle><jtitle>Ground water monitoring & remediation</jtitle><addtitle>Groundwater Monit R</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>87</epage><pages>79-87</pages><issn>1069-3629</issn><eissn>1745-6592</eissn><coden>GWMREV</coden><abstract>The HydraSleeve is a sampling device for collecting groundwater from the screened interval of a monitoring well without purging that uses a check valve to take in water over the first 3 to 5 feet of an upward pulling motion. If the check valve does not perform as expected, then the HydraSleeve has the potential to collect water from an incorrect depth interval, possibly above the screened interval of the well. We have evaluated volatile organic chemical (VOC) results from groundwater samples collected with the HydraSleeve sampler compared to other methods for sampling monitoring wells at three sites. At all three sites, lower VOC concentration results were observed for samples collected using the HydraSleeve. At two of these three sites, the low concentration sample results were most strongly associated with monitoring wells with more than 10 feet of water above the monitoring well‐screened interval. At the site with the largest dataset, the median bias for samples collected with HydraSleeve was −20% (p < 0.001). At this site, a bias of −26% (p < 0.001) was observed for the subset of monitoring wells with greater than 10 feet of water above the screened interval compared to a bias of −7% (p = 0.21) for wells screened across the top of the water table. In addition to lower VOC concentrations, the monitoring records obtained using the HydraSleeve were more variable compared to monitoring records obtained using purge sampling methods, a characteristic that would make it more difficult to determine the long‐term concentration trend in the well.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/gwmr.12141</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1069-3629 |
ispartof | Ground water monitoring & remediation, 2016-02, Vol.36 (1), p.79-87 |
issn | 1069-3629 1745-6592 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808069526 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Bias Groundwater Intervals Monitoring Organic chemicals Sampling Valves VOCs Volatile organic compounds Wells |
title | Negative Bias and Increased Variability in VOC Concentrations Using the HydraSleeve in Monitoring Wells |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T04%3A55%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Negative%20Bias%20and%20Increased%20Variability%20in%20VOC%20Concentrations%20Using%20the%20HydraSleeve%20in%20Monitoring%20Wells&rft.jtitle=Ground%20water%20monitoring%20&%20remediation&rft.au=McHugh,%20Thomas%20E.&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=87&rft.pages=79-87&rft.issn=1069-3629&rft.eissn=1745-6592&rft.coden=GWMREV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/gwmr.12141&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1808069526%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1778083401&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |