Women's Health Behaviours and Psychosocial Well-Being by Cardiac Rehabilitation Program Model: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract Background Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is associated with significantly lower mortality and improved psychosocial well-being. However, women are less likely to participate than men. This trial tested whether participation in women-only CR results in better health behaviours and psychosocial...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of cardiology 2016-08, Vol.32 (8), p.956-962 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 962 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 956 |
container_title | Canadian journal of cardiology |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Midence, Liz, MSc Arthur, Heather M., PhD Oh, Paul, MD Stewart, Donna E., MD Grace, Sherry L., PhD |
description | Abstract Background Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is associated with significantly lower mortality and improved psychosocial well-being. However, women are less likely to participate than men. This trial tested whether participation in women-only CR results in better health behaviours and psychosocial outcomes than do other models. Methods Cardiac Rehabilitation for her Heart Event Recovery (CR4HER) was a single-blind randomized trial with 3 parallel arms. Low-risk cardiac patients were recruited from 6 sites in Ontario. Consenting participants completed surveys assessing health behaviours (physical activity, diet, medication adherence, smoking) and psychosocial well-being (social support, quality of life, depressive symptoms) and wore pedometers for 7 days. After intake assessment, eligible participants were randomized to mixed-sex, women-only, or home-based CR. Participants were mailed follow-up surveys and pedometers 6 months later. Results One hundred sixty-nine patients were randomized, and 116 (68.6%) were retained. Self-reported physical activity increased among women in mixed-sex and women-only CR groups (per protocol and as treated, P < 0.05). Diet improved among women in women-only CR groups (as treated, P < 0.05). Quality of life improved among women in mixed-sex (per protocol and as treated, P < 0.05) and women-only CR groups (per protocol, P < 0.05; as treated, P < 0.01). After testing, women in the mixed-sex CR group had higher anxiety symptoms than did those in the women-only group (per protocol, P = 0.017), and those in the mixed-sex CR group had higher depressive symptoms than did those in the women-only group (as treated, P = 0.001). Analyses adjusted for confounding variables revealed no significant differences in any outcome by model. Post hoc equivalency tests were computed on a per-protocol basis, and all outcomes were equivalent by model. Conclusions Behavioural and psychosocial outcomes were largely equivalent regardless of model; however, women-only programs may confer an advantage for anxiety and depressive symptoms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.10.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1807532902</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0828282X15014968</els_id><sourcerecordid>1807532902</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-53cd36c1d9937f1f8ab076ed327179372883320ef0dfb6690e3abd5f8c1491973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9rFDEcxYModq3-Ax4kN73Mmh87k4xIoV2sFSqWWqm3kEm-082YSWoyW9jiH2-GrR48eEp4vPfg-3kIvaRkSQlt3g5LMxi9ZITWRVgSIh6hBW1pUwki6sdoQSSTFZPs-wF6lvNAyIoK0TxFB6yRNRFMLNCv6zhCeJ3xGWg_bfAJbPSdi9uUsQ4WX-Sd2cQcjdMeX4P31Qm4cIO7HV7rZJ02-LIkOufdpCcXA75I8SbpEX-OFvw7fIwvS08c3T1YvI5hStH78r1KpfE5etJrn-HFw3uIvp1-uFqfVedfPn5aH59XZlXXU1VzY3ljqG1bLnraS90R0YDlTFBRJCYl54xAT2zfNU1LgOvO1r00dNXSVvBD9Gbfe5vizy3kSY0um3KNDhC3WVFZeHHWElasbG81KeacoFe3yY067RQlaqauBjVTVzP1WSvUS-jVQ_-2G8H-jfzBXAzv9wYoV945SCobB8GAdQnMpGx0_-8_-iduvAvOaP8DdpCHMlco_BRVmSmivs67z7PTmhQCjeS_ASEvqEw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1807532902</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Women's Health Behaviours and Psychosocial Well-Being by Cardiac Rehabilitation Program Model: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Midence, Liz, MSc ; Arthur, Heather M., PhD ; Oh, Paul, MD ; Stewart, Donna E., MD ; Grace, Sherry L., PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Midence, Liz, MSc ; Arthur, Heather M., PhD ; Oh, Paul, MD ; Stewart, Donna E., MD ; Grace, Sherry L., PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is associated with significantly lower mortality and improved psychosocial well-being. However, women are less likely to participate than men. This trial tested whether participation in women-only CR results in better health behaviours and psychosocial outcomes than do other models. Methods Cardiac Rehabilitation for her Heart Event Recovery (CR4HER) was a single-blind randomized trial with 3 parallel arms. Low-risk cardiac patients were recruited from 6 sites in Ontario. Consenting participants completed surveys assessing health behaviours (physical activity, diet, medication adherence, smoking) and psychosocial well-being (social support, quality of life, depressive symptoms) and wore pedometers for 7 days. After intake assessment, eligible participants were randomized to mixed-sex, women-only, or home-based CR. Participants were mailed follow-up surveys and pedometers 6 months later. Results One hundred sixty-nine patients were randomized, and 116 (68.6%) were retained. Self-reported physical