The use of contralateral free extended latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for a tertiary failed breast reconstruction: Is it still an option?

Summary Background Unsuccessful breast reconstruction management represents a complex challenge for the plastic surgeon. Although these events rarely occur, many patients are not suitable candidates for conventional flaps, because of either previous donor-site surgery or lack of sufficient tissue. M...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2016-08, Vol.69 (8), p.1087-1091
Hauptverfasser: Munhoz, Alexandre Mendonça, Montag, Eduardo, Arruda, Eduardo Gustavo, Okada, Alberto, Fonseca, Alexandre, Filassi, José Roberto, Gemperli, Rolf
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1091
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1087
container_title Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery
container_volume 69
creator Munhoz, Alexandre Mendonça
Montag, Eduardo
Arruda, Eduardo Gustavo
Okada, Alberto
Fonseca, Alexandre
Filassi, José Roberto
Gemperli, Rolf
description Summary Background Unsuccessful breast reconstruction management represents a complex challenge for the plastic surgeon. Although these events rarely occur, many patients are not suitable candidates for conventional flaps, because of either previous donor-site surgery or lack of sufficient tissue. Methods In this study, a contralateral free latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap (CL–LDMF) was planned for correction of major lesions in the anterior chest wall. Twelve patients underwent secondary/tertiary breast reconstruction with CL–LDMF with a customized shape (horizontal, oblique, or “fleur-de-lis”) depending on the amount of tissue necessary. The technique was indicated in patients with large thoracic defects who lacked a donor site and had undergone previous unsuccessful pedicled LDMF. Results The mean follow-up time was 42.5 months (range: 18–72 months). Five local complications occurred in four of the 12 patients. Dorsal dehiscence was observed in one, local wound infection in one, small partial CL–LDMF necrosis in one, and dorsal seroma in one patient. All cases of complications were limited and treated with a conservative approach except for one implant extrusion 4 months after reconstruction. No total flap loss was reported. All patients achieved a satisfactory thoracic and breast reconstruction. Conclusion The results of this study demonstrate that free CL–LDMF is a reliable technique and should be considered in selected cases of tertiary reconstructions. The majority of complications were immediate, minor, and comparable to other reconstructive techniques. We believe that in selected patients, especially those who do not have available donor-site areas, free CL–LDMF is advantageous and should be part of the armamentarium of all plastic surgeons who deal with tertiary breast reconstructions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.01.019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1807081923</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1748681516000486</els_id><sourcerecordid>1807081923</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ba05f5dda446055258a42bf5ff04a9bb01255da78f0c795854feb77d1007a7db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Us2q1jAQLaJ4f_QFXEiWbvqZtEnTiihy8eqFCy68rkOaTDA1bWomFb-H8J1N-a4uXAhDMhzOOXBmpqqeMXpglHUvp8M4rXhoSn-grNTwoDpnvexrKtrhYekl7-uuZ-KsukCcKOUt4-JxddZ0A5edbM6rX3dfgWwIJDpi4pKTDjpDeYlLAAR-ZlgsWFJQj-jnDYmNCT2Zj9FsWS8QC-SCXomLiWhSxNnrdCRO-1CEYwKNmSQo7pjTZrKPyytyg8RngtmHQPRC4rrDb59Uj5wOCE_v_8vqy_X7u6uP9e2nDzdX725rwxnL9aipcMJazXlHhWhEr3kzOuEc5XoYR8oaIayWvaNGDqIX3MEopWWUSi3t2F5WL06-a4rfN8CsZo8GQjjlUaynkvZsaNpCbU5UkyJiAqfW5OcSUDGq9jWoSe1rUPsaFGWlhiJ6fu-_jTPYv5I_cy-E1ycClJQ_PCSFxsNiwPoyqaxs9P_3f_OP3AS_eKPDNzgCTnFLS5mfYgobRdXn_RD2O2AdLUfQd-1v-fOw-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1807081923</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The use of contralateral free extended latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for a tertiary failed breast reconstruction: Is it still an option?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Munhoz, Alexandre Mendonça ; Montag, Eduardo ; Arruda, Eduardo Gustavo ; Okada, Alberto ; Fonseca, Alexandre ; Filassi, José Roberto ; Gemperli, Rolf</creator><creatorcontrib>Munhoz, Alexandre Mendonça ; Montag, Eduardo ; Arruda, Eduardo Gustavo ; Okada, Alberto ; Fonseca, Alexandre ; Filassi, José Roberto ; Gemperli, Rolf</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background Unsuccessful breast reconstruction management represents a complex challenge for the plastic surgeon. Although these events rarely occur, many patients are not suitable candidates for conventional flaps, because of either previous donor-site surgery or lack of sufficient tissue. Methods In this study, a contralateral free latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap (CL–LDMF) was planned for correction of major lesions in the anterior chest wall. Twelve patients underwent secondary/tertiary breast reconstruction with CL–LDMF with a customized shape (horizontal, oblique, or “fleur-de-lis”) depending on the amount of tissue necessary. The technique was indicated in patients with large thoracic defects who lacked a donor site and had undergone previous unsuccessful pedicled LDMF. Results The mean follow-up time was 42.5 months (range: 18–72 months). Five local complications occurred in four of the 12 patients. Dorsal dehiscence was observed in one, local wound infection in one, small partial CL–LDMF necrosis in one, and dorsal seroma in one patient. All cases of complications were limited and treated with a conservative approach except for one implant extrusion 4 months after reconstruction. No total flap loss was reported. All patients achieved a satisfactory thoracic and breast reconstruction. Conclusion The results of this study demonstrate that free CL–LDMF is a reliable technique and should be considered in selected cases of tertiary reconstructions. The majority of complications were immediate, minor, and comparable to other reconstructive techniques. We believe that in selected patients, especially those who do not have available donor-site areas, free CL–LDMF is advantageous and should be part of the armamentarium of all plastic surgeons who deal with tertiary breast reconstructions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-6815</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.01.