Serological and molecular investigation of Ehrlichia spp. and Anaplasma spp. in ticks and blood of dogs, in the Thrace Region of Turkey

In recent years, tick-borne diseases like ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis became widespread worldwide threatening the health of both human and companion animals. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the presence of Anaplasma spp., and Ehrlichia spp. in dogs and ticks in the Thrace Region...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ticks and tick-borne diseases 2016-07, Vol.7 (5), p.706-714
Hauptverfasser: Çetinkaya, Handan, Matur, Erdal, Akyazi, İbrahim, Ekiz, Elif Ergul, Aydin, Levent, Toparlak, Mufit
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 714
container_issue 5
container_start_page 706
container_title Ticks and tick-borne diseases
container_volume 7
creator Çetinkaya, Handan
Matur, Erdal
Akyazi, İbrahim
Ekiz, Elif Ergul
Aydin, Levent
Toparlak, Mufit
description In recent years, tick-borne diseases like ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis became widespread worldwide threatening the health of both human and companion animals. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the presence of Anaplasma spp., and Ehrlichia spp. in dogs and ticks in the Thrace Region of Turkey. A total of 400 blood samples and 912 ticks were collected from dogs living in shelters that are located in four cities (Istanbul, Edirne, Tekirdag and Kirklareli) of the Thrace Region. Blood and buffy coat smears were prepared for microscopic examination. Hematologic and serologic analyses were performed using cell counter and commercial Snap3Dx test kit, respectively. Eight hundred fifty of collected ticks were classified as Rhipicephalus sanguineus, 33 as Rhipicephalus turanicus and 29 as Ixodes ricinus. After DNA extraction from blood samples and pooled ticks (127 tick pools, in total), nested PCR was performed to detect the DNA of Anaplasma spp., and Ehrlichia spp. The seroprevalence of Ehrlichia canis was 27.25% (109) by Snap3Dx test and the total molecular positivity was 11.75% (47) in dog blood samples and 21.25% (27) in tick pools by nested PCR. The frequencies of the infected blood samples with E. canis, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Anaplasma platys were detected as 6%, 4% and 6%, respectively. E. canis and A. platys were detected in R. sanguineus pools with a ratio of 15.75% and 0.7%, respectively. In addition, A. platys was also detected in R. turanicus pools (0.7%). A. phagocytophilum was found only in I. ricinus pools (3.93%). Morulae of three species were detected in buffy coat and blood smears. While anemia was observed in dogs infected with E. canis and co-infected (with one or more species), thrombocytopenia was observed only in co-infected dogs. This is the first study providing evidence for the presence of Anaplasma spp. and Ehrlichia spp. in dogs and ticks in the Thrace Region of Turkey. Based on the results of the tests used in this study, we recommend the combined use of serologic, molecular, cytologic, hematologic analyses and physical examination of tick exposure for an accurate diagnosis of ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2016.02.021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1805489134</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1805489134</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-ab7b68241059638f1e8ec423f0a9a5b3cae51e0cdfff9ff09f7fbfbc1ed875cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UdtKAzEQDaLYUvsHInn0wa7JZq-PpdQLFASt4FvIZidt2uxmTXaFfoG_7fZmGMhM5pwzTA5Ct5QElNDkcRO0bVFqH4R9FZCwD3qBhjRL00meEHZ5zuP8a4DG3m9IfxiNsjS8RoMwyRMaptEQ_X6As8autBQGi7rElTUgOyMc1vUP-FavRKttja3C87UzWq61wL5pggN6WovGCF-dnnSNWy23_tArjLXlnlfalX849NaAl2snJOB3WJ1Ul53bwu4GXSlhPIxP9wh9Ps2Xs5fJ4u35dTZdTCRLWTsRRVokWRhREucJyxSFDGQUMkVELuKCSQExBSJLpVSuFMlVqgpVSApllsZSshG6P-o2zn53_X680l6CMaIG23lOMxJHWU5Z1EOjI1Q6670DxRunK-F2nBK-d4Fv-NEFvneBk7AP2tPuThO6ooLyn3T-c_YHNHOHeA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1805489134</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Serological and molecular investigation of Ehrlichia spp. and Anaplasma spp. in ticks and blood of dogs, in the Thrace Region of Turkey</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Çetinkaya, Handan ; Matur, Erdal ; Akyazi, İbrahim ; Ekiz, Elif Ergul ; Aydin, Levent ; Toparlak, Mufit</creator><creatorcontrib>Çetinkaya, Handan ; Matur, Erdal ; Akyazi, İbrahim ; Ekiz, Elif Ergul ; Aydin, Levent ; Toparlak, Mufit</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years, tick-borne diseases like ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis became widespread worldwide threatening the health of both human and companion animals. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the presence of Anaplasma spp., and Ehrlichia spp. in dogs and ticks in the Thrace Region of Turkey. A total of 400 blood samples and 912 ticks were collected from dogs living in shelters that are located in four cities (Istanbul, Edirne, Tekirdag and Kirklareli) of the Thrace Region. Blood and buffy coat smears were prepared for microscopic examination. Hematologic and serologic analyses were performed using cell counter and commercial Snap3Dx test kit, respectively. Eight hundred fifty of collected ticks were classified as Rhipicephalus sanguineus, 33 as Rhipicephalus turanicus and 29 as Ixodes ricinus. After DNA extraction from blood samples and pooled ticks (127 tick pools, in total), nested PCR was performed to detect the DNA of Anaplasma spp., and Ehrlichia spp. The seroprevalence of Ehrlichia canis was 27.25% (109) by Snap3Dx test and the total molecular positivity was 11.75% (47) in dog blood samples and 21.25% (27) in tick pools by nested PCR. The frequencies of the infected blood samples with E. canis, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Anaplasma platys were detected as 6%, 4% and 6%, respectively. E. canis and A. platys were detected in R. sanguineus pools with a ratio of 15.75% and 0.7%, respectively. In addition, A. platys was also detected in R. turanicus pools (0.7%). A. phagocytophilum was found only in I. ricinus pools (3.93%). Morulae of three species were detected in buffy coat and blood smears. While anemia was observed in dogs infected with E. canis and co-infected (with one or more species), thrombocytopenia was observed only in co-infected dogs. This is the first study providing evidence for the presence of Anaplasma spp. and Ehrlichia spp. in dogs and ticks in the Thrace Region of Turkey. Based on the results of the tests used in this study, we recommend the combined use of serologic, molecular, cytologic, hematologic analyses and physical examination of tick exposure for an accurate diagnosis of ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1877-959X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1877-9603</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2016.02.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26961274</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands</publisher><subject>Anaplasma - classification ; Anaplasma - genetics ; Anaplasma - isolation &amp; purification ; Anaplasmosis - epidemiology ; Animals ; Antibodies, Bacterial - blood ; Blood - immunology ; Blood - microbiology ; Cities ; DNA, Bacterial - genetics ; DNA, Bacterial - isolation &amp; purification ; Dog Diseases - epidemiology ; Dog Diseases - microbiology ; Dogs ; Ehrlichia - classification ; Ehrlichia - genetics ; Ehrlichia - isolation &amp; purification ; Ehrlichiosis - epidemiology ; Ehrlichiosis - veterinary ; Immunoassay ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Seroepidemiologic Studies ; Ticks ; Turkey - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Ticks and tick-borne diseases, 2016-07, Vol.7 (5), p.706-714</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-ab7b68241059638f1e8ec423f0a9a5b3cae51e0cdfff9ff09f7fbfbc1ed875cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-ab7b68241059638f1e8ec423f0a9a5b3cae51e0cdfff9ff09f7fbfbc1ed875cc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26961274$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Çetinkaya, Handan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matur, Erdal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akyazi, İbrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekiz, Elif Ergul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aydin, Levent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toparlak, Mufit</creatorcontrib><title>Serological and molecular investigation of Ehrlichia spp. and Anaplasma spp. in ticks and blood of dogs, in the Thrace Region of Turkey</title><title>Ticks and tick-borne diseases</title><addtitle>Ticks Tick Borne Dis</addtitle><description>In recent years, tick-borne diseases like ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis became widespread worldwide threatening the health of both human and companion animals. