Laurentian and Amazonian sediment sources to Neoproterozoic-lower Paleozoic Maryland Piedmont rocks

Several terranes of variable tectonic affinity and history underlie the central Appalachian Piedmont Province (eastern United States). These terranes mostly consist of widespread metasedimentary and lesser metavolcanic rocks. Intense and pervasive deformation and metamorphism have made the depositio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geosphere (Boulder, Colo.) Colo.), 2015-08, Vol.11 (4), p.1042-1061
Hauptverfasser: Martin, Aaron J, Southworth, Scott, Collins, Jennifer C, Fisher, Steven W, Kingman, III
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1061
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1042
container_title Geosphere (Boulder, Colo.)
container_volume 11
creator Martin, Aaron J
Southworth, Scott
Collins, Jennifer C
Fisher, Steven W
Kingman, III
description Several terranes of variable tectonic affinity and history underlie the central Appalachian Piedmont Province (eastern United States). These terranes mostly consist of widespread metasedimentary and lesser metavolcanic rocks. Intense and pervasive deformation and metamorphism have made the depositional ages and provenance of sediment in these rocks difficult to determine. The lack of tight constraints on such basic information led to a century-long debate about the tectonic significance of these rocks, particularly how they correlate to similar rocks along and across strike in the Appalachian orogen. We address these issues using U/Pb isotopic ages from single spots in 2433 zircon grains from 18 metasedimentary rock samples distributed across the Maryland Piedmont.The resulting age signatures indicate that the Marburg Formation and Prettyboy Schist, heretofore assigned to the Westminster terrane, actually belong to the Potomac terrane, making the Hyattstown thrust the contact between the two terranes. Ediacaran Laurentia could have supplied all Potomac terrane sediment except for the detritus in one sample from the northern part of the terrane that likely came from Amazonia. This is one of the first recognitions of a Gondwana-derived terrane between Carolinia to the south and Ganderia to the north. Maximum depositional ages for Potomac terrane suprasubduction zone sedimentary rocks are latest Neoproterozoic or early Cambrian, and some may have been deposited ca. 510 Ma. Continental rifting ended ca. 560 Ma at the longitude of our study, so the transition from rifting to subduction at this location in eastern Laurentia may have lasted only 50 M.y. Lower Ordovician arc intrusions into these rocks demonstrate that the transition lasted no longer than 90 M.y. The Iapetan margin of central-eastern Laurentia was one of the shortest lived passive margins that formed in Neoproterozoic time.
doi_str_mv 10.1130/GES01140.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1805511185</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1730079879</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a392t-9667b0708e224385ccc6c411548ade37e9a62b9832b6ea0b7815e944ba8e88813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUNFKwzAUDaLgnL74BX0UpZrbNG3yOIZOYepABd9Cmt5JZ9vMpGW4rzd1Cr75dO_hnns45xByCvQSgNGr2fUTBUgD2iMj4JzFNKWv-3_2Q3Lk_YpSJjlLRsTMde-w7SrdRroto0mjt7YdkMeyasIl8rZ3Bn3U2egB7drZDp3d2srEtd2gixa6xm8c3Wv3WQ8qiwrLxoZfZ827PyYHS117PPmZY_Jyc_08vY3nj7O76WQeayaTLpZZlhc0pwKTJGWCG2MykwLwVOgSWY5SZ0khBUuKDDUtcgEcZZoWWqAQAtiYnO10g8ePHn2nmsobrIMltL1XICjnACD4_9ScUZpLkctAPd9RjbPeO1yqtauakFQBVUPp6rd0NVi42JHf0HpTYWtwY11dqlUosQ3hVUKBq5CSQsa-AP1lg24</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1730079879</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Laurentian and Amazonian sediment sources to Neoproterozoic-lower Paleozoic Maryland Piedmont rocks</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Martin, Aaron J ; Southworth, Scott ; Collins, Jennifer C ; Fisher, Steven W ; Kingman, III</creator><creatorcontrib>Martin, Aaron J ; Southworth, Scott ; Collins, Jennifer C ; Fisher, Steven W ; Kingman, III</creatorcontrib><description>Several terranes of variable tectonic affinity and history underlie the central Appalachian Piedmont Province (eastern United States). These terranes mostly consist of widespread metasedimentary and lesser metavolcanic rocks. Intense and pervasive deformation and metamorphism have made the depositional ages and provenance of sediment in these rocks difficult to determine. The