The provenance of sediments in Moreton Bay, Australia: a synthesis of major, trace element and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic geochemistry, modelling and landscape analysis
Issue Title: The Interactions between Sediments and Water Moreton Bay (MB) is a large semi-enclosed coastal embayment, located on the east coast of Australia adjacent to the Queensland capital city of Brisbane. The MB catchment is ca. 22000 km^sup 2^ while the bay itself is ca. 1500 km^sup 2^. This...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hydrobiologia 2003-03, Vol.494 (1-3), p.145-152 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 152 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-3 |
container_start_page | 145 |
container_title | Hydrobiologia |
container_volume | 494 |
creator | DOUGLAS, G PALMER, M CAITCHEON, G |
description | Issue Title: The Interactions between Sediments and Water Moreton Bay (MB) is a large semi-enclosed coastal embayment, located on the east coast of Australia adjacent to the Queensland capital city of Brisbane. The MB catchment is ca. 22000 km^sup 2^ while the bay itself is ca. 1500 km^sup 2^. This represents a catchment:bay ratio of ca. 15:1. Within the MB catchment there are over 85 rocktypes with the most abundant, the Marburg Formation, constituting only ca. 12% of the catchment area. Detailed landscape analysis and a reconnaissance soil sampling program in combination with major and trace element and Sr, Nd and Pb isotope geochemistry were used to identify the major sources of sediment delivered to MB. A Bayesian linear mixing model allowed the proportion of sediment sources to be estimated. Model estimates suggest that there are substantial differences in the proportions of sediment being delivered into MB by the two major tributaries, the Brisbane and Logan Rivers despite both rivers containing a similar suite of major rocktypes. Over 50% of the sediment delivered to MB is derived from soils developed on the Marburg Formation. This equates to a catchment area/bay sediment deposition ratio of ca. 5. Basaltic soils of the Main Range Volcanics (Brisbane River catchment) and Lamington Group (Logan River catchment) and sediments from the Walloon Subgroup (present in both catchments) are on average also enriched in MB relative to the catchment by a factor of ca. 2.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1023/A:1025454013160 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18045196</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18045196</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-de7fdf04d37d22b35c95d51094ba94580f0d9f303ba7ee891ca4ab751803afae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUFr3DAQhUVpodu0515FoTnFjWRZsZzbNjRpIG0CTc9mLI2yWmxpI3kD-2vyVzPbBEp70SDmvY_hPcY-SvFFilodL09p6EY3Qip5Il6xhdStqrSU7Wu2EEKaykht3rJ3payFEG1XiwV7vF0h3-T0gBGiRZ48L-jChHEuPET-I2WcU-RfYXfEl9syZxgDnHLgZRfnFZZQ9p4J1ikfcdoSA0fc-zlEx3_l6qerbgYeSprTJlh-h8mucAqEIuSUHI5jiHd_1CM9xcIG6QfjjuDv2RsPY8EPL_OA_T7_dnv2vbq6vrg8W15VVtXtXDlsvfOicap1dT0obTvttBRdM0DXaCO8cJ1XQg3QIppOWmhgaLU0QoEHVAfs8JlLWdxvscw9XWjpNIiYtqUnYaNld0LCT_8J12mb6drSm1rWjaagSXT8LLI5lZLR95scJsi7Xop-31a_7P9pixyfX7BAAYw-Uxuh_LVpqXVtjHoCm_6V7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>821245018</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The provenance of sediments in Moreton Bay, Australia: a synthesis of major, trace element and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic geochemistry, modelling and landscape analysis</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>DOUGLAS, G ; PALMER, M ; CAITCHEON, G</creator><creatorcontrib>DOUGLAS, G ; PALMER, M ; CAITCHEON, G</creatorcontrib><description>Issue Title: The Interactions between Sediments and Water Moreton Bay (MB) is a large semi-enclosed coastal embayment, located on the east coast of Australia adjacent to the Queensland capital city of Brisbane. The MB catchment is ca. 22000 km^sup 2^ while the bay itself is ca. 1500 km^sup 2^. This represents a catchment:bay ratio of ca. 15:1. Within the MB catchment there are over 85 rocktypes with the most abundant, the Marburg Formation, constituting only ca. 12% of the catchment area. Detailed landscape analysis and a reconnaissance soil sampling program in combination with major and trace element and Sr, Nd and Pb isotope geochemistry were used to identify the major sources of sediment delivered to MB. A Bayesian linear mixing model allowed the proportion of sediment sources to be estimated. Model estimates suggest that there are substantial differences in the proportions of sediment being delivered into MB by the two major tributaries, the Brisbane and Logan Rivers despite both rivers containing a similar suite of major rocktypes. Over 50% of the sediment delivered to MB is derived from soils developed on the Marburg Formation. This equates to a catchment area/bay sediment deposition ratio of ca. 5. Basaltic soils of the Main Range Volcanics (Brisbane River catchment) and Lamington Group (Logan River catchment) and sediments from the Walloon Subgroup (present in both catchments) are on average also enriched in MB relative to the catchment by a factor of ca. 2.