Sustainability assessment of energy saving measures: A multi-criteria approach for residential buildings retrofitting—A case study of the Spanish housing stock

•A multi-criteria methodology for the analysis of retrofitting solutions is proposed.•LCA and LCC are combined by expressing environmental impacts in monetary values.•A Pareto optimization is used to select the preferred strategies.•The methodology is illustrated by a case study in Madrid, Spain.•Bu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy and buildings 2016-03, Vol.116, p.384-394
Hauptverfasser: Pombo, Olatz, Allacker, Karen, Rivela, Beatriz, Neila, Javier
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 394
container_issue
container_start_page 384
container_title Energy and buildings
container_volume 116
creator Pombo, Olatz
Allacker, Karen
Rivela, Beatriz
Neila, Javier
description •A multi-criteria methodology for the analysis of retrofitting solutions is proposed.•LCA and LCC are combined by expressing environmental impacts in monetary values.•A Pareto optimization is used to select the preferred strategies.•The methodology is illustrated by a case study in Madrid, Spain.•Business as usual scenario is far from being an optimal solution. The building sector is well known to be one of the key energy consumers worldwide. The renovation of existing buildings provides excellent opportunities for an effective reduction of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions but it is essential to identify the optimal strategies. In this paper a multi-criteria methodology is proposed for the comparative analysis of retrofitting solutions. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Cost (LCC) are combined by expressing environmental impacts in monetary values. A Pareto optimization is used to select the preferred strategies. The methodology is exemplified by a case study: the renovation of a representative housing block from the 1960s located in Madrid. Eight scenarios have been proposed, from the Business as Usual scenario (BAU), through Spanish Building Regulation requirements (for new buildings) up to the Passive House standard. Results show how current renovation strategies that are being applied in Madrid are far from being optimal solutions. The required additional investment, which is needed to obtain an overall performance improvement of the envelope compared with the common practice to date, is relatively low (8%) considering the obtained life cycle environmental and financial savings (43% and 45%, respectively).
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.01.019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808064211</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378778816300196</els_id><sourcerecordid>1808064211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-8eea3582cfe2973ebb0f2d7374b7676d5a44761d69133e761a83e8704524c1fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUclKJEEQrcMI4_YJA3n0Um1mbZnlRRpxGRA8OJ6TqKwoO9pa2owsoW9-hD8wv-aXTPa0dyEgFt57EcFLkl9KLpRU1fl6gWMzU98ustgupIpR_0gOZa5NqrUxP5Mj5rWUsiq1Okz-Ps4cgEZoqKewFcCMzAOOQUydwBH981YwvNH4LAYEnj3yhViKYe4Dpc5TQE8gYLPxE7iV6CYvIoTaqEDQi_-3RDLHafBTRyHE7vP9YykcMAoOc7vdrQorFI8bGIlXYjXNvFvIYXIvJ8lBBz3j6Vc-Tp5urv9c3aX3D7e_r5b3qSuMDKlBhLw0meswq3WOTSO7rNW5Lhpd6aotoSh0pdqqVnmOsQKTo9GyKLPCqQ7z4-Rsrxs_eZ2Rgx2IHfY9jBjvscpII6siU-p7qK5lXRhdZhFa7qHOT8weO7vxNIDfWiXtzjG7tl-O2Z1jVqoYdeRd7nkYX34j9JYd4eiwJY8u2HaibxT-AVbaqL4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1790948752</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sustainability assessment of energy saving measures: A multi-criteria approach for residential buildings retrofitting—A case study of the Spanish housing stock</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Pombo, Olatz ; Allacker, Karen ; Rivela, Beatriz ; Neila, Javier</creator><creatorcontrib>Pombo, Olatz ; Allacker, Karen ; Rivela, Beatriz ; Neila, Javier</creatorcontrib><description>•A multi-criteria methodology for the analysis of retrofitting solutions is proposed.•LCA and LCC are combined by expressing environmental impacts in monetary values.•A Pareto optimization is used to select the preferred strategies.•The methodology is illustrated by a case study in Madrid, Spain.•Business as usual scenario is far from being an optimal solution. The building sector is well known to be one of the key energy consumers worldwide. The renovation of existing buildings provides excellent opportunities for an effective reduction of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions but it is essential to identify the optimal strategies. In this paper a multi-criteria methodology is proposed for the comparative analysis of retrofitting solutions. