Toxicity studies on western juniper oil ( Juniperus occidentalis) and Port-Orford-cedar oil ( Chamaecyparis lawsoniana) extracts utilizing local lymph node and acute dermal irritation assays

The essential oil extracts of western juniper oil ( Juniperus occidentalis) and Port-Orford-cedar oil ( Chamaecyparis lawsoniana) were evaluated for possible dermal toxic effects on mice and rabbits. Mice were tested for their response to both extracts utilizing a local lymph node assay. Western jun...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Toxicology letters 2004-12, Vol.154 (3), p.217-224
Hauptverfasser: Craig, A. Morrie, Karchesy, Joseph J., Blythe, Linda L., González-Hernández, Maria del Pilar, Swan, Laurence R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The essential oil extracts of western juniper oil ( Juniperus occidentalis) and Port-Orford-cedar oil ( Chamaecyparis lawsoniana) were evaluated for possible dermal toxic effects on mice and rabbits. Mice were tested for their response to both extracts utilizing a local lymph node assay. Western juniper oil extract at 0.5% and 5% concentrations did not show a stimulation index (SI) greater than normal (3.0); however, a 50% concentration did show a positive response at 3.3. Port-Orford-cedar oil extract did not show a positive response at concentrations of 0.5%, 5% or 50%. An acute dermal irritation study using rabbits had a primary irritation index (PII) of 3.3 with 100% Port-Orford-cedar oil extract. This was reduced to a PII of 0.625 when diluted 1:1 with olive oil. Undiluted western juniper oil extract had a PII score of 2.7. While a 5.0% solution had a PII score of 0.3, a 0.5% solution of western juniper oil was a non-irritant. It would appear that animals bedded on wood shavings have contact with essential oils at concentrations far less than the 2% maximum by weight obtained by steam distillation extraction. These concentrations did not elicit a hypersensitivity response.
ISSN:0378-4274
1879-3169
DOI:10.1016/j.toxlet.2004.08.004