US-guided Percutaneous Release of the Trigger Finger by Using a 21-gauge Needle: A Prospective Study of 60 Cases

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of ultrasonographically (US)-guided percutaneous treatment of the trigger finger by releasing the A1 pulley with a 21-gauge needle. Materials and Methods This two-part study was approved by the ethics committee, and written consent was obtained from all patients. The...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiology 2016-08, Vol.280 (2), p.493-499
Hauptverfasser: Lapègue, Franck, André, Aymeric, Meyrignac, Olivier, Pasquier-Bernachot, Etienne, Dupré, Pierre, Brun, Céline, Bakouche, Sarah, Chiavassa-Gandois, Hélène, Sans, Nicolas, Faruch, Marie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 499
container_issue 2
container_start_page 493
container_title Radiology
container_volume 280
creator Lapègue, Franck
André, Aymeric
Meyrignac, Olivier
Pasquier-Bernachot, Etienne
Dupré, Pierre
Brun, Céline
Bakouche, Sarah
Chiavassa-Gandois, Hélène
Sans, Nicolas
Faruch, Marie
description Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of ultrasonographically (US)-guided percutaneous treatment of the trigger finger by releasing the A1 pulley with a 21-gauge needle. Materials and Methods This two-part study was approved by the ethics committee, and written consent was obtained from all patients. The first part consisted of 10 procedures on cadaver digits followed by dissection to analyze the effectiveness of the A1 pulley release and detect any collateral damage to the A2 pulley, interdigital nerves, or underlying flexor tendons. The second part was performed during an 18-month period starting in March 2013. It was a prospective clinical study of 60 procedures performed in 48 patients. Outcomes were evaluated through a clinical examination at day 0 and during a 6-month follow-up visit, where the trigger digit was evaluated clinically and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure, or QuickDASH, and patient satisfaction questionnaires were administered. Results No complications were found during the cadaver study. However, the release was considered "partial" in all fingers. In the clinical study, the trigger finger was completely resolved in 81.7% (49 of 60) of cases immediately after the procedure. Moderate trigger finger persisted in 10 cases, and one thumb pulley could not be released. A US-guided corticosteroid injection was subsequently performed in these 11 cases. At 6-month follow-up, only two cases still had moderate trigger finger and there were no late complications. The mean QuickDASH questionnaire score was 4; all patients said they were satisfied. Conclusion US-guided treatment of the trigger finger by using a 21-gauge needle is feasible in current practice, with minimal complications. (©) RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
doi_str_mv 10.1148/radiol.2016151886
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1805768628</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1805768628</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-aaaa0fb5b5b5aad6c0a79b617f9d240f6e6abb705ea5e356289e2560ee2adfd33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEFPwzAMhSMEYmPwA7igHLl0xGmTptymaQOkCSa2nau0cUtRt5akRdq_p1UH2Af78N4n-xFyC2wKEKgHq01RlVPOQIIApeQZGYPgoQc-iHMyZsz3PRVANCJXzn0yBoFQ4SUZcRlBFAR8TOrdxsvbwqCha7Rp2-gDVq2j71iidkirjDYfSLe2yHO0dFkc-pEc6c51K9WUg5frNkf6imhKfKQzuraVqzFtim-km6Y1x54iGZ13QHdNLjJdOrw5zQnZLRfb-bO3ent6mc9WXsrDoPF0VyxLRN9aG5kyHUaJhDCLDA9YJlHqJAmZQC3QF5KrCLmQDJFrkxnfn5D7gVvb6qtF18T7wqVYlsODMSgmQqk6YyeFQZp2hzuLWVzbYq_tMQYW90HHQ9Dxf9Cd5-6Eb5M9mj_Hb7L-D_Ufel4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1805768628</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>US-guided Percutaneous Release of the Trigger Finger by Using a 21-gauge Needle: A Prospective Study of 60 Cases</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Lapègue, Franck ; André, Aymeric ; Meyrignac, Olivier ; Pasquier-Bernachot, Etienne ; Dupré, Pierre ; Brun, Céline ; Bakouche, Sarah ; Chiavassa-Gandois, Hélène ; Sans, Nicolas ; Faruch, Marie</creator><creatorcontrib>Lapègue, Franck ; André, Aymeric ; Meyrignac, Olivier ; Pasquier-Bernachot, Etienne ; Dupré, Pierre ; Brun, Céline ; Bakouche, Sarah ; Chiavassa-Gandois, Hélène ; Sans, Nicolas ; Faruch, Marie</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of ultrasonographically (US)-guided percutaneous treatment of the trigger finger by releasing the A1 pulley with a 21-gauge needle. Materials and Methods This two-part study was approved by the ethics committee, and written consent was obtained from all patients. The first part consisted of 10 procedures on cadaver digits followed by dissection to analyze the effectiveness of the A1 pulley release and detect any collateral damage to the A2 pulley, interdigital nerves, or underlying flexor tendons. The second part was performed during an 18-month period starting in March 2013. It was a prospective clinical study of 60 procedures performed in 48 patients. Outcomes were evaluated through a clinical examination at day 0 and during a 6-month follow-up visit, where the trigger digit was evaluated clinically and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure, or QuickDASH, and patient satisfaction questionnaires were administered. Results No complications were found during the cadaver study. However, the release was considered "partial" in all fingers. In the clinical study, the trigger finger was completely resolved in 81.7% (49 of 60) of cases immediately after the procedure. Moderate trigger