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the presence of Anaplasma spp., and Ehrlichia spp. in dogs and ticks in the Thrace Region of Turkey. A total of 400 blood samples and 912 ticks were collected from dogs living in shelters that are located in four cities (Istanbul, Edirne, Tekirdag and Kirklareli) of the Thrace Region. Blood and buffy coat smears were prepared for microscopic examination. Hematologic and serologic analyses were performed using cell counter and commercial Snap3Dx test kit, respectively. Eight hundred fifty of collected ticks were classified as Rhipicephalus sanguineus, 33 as Rhipicephalus turanicus and 29 as Ixodes ricinus. After DNA extraction from blood samples and pooled ticks (127 tick pools, in total), nested PCR was performed to detect the DNA of Anaplasma spp., and Ehrlichia spp. The seroprevalence of Ehrlichia canis was 27.25% (109) by Snap3Dx test and the total molecular positivity was 11.75% (47) in dog blood samples and 21.25% (27) in tick pools by nested PCR. The frequencies of the infected blood samples with E. canis, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Anaplasma platys were detected as 6%, 4% and 6%, respectively. E. canis and A. platys were detected in R. sanguineus pools with a ratio of 15.75% and 0.7%, respectively. In addition, A. platys was also detected in R. turanicus pools (0.7%). A. phagocytophilum was found only in I. ricinus pools (3.93%). Morulae of three species were detected in buffy coat and blood smears. While anemia was observed in dogs infected with E. canis and co-infected (with one or more species), thrombocytopenia was observed only in co-infected dogs. This is the first study providing evidence for the presence of Anaplasma spp. and Ehrlichia spp. in dogs and ticks in the Thrace Region of Turkey. Based on the results of the tests used in this study, we recommend the combined use of serologic, molecular, cytologic, hematologic analyses and physical examination of tick exposure for an accurate diagnosis of ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis.</description><subject>Anaplasma - classification</subject><subject>Anaplasma - genetics</subject><subject>Anaplasma - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Anaplasmosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibodies, Bacterial - blood</subject><subject>Blood - immunology</subject><subject>Blood - microbiology</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Dog Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Dog Diseases - microbiology</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Ehrlichia - classification</subject><subject>Ehrlichia - genetics</subject><subject>Ehrlichia - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Ehrlichiosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Ehrlichiosis - veterinary</subject><subject>Immunoassay</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Seroepidemiologic Studies</subject><subject>Ticks</subject><subject>Turkey - epidemiology</subject><issn>1877-959X</issn><issn>1877-9603</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UdtKAzEQDaLYUvsHInn0wa7JZq-PpdQLFASt4FvIZidt2uxmTXaFfoG_7fZmGMhM5pwzTA5Ct5QElNDkcRO0bVFqH4R9FZCwD3qBhjRL00meEHZ5zuP8a4DG3m9IfxiNsjS8RoMwyRMaptEQ_X6As8autBQGi7rElTUgOyMc1vUP-FavRKttja3C87UzWq61wL5pggN6WovGCF-dnnSNWy23_tArjLXlnlfalX849NaAl2snJOB3WJ1Ul53bwu4GXSlhPIxP9wh9Ps2Xs5fJ4u35dTZdTCRLWTsRRVokWRhREucJyxSFDGQUMkVELuKCSQExBSJLpVSuFMlVqgpVSApllsZSshG6P-o2zn53_X680l6CMaIG23lOMxJHWU5Z1EOjI1Q6670DxRunK-F2nBK-d4Fv-NEFvneBk7AP2tPuThO6ooLyn3T-c_YHNHOHeA</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Çetinkaya, Handan</creator><creator>Matur, Erdal</creator><creator>Akyazi, İbrahim</creator><creator>Ekiz, Elif Ergul</creator><creator>Aydin, Levent</creator><creator>Toparlak, Mufit</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Serological and molecular investigation of Ehrlichia spp. and Anaplasma spp. in ticks and blood of dogs, in the Thrace Region of Turkey</title><author>Çetinkaya, Handan ; Matur, Erdal ; Akyazi, İbrahim ; Ekiz, Elif Ergul ; Aydin, Levent ; Toparlak, Mufit</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-ab7b68241059638f1e8ec423f0a9a5b3cae51e0cdfff9ff09f7fbfbc1ed875cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Anaplasma - classification</topic><topic>Anaplasma - genetics</topic><topic>Anaplasma - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Anaplasmosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibodies, Bacterial - blood</topic><topic>Blood - immunology</topic><topic>Blood - microbiology</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Dog Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Dog Diseases - microbiology</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Ehrlichia - classification</topic><topic>Ehrlichia - genetics</topic><topic>Ehrlichia - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Ehrlichiosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Ehrlichiosis - veterinary</topic><topic>Immunoassay</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Seroepidemiologic Studies</topic><topic>Ticks</topic><topic>Turkey - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Çetinkaya, Handan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matur, Erdal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akyazi, İbrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekiz, Elif Ergul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aydin, Levent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toparlak, Mufit</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ticks