Short form development of the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding: Applying confirmatory factor analysis, item response theory, and cognitive interviews to scale reduction

The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR) is one of the most commonly used measures of socially desirable responding. It consists of two subscales, Self-Deceptive Enhancement (SDE) and Impression Management (IM), containing 20 statements each, answered on a 7-point scale. The purpose of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Personality and individual differences 2016-07, Vol.96, p.212-221
Hauptverfasser: Asgeirsdottir, Ragnhildur Lilja, Vésteinsdóttir, Vaka, Thorsdottir, Fanney
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 221
container_issue
container_start_page 212
container_title Personality and individual differences
container_volume 96
creator Asgeirsdottir, Ragnhildur Lilja
Vésteinsdóttir, Vaka
Thorsdottir, Fanney
description The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR) is one of the most commonly used measures of socially desirable responding. It consists of two subscales, Self-Deceptive Enhancement (SDE) and Impression Management (IM), containing 20 statements each, answered on a 7-point scale. The purpose of this paper was to analyze the items on the SDE and IM for a suggested short form version of the scale. Three studies were conducted using the Icelandic version of the BIDR. The first study (N=579) focused on analyzing the items using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Item Response Theory (IRT), the second study (N=471) examined the effects of faking instructions on an item level and in the third study (N=20) Cognitive Interviews (CI) with probing were used in order to identify problematic items. Based on results from CFA, IRT, the effects of instructional variations and CI, a short form version of the BIDR-6 was introduced, containing 12 SDE items and 12 IM items. The results suggest that the psychometric properties of measurements obtained with the short form version were adequate. •BIDR items were analyzed using CFA, IRT, Cognitive Interviews and faking instructions.•A short form of the BIDR was introduced, containing 12 SDE items and 12 IM items.•The psychometric properties of the BIDR short form were adequate.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.083
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1805492352</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0191886916301398</els_id><sourcerecordid>1805492352</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-e0f090d302962cb1bafbcdbd1e12c05afbceb398864997fed5d40c0064732cc83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UctuFDEQtBBILAk_wMlHDpmhbe_sjhGXEF6RIiEFOFseu514NWMPtnej_a18IZ4s55z6VdWtriLkHYOWAdt82LWz9rblNW-Bt9CLF2TF-q1oRLeWL8kKmGRN32_ka_Im5x0AdB2XK_L46z6mQl1ME7V4wDHOE4ZCo6PlHulnPepg0NLrcKjtmI7L5Atmn_QwIr3FPMdgfbj7SC_neTzWjJoYnE-TfoI7bWqkOujxmH2-oL7gRNMTL-NypKIu6txW3l3wxR-Q-lAwHTw-ZFoizUbXUwnt3hQfwzl55fSY8e3_eEb-fPv6--pHc_Pz-_XV5U1jhBClQXAgwQrgcsPNwAbtBmMHy5BxA91S4SBk1WQt5dah7ewaDMBmvRXcmF6ckfenvXOKf_eYi5p8NjhWRTDus2I9VG256HiF8hPUpJhzQqfm5CedjoqBWgxSO7UYpBaDFHBVDaqkTycS1ifqs0ll43FR2yc0Rdnon6P_A1yfn1A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1805492352</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Short form development of the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding: Applying confirmatory factor analysis, item response theory, and cognitive interviews to scale reduction</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Asgeirsdottir, Ragnhildur Lilja ; Vésteinsdóttir, Vaka ; Thorsdottir, Fanney</creator><creatorcontrib>Asgeirsdottir, Ragnhildur Lilja ; Vésteinsdóttir, Vaka ; Thorsdottir, Fanney</creatorcontrib><description>The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR) is one of the most commonly used measures of socially desirable responding. It consists of two subscales, Self-Deceptive Enhancement (SDE) and Impression Management (IM), containing 20 statements each, answered on a 7-point scale. The purpose of this paper was to analyze the items on the SDE and IM for a suggested short form version of the scale. Three studies were conducted using the Icelandic version of the BIDR. The first study (N=579) focused on analyzing the items using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Item Response Theory (IRT), the second study (N=471) examined the effects of faking instructions on an item level and in the third study (N=20) Cognitive Interviews (CI) with probing were used in order to identify problematic items. Based on results from CFA, IRT, the effects of instructional variations and CI, a short form version of the BIDR-6 was introduced, containing 12 SDE items and 12 IM items. The results suggest that the psychometric properties of measurements obtained with the short form version were adequate. •BIDR items were analyzed using CFA, IRT, Cognitive Interviews and faking instructions.•A short form of the BIDR was introduced, containing 12 SDE items and 12 IM items.•The psychometric properties of the BIDR short form were adequate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0191-8869</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3549</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.083</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding ; Cognitive interviews ; Confirmatory factor analysis ; Item response theory ; Short form development ; Socially desirable responding</subject><ispartof>Personality and individual differences, 2016-07, Vol.96, p.212-221</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-e0f090d302962cb1bafbcdbd1e12c05afbceb398864997fed5d40c0064732cc83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-e0f090d302962cb1bafbcdbd1e12c05afbceb398864997fed5d40c0064732cc83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.083$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Asgeirsdottir, Ragnhildur Lilja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vésteinsdóttir, Vaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorsdottir, Fanney</creatorcontrib><title>Short form development of the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding: Applying confirmatory factor analysis, item response theory, and cognitive interviews to scale reduction</title><title>Personality and individual differences</title><description>The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR) is one of the most commonly used measures of socially desirable responding. It consists of two subscales, Self-Deceptive Enhancement (SDE) and Impression Management (IM), containing 20 statements each, answered on a 7-point scale. The purpose of this paper was to analyze the items on the SDE and IM for a suggested short form version of the scale. Three studies were conducted using the Icelandic version of the BIDR. The first study (N=579) focused on analyzing the items using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Item Response Theory (IRT), the second study (N=471) examined the effects of faking instructions on an item level and in the third study (N=20) Cognitive Interviews (CI) with probing were used in order to identify problematic items. Based on results from CFA, IRT, the effects of instructional variations and CI, a short form version of the BIDR-6 was introduced, containing 12 SDE items and 12 IM items. The results suggest that the psychometric properties of measurements obtained with the short form version were adequate. •BIDR items were analyzed using CFA, IRT, Cognitive Interviews and faking instructions.