Evaluation of a multiple-species approach to monitoring species at the ecoregional scale

Monitoring is required of land managers and conservation practitioners to assess the success of management actions. "Shortcuts" are sought to reduce monitoring costs, most often consisting of the selection of a small number of species that are closely monitored to represent the status of m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecological applications 2004-01, Vol.14 (1), p.296-310
Hauptverfasser: Manley, P.N, Zielinski, W.J, Schlesinger, M.D, Mori, S.R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 310
container_issue 1
container_start_page 296
container_title Ecological applications
container_volume 14
creator Manley, P.N
Zielinski, W.J
Schlesinger, M.D
Mori, S.R
description Monitoring is required of land managers and conservation practitioners to assess the success of management actions. "Shortcuts" are sought to reduce monitoring costs, most often consisting of the selection of a small number of species that are closely monitored to represent the status of many associated species and environmental correlates. Assumptions associated with such shortcuts have been challenged, yet alternative approaches remain scant. We evaluated an approach that departs significantly from the approach of selecting a few representative species. We explored two primary assertions: (1) that a coordinated multiple-species monitoring effort that collects presence-absence data on a broad range of species is a robust alternative to a few intensive single-species efforts, and (2) that the vertebrate species expected to be detected using this approach are numerous and diverse enough to represent all vertebrate species. We simulated monitoring the vertebrate species pool on an existing sample grid across the 7 million ha of public lands in the Sierra Nevada (USA) ecoregion. Based on the use of eight standard presence-absence protocols, we estimated the number of vertebrate species (excluding fish) with an adequate number of sample points within their range to detect ≥20% relative change in the proportion of points with detections between two points in time. We estimated that adequate detections would be obtained for 76% of the 465 vertebrate species, including 83% of all birds, 76% of all mammals, 65% of all reptiles, and 44% of all amphibians. Detection adequacy varied among life-history and ecological groups, but >50% of the species were adequately detected in every group with the exception of three groups: rare species, endemic species, and species of concern (33%, 24%, and 47% of associated species adequately detected, respectively). A multiple-species monitoring approach represents an effective and feasible alternative to the challenges of large-scale monitoring needs by targeting the most basic of population data for a large number and breadth of species.
doi_str_mv 10.1890/02-5249
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18065481</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4493537</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4493537</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3426-e29a47111ccdd5aeeeef7b03c23dbaefc0778438009e23823d7dc7c7b4ef09503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhQdRsFbxDwhmpavRm9dkZllKfYCgoAV3IU3vtClpM06mSv-9KSPdeTf3kvOdQzhZdknhjpYV3APLJRPVUTagFa9yKUt2nG6QNAdV0NPsLMYVpGGMDbLPybfxW9O5sCGhJoast75zjcc8NmgdRmKapg3GLkkXyDpsXBdat1mQg9yRbokEbWhxkVKMJ9Eaj-fZSW18xIu_PcymD5OP8VP-8vr4PB695JYLVuTIKiMUpdTa-VwaTFOrGXDL-HxmsLagVCl4CVAh42V6VXOrrJoJrKGSwIfZTZ-bfvm1xdjptYsWvTcbDNuoaQmFFCVN4G0P2jbE2GKtm9atTbvTFPS-OQ1M75tLJOvJH-dx9x-mJ6M3BiCooKwqkumqN61iauhgEilPcpXk616uTdBm0bqop-8MKAcKwJUs-C9qS4Ix</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18065481</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of a multiple-species approach to monitoring species at the ecoregional scale</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Manley, P.N ; Zielinski, W.J ; Schlesinger, M.D ; Mori, S.R</creator><creatorcontrib>Manley, P.N ; Zielinski, W.J ; Schlesinger, M.D ; Mori, S.R</creatorcontrib><description>Monitoring is required of land managers and conservation practitioners to assess the success of management actions. "Shortcuts" are sought to reduce monitoring costs, most often consisting of the selection of a small number of species that are closely monitored to represent the status of many associated species and environmental correlates. Assumptions associated with such shortcuts have been challenged, yet alternative approaches remain scant. We evaluated an approach that departs significantly from the approach of selecting a few representative species. We explored two primary assertions: (1) that a coordinated multiple-species monitoring effort that collects presence-absence data on a broad range of species is a robust alternative to a few intensive single-species efforts, and (2) that the vertebrate species expected to be detected using this approach are numerous and diverse enough to represent all vertebrate species. We simulated monitoring the vertebrate species pool on an existing sample grid across the 7 million ha of public lands in the Sierra Nevada (USA) ecoregion. Based on the use of eight standard presence-absence protocols, we estimated the number of vertebrate species (excluding fish) with an adequate number of sample points within their range to detect ≥20% relative change in the proportion of points with detections between two points in time. We estimated that adequate detections would be obtained for 76% of the 465 vertebrate species, including 83% of all birds, 76% of all mammals, 65% of