Dexmedetomidine versus morphine infusion following laparoscopic bariatric surgery: effect on supplemental narcotic requirement during the first 24 h

Introduction The primary aim of this pilot study was to determine whether the dexmedetomidine infusion initiated immediately after laparoscopic bariatric surgery, offers an advantage over a morphine infusion with respect to rescue morphine and paracetamol requirements over the first 24 post-operativ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 2016-08, Vol.30 (8), p.3368-3374
Hauptverfasser: Abu-Halaweh, Sami, Obeidat, Firas, Absalom, Anthony R., AlOweidi, Abdelkareem, Abeeleh, Mahmood Abu, Qudaisat, Ibrahim, Robinson, Fay, Mason, Keira P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction The primary aim of this pilot study was to determine whether the dexmedetomidine infusion initiated immediately after laparoscopic bariatric surgery, offers an advantage over a morphine infusion with respect to rescue morphine and paracetamol requirements over the first 24 post-operative hours. Methods Sixty morbidly obese adult patients scheduled for laparoscopic bariatric surgery were randomly assigned to receive an infusion of either 0.3 mcg/kg/h dexmedetomidine (Group D) or 3 mg/h Morphine (Group M) for 24 h immediately post-operatively. All patients received standardized general anesthesia and were evaluated and treated for pain in the intensive care unit by providers who were blinded to their treatment group. The primary outcome was the need for supplemental, “rescue” paracetamol (Dolargan. Hikma, Jordan) and morphine titrated to achieve visual analog scales (VAS) of
ISSN:0930-2794
1432-2218
DOI:10.1007/s00464-015-4614-y