Evaluation of Stomach Tubes and Gastric Lavage for Sampling Diets from Blue Catfish and Flathead Catfish

Evaluation of Stomach Tubes and Gastric Lavage for Sampling Diets from Blue Catfish and Flathead Catfish

We compared the ability to extract all stomach contents by using stomach tubes or gastric lavage to sample diets from blue catfish Ictalurus furcatus and flathead catfish Pylodictis olivaris. Pulsed gastric lavage (PGL) removed a significantly greater proportion of stomach content mass (95.6%) from...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:North American journal of fisheries management 2004-02, Vol.24 (1), p.258-261
Hauptverfasser: Waters, D. Scott, Kwak, Thomas J., Arnott, Joshua B., Pine, William E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Ictalurus furcatus
Pylodictis olivaris
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 261
container_issue 1
container_start_page 258
container_title North American journal of fisheries management
container_volume 24
creator Waters, D. Scott
Kwak, Thomas J.
Arnott, Joshua B.
Pine, William E.
description We compared the ability to extract all stomach contents by using stomach tubes or gastric lavage to sample diets from blue catfish Ictalurus furcatus and flathead catfish Pylodictis olivaris. Pulsed gastric lavage (PGL) removed a significantly greater proportion of stomach content mass (95.6%) from blue catfish than did stomach tubes (14.6%). Percent mass of flathead catfish contents removed with PGL (96.0%) was not significantly different from that removed with stomach tubes (86.9%). Based on the greater effectiveness of PGL for blue catfish, combined with a shorter mean time required per sample (69 versus 118 s) and the better preservation of extracted diet material, we recommend using PGL as a nonlethal technique to collect diet samples from large catfishes.
doi_str_mv 10.1577/M02-156
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18066843</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18066843</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3258-98d76ad771f60ab7ee3e1234abdb9e9e9ce30aa991fc0092806d5f659e2ad4f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqUgXsEnOAXsJP7JEUpbkAocWs7RJlk3Rkld7KSob0-gcERz2NHqmzkMIZec3XCh1O0ziyMu5BEZcZHqSEsljsmIxUpEIkvVKTkL4Z0xJrSIR6Se7qDpobNuQ52hy861UNZ01RcYKGwqOofQeVvSBexgjdQ4T5fQbhu7WdMHi12gxruW3jc90gl0xob6JzdroKsRqr_nOTkx0AS8-L1j8jabriaP0eJ1_jS5W0RlEgsdZbpSEiqluJEMCoWYII-TFIqqyHBQiQkDyDJuSsayWDNZCSNFhjFUqVHJmFwderfeffQYury1ocSmgQ26PuR8SEidJgN4fQBL70LwaPKtty34fc5Z_r1kPiw5GDmQ0YH8tA3u_8Pyl7vZYIVOvgArT3OS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18066843</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Stomach Tubes and Gastric Lavage for Sampling Diets from Blue Catfish and Flathead Catfish</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Waters, D. Scott ; Kwak, Thomas J. ; Arnott, Joshua B. ; Pine, William E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Waters, D. Scott ; Kwak, Thomas J. ; Arnott, Joshua B. ; Pine, William E.</creatorcontrib><description>We compared the ability to extract all stomach contents by using stomach tubes or gastric lavage to sample diets from blue catfish Ictalurus furcatus and flathead catfish Pylodictis olivaris. Pulsed gastric lavage (PGL) removed a significantly greater proportion of stomach content mass (95.6%) from blue catfish than did stomach tubes (14.6%). Percent mass of flathead catfish contents removed with PGL (96.0%) was not significantly different from that removed with stomach tubes (86.9%). Based on the greater effectiveness of PGL for blue catfish, combined with a shorter mean time required per sample (69 versus 118 s) and the better preservation of extracted diet material, we recommend using PGL as a nonlethal technique to collect diet samples from large catfishes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0275-5947</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-8675</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1577/M02-156</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Ictalurus furcatus ; Pylodictis olivaris</subject><ispartof>North American journal of fisheries management, 2004-02, Vol.24 (1), p.258-261</ispartof><rights>2004 American Fisheries Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3258-98d76ad771f60ab7ee3e1234abdb9e9e9ce30aa991fc0092806d5f659e2ad4f73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3258-98d76ad771f60ab7ee3e1234abdb9e9e9ce30aa991fc0092806d5f659e2ad4f73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1577%2FM02-156$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1577%2FM02-156$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Waters, D. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwak, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnott, Joshua B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pine, William E.