lack of tight constraints on such basic information led to a century-long debate about the tectonic significance of these rocks, particularly how they correlate to similar rocks along and across strike in the Appalachian orogen. We address these issues using U/Pb isotopic ages from single spots in 2433 zircon grains from 18 metasedimentary rock samples distributed across the Maryland Piedmont.The resulting age signatures indicate that the Marburg Formation and Prettyboy Schist, heretofore assigned to the Westminster terrane, actually belong to the Potomac terrane, making the Hyattstown thrust the contact between the two terranes. Ediacaran Laurentia could have supplied all Potomac terrane sediment except for the detritus in one sample from the northern part of the terrane that likely came from Amazonia. This is one of the first recognitions of a Gondwana-derived terrane between Carolinia to the south and Ganderia to the north. Maximum depositional ages for Potomac terrane suprasubduction zone sedimentary rocks are latest Neoproterozoic or early Cambrian, and some may have been deposited ca. 510 Ma. Continental rifting ended ca. 560 Ma at the longitude of our study, so the transition from rifting to subduction at this location in eastern Laurentia may have lasted only 50 M.y. Lower Ordovician arc intrusions into these rocks demonstrate that the transition lasted no longer than 90 M.y. The Iapetan margin of central-eastern Laurentia was one of the shortest lived passive margins that formed in Neoproterozoic time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1553-040X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-040X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1130/GES01140.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Geological Society of America</publisher><subject>absolute age ; Age ; Amazonia ; Appalachians ; Central Appalachians ; dates ; Deposition ; Eastern U.S ; Geochronology ; lower Paleozoic ; metamorphic rocks ; metasedimentary rocks ; Neoproterozoic ; nesosilicates ; North America ; orthosilicates ; Paleozoic ; Piedmont ; Piedmonts ; plate tectonics ; Potomac Terrane ; Precambrian ; Proterozoic ; provenance ; rifting ; Rocks ; Sediments ; silicates ; Stratigraphy ; Strikes ; subduction ; Tectonics ; tectonostratigraphic units ; terranes ; U/Pb ; United States ; upper Precambrian ; zircon ; zircon group</subject><ispartof>Geosphere (Boulder, Colo.), 2015-08, Vol.11 (4), p.1042-1061</ispartof><rights>GeoRef, Copyright 2022, American Geosciences Institute. Reference includes data from GeoScienceWorld @Alexandria, VA @USA @United States. Reference includes data supplied by the Geological Society of America @Boulder, CO @USA @United States</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a392t-9667b0708e224385ccc6c411548ade37e9a62b9832b6ea0b7815e944ba8e88813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a392t-9667b0708e224385ccc6c411548ade37e9a62b9832b6ea0b7815e944ba8e88813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martin, Aaron J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Southworth, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Jennifer C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Steven W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingman, III</creatorcontrib><title>Laurentian and Amazonian sediment sources to Neoproterozoic-lower Paleozoic Maryland Piedmont rocks</title><title>Geosphere (Boulder, Colo.)</title><description>Several terranes of variable tectonic affinity and history underlie the central Appalachian Piedmont Province (eastern United States). These terranes mostly consist of widespread metasedimentary and lesser metavolcanic rocks. Intense and pervasive deformation and metamorphism have made the depositional ages and provenance of sediment in these rocks difficult to determine. The lack of tight constraints on such basic information led to a century-long debate about the tectonic significance of these rocks, particularly how they correlate to similar rocks along and across strike in the Appalachian orogen. We address these issues using U/Pb isotopic ages from single spots in 2433 zircon grains from 18 metasedimentary rock samples distributed across the Maryland Piedmont.The resulting age signatures indicate that the Marburg Formation and Prettyboy Schist, heretofore assigned to the Westminster terrane, actually belong to the Potomac terrane, making the Hyattstown thrust the contact between