Evaluation of the current state of mechanistic aquatic biogeochemical modeling

The need for predictive process-oriented planktonic ecosystem models is widely recognized by the aquatic science community. We conducted a meta-analysis of recent mechanistic aquatic biogeochemical models (153 studies published from 1990 to 2002), to assess their ability to predict spatial and tempo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek) 2004-04, Vol.271, p.13-26
Hauptverfasser: Arhonditsis, George B., Brett, Michael T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 26
container_issue
container_start_page 13
container_title Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)
container_volume 271
creator Arhonditsis, George B.
Brett, Michael T.
description The need for predictive process-oriented planktonic ecosystem models is widely recognized by the aquatic science community. We conducted a meta-analysis of recent mechanistic aquatic biogeochemical models (153 studies published from 1990 to 2002), to assess their ability to predict spatial and temporal patterns in the physical, chemical and biological dynamics of planktonic systems. The selected modeling studies covered a wide range of model complexity, ecosystem-types, spatio-temporal scales and purposes for model development. Despite the heterogeneous nature of this data set, we were able to identify model behavior trends and illuminate aspects of current modeling practice that need to be reevaluated. Temperature and dissolved oxygen had the highest coefficients of determination (respective median r² values were 0.93 and 0.70) and the lowest relative error (median RE < 10%), nutrients and phytoplankton had intermediate predictability (median r² values ranging from 0.40 to 0.60 and median RE ~ 40%), whereas bacteria (median r² = 0.06) and zooplankton (median RE = 70%) dynamics were poorly predicted. Longer simulation periods (i.e. months to decades) reduced model predictability, and increased model complexity did not improve fit. Aquatic biogeochemical modelers need to be more consistent in how they apply conventional methodological steps during model development (i.e. sensitivity analysis, validation), and the aquatic modeling community should adopt generally accepted standards of model performance. Recent advancements in data assimilation techniques, the combination of the present family of models with goal functions (derived from non-equilibrium thermodynamics) and the development of models with a stronger physiological basis are promising frameworks for obtaining more accurate simulations of planktonic processes.
doi_str_mv 10.3354/meps271013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18056871</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24867420</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24867420</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-91c058f1feaccfdf02c2b609d4b3e0617842d5ab7bb12da9e68ec5e204117dcd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0EtLw0AQAOBFFKzVi3chFz0I0Z1N9pGjlPqAohc9h81m0m5Jsu3uVvDfm9Bij54GZr4ZZoaQa6APWcbzxw43gUmgkJ2QCQgQKfCiOCUTChJSJTJ6Ti5CWFMKIpdiQt7n37rd6Whdn7gmiStMzM577GMSoo44Jjs0K93bEK1J9HbEJqmsW6IzK-ys0W3SuRpb2y8vyVmj24BXhzglX8_zz9lruvh4eZs9LVKTySKmBRjKVQMNamOauqHMsErQos6rDKkAqXJWc13JqgJW6wKFQsOR0RxA1qbOpuRuP3fj3XaHIZadDQbbVvfodqEERblQEv6HslBcUTnA-z003oXgsSk33nba_5RAy_G35fG3A749TNVhOL_xujc2HDu4ysdVB3ezd-sQnf-rs1wJmTOa_QLFCIR4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17985807</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the current state of mechanistic aquatic biogeochemical modeling</title><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)</source><source>Inter-Research Science Center Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Arhonditsis, George B. ; Brett, Michael T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Arhonditsis, George B. ; Brett, Michael T.</creatorcontrib><description>The need for predictive process-oriented planktonic ecosystem models is widely recognized by the aquatic science community. We conducted a meta-analysis of recent mechanistic aquatic biogeochemical models (153 studies published from 1990 to 2002), to assess their ability to predict spatial and temporal patterns in the physical, chemical and biological dynamics of planktonic systems. The selected modeling studies covered a wide range of model complexity, ecosystem-types, spatio-temporal scales and purposes for model development. Despite the heterogeneous nature of this data set, we were able to identify model behavior trends and illuminate aspects of current modeling practice that need to be reevaluated. Temperature and dissolved oxygen had the highest coefficients of determination (respective median r² values were 0.93 and 0.70) and the lowest relative error (median RE &lt; 10%), nutrients and phytoplankton had intermediate predictability (median r² values ranging from 0.40 to 0.60 and median RE ~ 40%), whereas bacteria (median r² = 0.06) and zooplankton (median RE = 70%) dynamics were poorly predicted. Longer simulation