all reptiles, and 44% of all amphibians. Detection adequacy varied among life-history and ecological groups, but &gt;50% of the species were adequately detected in every group with the exception of three groups: rare species, endemic species, and species of concern (33%, 24%, and 47% of associated species adequately detected, respectively). A multiple-species monitoring approach represents an effective and feasible alternative to the challenges of large-scale monitoring needs by targeting the most basic of population data for a large number and breadth of species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-0761</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/02-5249</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Biodiversity conservation ; biological diversity ; Conservation biology ; conservation strategies, choosing ; Ecoregions ; Ecosystems ; Environmental conservation ; Forest service ; Habitat conservation ; inventory ; land management ; management actions, assessing success of ; monitoring ; populations ; Sierra Nevada (California, USA) ; Species ; species monitoring, multiple-species approach ; survey ; vertebrate population distributions ; Vertebrates ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Ecological applications, 2004-01, Vol.14 (1), p.296-310</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2004 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3426-e29a47111ccdd5aeeeef7b03c23dbaefc0778438009e23823d7dc7c7b4ef09503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3426-e29a47111ccdd5aeeeef7b03c23dbaefc0778438009e23823d7dc7c7b4ef09503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4493537$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4493537$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Manley, P.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zielinski, W.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlesinger, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mori, S.R</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of a multiple-species approach to monitoring species at the ecoregional scale</title><title>Ecological applications</title><description>Monitoring is required of land managers and conservation practitioners to assess the success of management actions. "Shortcuts" are sought to reduce monitoring costs, most often consisting of the selection of a small number of species that are closely monitored to represent the status of many associated species and environmental correlates. Assumptions associated with such shortcuts have been challenged, yet alternative approaches remain scant. We evaluated an approach that departs significantly from the approach of selecting a few representative species. We explored two primary assertions: (1) that a coordinated multiple-species monitoring effort that collects presence-absence data on a broad range of species is a robust alternative to a few intensive single-species efforts, and (2) that the vertebrate species expected to be detected using this approach are numerous and diverse enough to represent all vertebrate species. We simulated monitoring the vertebrate species pool on an existing sample grid across the 7 million ha of public lands in the Sierra Nevada (USA) ecoregion. Based on the use of eight standard presence-absence protocols, we estimated the number of vertebrate species (excluding fish) with an adequate number of sample points within their range to detect ≥20% relative change in the proportion of points with detections between two points in time. We estimated that adequate detections would be obtained for 76% of the 465 vertebrate species, including 83% of all birds, 76% of all mammals, 65% of all reptiles, and 44% of all amphibians. Detection adequacy varied among life-history and ecological groups, but &gt;50% of the species were adequately detected in every group with the exception of three groups: rare species, endemic species, and species of concern (33%, 24%, and 47% of associated species adequately detected, respectively). A multiple-species monitoring approach represents an effective and feasible alternative to the challenges of large-scale monitoring needs by targeting the most basic of population data for a large number and breadth of species.</description><subject>Biodiversity conservation</subject><subject>biological diversity</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>conservation strategies, choosing</subject><subject>Ecoregions</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental conservation</subject><subject>Forest service</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>inventory</subject><subject>land management</subject><subject>management actions, assessing success of</subject><subject>monitoring</subject><subject>populations</subject><subject>Sierra Nevada (California, USA)</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>species monitoring, multiple-species approach</subject><subject>survey</subject><subject>vertebrate population distributions</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1051-0761</issn><issn>1939-5582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhQdRsFbxDwhmpavRm9dkZllKfYCgoAV3IU3vtClpM06mSv-9KSPdeTf3kvOdQzhZdknhjpYV3APLJRPVUTagFa9yKUt2nG6QNAdV0NPsLMYVpGGMDbLPybfxW9O5sCGhJoast75zjcc8NmgdRmKapg3GLkkXyDpsXBdat1mQg9yRbokEbWhxkVKMJ9Eaj-fZSW18xIu_PcymD5OP8VP-8vr4PB695JYLVuTIKiMUpdTa-VwaTFOrGXDL-HxmsLagVCl4CVAh42V6VXOrrJoJrKGSwIfZTZ-bfvm1xdjptYsWvTcbDNuoaQmFFCVN4G0P2jbE2GKtm9atTbvTFPS-OQ1M75tLJOvJH-dx9x-mJ6M3BiCooKwqkumqN61iauhgEilPcpXk616uTdBm0bqop-8MKAcKwJUs-C9qS4Ix</recordid><startdate>200401</startdate><enddate>200401</enddate><creator>Manley, P.N</creator><creator>Zielinski, W.J</creator><creator>Schlesinger, M.D</creator><creator>Mori, S.R</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200401</creationdate><title>Evaluation