A Systems Engineering Perspective on the Revised Defense Acquisition System

ABSTRACT The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) has recently revised the defense acquisition system to address suspected root causes hindering higher success rates. This article applies two systems thinking methodologies in a uniquely integrated fashion to provide an in‐depth review and compelling int...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Systems engineering 2015-11, Vol.18 (6), p.584-603
Hauptverfasser: Cilli, Matthew, Parnell, Gregory S., Cloutier, Robert, Zigh, Teresa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 603
container_issue 6
container_start_page 584
container_title Systems engineering
container_volume 18
creator Cilli, Matthew
Parnell, Gregory S.
Cloutier, Robert
Zigh, Teresa
description ABSTRACT The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) has recently revised the defense acquisition system to address suspected root causes hindering higher success rates. This article applies two systems thinking methodologies in a uniquely integrated fashion to provide an in‐depth review and compelling interpretation of the revised defense acquisition system as put forth in January 7, 2015 DoDI 5000.02. Changes from the previous defense acquisition system are significant and may be cause for some cautious optimism in the United States. This article describes how the architects of the revised defense acquisition system have increased emphasis on systems engineering activities applied early in the lifecycle so that meaningful trade‐offs between capability requirements and lifecycle costs can be explored as requirements are being written to ensure realistic program baselines are established such that associated lifecycle costs will likely fit within future budgets. Expressed as emerging systems engineering research questions, this article identifies several gaps that are likely to emerge as the defense acquisition community attempts to execute the new acquisition system.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/sys.21329
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808058838</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3933784141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5129-61748c35959d2fd9af9e8cfe86e1fcb6298871712c9ca339ca1da3ca0f6039b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEFPwkAQhRujiYge_AdNvHgp7OzS7e6RgIKRoBGM0cumbKe4WAp0W7T_3pUaD15mJpnvvcw8z7sE0gFCaNfWtkOBUXnktSCkJOAiFMduJlIEQHtw6p1ZuyIECABpefd9f1bbEtfWv8mXJkcsTL70H7GwW9Sl2aO_yf3yHf0n3BuLiT_EFHOLfl_vKmNNady-sTj3TtI4s3jx29ve8-3NfDAOJg-ju0F_EugQqAw4RD2hWShDmdA0kXEqUegUBUdI9YJTKUQEEVAtdcyYK5DETMck5YTJBWdt77rx3RabXYW2VGtjNWZZnOOmsgoEESQUggmHXv1DV5uqyN11CiJOKOeSRY7qNtSnybBW28Ks46JWQNRPpsplqg6Zqtnr7DA4RdAojHv8608RFx-KRywK1ct0pMSED9_mcqym7BsmBHok</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1760266937</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Systems Engineering Perspective on the Revised Defense Acquisition System</title><source>Wiley Online Library (Online service)</source><creator>Cilli, Matthew ; Parnell, Gregory S. ; Cloutier, Robert ; Zigh, Teresa</creator><creatorcontrib>Cilli, Matthew ; Parnell, Gregory S. ; Cloutier, Robert ; Zigh, Teresa</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) has recently revised the defense acquisition system to address suspected root causes hindering higher success rates. This article applies two systems thinking methodologies in a uniquely integrated fashion to provide an in‐depth review and compelling interpretation of the revised defense acquisition system as put forth in January 7, 2015 DoDI 5000.02. Changes from the previous defense acquisition system are significant and may be cause for some cautious optimism in the United States. This article describes how the architects of the revised defense acquisition system have increased emphasis on systems engineering activities applied early in the lifecycle so that meaningful trade‐offs between capability requirements and lifecycle costs can be explored as requirements are being written to ensure realistic program baselines are established such that associated lifecycle costs will likely fit within future budgets. Expressed as emerging systems engineering research questions, this article identifies several gaps that are likely to emerge as the defense acquisition community attempts to execute the new acquisition system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-1241</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6858</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sys.21329</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Acquisitions ; affordability ; better buying power ; Communities ; conceptagon ; Congressional investigations ; Costs ; Defense ; defense acquisition system ; Life cycle costs ; Life cycle engineering ; Marketing ; Military technology ; new product development ; Scandals ; systemigram ; Systems engineering ; systems engineering trade-off analyses ; systems thinking ; Tradeoffs</subject><ispartof>Systems engineering, 2015-11, Vol.18 (6), p.584-603</ispartof><rights>2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5129-61748c35959d2fd9af9e8cfe86e1fcb6298871712c9ca339ca1da3ca0f6039b63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsys.21329$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsys.21329$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cilli, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parnell, Gregory S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cloutier, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zigh, Teresa</creatorcontrib><title>A Systems Engineering Perspective on the Revised Defense Acquisition System</title><title>Systems engineering</title><addtitle>Syst. Engin</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) has recently revised the defense acquisition system to address suspected root causes hindering higher success rates. This article applies two systems thinking methodologies in a uniquely integrated fashion to provide an in‐depth review and compelling interpretation of the revised defense acquisition system as put forth in January 7, 2015 DoDI 5000.02. Changes from the previous defense acquisition system are significant and may be cause for some cautious optimism in the United States. This article describes how the architects of the revised defense acquisition system have increased emphasis on systems engineering activities applied early in the lifecycle so that meaningful trade‐offs between capability requirements and lifecycle costs can be explored as requirements are being written to ensure realistic program baselines are established such that associated lifecycle costs will likely fit within future budgets. Expressed as emerging systems engineering research questions, this article identifies several gaps that are likely to emerge as the defense acquisition community attempts to execute the new acquisition system.</description><subject>Acquisitions</subject><subject>affordability</subject><subject>better buying power</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>conceptagon</subject><subject>Congressional investigations</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Defense</subject><subject>defense acquisition system</subject><subject>Life cycle costs</subject><subject>Life cycle engineering</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Military technology</subject><subject>new product development</subject><subject>Scandals</subject><subject>systemigram</subject><subject>Systems engineering</subject><subject>systems engineering trade-off analyses</subject><subject>systems thinking</subject><subject>Tradeoffs</subject><issn>1098-1241</issn><issn>1520-6858</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkEFPwkAQhRujiYge_AdNvHgp7OzS7e6RgIKRoBGM0cumbKe4WAp0W7T_3pUaD15mJpnvvcw8z7sE0gFCaNfWtkOBUXnktSCkJOAiFMduJlIEQHtw6p1ZuyIECABpefd9f1bbEtfWv8mXJkcsTL70H7GwW9Sl2aO_yf3yHf0n3BuLiT_EFHOLfl_vKmNNady-sTj3TtI4s3jx29ve8-3NfDAOJg-ju0F_EugQqAw4RD2hWShDmdA0kXEqUegUBUdI9YJTKUQEEVAtdcyYK5DETMck5YTJBWdt77rx3RabXYW2VGtjNWZZnOOmsgoEESQUggmHXv1DV5uqyN11CiJOKOeSRY7qNtSnybBW28Ks46JWQNRPpsplqg6Zqtnr7DA4RdAojHv8608RFx-KRywK1ct0pMSED9_mcqym7BsmBHok</recordid><startdate>201511</startdate><enddate>201511</enddate><creator>Cilli, Matthew</creator><creator>Parnell, Gregory S.</creator><creator>Cloutier, Robert</creator><creator>Zigh, Teresa</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201511</creationdate><title>A Systems Engineering Perspective on the Revised Defense Acquisition System</title><author>Cilli, Matthew ; Parnell, Gregory S. ; Cloutier, Robert ; Zigh, Teresa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5129-61748c35959d2fd9af9e8cfe86e1fcb6298871712c9ca339ca1da3ca0f6039b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Acquisitions</topic><topic>affordability</topic><topic>better buying power</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>conceptagon</topic><topic>Congressional investigations</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Defense</topic><topic>defense acquisition system</topic><topic>Life cycle costs</topic><topic>Life cycle engineering</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Military technology</topic><topic>new product development</topic><topic>Scandals</topic><topic>systemigram</topic><topic>Systems engineering</topic><topic>systems engineering trade-off analyses</topic><topic>systems thinking</topic><topic>Tradeoffs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cilli, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parnell, Gregory S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cloutier, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zigh, Teresa</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Systems engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cilli, Matthew</au><au>Parnell, Gregory S.</au><au>Cloutier, Robert</au><au>Zigh, Teresa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Systems Engineering Perspective on the Revised Defense Acquisition System</atitle><jtitle>Systems engineering</jtitle><addtitle>Syst. Engin</addtitle><date>2015-11</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>584</spage><epage>603</epage><pages>584-603</pages><issn>1098-1241</issn><eissn>1520-6858</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) has recently revised the defense acquisition system to address suspected root causes hindering higher success rates. This article applies two systems thinking methodologies in a uniquely integrated fashion to provide an in‐depth review and compelling interpretation of the revised defense acquisition system as put forth in January 7, 2015 DoDI 5000.02. Changes from the previous defense acquisition system are significant and may be cause for some cautious optimism in the United States. This article describes how the architects of the revised defense acquisition system have increased emphasis on systems engineering activities applied early in the lifecycle so that meaningful trade‐offs between capability requirements and lifecycle costs can be explored as requirements are being written to ensure realistic program baselines are established such that associated lifecycle costs will likely fit within future budgets. Expressed as emerging systems engineering research questions, this article identifies several gaps that are likely to emerge as the defense acquisition community attempts to execute the new acquisition system.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/sys.21329</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1098-1241
ispartof Systems engineering, 2015-11, Vol.18 (6), p.584-603
issn 1098-1241
1520-6858
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808058838
source Wiley Online Library (Online service)
subjects Acquisitions
affordability
better buying power
Communities
conceptagon
Congressional investigations
Costs
Defense
defense acquisition system
Life cycle costs
Life cycle engineering
Marketing
Military technology
new product development
Scandals
systemigram
Systems engineering
systems engineering trade-off analyses
systems thinking
Tradeoffs
title A Systems Engineering Perspective on the Revised Defense Acquisition System
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T10%3A54%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Systems%20Engineering%20Perspective%20on%20the%20Revised%20Defense%20Acquisition%20System&rft.jtitle=Systems%20engineering&rft.au=Cilli,%20Matthew&rft.date=2015-11&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=584&rft.epage=603&rft.pages=584-603&rft.issn=1098-1241&rft.eissn=1520-6858&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sys.21329&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E3933784141%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1760266937&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true