Progressive Nitrogen Limitation of Ecosystem Responses to Rising Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide

A highly controversial issue in global biogeochemistry is the regulation of terrestrial carbon (C) sequestration by soil nitrogen (N) availability. This controversy translates into great uncertainty in predicting future global terrestrial C sequestration. We propose a new framework that centers on t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bioscience 2004-08, Vol.54 (8), p.731-739
Hauptverfasser: LUO, YIQI, SU, BO, CURRIE, WILLIAM S, DUKES, JEFFREY S, FINZI, ADRIEN, HARTWIG, UELI, HUNGATE, BRUCE, Mc MURTRIE, ROSS E, OREN, RAM, PARTON, WILLIAM J, PATAKI, DIANE E, SHAW, M. REBECCA, ZAK, DONALD R, FIELD, CHRISTOPHER B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A highly controversial issue in global biogeochemistry is the regulation of terrestrial carbon (C) sequestration by soil nitrogen (N) availability. This controversy translates into great uncertainty in predicting future global terrestrial C sequestration. We propose a new framework that centers on the concept of progressive N limitation (PNL) for studying the interactions between C and N in terrestrial ecosystems. In PNL, available soil N becomes increasingly limiting as C and N are sequestered in long-lived plant biomass and soil organic matter. Our analysis focuses on the role of PNL in regulating ecosystem responses to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration, but the concept applies to any perturbation that initially causes C and N to accumulate in organic forms. This article examines conditions under which PNL may or may not constrain net primary production and C sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems. While the PNL-centered framework has the potential to explain diverse experimental results and to help researchers integrate models and data, direct tests of the PNL hypothesis remain a great challenge to the research community.
ISSN:0006-3568
1525-3244
DOI:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0731:PNLOER]2.0.CO;2