of a multiple-species approach to monitoring species at the ecoregional scale</title><author>Manley, P.N ; Zielinski, W.J ; Schlesinger, M.D ; Mori, S.R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3426-e29a47111ccdd5aeeeef7b03c23dbaefc0778438009e23823d7dc7c7b4ef09503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity conservation</topic><topic>biological diversity</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>conservation strategies, choosing</topic><topic>Ecoregions</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental conservation</topic><topic>Forest service</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>inventory</topic><topic>land management</topic><topic>management actions, assessing success of</topic><topic>monitoring</topic><topic>populations</topic><topic>Sierra Nevada (California, USA)</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>species monitoring, multiple-species approach</topic><topic>survey</topic><topic>vertebrate population distributions</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Manley, P.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zielinski, W.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlesinger, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mori, S.R</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Manley, P.N</au><au>Zielinski, W.J</au><au>Schlesinger, M.D</au><au>Mori, S.R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of a multiple-species approach to monitoring species at the ecoregional scale</atitle><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle><date>2004-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>296</spage><epage>310</epage><pages>296-310</pages><issn>1051-0761</issn><eissn>1939-5582</eissn><abstract>Monitoring is required of land managers and conservation practitioners to assess the success of management actions. "Shortcuts" are sought to reduce monitoring costs, most often consisting of the selection of a small number of species that are closely monitored to represent the status of many associated species and environmental correlates. Assumptions associated with such shortcuts have been challenged, yet alternative approaches remain scant. We evaluated an approach that departs significantly from the approach of selecting a few representative species. We explored two primary assertions: (1) that a coordinated multiple-species monitoring effort that collects presence-absence data on a broad range of species is a robust alternative to a few intensive single-species efforts, and (2) that the vertebrate species expected to be detected using this approach are numerous and diverse enough to represent all vertebrate species. We simulated monitoring the vertebrate species pool on an existing sample grid across the 7 million ha of public lands in the Sierra Nevada (USA) ecoregion. Based on the use of eight standard presence-absence protocols, we estimated the number of vertebrate species (excluding fish) with an adequate number of sample points within their range to detect ≥20% relative change in the proportion of points with detections between two points in time. We estimated that adequate detections would be obtained for 76% of the 465 vertebrate species, including 83% of all birds, 76% of all mammals, 65% of all reptiles, and 44% of all amphibians. Detection adequacy varied among life-history and ecological groups, but &gt;50% of the species were adequately detected in every group with the exception of three groups: rare species, endemic species, and species of concern (33%, 24%, and 47% of associated species adequately detected, respectively). A multiple-species monitoring approach represents an effective and feasible alternative to the challenges of large-scale monitoring needs by targeting the most basic of population data for a large number and breadth of species.</abstract><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.1890/02-5249</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1051-0761
ispartof Ecological applications, 2004-01, Vol.14 (1), p.296-310
issn 1051-0761
1939-5582
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18065481
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Biodiversity conservation
biological diversity
Conservation biology
conservation strategies, choosing
Ecoregions
Ecosystems
Environmental conservation
Forest service
Habitat conservation
inventory
land management
management actions, assessing success of
monitoring
populations
Sierra Nevada (California, USA)
Species
species monitoring, multiple-species approach
survey
vertebrate population distributions
Vertebrates
Wildlife conservation
title Evaluation of a multiple-species approach to monitoring species at the ecoregional scale
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T07%3A52%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20a%20multiple-species%20approach%20to%20monitoring%20species%20at%20the%20ecoregional%20scale&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20applications&rft.au=Manley,%20P.N&rft.date=2004-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=296&rft.epage=310&rft.pages=296-310&rft.issn=1051-0761&rft.eissn=1939-5582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/02-5249&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4493537%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18065481&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4493537&rfr_iscdi=true