finger persisted in 10 cases, and one thumb pulley could not be released. A US-guided corticosteroid injection was subsequently performed in these 11 cases. At 6-month follow-up, only two cases still had moderate trigger finger and there were no late complications. The mean QuickDASH questionnaire score was 4; all patients said they were satisfied. Conclusion US-guided treatment of the trigger finger by using a 21-gauge needle is feasible in current practice, with minimal complications. (©) RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-8419</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016151886</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26919442</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cadaver ; Female ; Fingers - diagnostic imaging ; Fingers - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Needles ; Orthopedic Procedures - instrumentation ; Orthopedic Procedures - methods ; Prospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Trigger Finger Disorder - diagnostic imaging ; Trigger Finger Disorder - surgery ; Ultrasonography, Interventional</subject><ispartof>Radiology, 2016-08, Vol.280 (2), p.493-499</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-aaaa0fb5b5b5aad6c0a79b617f9d240f6e6abb705ea5e356289e2560ee2adfd33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-aaaa0fb5b5b5aad6c0a79b617f9d240f6e6abb705ea5e356289e2560ee2adfd33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26919442$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lapègue, Franck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>André, Aymeric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyrignac, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasquier-Bernachot, Etienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dupré, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brun, Céline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakouche, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiavassa-Gandois, Hélène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sans, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faruch, Marie</creatorcontrib><title>US-guided Percutaneous Release of the Trigger Finger by Using a 21-gauge Needle: A Prospective Study of 60 Cases</title><title>Radiology</title><addtitle>Radiology</addtitle><description>Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of ultrasonographically (US)-guided percutaneous treatment of the trigger finger by releasing the A1 pulley with a 21-gauge needle. Materials and Methods This two-part study was approved by the ethics committee, and written consent was obtained from all patients. The first part consisted of 10 procedures on cadaver digits followed by dissection to analyze the effectiveness of the A1 pulley release and detect any collateral damage to the A2 pulley, interdigital nerves, or underlying flexor tendons. The second part was performed during an 18-month period starting in March 2013. It was a prospective clinical study of 60 procedures performed in 48 patients. Outcomes were evaluated through a clinical examination at day 0 and during a 6-month follow-up visit, where the trigger digit was evaluated clinically and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure, or QuickDASH, and patient satisfaction questionnaires were administered. Results No complications were found during the cadaver study. However, the release was considered "partial" in all fingers. In the clinical study, the trigger finger was completely resolved in 81.7% (49 of 60) of cases immediately after the procedure. Moderate trigger finger persisted in 10 cases, and one thumb pulley could not be released. A US-guided corticosteroid injection was subsequently performed in these 11 cases. At 6-month follow-up, only two cases still had moderate trigger finger and there were no late complications. The mean QuickDASH questionnaire score was 4; all patients said they were satisfied. Conclusion US-guided treatment of the trigger finger by using a 21-gauge needle is feasible in current practice, with minimal complications. (©) RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fingers - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Fingers - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Needles</subject><subject>Orthopedic Procedures - instrumentation</subject><subject>Orthopedic Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Trigger Finger Disorder - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Trigger Finger Disorder - surgery</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional</subject><issn>0033-8419</issn><issn>1527-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEFPwzAMhSMEYmPwA7igHLl0xGmTptymaQOkCSa2nau0cUtRt5akRdq_p1UH2Af78N4n-xFyC2wKEKgHq01RlVPOQIIApeQZGYPgoQc-iHMyZsz3PRVANCJXzn0yBoFQ4SUZcRlBFAR8TOrdxsvbwqCha7Rp2-gDVq2j71iidkirjDYfSLe2yHO0dFkc-pEc6c51K9WUg5frNkf6imhKfKQzuraVqzFtim-km6Y1x54iGZ13QHdNLjJdOrw5zQnZLRfb-bO3ent6mc9WXsrDoPF0VyxLRN9aG5kyHUaJhDCLDA9YJlHqJAmZQC3QF5KrCLmQDJFrkxnfn5D7gVvb6qtF18T7wqVYlsODMSgmQqk6YyeFQZp2hzuLWVzbYq_tMQYW90HHQ9Dxf9Cd5-6Eb5M9mj_Hb7L-D_Ufel4</recordid><startdate>201608</startdate><enddate>201608</enddate><creator>Lapègue, Franck</creator><creator>André, Aymeric</creator><creator>Meyrignac, Olivier</creator><creator>Pasquier-Bernachot, Etienne</creator><creator>Dupré, Pierre</creator><creator>Brun, Céline</creator><creator>Bakouche, Sarah</creator><creator>Chiavassa-Gandois, Hélène</creator><creator>Sans, Nicolas</creator><creator>Faruch, Marie</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201608</creationdate><title>US-guided