activity increased among women in mixed-sex and women-only CR groups (per protocol and as treated, P < 0.05). Diet improved among women in women-only CR groups (as treated, P < 0.05). Quality of life improved among women in mixed-sex (per protocol and as treated, P < 0.05) and women-only CR groups (per protocol, P < 0.05; as treated, P < 0.01). After testing, women in the mixed-sex CR group had higher anxiety symptoms than did those in the women-only group (per protocol, P = 0.017), and those in the mixed-sex CR group had higher depressive symptoms than did those in the women-only group (as treated, P = 0.001). Analyses adjusted for confounding variables revealed no significant differences in any outcome by model. Post hoc equivalency tests were computed on a per-protocol basis, and all outcomes were equivalent by model. Conclusions Behavioural and psychosocial outcomes were largely equivalent regardless of model; however, women-only programs may confer an advantage for anxiety and depressive symptoms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0828-282X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1916-7075</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.10.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26850727</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Anxiety - therapy ; Cardiac Rehabilitation ; Cardiovascular ; Depression - therapy ; Diet ; Exercise ; Female ; Health Behavior ; Humans ; Male ; Mental Health ; Middle Aged ; Quality of Life ; Single-Blind Method ; Women's Health</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of cardiology, 2016-08, Vol.32 (8), p.956-962</ispartof><rights>Canadian Cardiovascular Society</rights><rights>2016 Canadian Cardiovascular Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-53cd36c1d9937f1f8ab076ed327179372883320ef0dfb6690e3abd5f8c1491973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-53cd36c1d9937f1f8ab076ed327179372883320ef0dfb6690e3abd5f8c1491973</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0828282X15014968$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26850727$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Midence, Liz, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arthur, Heather M., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Paul, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Donna E., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grace, Sherry L., PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Women's Health Behaviours and Psychosocial Well-Being by Cardiac Rehabilitation Program Model: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><title>Canadian journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>Can J Cardiol</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is associated with significantly lower mortality and improved psychosocial well-being. However, women are less likely to participate than men. This trial tested whether participation in women-only CR results in better health behaviours and psychosocial outcomes than do other models. Methods Cardiac Rehabilitation for her Heart Event Recovery (CR4HER) was a single-blind randomized trial with 3 parallel arms. Low-risk cardiac patients were recruited from 6 sites in Ontario. Consenting participants completed surveys assessing health behaviours (physical activity, diet, medication adherence, smoking) and psychosocial well-being (social support, quality of life, depressive symptoms) and wore pedometers for 7 days. After intake assessment, eligible participants were randomized to mixed-sex, women-only, or home-based CR. Participants were mailed follow-up surveys and pedometers 6 months later. Results One hundred sixty-nine patients were randomized, and 116 (68.6%) were retained. Self-reported physical activity increased among women in mixed-sex and women-only CR groups (per protocol and as treated, P < 0.05). Diet improved among women in women-only CR groups (as treated, P < 0.05). Quality of life improved among women in mixed-sex (per protocol and as treated, P < 0.05) and women-only CR groups (per protocol, P < 0.05; as treated, P < 0.01). After testing, women in the mixed-sex CR group had higher anxiety symptoms than did those in the women-only group (per protocol, P = 0.017), and those in the mixed-sex CR group had higher depressive symptoms than did those in the women-only group (as treated, P = 0.001). Analyses adjusted for confounding variables revealed no significant differences in any outcome by model. Post hoc equivalency tests were computed on a per-protocol basis, and all outcomes were equivalent by model. Conclusions Behavioural and psychosocial outcomes were largely equivalent regardless of model; however, women-only programs may confer an advantage for anxiety and depressive symptoms.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anxiety - therapy</subject><subject>Cardiac Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Depression - therapy</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Women's Health</subject><issn>0828-282X</issn><issn>1916-7075</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9rFDEcxYModq3-Ax4kN73Mmh87k4xIoV2sFSqWWqm3kEm-082YSWoyW9jiH2-GrR48eEp4vPfg-3kIvaRkSQlt3g5LMxi9ZITWRVgSIh6hBW1pUwki6sdoQSSTFZPs-wF6lvNAyIoK0TxFB6yRNRFMLNCv6zhCeJ3xGWg_bfAJbPSdi9uUsQ4WX-Sd2cQcjdMeX4P31Qm4cIO7HV7rZJ02-LIkOufdpCcXA75I8SbpEX-OFvw7fIwvS08c3T1YvI5hStH78r1KpfE5etJrn-HFw3uIvp1-uFqfVedfPn5aH59XZlXXU1VzY3ljqG1bLnraS90R0YDlTFBRJCYl54xAT2zfNU1LgOvO1r00dNXSVvBD9Gbfe5vizy3kSY0um3KNDhC3WVFZeHHWElasbG81KeacoFe3yY067RQlaqauBjVTVzP1WSvUS-jVQ_-2G8H-jfzBXAzv9wYoV945SCobB8GAdQnMpGx0_-8_-iduvAvOaP8DdpCHMlco_BRVmSmivs67z7PTmhQCjeS_ASEvqEw</recordid><startdate>20160801</startdate><enddate>20160801</enddate><creator>Midence, Liz, MSc</creator><creator>Arthur, Heather M., PhD</creator><creator>Oh, Paul, MD</creator><creator>Stewart, Donna E., MD</creator><creator>Grace, Sherry L., PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160801</creationdate><title>Women's Health Behaviours and Psychosocial Well-Being by Cardiac Rehabilitation Program Model: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><author>Midence, Liz, MSc ; Arthur, Heather M., PhD ; Oh, Paul, MD ; Stewart, Donna E., MD ; Grace, Sherry L., PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-53cd36c1d9937f1f8ab076ed327179372883320ef0dfb6690e3abd5f8c1491973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anxiety - therapy</topic><topic>Cardiac Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Depression - therapy</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Women's Health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Midence, Liz, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arthur, Heather M., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Paul, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Donna E., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grace, Sherry L., PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Midence, Liz, MSc</au><au>Arthur, Heather M., PhD</au><au>Oh, Paul, MD</au><au>Stewart, Donna E., MD</au><au>Grace, Sherry L., PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Women's Health Behaviours and Psychosocial Well-Being by Cardiac Rehabilitation Program Model: A Randomized Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Can J Cardiol</addtitle><date>2016-08-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>956</spage><epage>962</epage><pages>956-962</pages><issn>0828-282X</issn><eissn>1916-7075</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is associated with significantly lower mortality and improved psychosocial well-being. However, women are less likely to participate than men. This trial tested whether participation in women-only CR results in better health behaviours and psychosocial outcomes than do other models. Methods Cardiac Rehabilitation for her Heart Event Recovery (CR4HER) was a single-blind randomized trial with 3 parallel arms. Low-risk cardiac patients were recruited from 6 sites in Ontario. Consenting participants completed surveys assessing health behaviours (physical activity, diet, medication adherence, smoking) and psychosocial well-being (social support, quality of life, depressive symptoms) and wore pedometers for 7 days. After intake assessment, eligible participants were randomized to mixed-sex, women-only, or home-based CR. Participants were mailed follow-up surveys and pedometers 6 months later. Results One hundred sixty-nine patients were randomized, and 116 (68.6%) were retained. Self-reported physical activity increased among women in mixed-sex and women-only CR groups (per protocol and as treated, P < 0.05). Diet improved among women in women-only CR groups (as treated, P < 0.05). Quality of life improved among women in mixed-sex (per protocol and as treated, P < 0.05) and women-only CR groups (per protocol, P < 0.05; as treated, P < 0.01). After testing, women in the mixed-sex CR group had higher anxiety symptoms than did those in the women-only group (per protocol, P = 0.017), and those in the mixed-sex CR group had higher depressive symptoms than did those in the women-only group (as treated, P = 0.001). Analyses adjusted for confounding variables revealed no significant differences in any outcome by model. Post hoc equivalency tests were computed on a per-protocol basis, and all outcomes were equivalent by model. Conclusions Behavioural and psychosocial outcomes were largely equivalent regardless of model; however, women-only programs may confer an advantage for anxiety and depressive symptoms.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26850727</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cjca.2015.10.007</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0828-282X |
ispartof | Canadian journal of cardiology, 2016-08, Vol.32 (8), p.956-962 |
issn | 0828-282X 1916-7075 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1807532902 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Aged Anxiety - therapy Cardiac Rehabilitation Cardiovascular Depression - therapy Diet Exercise Female Health Behavior Humans Male Mental Health Middle Aged Quality of Life Single-Blind Method Women's Health |
title | Women's Health Behaviours and Psychosocial Well-Being by Cardiac Rehabilitation Program Model: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T20%3A50%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Women's%20Health%20Behaviours%20and%20Psychosocial%20Well-Being%20by%20Cardiac%20Rehabilitation%20Program%20Model:%20A%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Midence,%20Liz,%20MSc&rft.date=2016-08-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=956&rft.epage=962&rft.pages=956-962&rft.issn=0828-282X&rft.eissn=1916-7075&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cjca.2015.10.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1807532902%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1807532902&rft_id=info:pmid/26850727&rft_els_id=S0828282X15014968&rfr_iscdi=true |