The use of contralateral free extended latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for a tertiary failed breast reconstruction: Is it still an option?
Summary Background Unsuccessful breast reconstruction management represents a complex challenge for the plastic surgeon. Although these events rarely occur, many patients are not suitable candidates for conventional flaps, because of either previous donor-site surgery or lack of sufficient tissue. M...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2016-08, Vol.69 (8), p.1087-1091 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1091 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1087 |
container_title | Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery |
container_volume | 69 |
creator | Munhoz, Alexandre Mendonça Montag, Eduardo Arruda, Eduardo Gustavo Okada, Alberto Fonseca, Alexandre Filassi, José Roberto Gemperli, Rolf |
description | Summary Background Unsuccessful breast reconstruction management represents a complex challenge for the plastic surgeon. Although these events rarely occur, many patients are not suitable candidates for conventional flaps, because of either previous donor-site surgery or lack of sufficient tissue. Methods In this study, a contralateral free latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap (CL–LDMF) was planned for correction of major lesions in the anterior chest wall. Twelve patients underwent secondary/tertiary breast reconstruction with CL–LDMF with a customized shape (horizontal, oblique, or “fleur-de-lis”) depending on the amount of tissue necessary. The technique was indicated in patients with large thoracic defects who lacked a donor site and had undergone previous unsuccessful pedicled LDMF. Results The mean follow-up time was 42.5 months (range: 18–72 months). Five local complications occurred in four of the 12 patients. Dorsal dehiscence was observed in one, local wound infection in one, small partial CL–LDMF necrosis in one, and dorsal seroma in one patient. All cases of complications were limited and treated with a conservative approach except for one implant extrusion 4 months after reconstruction. No total flap loss was reported. All patients achieved a satisfactory thoracic and breast reconstruction. Conclusion The results of this study demonstrate that free CL–LDMF is a reliable technique and should be considered in selected cases of tertiary reconstructions. The majority of complications were immediate, minor, and comparable to other reconstructive techniques. We believe that in selected patients, especially those who do not have available donor-site areas, free CL–LDMF is advantageous and should be part of the armamentarium of all plastic surgeons who deal with tertiary breast reconstructions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.01.019 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1807081923</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1748681516000486</els_id><sourcerecordid>1807081923</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ba05f5dda446055258a42bf5ff04a9bb01255da78f0c795854feb77d1007a7db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Us2q1jAQLaJ4f_QFXEiWbvqZtEnTiihy8eqFCy68rkOaTDA1bWomFb-H8J1N-a4uXAhDMhzOOXBmpqqeMXpglHUvp8M4rXhoSn-grNTwoDpnvexrKtrhYekl7-uuZ-KsukCcKOUt4-JxddZ0A5edbM6rX3dfgWwIJDpi4pKTDjpDeYlLAAR-ZlgsWFJQj-jnDYmNCT2Zj9FsWS8QC-SCXomLiWhSxNnrdCRO-1CEYwKNmSQo7pjTZrKPyytyg8RngtmHQPRC4rrDb59Uj5wOCE_v_8vqy_X7u6uP9e2nDzdX725rwxnL9aipcMJazXlHhWhEr3kzOuEc5XoYR8oaIayWvaNGDqIX3MEopWWUSi3t2F5WL06-a4rfN8CsZo8GQjjlUaynkvZsaNpCbU5UkyJiAqfW5OcSUDGq9jWoSe1rUPsaFGWlhiJ6fu-_jTPYv5I_cy-E1ycClJQ_PCSFxsNiwPoyqaxs9P_3f_OP3AS_eKPDNzgCTnFLS5mfYgobRdXn_RD2O2AdLUfQd-1v-fOw-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1807081923</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The use of contralateral free extended latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for a tertiary failed breast reconstruction: Is it still an option?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Munhoz, Alexandre Mendonça ; Montag, Eduardo ; Arruda, Eduardo Gustavo ; Okada, Alberto ; Fonseca, Alexandre ; Filassi, José Roberto ; Gemperli, Rolf</creator><creatorcontrib>Munhoz, Alexandre Mendonça ; Montag, Eduardo ; Arruda, Eduardo Gustavo ; Okada, Alberto ; Fonseca, Alexandre ; Filassi, José Roberto ; Gemperli, Rolf</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background Unsuccessful breast reconstruction management represents a complex challenge for the plastic surgeon. Although these events rarely occur, many patients are not suitable candidates for conventional flaps, because of either previous donor-site surgery or lack of sufficient tissue. Methods In this study, a contralateral free latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap (CL–LDMF) was planned for correction of major lesions in the anterior chest wall. Twelve patients underwent secondary/tertiary breast reconstruction with CL–LDMF with a customized shape (horizontal, oblique, or “fleur-de-lis”) depending on the amount of tissue necessary. The technique was indicated in patients with large thoracic defects who lacked a donor site and had undergone previous unsuccessful pedicled LDMF. Results The mean follow-up time was 42.5 months (range: 18–72 months). Five local complications occurred in four of the 12 patients. Dorsal dehiscence was observed in one, local wound infection in one, small partial CL–LDMF necrosis in one, and dorsal seroma in one patient. All cases of complications were limited and treated with a conservative approach except for one implant extrusion 4 months after reconstruction. No total flap loss was reported. All patients achieved a satisfactory thoracic and breast reconstruction. Conclusion The results of this study demonstrate that free CL–LDMF is a reliable technique and should be considered in selected cases of tertiary reconstructions. The majority of complications were immediate, minor, and comparable to other reconstructive techniques. We believe that in selected patients, especially those who do not have available donor-site areas, free CL–LDMF is advantageous and should be part of the armamentarium of all plastic surgeons who deal with tertiary breast reconstructions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-6815</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.01.