•A short form of the BIDR was introduced, containing 12 SDE items and 12 IM items.•The psychometric properties of the BIDR short form were adequate.</description><subject>Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding</subject><subject>Cognitive interviews</subject><subject>Confirmatory factor analysis</subject><subject>Item response theory</subject><subject>Short form development</subject><subject>Socially desirable responding</subject><issn>0191-8869</issn><issn>1873-3549</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UctuFDEQtBBILAk_wMlHDpmhbe_sjhGXEF6RIiEFOFseu514NWMPtnej_a18IZ4s55z6VdWtriLkHYOWAdt82LWz9rblNW-Bt9CLF2TF-q1oRLeWL8kKmGRN32_ka_Im5x0AdB2XK_L46z6mQl1ME7V4wDHOE4ZCo6PlHulnPepg0NLrcKjtmI7L5Atmn_QwIr3FPMdgfbj7SC_neTzWjJoYnE-TfoI7bWqkOujxmH2-oL7gRNMTL-NypKIu6txW3l3wxR-Q-lAwHTw-ZFoizUbXUwnt3hQfwzl55fSY8e3_eEb-fPv6--pHc_Pz-_XV5U1jhBClQXAgwQrgcsPNwAbtBmMHy5BxA91S4SBk1WQt5dah7ewaDMBmvRXcmF6ckfenvXOKf_eYi5p8NjhWRTDus2I9VG256HiF8hPUpJhzQqfm5CedjoqBWgxSO7UYpBaDFHBVDaqkTycS1ifqs0ll43FR2yc0Rdnon6P_A1yfn1A</recordid><startdate>201607</startdate><enddate>201607</enddate><creator>Asgeirsdottir, Ragnhildur Lilja</creator><creator>Vésteinsdóttir, Vaka</creator><creator>Thorsdottir, Fanney</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201607</creationdate><title>Short form development of the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding: Applying confirmatory factor analysis, item response theory, and cognitive interviews to scale reduction</title><author>Asgeirsdottir, Ragnhildur Lilja ; Vésteinsdóttir, Vaka ; Thorsdottir, Fanney</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-e0f090d302962cb1bafbcdbd1e12c05afbceb398864997fed5d40c0064732cc83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding</topic><topic>Cognitive interviews</topic><topic>Confirmatory factor analysis</topic><topic>Item response theory</topic><topic>Short form development</topic><topic>Socially desirable responding</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Asgeirsdottir, Ragnhildur Lilja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vésteinsdóttir, Vaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorsdottir, Fanney</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Personality and individual differences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Asgeirsdottir, Ragnhildur Lilja</au><au>Vésteinsdóttir, Vaka</au><au>Thorsdottir, Fanney</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Short form development of the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding: Applying confirmatory factor analysis, item response theory, and cognitive interviews to scale reduction</atitle><jtitle>Personality and individual differences</jtitle><date>2016-07</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>96</volume><spage>212</spage><epage>221</epage><pages>212-221</pages><issn>0191-8869</issn><eissn>1873-3549</eissn><abstract>The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR) is one of the most commonly used measures of socially desirable responding. It consists of two subscales, Self-Deceptive Enhancement (SDE) and Impression Management (IM), containing 20 statements each, answered on a 7-point scale. The purpose of this paper was to analyze the items on the SDE and IM for a suggested short form version of the scale. Three studies were conducted using the Icelandic version of the BIDR. The first study (N=579) focused on analyzing the items using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Item Response Theory (IRT), the second study (N=471) examined the effects of faking instructions on an item level and in the third study (N=20) Cognitive Interviews (CI) with probing were used in order to identify problematic items. Based on results from CFA, IRT, the effects of instructional variations and CI, a short form version of the BIDR-6 was introduced, containing 12 SDE items and 12 IM items. The results suggest that the psychometric properties of measurements obtained with the short form version were adequate. •BIDR items were analyzed using CFA, IRT, Cognitive Interviews and faking instructions.•A short form of the BIDR was introduced, containing 12 SDE items and 12 IM items.•The psychometric properties of the BIDR short form were adequate.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.083</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0191-8869
ispartof Personality and individual differences, 2016-07, Vol.96, p.212-221
issn 0191-8869
1873-3549
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1805492352
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding
Cognitive interviews
Confirmatory factor analysis
Item response theory
Short form development
Socially desirable responding
title Short form development of the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding: Applying confirmatory factor analysis, item response theory, and cognitive interviews to scale reduction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T14%3A42%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Short%20form%20development%20of%20the%20Balanced%20Inventory%20of%20Desirable%20Responding:%20Applying%20confirmatory%20factor%20analysis,%20item%20response%20theory,%20and%20cognitive%20interviews%20to%20scale%20reduction&rft.jtitle=Personality%20and%20individual%20differences&rft.au=Asgeirsdottir,%20Ragnhildur%20Lilja&rft.date=2016-07&rft.volume=96&rft.spage=212&rft.epage=221&rft.pages=212-221&rft.issn=0191-8869&rft.eissn=1873-3549&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.083&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1805492352%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1805492352&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0191886916301398&rfr_iscdi=true