the two terranes. Ediacaran Laurentia could have supplied all Potomac terrane sediment except for the detritus in one sample from the northern part of the terrane that likely came from Amazonia. This is one of the first recognitions of a Gondwana-derived terrane between Carolinia to the south and Ganderia to the north. Maximum depositional ages for Potomac terrane suprasubduction zone sedimentary rocks are latest Neoproterozoic or early Cambrian, and some may have been deposited ca. 510 Ma. Continental rifting ended ca. 560 Ma at the longitude of our study, so the transition from rifting to subduction at this location in eastern Laurentia may have lasted only 50 M.y. Lower Ordovician arc intrusions into these rocks demonstrate that the transition lasted no longer than 90 M.y. The Iapetan margin of central-eastern Laurentia was one of the shortest lived passive margins that formed in Neoproterozoic time.</description><subject>absolute age</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Amazonia</subject><subject>Appalachians</subject><subject>Central Appalachians</subject><subject>dates</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>Eastern U.S</subject><subject>Geochronology</subject><subject>lower Paleozoic</subject><subject>metamorphic rocks</subject><subject>metasedimentary rocks</subject><subject>Neoproterozoic</subject><subject>nesosilicates</subject><subject>North America</subject><subject>orthosilicates</subject><subject>Paleozoic</subject><subject>Piedmont</subject><subject>Piedmonts</subject><subject>plate tectonics</subject><subject>Potomac Terrane</subject><subject>Precambrian</subject><subject>Proterozoic</subject><subject>provenance</subject><subject>rifting</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>silicates</subject><subject>Stratigraphy</subject><subject>Strikes</subject><subject>subduction</subject><subject>Tectonics</subject><subject>tectonostratigraphic units</subject><subject>terranes</subject><subject>U/Pb</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>upper Precambrian</subject><subject>zircon</subject><subject>zircon group</subject><issn>1553-040X</issn><issn>1553-040X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUNFKwzAUDaLgnL74BX0UpZrbNG3yOIZOYepABd9Cmt5JZ9vMpGW4rzd1Cr75dO_hnns45xByCvQSgNGr2fUTBUgD2iMj4JzFNKWv-3_2Q3Lk_YpSJjlLRsTMde-w7SrdRroto0mjt7YdkMeyasIl8rZ3Bn3U2egB7drZDp3d2srEtd2gixa6xm8c3Wv3WQ8qiwrLxoZfZ827PyYHS117PPmZY_Jyc_08vY3nj7O76WQeayaTLpZZlhc0pwKTJGWCG2MykwLwVOgSWY5SZ0khBUuKDDUtcgEcZZoWWqAQAtiYnO10g8ePHn2nmsobrIMltL1XICjnACD4_9ScUZpLkctAPd9RjbPeO1yqtauakFQBVUPp6rd0NVi42JHf0HpTYWtwY11dqlUosQ3hVUKBq5CSQsa-AP1lg24</recordid><startdate>20150801</startdate><enddate>20150801</enddate><creator>Martin, Aaron J</creator><creator>Southworth, Scott</creator><creator>Collins, Jennifer C</creator><creator>Fisher, Steven W</creator><creator>Kingman, III</creator><general>Geological Society of America</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150801</creationdate><title>Laurentian and Amazonian sediment sources to Neoproterozoic-lower Paleozoic Maryland Piedmont rocks</title><author>Martin, Aaron J ; Southworth, Scott ; Collins, Jennifer C ; Fisher, Steven W ; Kingman, III</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a392t-9667b0708e224385ccc6c411548ade37e9a62b9832b6ea0b7815e944ba8e88813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>absolute age</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Amazonia</topic><topic>Appalachians</topic><topic>Central Appalachians</topic><topic>dates</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>Eastern U.S</topic><topic>Geochronology</topic><topic>lower Paleozoic</topic><topic>metamorphic rocks</topic><topic>metasedimentary rocks</topic><topic>Neoproterozoic</topic><topic>nesosilicates</topic><topic>North America</topic><topic>orthosilicates</topic><topic>Paleozoic</topic><topic>Piedmont</topic><topic>Piedmonts</topic><topic>plate tectonics</topic><topic>Potomac Terrane</topic><topic>Precambrian</topic><topic>Proterozoic</topic><topic>provenance</topic><topic>rifting</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>silicates</topic><topic>Stratigraphy</topic><topic>Strikes</topic><topic>subduction</topic><topic>Tectonics</topic><topic>tectonostratigraphic units</topic><topic>terranes</topic><topic>U/Pb</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>upper Precambrian</topic><topic>zircon</topic><topic>zircon group</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martin, Aaron J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Southworth, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Jennifer C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Steven W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingman, III</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Geosphere (Boulder, Colo.