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26947672</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Breast reconstruction ; Complication ; Female ; Humans ; Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap ; Mammaplasty - adverse effects ; Mammaplasty - methods ; Microsurgery ; Middle Aged ; Myocutaneous Flap ; Plastic Surgery ; Postoperative Complications - surgery ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Superficial Back Muscles ; Total failure ; Treatment Failure ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2016-08, Vol.69 (8), p.1087-1091</ispartof><rights>British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons</rights><rights>2016 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ba05f5dda446055258a42bf5ff04a9bb01255da78f0c795854feb77d1007a7db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ba05f5dda446055258a42bf5ff04a9bb01255da78f0c795854feb77d1007a7db3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681516000486$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26947672$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Munhoz, Alexandre Mendonça</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montag, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arruda, Eduardo Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okada, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filassi, José Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gemperli, Rolf</creatorcontrib><title>The use of contralateral free extended latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for a tertiary failed breast reconstruction: Is it still an option?</title><title>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery</title><addtitle>J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg</addtitle><description>Summary Background Unsuccessful breast reconstruction management represents a complex challenge for the plastic surgeon. Although these events rarely occur, many patients are not suitable candidates for conventional flaps, because of either previous donor-site surgery or lack of sufficient tissue. Methods In this study, a contralateral free latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap (CL–LDMF) was planned for correction of major lesions in the anterior chest wall. Twelve patients underwent secondary/tertiary breast reconstruction with CL–LDMF with a customized shape (horizontal, oblique, or “fleur-de-lis”) depending on the amount of tissue necessary. The technique was indicated in patients with large thoracic defects who lacked a donor site and had undergone previous unsuccessful pedicled LDMF. Results The mean follow-up time was 42.5 months (range: 18–72 months). Five local complications occurred in four of the 12 patients. Dorsal dehiscence was observed in one, local wound infection in one, small partial CL–LDMF necrosis in one, and dorsal seroma in one patient. All cases of complications were limited and treated with a conservative approach except for one implant extrusion 4 months after reconstruction. No total flap loss was reported. All patients achieved a satisfactory thoracic and breast reconstruction. Conclusion The results of this study demonstrate that free CL–LDMF is a reliable technique and should be considered in selected cases of tertiary reconstructions. The majority of complications were immediate, minor, and comparable to other reconstructive techniques. We believe that in selected patients, especially those who do not have available donor-site areas, free CL–LDMF is advantageous and should be part of the armamentarium of all plastic surgeons who deal with tertiary breast reconstructions.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Breast reconstruction</subject><subject>Complication</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap</subject><subject>Mammaplasty - adverse effects</subject><subject>Mammaplasty - methods</subject><subject>Microsurgery</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Myocutaneous Flap</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - surgery</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Superficial Back Muscles</subject><subject>Total failure</subject><subject>Treatment Failure</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1748-6815</issn><issn>1878-0539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Us2q1jAQLaJ4f_QFXEiWbvqZtEnTiihy8eqFCy68rkOaTDA1bWomFb-H8J1N-a4uXAhDMhzOOXBmpqqeMXpglHUvp8M4rXhoSn-grNTwoDpnvexrKtrhYekl7-uuZ-KsukCcKOUt4-JxddZ0A5edbM6rX3dfgWwIJDpi4pKTDjpDeYlLAAR-ZlgsWFJQj-jnDYmNCT2Zj9FsWS8QC-SCXomLiWhSxNnrdCRO-1CEYwKNmSQo7pjTZrKPyytyg8RngtmHQPRC4rrDb59Uj5wOCE_v_8vqy_X7u6uP9e2nDzdX725rwxnL9aipcMJazXlHhWhEr3kzOuEc5XoYR8oaIayWvaNGDqIX3MEopWWUSi3t2F5WL06-a4rfN8CsZo8GQjjlUaynkvZsaNpCbU5UkyJiAqfW5OcSUDGq9jWoSe1rUPsaFGWlhiJ6fu-_jTPYv5I_cy-E1ycClJQ_PCSFxsNiwPoyqaxs9P_3f_OP3AS_eKPDNzgCTnFLS5mfYgobRdXn_RD2O2AdLUfQd-1v-fOw-g</recordid><startdate>20160801</startdate><enddate>20160801</enddate><creator>Munhoz, Alexandre Mendonça</creator><creator>Montag, Eduardo</creator><creator>Arruda, Eduardo Gustavo</creator><creator>Okada, Alberto</creator><creator>Fonseca, Alexandre</creator><creator>Filassi, José Roberto</creator><creator>Gemperli, Rolf</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160801</creationdate><title>The use of contralateral free extended latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for a tertiary failed breast reconstruction: Is it still an option?