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26947672</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Breast reconstruction ; Complication ; Female ; Humans ; Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap ; Mammaplasty - adverse effects ; Mammaplasty - methods ; Microsurgery ; Middle Aged ; Myocutaneous Flap ; Plastic Surgery ; Postoperative Complications - surgery ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Superficial Back Muscles ; Total failure ; Treatment Failure ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery, 2016-08, Vol.69 (8), p.1087-1091</ispartof><rights>British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons</rights><rights>2016 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ba05f5dda446055258a42bf5ff04a9bb01255da78f0c795854feb77d1007a7db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ba05f5dda446055258a42bf5ff04a9bb01255da78f0c795854feb77d1007a7db3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681516000486$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26947672$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Munhoz, Alexandre Mendonça</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montag, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arruda, Eduardo Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okada, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filassi, José Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gemperli, Rolf</creatorcontrib><title>The use of contralateral free extended latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for a tertiary failed breast reconstruction: Is it still an option?</title><title>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery</title><addtitle>J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg</addtitle><description>Summary Background Unsuccessful breast reconstruction management represents a complex challenge for the plastic surgeon. Although these events rarely occur, many patients are not suitable candidates for conventional flaps, because of either previous donor-site surgery or lack of sufficient tissue. Methods In this study, a contralateral free latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap (CL–LDMF) was planned for correction of major lesions in the anterior chest wall. Twelve patients underwent secondary/tertiary breast reconstruction with CL–LDMF with a customized shape (horizontal, oblique, or “fleur-de-lis”) depending on the amount of tissue necessary. The technique was indicated in patients with large thoracic defects who lacked a donor site and had undergone previous unsuccessful pedicled LDMF. Results The mean follow-up time was 42.5 months (range: 18–72 months). Five local complications occurred in four of the 12 patients. Dorsal dehiscence was observed in one, local wound infection in one, small partial CL–LDMF necrosis in one, and dorsal seroma in one patient. All cases of complications were limited and treated with a conservative approach except for one implant extrusion 4 months after reconstruction. No total flap loss was reported. All patients achieved a satisfactory thoracic and breast reconstruction. Conclusion The results of this study demonstrate that free CL–LDMF is a reliable technique and should be considered in selected cases of tertiary reconstructions. The majority of complications were immediate, minor, and comparable to other reconstructive techniques. We believe that in selected patients, especially those who do not have available donor-site areas, free CL–LDMF is advantageous and should be part of the armamentarium of all plastic surgeons who deal with tertiary breast reconstructions.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Breast reconstruction</subject><subject>Complication</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap</subject><subject>Mammaplasty - adverse effects</subject><subject>Mammaplasty - methods</subject><subject>Microsurgery</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Myocutaneous Flap</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - surgery</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Superficial Back Muscles</subject><subject>Total failure</subject><subject>Treatment Failure</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1748-6815</issn><issn>1878-0539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Us2q1jAQLaJ4f_QFXEiWbvqZtEnTiihy8eqFCy68rkOaTDA1bWomFb-H8J1N-a4uXAhDMhzOOXBmpqqeMXpglHUvp8M4rXhoSn-grNTwoDpnvexrKtrhYekl7-uuZ-KsukCcKOUt4-JxddZ0A5edbM6rX3dfgWwIJDpi4pKTDjpDeYlLAAR-ZlgsWFJQj-jnDYmNCT2Zj9FsWS8QC-SCXomLiWhSxNnrdCRO-1CEYwKNmSQo7pjTZrKPyytyg8RngtmHQPRC4rrDb59Uj5wOCE_v_8vqy_X7u6uP9e2nDzdX725rwxnL9aipcMJazXlHhWhEr3kzOuEc5XoYR8oaIayWvaNGDqIX3MEopWWUSi3t2F5WL06-a4rfN8CsZo8GQjjlUaynkvZsaNpCbU5UkyJiAqfW5OcSUDGq9jWoSe1rUPsaFGWlhiJ6fu-_jTPYv5I_cy-E1ycClJQ_PCSFxsNiwPoyqaxs9P_3f_OP3AS_eKPDNzgCTnFLS5mfYgobRdXn_RD2O2AdLUfQd-1v-fOw-g</recordid><startdate>20160801</startdate><enddate>20160801</enddate><creator>Munhoz, Alexandre Mendonça</creator><creator>Montag, Eduardo</creator><creator>Arruda, Eduardo Gustavo</creator><creator>Okada, Alberto</creator><creator>Fonseca, Alexandre</creator><creator>Filassi, José Roberto</creator><creator>Gemperli, Rolf</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160801</creationdate><title>The use of contralateral free extended latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for a tertiary failed breast reconstruction: Is it still an option?