periods (i.e. months to decades) reduced model predictability, and increased model complexity did not improve fit. Aquatic biogeochemical modelers need to be more consistent in how they apply conventional methodological steps during model development (i.e. sensitivity analysis, validation), and the aquatic modeling community should adopt generally accepted standards of model performance. Recent advancements in data assimilation techniques, the combination of the present family of models with goal functions (derived from non-equilibrium thermodynamics) and the development of models with a stronger physiological basis are promising frameworks for obtaining more accurate simulations of planktonic processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0171-8630</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1616-1599</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3354/meps271013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oldendorf: Inter-Research</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biogeochemistry ; Biological and medical sciences ; Ecological modeling ; Ecosystem models ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Marine ; Marine ecosystems ; Modeling ; Parametric models ; Phytoplankton ; Plankton ; Sea water ecosystems ; Seas ; Simulations ; Synecology</subject><ispartof>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 2004-04, Vol.271, p.13-26</ispartof><rights>Inter-Research 2004</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-91c058f1feaccfdf02c2b609d4b3e0617842d5ab7bb12da9e68ec5e204117dcd3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24867420$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24867420$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,3759,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15840411$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arhonditsis, George B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brett, Michael T.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the current state of mechanistic aquatic biogeochemical modeling</title><title>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</title><description>The need for predictive process-oriented planktonic ecosystem models is widely recognized by the aquatic science community. We conducted a meta-analysis of recent mechanistic aquatic biogeochemical models (153 studies published from 1990 to 2002), to assess their ability to predict spatial and temporal patterns in the physical, chemical and biological dynamics of planktonic systems. The selected modeling studies covered a wide range of model complexity, ecosystem-types, spatio-temporal scales and purposes for model development. Despite the heterogeneous nature of this data set, we were able to identify model behavior trends and illuminate aspects of current modeling practice that need to be reevaluated. Temperature and dissolved oxygen had the highest coefficients of determination (respective median r² values were 0.93 and 0.70) and the lowest relative error (median RE &lt; 10%), nutrients and phytoplankton had intermediate predictability (median r² values ranging from 0.40 to 0.60 and median RE ~ 40%), whereas bacteria (median r² = 0.06) and zooplankton (median RE = 70%) dynamics were poorly predicted. Longer simulation periods (i.e. months to decades) reduced model predictability, and increased model complexity did not improve fit. Aquatic biogeochemical modelers need to be more consistent in how they apply conventional methodological steps during model development (i.e. sensitivity analysis, validation), and the aquatic modeling community should adopt generally accepted standards of model performance. Recent advancements in data assimilation techniques, the combination of the present family of models with goal functions (derived from non-equilibrium thermodynamics) and the development of models with a stronger physiological basis are promising frameworks for obtaining more accurate simulations of planktonic processes.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biogeochemistry</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Ecological modeling</subject><subject>Ecosystem models</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine ecosystems</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Parametric models</subject><subject>Phytoplankton</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>Sea water ecosystems</subject><subject>Seas</subject><subject>Simulations</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><issn>0171-8630</issn><issn>1616-1599</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0EtLw0AQAOBFFKzVi3chFz0I0Z1N9pGjlPqAohc9h81m0m5Jsu3uVvDfm9Bij54GZr4ZZoaQa6APWcbzxw43gUmgkJ2QCQgQKfCiOCUTChJSJTJ6Ti5CWFMKIpdiQt7n37rd6Whdn7gmiStMzM577GMSoo44Jjs0K93bEK1J9HbEJqmsW6IzK-ys0W3SuRpb2y8vyVmj24BXhzglX8_zz9lruvh4eZs9LVKTySKmBRjKVQMNamOauqHMsErQos6rDKkAqXJWc13JqgJW6wKFQsOR0RxA1qbOpuRuP3fj3XaHIZadDQbbVvfodqEERblQEv6HslBcUTnA-z003oXgsSk33nba_5RAy_G35fG3A749TNVhOL_xujc2HDu4ysdVB3ezd-sQnf-rs1wJmTOa_QLFCIR4</recordid><startdate>20040428</startdate><enddate>20040428</enddate><creator>Arhonditsis, George B.