Evaluation of a multiple-species approach to monitoring species at the ecoregional scale
Monitoring is required of land managers and conservation practitioners to assess the success of management actions. "Shortcuts" are sought to reduce monitoring costs, most often consisting of the selection of a small number of species that are closely monitored to represent the status of m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecological applications 2004-01, Vol.14 (1), p.296-310 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 310 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 296 |
container_title | Ecological applications |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Manley, P.N Zielinski, W.J Schlesinger, M.D Mori, S.R |
description | Monitoring is required of land managers and conservation practitioners to assess the success of management actions. "Shortcuts" are sought to reduce monitoring costs, most often consisting of the selection of a small number of species that are closely monitored to represent the status of many associated species and environmental correlates. Assumptions associated with such shortcuts have been challenged, yet alternative approaches remain scant. We evaluated an approach that departs significantly from the approach of selecting a few representative species. We explored two primary assertions: (1) that a coordinated multiple-species monitoring effort that collects presence-absence data on a broad range of species is a robust alternative to a few intensive single-species efforts, and (2) that the vertebrate species expected to be detected using this approach are numerous and diverse enough to represent all vertebrate species. We simulated monitoring the vertebrate species pool on an existing sample grid across the 7 million ha of public lands in the Sierra Nevada (USA) ecoregion. Based on the use of eight standard presence-absence protocols, we estimated the number of vertebrate species (excluding fish) with an adequate number of sample points within their range to detect ≥20% relative change in the proportion of points with detections between two points in time. We estimated that adequate detections would be obtained for 76% of the 465 vertebrate species, including 83% of all birds, 76% of all mammals, 65% of all reptiles, and 44% of all amphibians. Detection adequacy varied among life-history and ecological groups, but >50% of the species were adequately detected in every group with the exception of three groups: rare species, endemic species, and species of concern (33%, 24%, and 47% of associated species adequately detected, respectively). A multiple-species monitoring approach represents an effective and feasible alternative to the challenges of large-scale monitoring needs by targeting the most basic of population data for a large number and breadth of species. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1890/02-5249 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18065481</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4493537</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4493537</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3426-e29a47111ccdd5aeeeef7b03c23dbaefc0778438009e23823d7dc7c7b4ef09503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhQdRsFbxDwhmpavRm9dkZllKfYCgoAV3IU3vtClpM06mSv-9KSPdeTf3kvOdQzhZdknhjpYV3APLJRPVUTagFa9yKUt2nG6QNAdV0NPsLMYVpGGMDbLPybfxW9O5sCGhJoast75zjcc8NmgdRmKapg3GLkkXyDpsXBdat1mQg9yRbokEbWhxkVKMJ9Eaj-fZSW18xIu_PcymD5OP8VP-8vr4PB695JYLVuTIKiMUpdTa-VwaTFOrGXDL-HxmsLagVCl4CVAh42V6VXOrrJoJrKGSwIfZTZ-bfvm1xdjptYsWvTcbDNuoaQmFFCVN4G0P2jbE2GKtm9atTbvTFPS-OQ1M75tLJOvJH-dx9x-mJ6M3BiCooKwqkumqN61iauhgEilPcpXk616uTdBm0bqop-8MKAcKwJUs-C9qS4Ix</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18065481</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of a multiple-species approach to monitoring species at the ecoregional scale</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Manley, P.N ; Zielinski, W.J ; Schlesinger, M.D ; Mori, S.R</creator><creatorcontrib>Manley, P.N ; Zielinski, W.J ; Schlesinger, M.D ; Mori, S.R</creatorcontrib><description>Monitoring is required of land managers and conservation practitioners to assess the success of management actions. "Shortcuts" are sought to reduce monitoring costs, most often consisting of the selection of a small number of species that are closely monitored to represent the status of many associated species and environmental correlates. Assumptions associated with such shortcuts have been challenged, yet alternative approaches remain scant. We evaluated an approach that departs significantly from the approach of selecting a few representative species. We explored two primary assertions: (1) that a coordinated multiple-species monitoring effort that collects presence-absence data on a broad range of species is a robust alternative to a few intensive single-species efforts, and (2) that the vertebrate species expected to be detected using this approach are numerous and diverse enough to represent all vertebrate species. We simulated monitoring the vertebrate species pool on an existing sample grid across the 7 million ha of public lands in the Sierra Nevada (USA) ecoregion. Based on the use of eight standard presence-absence protocols, we estimated the number of vertebrate species (excluding fish) with an adequate number of sample points within their range to detect ≥20% relative change in the proportion of points with detections between two points in time. We estimated that adequate detections would be obtained for 76% of the 465 vertebrate species, including 83% of all birds, 76% of all mammals, 