A Systems Engineering Perspective on the Revised Defense Acquisition System
ABSTRACT The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) has recently revised the defense acquisition system to address suspected root causes hindering higher success rates. This article applies two systems thinking methodologies in a uniquely integrated fashion to provide an in‐depth review and compelling int...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Systems engineering 2015-11, Vol.18 (6), p.584-603 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 603 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 584 |
container_title | Systems engineering |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Cilli, Matthew Parnell, Gregory S. Cloutier, Robert Zigh, Teresa |
description | ABSTRACT
The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) has recently revised the defense acquisition system to address suspected root causes hindering higher success rates. This article applies two systems thinking methodologies in a uniquely integrated fashion to provide an in‐depth review and compelling interpretation of the revised defense acquisition system as put forth in January 7, 2015 DoDI 5000.02. Changes from the previous defense acquisition system are significant and may be cause for some cautious optimism in the United States. This article describes how the architects of the revised defense acquisition system have increased emphasis on systems engineering activities applied early in the lifecycle so that meaningful trade‐offs between capability requirements and lifecycle costs can be explored as requirements are being written to ensure realistic program baselines are established such that associated lifecycle costs will likely fit within future budgets. Expressed as emerging systems engineering research questions, this article identifies several gaps that are likely to emerge as the defense acquisition community attempts to execute the new acquisition system. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/sys.21329 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808058838</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3933784141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5129-61748c35959d2fd9af9e8cfe86e1fcb6298871712c9ca339ca1da3ca0f6039b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEFPwkAQhRujiYge_AdNvHgp7OzS7e6RgIKRoBGM0cumbKe4WAp0W7T_3pUaD15mJpnvvcw8z7sE0gFCaNfWtkOBUXnktSCkJOAiFMduJlIEQHtw6p1ZuyIECABpefd9f1bbEtfWv8mXJkcsTL70H7GwW9Sl2aO_yf3yHf0n3BuLiT_EFHOLfl_vKmNNady-sTj3TtI4s3jx29ve8-3NfDAOJg-ju0F_EugQqAw4RD2hWShDmdA0kXEqUegUBUdI9YJTKUQEEVAtdcyYK5DETMck5YTJBWdt77rx3RabXYW2VGtjNWZZnOOmsgoEESQUggmHXv1DV5uqyN11CiJOKOeSRY7qNtSnybBW28Ks46JWQNRPpsplqg6Zqtnr7DA4RdAojHv8608RFx-KRywK1ct0pMSED9_mcqym7BsmBHok</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1760266937</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Systems Engineering Perspective on the Revised Defense Acquisition System</title><source>Wiley Online Library (Online service)</source><creator>Cilli, Matthew ; Parnell, Gregory S. ; Cloutier, Robert ; Zigh, Teresa</creator><creatorcontrib>Cilli, Matthew ; Parnell, Gregory S. ; Cloutier, Robert ; Zigh, Teresa</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) has recently revised the defense acquisition system to address suspected root causes hindering higher success rates. This article applies two systems thinking methodologies in a uniquely integrated fashion to provide an in‐depth review and compelling interpretation of the revised defense acquisition system as put forth in January 7, 2015 DoDI 5000.02. Changes from the previous defense acquisition system are significant and may be cause for some cautious optimism in the United States. This article describes how the architects of the revised defense acquisition system have increased emphasis on systems engineering activities applied early in the lifecycle so that meaningful trade‐offs between capability requirements and lifecycle costs can be explored as requirements are being written to ensure realistic program baselines are established such that associated lifecycle costs will likely fit within future budgets. Expressed as emerging systems engineering research questions, this article identifies several gaps that are likely to emerge as the defense acquisition community attempts to execute the new acquisition system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-1241</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6858</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sys.21329</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Acquisitions ; affordability ; better buying power ; Communities ; conceptagon ; Congressional investigations ; Costs ; Defense ; defense acquisition system ; Life cycle costs ; Life cycle engineering ; Marketing ; Military technology ; new product development ; Scandals ; systemigram ; Systems engineering ; systems engineering trade-off analyses ; systems thinking ; Tradeoffs</subject><ispartof>Systems engineering, 2015-11, Vol.18 (6), p.584-603</ispartof><rights>2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5129-61748c35959d2fd9af9e8cfe86e1fcb6298871712c9ca339ca1da3ca0f6039b63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsys.21329$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsys.21329$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cilli, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parnell, Gregory S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cloutier, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zigh, Teresa</creatorcontrib><title>A Systems Engineering Perspective on the Revised Defense Acquisition System</title><title>Systems engineering</title><addtitle>Syst. Engin</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT
The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) has recently revised the defense acquisition system to address suspected root causes hindering higher success rates. This article applies two systems thinking methodologies in a uniquely integrated fashion to provide an in‐depth review and compelling interpretation of the revised defense acquisition system as put forth in January 7, 2015 DoDI 5000.02. Changes from the previous defense acquisition system are significant and may be cause for some cautious optimism in the United States. This article describes how the architects of the revised defense acquisition system have increased emphasis on systems engineering activities applied early in the lifecycle so that meaningful trade‐offs between capability requirements and lifecycle costs can be explored as requirements are being written to ensure realistic program baselines are established such that associated lifecycle costs will likely fit within future budgets. Expressed as emerging systems engineering research questions, this article identifies several gaps that are likely to emerge as the defense acquisition community attempts to execute the new acquisition system.</description><subject>Acquisitions</subject><subject>affordability</subject><subject>better buying power</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>conceptagon</subject><subject>Congressional investigations</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Defense</subject><subject>defense acquisition system</subject><subject>Life cycle costs</subject><subject>Life cycle engineering</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Military technology</subject><subject>new product development</subject><subject>Scandals</subject><subject>systemigram</subject><subject>Systems engineering</subject><subject>systems engineering trade-off analyses</subject><subject>systems thinking</subject><subject>Tradeoffs</subject><issn>1098-1241</issn><issn>1520-6858</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkEFPwkAQhRujiYge_AdNvHgp7OzS7e6RgIKRoBGM0cumbKe4WAp0W7T_3pUaD15mJpnvvcw8z7sE0gFCaNfWtkOBUXnktSCkJOAiFMduJlIEQHtw6p1ZuyIECABpefd9f1bbEtfWv8mXJkcsTL70H7GwW9Sl2aO_yf3yHf0n3BuLiT_EFHOLfl_vKmNNady-sTj3TtI4s3jx29ve8-3NfDAOJg-ju0F_EugQqAw4RD2hWShDmdA0kXEqUegUBUdI9YJTKUQEEVAtdcyYK5DETMck5YTJBWdt77rx3RabXYW2VGtjNWZZnOOmsgoEESQUggmHXv1DV5uqyN11CiJOKOeSRY7qNtSnybBW28Ks46JWQNRPpsplqg6Zqtnr7DA4RdAojHv8608RFx-KRywK1ct0pMSED9_mcqym7BsmBHok</recordid><startdate>201511</startdate><enddate>201511</enddate><creator>Cilli, Matthew</creator><creator>Parnell, Gregory S.</creator><creator>Cloutier, Robert</creator><creator>Zigh, Teresa</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201511</creationdate><title>A Systems Engineering Perspective on the Revised Defense Acquisition System</title><author>Cilli, Matthew ; Parnell, Gregory S. ; Cloutier, Robert ; Zigh, Teresa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5129-61748c35959d2fd9af9e8cfe86e1fcb6298871712c9ca339ca1da3ca0f6039b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Acquisitions</topic><topic>affordability</topic><topic>better buying power</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>conceptagon</topic><topic>Congressional investigations</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Defense</topic><topic>defense acquisition system</topic><topic>Life cycle costs</topic><topic>Life cycle engineering</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Military technology</topic><topic>new product development</topic><topic>Scandals</topic><topic>systemigram</topic><topic>Systems engineering</topic><topic>systems engineering trade-off analyses</topic><topic>systems thinking</topic><topic>Tradeoffs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cilli, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parnell, Gregory S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cloutier, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zigh, Teresa</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Systems engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cilli, Matthew</au><au>Parnell, Gregory S.</au><au>Cloutier, Robert</au><au>Zigh, Teresa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Systems Engineering Perspective on the Revised Defense Acquisition System</atitle><jtitle>Systems engineering</jtitle><addtitle>Syst. Engin</addtitle><date>2015-11</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>584</spage><epage>603</epage><pages>584-603</pages><issn>1098-1241</issn><eissn>1520-6858</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT
The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) has recently revised the defense acquisition system to address suspected root causes hindering higher success rates. This article applies two systems thinking methodologies in a uniquely integrated fashion to provide an in‐depth review and compelling interpretation of the revised defense acquisition system as put forth in January 7, 2015 DoDI 5000.02. Changes from the previous defense acquisition system are significant and may be cause for some cautious optimism in the United States. This article describes how the architects of the revised defense acquisition system have increased emphasis on systems engineering activities applied early in the lifecycle so that meaningful trade‐offs between capability requirements and lifecycle costs can be explored as requirements are being written to ensure realistic program baselines are established such that associated lifecycle costs will likely fit within future budgets. Expressed as emerging systems engineering research questions, this article identifies several gaps that are likely to emerge as the defense acquisition community attempts to execute the new acquisition system.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/sys.21329</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1098-1241 |
ispartof | Systems engineering, 2015-11, Vol.18 (6), p.584-603 |
issn | 1098-1241 1520-6858 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808058838 |
source | Wiley Online Library (Online service) |
subjects | Acquisitions affordability better buying power Communities conceptagon Congressional investigations Costs Defense defense acquisition system Life cycle costs Life cycle engineering Marketing Military technology new product development Scandals systemigram Systems engineering systems engineering trade-off analyses systems thinking Tradeoffs |
title | A Systems Engineering Perspective on the Revised Defense Acquisition System |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T10%3A54%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Systems%20Engineering%20Perspective%20on%20the%20Revised%20Defense%20Acquisition%20System&rft.jtitle=Systems%20engineering&rft.au=Cilli,%20Matthew&rft.date=2015-11&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=584&rft.epage=603&rft.pages=584-603&rft.issn=1098-1241&rft.eissn=1520-6858&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sys.21329&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E3933784141%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1760266937&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |