Women's Health Behaviours and Psychosocial Well-Being by Cardiac Rehabilitation Program Model: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract Background Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is associated with significantly lower mortality and improved psychosocial well-being. However, women are less likely to participate than men. This trial tested whether participation in women-only CR results in better health behaviours and psychosocial...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of cardiology 2016-08, Vol.32 (8), p.956-962
Hauptverfasser: Midence, Liz, MSc, Arthur, Heather M., PhD, Oh, Paul, MD, Stewart, Donna E., MD, Grace, Sherry L., PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 962
container_issue 8
container_start_page 956
container_title Canadian journal of cardiology
container_volume 32
creator Midence, Liz, MSc
Arthur, Heather M., PhD
Oh, Paul, MD
Stewart, Donna E., MD
Grace, Sherry L., PhD
description Abstract Background Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is associated with significantly lower mortality and improved psychosocial well-being. However, women are less likely to participate than men. This trial tested whether participation in women-only CR results in better health behaviours and psychosocial outcomes than do other models. Methods Cardiac Rehabilitation for her Heart Event Recovery (CR4HER) was a single-blind randomized trial with 3 parallel arms. Low-risk cardiac patients were recruited from 6 sites in Ontario. Consenting participants completed surveys assessing health behaviours (physical activity, diet, medication adherence, smoking) and psychosocial well-being (social support, quality of life, depressive symptoms) and wore pedometers for 7 days. After intake assessment, eligible participants were randomized to mixed-sex, women-only, or home-based CR. Participants were mailed follow-up surveys and pedometers 6 months later. Results One hundred sixty-nine patients were randomized, and 116 (68.6%) were retained. Self-reported physical activity increased among women in mixed-sex and women-only CR groups (per protocol and as treated, P < 0.05). Diet improved among women in women-only CR groups (as treated, P < 0.05). Quality of life improved among women in mixed-sex (per protocol and as treated, P < 0.05) and women-only CR groups (per protocol, P < 0.05; as treated, P < 0.01). After testing, women in the mixed-sex CR group had higher anxiety symptoms than did those in the women-only group (per protocol, P  = 0.017), and those in the mixed-sex CR group had higher depressive symptoms than did those in the women-only group (as treated, P  = 0.001). Analyses adjusted for confounding variables revealed no significant differences in any outcome by model. Post hoc equivalency tests were computed on a per-protocol basis, and all outcomes were equivalent by model. Conclusions Behavioural and psychosocial outcomes were largely equivalent regardless of model; however, women-only programs may confer an advantage for anxiety and depressive symptoms.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.10.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1807532902</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0828282X15014968</els_id><sourcerecordid>1807532902</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-53cd36c1d9937f1f8ab076ed327179372883320ef0dfb6690e3abd5f8c1491973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9rFDEcxYModq3-Ax4kN73Mmh87k4xIoV2sFSqWWqm3kEm-082YSWoyW9jiH2-GrR48eEp4vPfg-3kIvaRkSQlt3g5LMxi9ZITWRVgSIh6hBW1pUwki6sdoQSSTFZPs-wF6lvNAyIoK0TxFB6yRNRFMLNCv6zhCeJ3xGWg_bfAJbPSdi9uUsQ4WX-Sd2cQcjdMeX4P31Qm4cIO7HV7rZJ02-LIkOufdpCcXA75I8SbpEX-OFvw7fIwvS08c3T1YvI5hStH78r1KpfE5etJrn-HFw3uIvp1-uFqfVedfPn5aH59XZlXXU1VzY3ljqG1bLnraS90R0YDlTFBRJCYl54xAT2zfNU1LgOvO1r00dNXSVvBD9Gbfe5vizy3kSY0um3KNDhC3WVFZeHHWElasbG81KeacoFe3yY067RQlaqauBjVTVzP1WSvUS-jVQ_-2G8H-jfzBXAzv9wYoV945SCobB8GAdQnMpGx0_-8_-iduvAvOaP8DdpCHMlco_BRVmSmivs67z7PTmhQCjeS_ASEvqEw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1807532902</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Women's Health Behaviours and Psychosocial Well-Being by Cardiac Rehabilitation Program Model: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Midence, Liz, MSc ; Arthur, Heather M., PhD ; Oh, Paul, MD ; Stewart, Donna E., MD ; Grace, Sherry L., PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Midence, Liz, MSc ; Arthur, Heather M., PhD ; Oh, Paul, MD ; Stewart, Donna E., MD ; Grace, Sherry L., PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is associated with significantly lower mortality and improved psychosocial well-being. However, women are less likely to participate than men. This trial tested whether participation in women-only CR results in better health behaviours and psychosocial outcomes than do other models. Methods Cardiac Rehabilitation for her Heart Event Recovery (CR4HER) was a single-blind randomized trial with 3 parallel arms. Low-risk cardiac patients were recruited from 6 sites in Ontario. Consenting participants completed surveys assessing health behaviours (physical activity, diet, medication adherence, smoking) and psychosocial well-being (social support, quality of life, depressive symptoms) and wore pedometers for 7 days. After intake assessment, eligible participants were randomized to mixed-sex, women-only, or home-based CR. Participants were mailed follow-up surveys and pedometers 6 months later. Results One hundred sixty-nine patients were randomized, and 116 (68.6%) were retained. Self-reported physical activity increased among women in mixed-sex and women-only CR groups (per protocol and as treated, P &lt; 0.05). Diet improved among women in women-only CR groups (as treated, P &lt; 0.05). Quality of life improved among women in mixed-sex (per protocol and as treated, P &lt; 0.05) and women-only CR groups (per protocol, P &lt; 0.05; as treated, P &lt; 0.01). After testing, women in the mixed-sex CR group had higher anxiety symptoms than did those in the women-only group (per protocol, P  = 0.017), and those in the mixed-sex CR group had higher depressive symptoms than did those in the women-only group (as treated, P  = 0.001). Analyses adjusted for confounding variables revealed no significant differences in any outcome by model. Post hoc equivalency tests were computed on a per-protocol basis, and all outcomes were equivalent by model. Conclusions Behavioural and psychosocial outcomes were largely equivalent regardless of model; however, women-only programs may confer an advantage for anxiety and depressive symptoms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0828-282X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1916-7075</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.10.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26850727</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Anxiety - therapy ; Cardiac Rehabilitation ; Cardiovascular ; Depression - therapy ; Diet ; Exercise ; Female ; Health Behavior ; Humans ; Male ; Mental Health ; Middle Aged ; Quality of Life ; Single-Blind Method ; Women's Health</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of cardiology, 2016-08, Vol.32 (8), p.956-962</ispartof><rights>Canadian Cardiovascular Society</rights><rights>2016 Canadian Cardiovascular Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-53cd36c1d9937f1f8ab076ed327179372883320ef0dfb6690e3abd5f8c1491973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-53cd36c1d9937f1f8ab076ed327179372883320ef0dfb6690e3abd5f8c1491973</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0828282X15014968$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26850727$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Midence, Liz, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arthur, Heather M., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Paul, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Donna E., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grace, Sherry L., PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Women's Health Behaviours and Psychosocial Well-Being by Cardiac Rehabilitation Program Model: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><title>Canadian journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>Can J Cardiol</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is associated with significantly lower mortality and improved psychosocial well-being. However, women are less likely to participate than men. This trial tested whether participation in women-only CR results in better health behaviours and psychosocial outcomes than do other models. Methods Cardiac Rehabilitation for her Heart Event Recovery (CR4HER) was a single-blind randomized trial with 3 parallel arms. Low-risk cardiac patients were recruited from 6 sites in Ontario. Consenting participants completed surveys assessing health behaviours (physical activity, diet, medication adherence, smoking) and psychosocial well-being (social support, quality of life, depressive symptoms) and wore pedometers for 7 days. After intake assessment, eligible participants were randomized to mixed-sex, women-only, or home-based CR. Participants were mailed follow-up surveys and pedometers 6 months later. Results One hundred sixty-nine patients were randomized, and 116 (68.6%) were retained. Self-reported physical activity increased among women in mixed-sex and women-only CR groups (per protocol and as treated, P &lt; 0.05). Diet improved among women in women-only CR groups (as treated, P &lt; 0.05). Quality of life improved among women in mixed-sex (per protocol and as treated, P &lt; 0.05) and women-only CR groups (per protocol, P &lt; 0.05; as treated, P &lt; 0.01). After testing, women in the mixed-sex CR group had higher anxiety symptoms than did those in the women-only group (per protocol, P  = 0.017), and those in the mixed-sex CR group had higher depressive symptoms than did those in the women-only group (as treated, P  = 0.001). Analyses adjusted for confounding variables revealed no significant differences in any outcome by model. Post hoc equivalency tests were computed on a per-protocol basis, and all outcomes were equivalent by model. Conclusions Behavioural and psychosocial outcomes were largely equivalent regardless of model; however, women-only programs may confer an advantage for anxiety and depressive symptoms.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anxiety - therapy</subject><subject>Cardiac Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Depression - therapy</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Women's Health</subject><issn>0828-282X</issn><issn>1916-7075</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9rFDEcxYModq3-Ax4kN73Mmh87k4xIoV2sFSqWWqm3kEm-082YSWoyW9jiH2-GrR48eEp4vPfg-3kIvaRkSQlt3g5LMxi9ZITWRVgSIh6hBW1pUwki6sdoQSSTFZPs-wF6lvNAyIoK0TxFB6yRNRFMLNCv6zhCeJ3xGWg_bfAJbPSdi9uUsQ4WX-Sd2cQcjdMeX4P31Qm4cIO7HV7rZJ02-LIkOufdpCcXA75I8SbpEX-OFvw7fIwvS08c3T1YvI5hStH78r1KpfE5etJrn-HFw3uIvp1-uFqfVedfPn5aH59XZlXXU1VzY3ljqG1bLnraS90R0YDlTFBRJCYl54xAT2zfNU1LgOvO1r00dNXSVvBD9Gbfe5vizy3kSY0um3KNDhC3WVFZeHHWElasbG81KeacoFe3yY067RQlaqauBjVTVzP1WSvUS-jVQ_-2G8H-jfzBXAzv9wYoV945SCobB8GAdQnMpGx0_-8_-iduvAvOaP8DdpCHMlco_BRVmSmivs67z7PTmhQCjeS_ASEvqEw</recordid><startdate>20160801</startdate><enddate>20160801</enddate><creator>Midence, Liz, MSc</creator><creator>Arthur, Heather M., PhD</creator><creator>Oh, Paul, MD</creator><creator>Stewart, Donna E., MD</creator><creator>Grace, Sherry L., PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160801</creationdate><title>Women's Health Behaviours and Psychosocial Well-Being by Cardiac Rehabilitation Program Model: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><author>Midence, Liz, MSc ; Arthur, Heather M., PhD ; Oh, Paul, MD ; Stewart, Donna E., MD ; Grace, Sherry L., PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-53cd36c1d9937f1f8ab076ed327179372883320ef0dfb6690e3abd5f8c1491973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anxiety - therapy</topic><topic>Cardiac Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Depression - therapy</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Women's Health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Midence, Liz, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arthur, Heather M., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Paul, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Donna E., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grace, Sherry L., PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Midence, Liz, MSc</au><au>Arthur, Heather M., PhD</au><au>Oh, Paul, MD</au><au>Stewart, Donna E., MD</au><au>Grace, Sherry L., PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Women's Health Behaviours and Psychosocial Well-Being by Cardiac Rehabilitation Program Model: A Randomized Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Can J Cardiol</addtitle><date>2016-08-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>956</spage><epage>962</epage><pages>956-962</pages><issn>0828-282X</issn><eissn>1916-7075</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is associated with significantly lower mortality and improved psychosocial well-being. However, women are less likely to participate than men. This trial tested whether participation in women-only CR results in better health behaviours and psychosocial outcomes than do other models. Methods Cardiac Rehabilitation for her Heart Event Recovery (CR4HER) was a single-blind randomized trial with 3 parallel arms. Low-risk cardiac patients were recruited from 6 sites in Ontario. Consenting participants completed surveys assessing health behaviours (physical activity, diet, medication adherence, smoking) and psychosocial well-being (social support, quality of life, depressive symptoms) and wore pedometers for 7 days. After intake assessment, eligible participants were randomized to mixed-sex, women-only, or home-based CR. Participants were mailed follow-up surveys and pedometers 6 months later. Results One hundred sixty-nine patients were randomized, and 116 (68.6%) were retained. Self-reported physical activity increased among women in mixed-sex and women-only CR groups (per protocol and as treated, P &lt; 0.05). Diet improved among women in women-only CR groups (as treated, P &lt; 0.05). Quality of life improved among women in mixed-sex (per protocol and as treated, P &lt; 0.05) and women-only CR groups (per protocol, P &lt; 0.05; as treated, P &lt; 0.01). After testing, women in the mixed-sex CR group had higher anxiety symptoms than did those in the women-only group (per protocol, P  = 0.017), and those in the mixed-sex CR group had higher depressive symptoms than did those in the women-only group (as treated, P  = 0.001). Analyses adjusted for confounding variables revealed no significant differences in any outcome by model. Post hoc equivalency tests were computed on a per-protocol basis, and all outcomes were equivalent by model. Conclusions Behavioural and psychosocial outcomes were largely equivalent regardless of model; however, women-only programs may confer an advantage for anxiety and depressive symptoms.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26850727</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cjca.2015.10.007</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0828-282X
ispartof Canadian journal of cardiology, 2016-08, Vol.32 (8), p.956-962
issn 0828-282X
1916-7075
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1807532902
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Aged
Anxiety - therapy
Cardiac Rehabilitation
Cardiovascular
Depression - therapy
Diet
Exercise
Female
Health Behavior
Humans
Male
Mental Health
Middle Aged
Quality of Life
Single-Blind Method
Women's Health
title Women's Health Behaviours and Psychosocial Well-Being by Cardiac Rehabilitation Program Model: A Randomized Controlled Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T20%3A50%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Women's%20Health%20Behaviours%20and%20Psychosocial%20Well-Being%20by%20Cardiac%20Rehabilitation%20Program%20Model:%20A%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Midence,%20Liz,%20MSc&rft.date=2016-08-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=956&rft.epage=962&rft.pages=956-962&rft.issn=0828-282X&rft.eissn=1916-7075&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cjca.2015.10.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1807532902%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1807532902&rft_id=info:pmid/26850727&rft_els_id=S0828282X15014968&rfr_iscdi=true