and tick-borne diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Çetinkaya, Handan</au><au>Matur, Erdal</au><au>Akyazi, İbrahim</au><au>Ekiz, Elif Ergul</au><au>Aydin, Levent</au><au>Toparlak, Mufit</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Serological and molecular investigation of Ehrlichia spp. and Anaplasma spp. in ticks and blood of dogs, in the Thrace Region of Turkey</atitle><jtitle>Ticks and tick-borne diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Ticks Tick Borne Dis</addtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>706</spage><epage>714</epage><pages>706-714</pages><issn>1877-959X</issn><eissn>1877-9603</eissn><abstract>In recent years, tick-borne diseases like ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis became widespread worldwide threatening the health of both human and companion animals. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the presence of Anaplasma spp., and Ehrlichia spp. in dogs and ticks in the Thrace Region of Turkey. A total of 400 blood samples and 912 ticks were collected from dogs living in shelters that are located in four cities (Istanbul, Edirne, Tekirdag and Kirklareli) of the Thrace Region. Blood and buffy coat smears were prepared for microscopic examination. Hematologic and serologic analyses were performed using cell counter and commercial Snap3Dx test kit, respectively. Eight hundred fifty of collected ticks were classified as Rhipicephalus sanguineus, 33 as Rhipicephalus turanicus and 29 as Ixodes ricinus. After DNA extraction from blood samples and pooled ticks (127 tick pools, in total), nested PCR was performed to detect the DNA of Anaplasma spp., and Ehrlichia spp. The seroprevalence of Ehrlichia canis was 27.25% (109) by Snap3Dx test and the total molecular positivity was 11.75% (47) in dog blood samples and 21.25% (27) in tick pools by nested PCR. The frequencies of the infected blood samples with E. canis, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Anaplasma platys were detected as 6%, 4% and 6%, respectively. E. canis and A. platys were detected in R. sanguineus pools with a ratio of 15.75% and 0.7%, respectively. In addition, A. platys was also detected in R. turanicus pools (0.7%). A. phagocytophilum was found only in I. ricinus pools (3.93%). Morulae of three species were detected in buffy coat and blood smears. While anemia was observed in dogs infected with E. canis and co-infected (with one or more species), thrombocytopenia was observed only in co-infected dogs. This is the first study providing evidence for the presence of Anaplasma spp. and Ehrlichia spp. in dogs and ticks in the Thrace Region of Turkey. Based on the results of the tests used in this study, we recommend the combined use of serologic, molecular, cytologic, hematologic analyses and physical examination of tick exposure for an accurate diagnosis of ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pmid>26961274</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ttbdis.2016.02.021</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1877-959X
ispartof Ticks and tick-borne diseases, 2016-07, Vol.7 (5), p.706-714
issn 1877-959X
1877-9603
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1805489134
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE
subjects Anaplasma - classification
Anaplasma - genetics
Anaplasma - isolation & purification
Anaplasmosis - epidemiology
Animals
Antibodies, Bacterial - blood
Blood - immunology
Blood - microbiology
Cities
DNA, Bacterial - genetics
DNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification
Dog Diseases - epidemiology
Dog Diseases - microbiology
Dogs
Ehrlichia - classification
Ehrlichia - genetics
Ehrlichia - isolation & purification
Ehrlichiosis - epidemiology
Ehrlichiosis - veterinary
Immunoassay
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Seroepidemiologic Studies
Ticks
Turkey - epidemiology
title Serological and molecular investigation of Ehrlichia spp. and Anaplasma spp. in ticks and blood of dogs, in the Thrace Region of Turkey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T14%3A48%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Serological%20and%20molecular%20investigation%20of%20Ehrlichia%20spp.%20and%20Anaplasma%20spp.%20in%20ticks%20and%20blood%20of%20dogs,%20in%20the%20Thrace%20Region%20of%20Turkey&rft.jtitle=Ticks%20and%20tick-borne%20diseases&rft.au=%C3%87etinkaya,%20Handan&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=706&rft.epage=714&rft.pages=706-714&rft.issn=1877-959X&rft.eissn=1877-9603&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2016.02.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1805489134%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1805489134&rft_id=info:pmid/26961274&rfr_iscdi=true