</creator><creator>Brett, Michael T.</creator><general>Inter-Research</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>H95</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040428</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the current state of mechanistic aquatic biogeochemical modeling</title><author>Arhonditsis, George B. ; Brett, Michael T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-91c058f1feaccfdf02c2b609d4b3e0617842d5ab7bb12da9e68ec5e204117dcd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biogeochemistry</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Ecological modeling</topic><topic>Ecosystem models</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine ecosystems</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Parametric models</topic><topic>Phytoplankton</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>Sea water ecosystems</topic><topic>Seas</topic><topic>Simulations</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arhonditsis, George B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brett, Michael T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arhonditsis, George B.</au><au>Brett, Michael T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the current state of mechanistic aquatic biogeochemical modeling</atitle><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle><date>2004-04-28</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>271</volume><spage>13</spage><epage>26</epage><pages>13-26</pages><issn>0171-8630</issn><eissn>1616-1599</eissn><abstract>The need for predictive process-oriented planktonic ecosystem models is widely recognized by the aquatic science community. We conducted a meta-analysis of recent mechanistic aquatic biogeochemical models (153 studies published from 1990 to 2002), to assess their ability to predict spatial and temporal patterns in the physical, chemical and biological dynamics of planktonic systems. The selected modeling studies covered a wide range of model complexity, ecosystem-types, spatio-temporal scales and purposes for model development. Despite the heterogeneous nature of this data set, we were able to identify model behavior trends and illuminate aspects of current modeling practice that need to be reevaluated. Temperature and dissolved oxygen had the highest coefficients of determination (respective median r² values were 0.93 and 0.70) and the lowest relative error (median RE &lt; 10%), nutrients and phytoplankton had intermediate predictability (median r² values ranging from 0.40 to 0.60 and median RE ~ 40%), whereas bacteria (median r² = 0.06) and zooplankton (median RE = 70%) dynamics were poorly predicted. Longer simulation periods (i.e. months to decades) reduced model predictability, and increased model complexity did not improve fit. Aquatic biogeochemical modelers need to be more consistent in how they apply conventional methodological steps during model development (i.e. sensitivity analysis, validation), and the aquatic modeling community should adopt generally accepted standards of model performance. Recent advancements in data assimilation techniques, the combination of the present family of models with goal functions (derived from non-equilibrium thermodynamics) and the development of models with a stronger physiological basis are promising frameworks for obtaining more accurate simulations of planktonic processes.</abstract><cop>Oldendorf</cop><pub>Inter-Research</pub><doi>10.3354/meps271013</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0171-8630
ispartof Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 2004-04, Vol.271, p.13-26
issn 0171-8630
1616-1599
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18056871
source Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ); Inter-Research Science Center Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; JSTOR
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biogeochemistry
Biological and medical sciences
Ecological modeling
Ecosystem models
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Marine
Marine ecosystems
Modeling
Parametric models
Phytoplankton
Plankton
Sea water ecosystems
Seas
Simulations
Synecology
title Evaluation of the current state of mechanistic aquatic biogeochemical modeling
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T10%3A05%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20current%20state%20of%20mechanistic%20aquatic%20biogeochemical%20modeling&rft.jtitle=Marine%20ecology.%20Progress%20series%20(Halstenbek)&rft.au=Arhonditsis,%20George%20B.&rft.date=2004-04-28&rft.volume=271&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=26&rft.pages=13-26&rft.issn=0171-8630&rft.eissn=1616-1599&rft_id=info:doi/10.3354/meps271013&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24867420%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17985807&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24867420&rfr_iscdi=true