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Cost (LCC) are combined by expressing environmental impacts in monetary values. A Pareto optimization is used to select the preferred strategies. The methodology is exemplified by a case study: the renovation of a representative housing block from the 1960s located in Madrid. Eight scenarios have been proposed, from the Business as Usual scenario (BAU), through Spanish Building Regulation requirements (for new buildings) up to the Passive House standard. Results show how current renovation strategies that are being applied in Madrid are far from being optimal solutions. The required additional investment, which is needed to obtain an overall performance improvement of the envelope compared with the common practice to date, is relatively low (8%) considering the obtained life cycle environmental and financial savings (43% and 45%, respectively).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-7788</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.01.019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Air pollution ; Environmental external costs ; Housing ; Housing retrofit ; Life cycle assessment ; Life cycle cost ; Life cycle costs ; Methodology ; Monetary valuation ; Optimization ; Pareto optimization ; Renovation ; Strategy</subject><ispartof>Energy and buildings, 2016-03, Vol.116, p.384-394</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-8eea3582cfe2973ebb0f2d7374b7676d5a44761d69133e761a83e8704524c1fe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-8eea3582cfe2973ebb0f2d7374b7676d5a44761d69133e761a83e8704524c1fe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778816300196$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pombo, Olatz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allacker, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivela, Beatriz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neila, Javier</creatorcontrib><title>Sustainability assessment of energy saving measures: A multi-criteria approach for residential buildings retrofitting—A case study of the Spanish housing stock</title><title>Energy and buildings</title><description>•A multi-criteria methodology for the analysis of retrofitting solutions is proposed.•LCA and LCC are combined by expressing environmental impacts in monetary values.•A Pareto optimization is used to select the preferred strategies.•The methodology is illustrated by a case study in Madrid, Spain.•Business as usual scenario is far from being an optimal solution. The building sector is well known to be one of the key energy consumers worldwide. The renovation of existing buildings provides excellent opportunities for an effective reduction of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions but it is essential to identify the optimal strategies. In this paper a multi-criteria methodology is proposed for the comparative analysis of retrofitting solutions. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Cost (LCC) are combined by expressing environmental impacts in monetary values. A Pareto optimization is used to select the preferred strategies. The methodology is exemplified by a case study: the renovation of a representative housing block from the 1960s located in Madrid. Eight scenarios have been proposed, from the Business as Usual scenario (BAU), through Spanish Building Regulation requirements (for new buildings) up to the Passive House standard. Results show how current renovation strategies that are being applied in Madrid are far from being optimal solutions. The required additional investment, which is needed to obtain an overall performance improvement of the envelope compared with the common practice to date, is relatively low (8%) considering the obtained life cycle environmental and financial savings (43% and 45%, respectively).</description><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Environmental external costs</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Housing retrofit</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment</subject><subject>Life cycle cost</subject><subject>Life cycle costs</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Monetary valuation</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Pareto optimization</subject><subject>Renovation</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><issn>0378-7788</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUclKJEEQrcMI4_YJA3n0Um1mbZnlRRpxGRA8OJ6TqKwoO9pa2owsoW9-hD8wv-aXTPa0dyEgFt57EcFLkl9KLpRU1fl6gWMzU98ustgupIpR_0gOZa5NqrUxP5Mj5rWUsiq1Okz-Ps4cgEZoqKewFcCMzAOOQUydwBH981YwvNH4LAYEnj3yhViKYe4Dpc5TQE8gYLPxE7iV6CYvIoTaqEDQi_-3RDLHafBTRyHE7vP9YykcMAoOc7vdrQorFI8bGIlXYjXNvFvIYXIvJ8lBBz3j6Vc-Tp5urv9c3aX3D7e_r5b3qSuMDKlBhLw0meswq3WOTSO7rNW5Lhpd6aotoSh0pdqqVnmOsQKTo9GyKLPCqQ7z4-Rsrxs_eZ2Rgx2IHfY9jBjvscpII6siU-p7qK5lXRhdZhFa7qHOT8weO7vxNIDfWiXtzjG7tl-O2Z1jVqoYdeRd7nkYX34j9JYd4eiwJY8u2HaibxT-AVbaqL4</recordid><startdate>20160315</startdate><enddate>20160315</enddate><creator>Pombo, Olatz</creator><creator>Allacker, Karen</creator><creator>Rivela, Beatriz</creator><creator>Neila, Javier</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160315</creationdate><title>Sustainability