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Stomach Tubes and Gastric Lavage for Sampling Diets from Blue Catfish and Flathead Catfish</title><title>North American journal of fisheries management</title><description>We compared the ability to extract all stomach contents by using stomach tubes or gastric lavage to sample diets from blue catfish Ictalurus furcatus and flathead catfish Pylodictis olivaris. Pulsed gastric lavage (PGL) removed a significantly greater proportion of stomach content mass (95.6%) from blue catfish than did stomach tubes (14.6%). Percent mass of flathead catfish contents removed with PGL (96.0%) was not significantly different from that removed with stomach tubes (86.9%). Based on the greater effectiveness of PGL for blue catfish, combined with a shorter mean time required per sample (69 versus 118 s) and the better preservation of extracted diet material, we recommend using PGL as a nonlethal technique to collect diet samples from large catfishes.</description><subject>Ictalurus furcatus</subject><subject>Pylodictis olivaris</subject><issn>0275-5947</issn><issn>1548-8675</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqUgXsEnOAXsJP7JEUpbkAocWs7RJlk3Rkld7KSob0-gcERz2NHqmzkMIZec3XCh1O0ziyMu5BEZcZHqSEsljsmIxUpEIkvVKTkL4Z0xJrSIR6Se7qDpobNuQ52hy861UNZ01RcYKGwqOofQeVvSBexgjdQ4T5fQbhu7WdMHi12gxruW3jc90gl0xob6JzdroKsRqr_nOTkx0AS8-L1j8jabriaP0eJ1_jS5W0RlEgsdZbpSEiqluJEMCoWYII-TFIqqyHBQiQkDyDJuSsayWDNZCSNFhjFUqVHJmFwderfeffQYury1ocSmgQ26PuR8SEidJgN4fQBL70LwaPKtty34fc5Z_r1kPiw5GDmQ0YH8tA3u_8Pyl7vZYIVOvgArT3OS</recordid><startdate>200402</startdate><enddate>200402</enddate><creator>Waters, D. Scott</creator><creator>Kwak, Thomas J.</creator><creator>Arnott, Joshua B.</creator><creator>Pine, William E.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200402</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Stomach Tubes and Gastric Lavage for Sampling Diets from Blue Catfish and Flathead Catfish</title><author>Waters, D. Scott ; Kwak, Thomas J. ; Arnott, Joshua B. ; Pine, William E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3258-98d76ad771f60ab7ee3e1234abdb9e9e9ce30aa991fc0092806d5f659e2ad4f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Ictalurus furcatus</topic><topic>Pylodictis olivaris</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Waters, D. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwak, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnott, Joshua B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pine, William E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>North American journal of fisheries management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Waters, D. Scott</au><au>Kwak, Thomas J.</au><au>Arnott, Joshua B.</au><au>Pine, William E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Stomach Tubes and Gastric Lavage for Sampling Diets from Blue Catfish and Flathead Catfish</atitle><jtitle>North American journal of fisheries management</jtitle><date>2004-02</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>258</spage><epage>261</epage><pages>258-261</pages><issn>0275-5947</issn><eissn>1548-8675</eissn><abstract>We compared the ability to extract all stomach contents by using stomach tubes or gastric lavage to sample diets from blue catfish Ictalurus furcatus and flathead catfish Pylodictis olivaris. Pulsed gastric lavage (PGL) removed a significantly greater proportion of stomach content mass (95.6%) from blue catfish than did stomach tubes (14.6%). Percent mass of flathead catfish contents removed with PGL (96.0%) was not significantly different from that removed with stomach tubes (86.9%). Based on the greater effectiveness of PGL for blue catfish, combined with a shorter mean time required per sample (69 versus 118 s) and the better preservation of extracted diet material, we recommend using PGL as a nonlethal technique to collect diet samples from large catfishes.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1577/M02-156</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0275-5947
ispartof North American journal of fisheries management, 2004-02, Vol.24 (1), p.258-261
issn 0275-5947
1548-8675
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18066843
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Ictalurus furcatus
Pylodictis olivaris
title Evaluation of Stomach Tubes and Gastric Lavage for Sampling Diets from Blue Catfish and Flathead Catfish
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T18%3A44%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Stomach%20Tubes%20and%20Gastric%20Lavage%20for%20Sampling%20Diets%20from%20Blue%20Catfish%20and%20Flathead%20Catfish&rft.jtitle=North%20American%20journal%20of%20fisheries%20management&rft.au=Waters,%20D.%20Scott&rft.date=2004-02&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=258&rft.epage=261&rft.pages=258-261&rft.issn=0275-5947&rft.eissn=1548-8675&rft_id=info:doi/10.1577/M02-156&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18066843%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18066843&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true