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martin, Aaron J</au><au>Southworth, Scott</au><au>Collins, Jennifer C</au><au>Fisher, Steven W</au><au>Kingman, III</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Laurentian and Amazonian sediment sources to Neoproterozoic-lower Paleozoic Maryland Piedmont rocks</atitle><jtitle>Geosphere (Boulder, Colo.)</jtitle><date>2015-08-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1042</spage><epage>1061</epage><pages>1042-1061</pages><issn>1553-040X</issn><eissn>1553-040X</eissn><abstract>Several terranes of variable tectonic affinity and history underlie the central Appalachian Piedmont Province (eastern United States). These terranes mostly consist of widespread metasedimentary and lesser metavolcanic rocks. Intense and pervasive deformation and metamorphism have made the depositional ages and provenance of sediment in these rocks difficult to determine. The lack of tight constraints on such basic information led to a century-long debate about the tectonic significance of these rocks, particularly how they correlate to similar rocks along and across strike in the Appalachian orogen. We address these issues using U/Pb isotopic ages from single spots in 2433 zircon grains from 18 metasedimentary rock samples distributed across the Maryland Piedmont.The resulting age signatures indicate that the Marburg Formation and Prettyboy Schist, heretofore assigned to the Westminster terrane, actually belong to the Potomac terrane, making the Hyattstown thrust the contact between the two terranes. Ediacaran Laurentia could have supplied all Potomac terrane sediment except for the detritus in one sample from the northern part of the terrane that likely came from Amazonia. This is one of the first recognitions of a Gondwana-derived terrane between Carolinia to the south and Ganderia to the north. Maximum depositional ages for Potomac terrane suprasubduction zone sedimentary rocks are latest Neoproterozoic or early Cambrian, and some may have been deposited ca. 510 Ma. Continental rifting ended ca. 560 Ma at the longitude of our study, so the transition from rifting to subduction at this location in eastern Laurentia may have lasted only 50 M.y. Lower Ordovician arc intrusions into these rocks demonstrate that the transition lasted no longer than 90 M.y. The Iapetan margin of central-eastern Laurentia was one of the shortest lived passive margins that formed in Neoproterozoic time.</abstract><pub>Geological Society of America</pub><doi>10.1130/GES01140.1</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1553-040X
ispartof Geosphere (Boulder, Colo.), 2015-08, Vol.11 (4), p.1042-1061
issn 1553-040X
1553-040X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1805511185
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects absolute age
Age
Amazonia
Appalachians
Central Appalachians
dates
Deposition
Eastern U.S
Geochronology
lower Paleozoic
metamorphic rocks
metasedimentary rocks
Neoproterozoic
nesosilicates
North America
orthosilicates
Paleozoic
Piedmont
Piedmonts
plate tectonics
Potomac Terrane
Precambrian
Proterozoic
provenance
rifting
Rocks
Sediments
silicates
Stratigraphy
Strikes
subduction
Tectonics
tectonostratigraphic units
terranes
U/Pb
United States
upper Precambrian
zircon
zircon group
title Laurentian and Amazonian sediment sources to Neoproterozoic-lower Paleozoic Maryland Piedmont rocks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T09%3A28%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laurentian%20and%20Amazonian%20sediment%20sources%20to%20Neoproterozoic-lower%20Paleozoic%20Maryland%20Piedmont%20rocks&rft.jtitle=Geosphere%20(Boulder,%20Colo.)&rft.au=Martin,%20Aaron%20J&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1042&rft.epage=1061&rft.pages=1042-1061&rft.issn=1553-040X&rft.eissn=1553-040X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1130/GES01140.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1730079879%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1730079879&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true