assessment of energy saving measures: A multi-criteria approach for residential buildings retrofitting—A case study of the Spanish housing stock</title><author>Pombo, Olatz ; Allacker, Karen ; Rivela, Beatriz ; Neila, Javier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-8eea3582cfe2973ebb0f2d7374b7676d5a44761d69133e761a83e8704524c1fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Environmental external costs</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Housing retrofit</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment</topic><topic>Life cycle cost</topic><topic>Life cycle costs</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Monetary valuation</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Pareto optimization</topic><topic>Renovation</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pombo, Olatz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allacker, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivela, Beatriz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neila, Javier</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy and buildings</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pombo, Olatz</au><au>Allacker, Karen</au><au>Rivela, Beatriz</au><au>Neila, Javier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sustainability assessment of energy saving measures: A multi-criteria approach for residential buildings retrofitting—A case study of the Spanish housing stock</atitle><jtitle>Energy and buildings</jtitle><date>2016-03-15</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>116</volume><spage>384</spage><epage>394</epage><pages>384-394</pages><issn>0378-7788</issn><abstract>•A multi-criteria methodology for the analysis of retrofitting solutions is proposed.•LCA and LCC are combined by expressing environmental impacts in monetary values.•A Pareto optimization is used to select the preferred strategies.•The methodology is illustrated by a case study in Madrid, Spain.•Business as usual scenario is far from being an optimal solution. The building sector is well known to be one of the key energy consumers worldwide. The renovation of existing buildings provides excellent opportunities for an effective reduction of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions but it is essential to identify the optimal strategies. In this paper a multi-criteria methodology is proposed for the comparative analysis of retrofitting solutions. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Cost (LCC) are combined by expressing environmental impacts in monetary values. A Pareto optimization is used to select the preferred strategies. The methodology is exemplified by a case study: the renovation of a representative housing block from the 1960s located in Madrid. Eight scenarios have been proposed, from the Business as Usual scenario (BAU), through Spanish Building Regulation requirements (for new buildings) up to the Passive House standard. Results show how current renovation strategies that are being applied in Madrid are far from being optimal solutions. The required additional investment, which is needed to obtain an overall performance improvement of the envelope compared with the common practice to date, is relatively low (8%) considering the obtained life cycle environmental and financial savings (43% and 45%, respectively).</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.01.019</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-7788
ispartof Energy and buildings, 2016-03, Vol.116, p.384-394
issn 0378-7788
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808064211
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Air pollution
Environmental external costs
Housing
Housing retrofit
Life cycle assessment
Life cycle cost
Life cycle costs
Methodology
Monetary valuation
Optimization
Pareto optimization
Renovation
Strategy
title Sustainability assessment of energy saving measures: A multi-criteria approach for residential buildings retrofitting—A case study of the Spanish housing stock
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T22%3A48%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sustainability%20assessment%20of%20energy%20saving%20measures:%20A%20multi-criteria%20approach%20for%20residential%20buildings%20retrofitting%E2%80%94A%20case%20study%20of%20the%20Spanish%20housing%20stock&rft.jtitle=Energy%20and%20buildings&rft.au=Pombo,%20Olatz&rft.date=2016-03-15&rft.volume=116&rft.spage=384&rft.epage=394&rft.pages=384-394&rft.issn=0378-7788&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.01.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1808064211%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1790948752&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0378778816300196&rfr_iscdi=true