Percutaneous Release of the Trigger Finger by Using a 21-gauge Needle: A Prospective Study of 60 Cases</title><author>Lapègue, Franck ; André, Aymeric ; Meyrignac, Olivier ; Pasquier-Bernachot, Etienne ; Dupré, Pierre ; Brun, Céline ; Bakouche, Sarah ; Chiavassa-Gandois, Hélène ; Sans, Nicolas ; Faruch, Marie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-aaaa0fb5b5b5aad6c0a79b617f9d240f6e6abb705ea5e356289e2560ee2adfd33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fingers - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Fingers - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Needles</topic><topic>Orthopedic Procedures - instrumentation</topic><topic>Orthopedic Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Trigger Finger Disorder - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Trigger Finger Disorder - surgery</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lapègue, Franck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>André, Aymeric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyrignac, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasquier-Bernachot, Etienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dupré, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brun, Céline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakouche, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiavassa-Gandois, Hélène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sans, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faruch, Marie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lapègue, Franck</au><au>André, Aymeric</au><au>Meyrignac, Olivier</au><au>Pasquier-Bernachot, Etienne</au><au>Dupré, Pierre</au><au>Brun, Céline</au><au>Bakouche, Sarah</au><au>Chiavassa-Gandois, Hélène</au><au>Sans, Nicolas</au><au>Faruch, Marie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>US-guided Percutaneous Release of the Trigger Finger by Using a 21-gauge Needle: A Prospective Study of 60 Cases</atitle><jtitle>Radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Radiology</addtitle><date>2016-08</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>280</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>493</spage><epage>499</epage><pages>493-499</pages><issn>0033-8419</issn><eissn>1527-1315</eissn><abstract>Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of ultrasonographically (US)-guided percutaneous treatment of the trigger finger by releasing the A1 pulley with a 21-gauge needle. Materials and Methods This two-part study was approved by the ethics committee, and written consent was obtained from all patients. The first part consisted of 10 procedures on cadaver digits followed by dissection to analyze the effectiveness of the A1 pulley release and detect any collateral damage to the A2 pulley, interdigital nerves, or underlying flexor tendons. The second part was performed during an 18-month period starting in March 2013. It was a prospective clinical study of 60 procedures performed in 48 patients. Outcomes were evaluated through a clinical examination at day 0 and during a 6-month follow-up visit, where the trigger digit was evaluated clinically and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure, or QuickDASH, and patient satisfaction questionnaires were administered. Results No complications were found during the cadaver study. However, the release was considered "partial" in all fingers. In the clinical study, the trigger finger was completely resolved in 81.7% (49 of 60) of cases immediately after the procedure. Moderate trigger finger persisted in 10 cases, and one thumb pulley could not be released. A US-guided corticosteroid injection was subsequently performed in these 11 cases. At 6-month follow-up, only two cases still had moderate trigger finger and there were no late complications. The mean QuickDASH questionnaire score was 4; all patients said they were satisfied. Conclusion US-guided treatment of the trigger finger by using a 21-gauge needle is feasible in current practice, with minimal complications. (©) RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>26919442</pmid><doi>10.1148/radiol.2016151886</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-8419
ispartof Radiology, 2016-08, Vol.280 (2), p.493-499
issn 0033-8419
1527-1315
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1805768628
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cadaver
Female
Fingers - diagnostic imaging
Fingers - surgery
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Needles
Orthopedic Procedures - instrumentation
Orthopedic Procedures - methods
Prospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Trigger Finger Disorder - diagnostic imaging
Trigger Finger Disorder - surgery
Ultrasonography, Interventional
title US-guided Percutaneous Release of the Trigger Finger by Using a 21-gauge Needle: A Prospective Study of 60 Cases
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T06%3A18%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=US-guided%20Percutaneous%20Release%20of%20the%20Trigger%20Finger%20by%20Using%20a%2021-gauge%20Needle:%20A%20Prospective%20Study%20of%2060%20Cases&rft.jtitle=Radiology&rft.au=Lap%C3%A8gue,%20Franck&rft.date=2016-08&rft.volume=280&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=493&rft.epage=499&rft.pages=493-499&rft.issn=0033-8419&rft.eissn=1527-1315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2016151886&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1805768628%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1805768628&rft_id=info:pmid/26919442&rfr_iscdi=true