65% of all reptiles, and 44% of all amphibians. Detection adequacy varied among life-history and ecological groups, but >50% of the species were adequately detected in every group with the exception of three groups: rare species, endemic species, and species of concern (33%, 24%, and 47% of associated species adequately detected, respectively). A multiple-species monitoring approach represents an effective and feasible alternative to the challenges of large-scale monitoring needs by targeting the most basic of population data for a large number and breadth of species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-0761</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/02-5249</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Biodiversity conservation ; biological diversity ; Conservation biology ; conservation strategies, choosing ; Ecoregions ; Ecosystems ; Environmental conservation ; Forest service ; Habitat conservation ; inventory ; land management ; management actions, assessing success of ; monitoring ; populations ; Sierra Nevada (California, USA) ; Species ; species monitoring, multiple-species approach ; survey ; vertebrate population distributions ; Vertebrates ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Ecological applications, 2004-01, Vol.14 (1), p.296-310</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2004 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3426-e29a47111ccdd5aeeeef7b03c23dbaefc0778438009e23823d7dc7c7b4ef09503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3426-e29a47111ccdd5aeeeef7b03c23dbaefc0778438009e23823d7dc7c7b4ef09503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4493537$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4493537$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Manley, P.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zielinski, W.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlesinger, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mori, S.R</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of a multiple-species approach to monitoring species at the ecoregional scale</title><title>Ecological applications</title><description>Monitoring is required of land managers and conservation practitioners to assess the success of management actions. "Shortcuts" are sought to reduce monitoring costs, most often consisting of the selection of a small number of species that are closely monitored to represent the status of many associated species and environmental correlates. Assumptions associated with such shortcuts have been challenged, yet alternative approaches remain scant. We evaluated an approach that departs significantly from the approach of selecting a few representative species. We explored two primary assertions: (1) that a coordinated multiple-species monitoring effort that collects presence-absence data on a broad range of species is a robust alternative to a few intensive single-species efforts, and (2) that the vertebrate species expected to be detected using this approach are numerous and diverse enough to represent all vertebrate species. We simulated monitoring the vertebrate species pool on an existing sample grid across the 7 million ha of public lands in the Sierra Nevada (USA) ecoregion. Based on the use of eight standard presence-absence protocols, we estimated the number of vertebrate species (excluding fish) with an adequate number of sample points within their range to detect ≥20% relative change in the proportion of points with detections between two points in time. We estimated that adequate detections would be obtained for 76% of the 465 vertebrate species, including 83% of all birds, 76% of all mammals, 65% of all reptiles, and 44% of all amphibians. Detection adequacy varied among life-history and ecological groups, but >50% of the species were adequately detected in every group with the exception of three groups: rare species, endemic species, and species of concern (33%, 24%, and 47% of associated species adequately detected, respectively). A multiple-species monitoring approach represents an effective and feasible alternative to the challenges of large-scale monitoring needs by targeting the most basic of population data for a large number and breadth of species.</description><subject>Biodiversity conservation</subject><subject>biological diversity</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>conservation strategies, choosing</subject><subject>Ecoregions</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental conservation</subject><subject>Forest service</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>inventory</subject><subject>land management</subject><subject>management actions, assessing success of</subject><subject>monitoring</subject><subject>populations</subject><subject>Sierra Nevada (California, USA)</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>species monitoring, multiple-species approach</subject><subject>survey</subject><subject>vertebrate population distributions</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1051-0761</issn><issn>1939-5582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhQdRsFbxDwhmpavRm9dkZllKfYCgoAV3IU3vtClpM06mSv-9KSPdeTf3kvOdQzhZdknhjpYV3APLJRPVUTagFa9yKUt2nG6QNAdV0NPsLMYVpGGMDbLPybfxW9O5sCGhJoast75zjcc8NmgdRmKapg3GLkkXyDpsXBdat1mQg9yRbokEbWhxkVKMJ9Eaj-fZSW18xIu_PcymD5OP8VP-8vr4PB695JYLVuTIKiMUpdTa-VwaTFOrGXDL-HxmsLagVCl4CVAh42V6VXOrrJoJrKGSwIfZTZ-bfvm1xdjptYsWvTcbDNuoaQmFFCVN4G0P2jbE2GKtm9atTbvTFPS-OQ1M75tLJOvJH-dx9x-mJ6M3BiCooKwqkumqN61iauhgEilPcpXk616uTdBm0bqop-8MKAcKwJUs-C9qS4Ix</recordid><startdate>200401</startdate><enddate>200401</enddate><creator>Manley, P.N</creator><creator>Zielinski, W.J</creator><creator>Schlesinger, M.D</creator><creator>Mori, S.R</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200401</creationdate><title>Evaluation