</title><author>Munhoz, Alexandre Mendonça ; Montag, Eduardo ; Arruda, Eduardo Gustavo ; Okada, Alberto ; Fonseca, Alexandre ; Filassi, José Roberto ; Gemperli, Rolf</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ba05f5dda446055258a42bf5ff04a9bb01255da78f0c795854feb77d1007a7db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Breast reconstruction</topic><topic>Complication</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap</topic><topic>Mammaplasty - adverse effects</topic><topic>Mammaplasty - methods</topic><topic>Microsurgery</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Myocutaneous Flap</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - surgery</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Superficial Back Muscles</topic><topic>Total failure</topic><topic>Treatment Failure</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Munhoz, Alexandre Mendonça</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montag, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arruda, Eduardo Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okada, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filassi, José Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gemperli, Rolf</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Munhoz, Alexandre Mendonça</au><au>Montag, Eduardo</au><au>Arruda, Eduardo Gustavo</au><au>Okada, Alberto</au><au>Fonseca, Alexandre</au><au>Filassi, José Roberto</au><au>Gemperli, Rolf</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The use of contralateral free extended latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for a tertiary failed breast reconstruction: Is it still an option?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg</addtitle><date>2016-08-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1087</spage><epage>1091</epage><pages>1087-1091</pages><issn>1748-6815</issn><eissn>1878-0539</eissn><abstract>Summary Background Unsuccessful breast reconstruction management represents a complex challenge for the plastic surgeon. Although these events rarely occur, many patients are not suitable candidates for conventional flaps, because of either previous donor-site surgery or lack of sufficient tissue. Methods In this study, a contralateral free latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap (CL–LDMF) was planned for correction of major lesions in the anterior chest wall. Twelve patients underwent secondary/tertiary breast reconstruction with CL–LDMF with a customized shape (horizontal, oblique, or “fleur-de-lis”) depending on the amount of tissue necessary. The technique was indicated in patients with large thoracic defects who lacked a donor site and had undergone previous unsuccessful pedicled LDMF. Results The mean follow-up time was 42.5 months (range: 18–72 months). Five local complications occurred in four of the 12 patients. Dorsal dehiscence was observed in one, local wound infection in one, small partial CL–LDMF necrosis in one, and dorsal seroma in one patient. All cases of complications were limited and treated with a conservative approach except for one implant extrusion 4 months after reconstruction. No total flap loss was reported. All patients achieved a satisfactory thoracic and breast reconstruction. Conclusion The results of this study demonstrate that free CL–LDMF is a reliable technique and should be considered in selected cases of tertiary reconstructions. The majority of complications were immediate, minor, and comparable to other reconstructive techniques. We believe that in selected patients, especially those who do not have available donor-site areas, free CL–LDMF is advantageous and should be part of the armamentarium of all plastic surgeons who deal with tertiary breast reconstructions.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26947672</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bjps.2016.01.019</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1748-6815
ispartof Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2016-08, Vol.69 (8), p.1087-1091
issn 1748-6815
1878-0539
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1807081923
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Breast Neoplasms - surgery
Breast reconstruction
Complication
Female
Humans
Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap
Mammaplasty - adverse effects
Mammaplasty - methods
Microsurgery
Middle Aged
Myocutaneous Flap
Plastic Surgery
Postoperative Complications - surgery
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Superficial Back Muscles
Total failure
Treatment Failure
Young Adult
title The use of contralateral free extended latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for a tertiary failed breast reconstruction: Is it still an option?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T19%3A32%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20use%20of%20contralateral%20free%20extended%20latissimus%20dorsi%20myocutaneous%20flap%20for%20a%20tertiary%20failed%20breast%20reconstruction:%20Is%20it%20still%20an%20option?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20plastic,%20reconstructive%20&%20aesthetic%20surgery&rft.au=Munhoz,%20Alexandre%20Mendon%C3%A7a&rft.date=2016-08-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1087&rft.epage=1091&rft.pages=1087-1091&rft.issn=1748-6815&rft.eissn=1878-0539&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjps.2016.01.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1807081923%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1807081923&rft_id=info:pmid/26947672&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1748681516000486&rfr_iscdi=true