</title><author>Munhoz, Alexandre Mendonça ; Montag, Eduardo ; Arruda, Eduardo Gustavo ; Okada, Alberto ; Fonseca, Alexandre ; Filassi, José Roberto ; Gemperli, Rolf</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ba05f5dda446055258a42bf5ff04a9bb01255da78f0c795854feb77d1007a7db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Breast reconstruction</topic><topic>Complication</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap</topic><topic>Mammaplasty - adverse effects</topic><topic>Mammaplasty - methods</topic><topic>Microsurgery</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Myocutaneous Flap</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - surgery</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Superficial Back Muscles</topic><topic>Total failure</topic><topic>Treatment Failure</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Munhoz, Alexandre Mendonça</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montag, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arruda, Eduardo Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okada, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filassi, José Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gemperli, Rolf</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Munhoz, Alexandre Mendonça</au><au>Montag, Eduardo</au><au>Arruda, Eduardo Gustavo</au><au>Okada, Alberto</au><au>Fonseca, Alexandre</au><au>Filassi, José Roberto</au><au>Gemperli, Rolf</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The use of contralateral free extended latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for a tertiary failed breast reconstruction: Is it still an option?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg</addtitle><date>2016-08-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1087</spage><epage>1091</epage><pages>1087-1091</pages><issn>1748-6815</issn><eissn>1878-0539</eissn><abstract>Summary Background Unsuccessful breast reconstruction management represents a complex challenge for the plastic surgeon. Although these events rarely occur, many patients are not suitable candidates for conventional flaps, because of either previous donor-site surgery or lack of sufficient tissue. Methods In this study, a contralateral free latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap (CL–LDMF) was planned for correction of major lesions in the anterior chest wall. Twelve patients underwent secondary/tertiary breast reconstruction with CL–LDMF with a customized shape (horizontal, oblique, or “fleur-de-lis”) depending on the amount of tissue necessary. The technique was indicated in patients with large thoracic defects who lacked a donor site and had undergone previous unsuccessful pedicled LDMF. Results The mean follow-up time was 42.5 months (range: 18–72 months). Five local complications occurred in four of the 12 patients. Dorsal dehiscence was observed in one, local wound infection in one, small partial CL–LDMF necrosis in one, and dorsal seroma in one patient. All cases of complications were limited and treated with a conservative approach except for one implant extrusion 4 months after reconstruction. No total flap loss was reported. All patients achieved a satisfactory thoracic and breast reconstruction. Conclusion The results of this study demonstrate that free CL–LDMF is a reliable technique and should be considered in selected cases of tertiary reconstructions. The majority of complications were immediate, minor, and comparable to other reconstructive techniques. We believe that in selected patients, especially those who do not have available donor-site areas, free CL–LDMF is advantageous and should be part of the armamentarium of all plastic surgeons who deal with tertiary breast reconstructions.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26947672</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bjps.2016.01.019</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1748-6815 |
ispartof | Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2016-08, Vol.69 (8), p.1087-1091 |
issn | 1748-6815 1878-0539 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1807081923 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Adult Aged Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - pathology Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy Breast Neoplasms - surgery Breast reconstruction Complication Female Humans Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap Mammaplasty - adverse effects Mammaplasty - methods Microsurgery Middle Aged Myocutaneous Flap Plastic Surgery Postoperative Complications - surgery Reoperation Retrospective Studies Superficial Back Muscles Total failure Treatment Failure Young Adult |
title | The use of contralateral free extended latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for a tertiary failed breast reconstruction: Is it still an option? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T19%3A32%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20use%20of%20contralateral%20free%20extended%20latissimus%20dorsi%20myocutaneous%20flap%20for%20a%20tertiary%20failed%20breast%20reconstruction:%20Is%20it%20still%20an%20option?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20plastic,%20reconstructive%20&%20aesthetic%20surgery&rft.au=Munhoz,%20Alexandre%20Mendon%C3%A7a&rft.date=2016-08-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1087&rft.epage=1091&rft.pages=1087-1091&rft.issn=1748-6815&rft.eissn=1878-0539&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjps.2016.01.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1807081923%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1807081923&rft_id=info:pmid/26947672&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1748681516000486&rfr_iscdi=true |