of a multiple-species approach to monitoring species at the ecoregional scale</title><author>Manley, P.N ; Zielinski, W.J ; Schlesinger, M.D ; Mori, S.R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3426-e29a47111ccdd5aeeeef7b03c23dbaefc0778438009e23823d7dc7c7b4ef09503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity conservation</topic><topic>biological diversity</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>conservation strategies, choosing</topic><topic>Ecoregions</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental conservation</topic><topic>Forest service</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>inventory</topic><topic>land management</topic><topic>management actions, assessing success of</topic><topic>monitoring</topic><topic>populations</topic><topic>Sierra Nevada (California, USA)</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>species monitoring, multiple-species approach</topic><topic>survey</topic><topic>vertebrate population distributions</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Manley, P.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zielinski, W.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlesinger, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mori, S.R</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Manley, P.N</au><au>Zielinski, W.J</au><au>Schlesinger, M.D</au><au>Mori, S.R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of a multiple-species approach to monitoring species at the ecoregional scale</atitle><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle><date>2004-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>296</spage><epage>310</epage><pages>296-310</pages><issn>1051-0761</issn><eissn>1939-5582</eissn><abstract>Monitoring is required of land managers and conservation practitioners to assess the success of management actions. "Shortcuts" are sought to reduce monitoring costs, most often consisting of the selection of a small number of species that are closely monitored to represent the status of many associated species and environmental correlates. Assumptions associated with such shortcuts have been challenged, yet alternative approaches remain scant. We evaluated an approach that departs significantly from the approach of selecting a few representative species. We explored two primary assertions: (1) that a coordinated multiple-species monitoring effort that collects presence-absence data on a broad range of species is a robust alternative to a few intensive single-species efforts, and (2) that the vertebrate species expected to be detected using this approach are numerous and diverse enough to represent all vertebrate species. We simulated monitoring the vertebrate species pool on an existing sample grid across the 7 million ha of public lands in the Sierra Nevada (USA) ecoregion. Based on the use of eight standard presence-absence protocols, we estimated the number of vertebrate species (excluding fish) with an adequate number of sample points within their range to detect ≥20% relative change in the proportion of points with detections between two points in time. We estimated that adequate detections would be obtained for 76% of the 465 vertebrate species, including 83% of all birds, 76% of all mammals, 65% of all reptiles, and 44% of all amphibians. Detection adequacy varied among life-history and ecological groups, but >50% of the species were adequately detected in every group with the exception of three groups: rare species, endemic species, and species of concern (33%, 24%, and 47% of associated species adequately detected, respectively). A multiple-species monitoring approach represents an effective and feasible alternative to the challenges of large-scale monitoring needs by targeting the most basic of population data for a large number and breadth of species.</abstract><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.1890/02-5249</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1051-0761 |
ispartof | Ecological applications, 2004-01, Vol.14 (1), p.296-310 |
issn | 1051-0761 1939-5582 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18065481 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Biodiversity conservation biological diversity Conservation biology conservation strategies, choosing Ecoregions Ecosystems Environmental conservation Forest service Habitat conservation inventory land management management actions, assessing success of monitoring populations Sierra Nevada (California, USA) Species species monitoring, multiple-species approach survey vertebrate population distributions Vertebrates Wildlife conservation |
title | Evaluation of a multiple-species approach to monitoring species at the ecoregional scale |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T07%3A52%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20a%20multiple-species%20approach%20to%20monitoring%20species%20at%20the%20ecoregional%20scale&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20applications&rft.au=Manley,%20P.N&rft.date=2004-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=296&rft.epage=310&rft.pages=296-310&rft.issn=1051-0761&rft.eissn=1939-5582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/02-5249&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4493537%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18065481&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4493537&rfr_iscdi=true |