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-8158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1025454013160</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HYDRB8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Catchment areas ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Geochemistry ; River catchments ; Rivers ; Sediments ; Trace elements</subject><ispartof>Hydrobiologia, 2003-03, Vol.494 (1-3), p.145-152</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-de7fdf04d37d22b35c95d51094ba94580f0d9f303ba7ee891ca4ab751803afae3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15155288$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DOUGLAS, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PALMER, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAITCHEON, G</creatorcontrib><title>The provenance of sediments in Moreton Bay, Australia: a synthesis of major, trace element and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic geochemistry, modelling and landscape analysis</title><title>Hydrobiologia</title><description>Issue Title: The Interactions between Sediments and Water Moreton Bay (MB) is a large semi-enclosed coastal embayment, located on the east coast of Australia adjacent to the Queensland capital city of Brisbane. The MB catchment is ca. 22000 km^sup 2^ while the bay itself is ca. 1500 km^sup 2^. This represents a catchment:bay ratio of ca. 15:1. Within the MB catchment there are over 85 rocktypes with the most abundant, the Marburg Formation, constituting only ca. 12% of the catchment area. Detailed landscape analysis and a reconnaissance soil sampling program in combination with major and trace element and Sr, Nd and Pb isotope geochemistry were used to identify the major sources of sediment delivered to MB. A Bayesian linear mixing model allowed the proportion of sediment sources to be estimated. Model estimates suggest that there are substantial differences in the proportions of sediment being delivered into MB by the two major tributaries, the Brisbane and Logan Rivers despite both rivers containing a similar suite of major rocktypes. Over 50% of the sediment delivered to MB is derived from soils developed on the Marburg Formation. This equates to a catchment area/bay sediment deposition ratio of ca. 5. Basaltic soils of the Main Range Volcanics (Brisbane River catchment) and Lamington Group (Logan River catchment) and sediments from the Walloon Subgroup (present in both catchments) are on average also enriched in MB relative to the catchment by a factor of ca. 2.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Catchment areas</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>River catchments</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Trace elements</subject><issn>0018-8158</issn><issn>1573-5117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUFr3DAQhUVpodu0515FoTnFjWRZsZzbNjRpIG0CTc9mLI2yWmxpI3kD-2vyVzPbBEp70SDmvY_hPcY-SvFFilodL09p6EY3Qip5Il6xhdStqrSU7Wu2EEKaykht3rJ3payFEG1XiwV7vF0h3-T0gBGiRZ48L-jChHEuPET-I2WcU-RfYXfEl9syZxgDnHLgZRfnFZZQ9p4J1ikfcdoSA0fc-zlEx3_l6qerbgYeSprTJlh-h8mucAqEIuSUHI5jiHd_1CM9xcIG6QfjjuDv2RsPY8EPL_OA_T7_dnv2vbq6vrg8W15VVtXtXDlsvfOicap1dT0obTvttBRdM0DXaCO8cJ1XQg3QIppOWmhgaLU0QoEHVAfs8JlLWdxvscw9XWjpNIiYtqUnYaNld0LCT_8J12mb6drSm1rWjaagSXT8LLI5lZLR95scJsi7Xop-31a_7P9pixyfX7BAAYw-Uxuh_LVpqXVtjHoCm_6V7Q</recordid><startdate>20030301</startdate><enddate>20030301</enddate><creator>DOUGLAS, G</creator><creator>PALMER, M</creator><creator>CAITCHEON, G</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>H96</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030301</creationdate><title>The provenance of sediments in Moreton Bay, Australia: a synthesis of major, trace element and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic geochemistry, modelling and landscape analysis</title><author>DOUGLAS, G ; PALMER, M ; CAITCHEON, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-de7fdf04d37d22b35c95d51094ba94580f0d9f303ba7ee891ca4ab751803afae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Catchment areas</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>River catchments</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Trace elements</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DOUGLAS, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PALMER, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAITCHEON, G</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DOUGLAS, G</au><au>PALMER, M</au><au>CAITCHEON, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The provenance of sediments in Moreton Bay, Australia: a synthesis of major, trace element and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic geochemistry, modelling and landscape analysis</atitle><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle><date>2003-03-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>494</volume><issue>1-3</issue><spage>145</spage><epage>152</epage><pages>145-152</pages><issn>0018-8158</issn><eissn>1573-5117</eissn><coden>HYDRB8</coden><abstract>Issue Title: The Interactions between Sediments and Water Moreton Bay (MB) is a large semi-enclosed coastal embayment, located on the east coast of Australia adjacent to the Queensland capital city of Brisbane. The MB catchment is ca. 22000 km^sup 2^ while the bay itself is ca. 1500 km^sup 2^. This represents a catchment:bay ratio of ca. 15:1. Within the MB catchment there are over 85 rocktypes with the most abundant, the Marburg Formation, constituting only ca. 12% of the catchment area. Detailed landscape analysis and a reconnaissance soil sampling program in combination with major and trace element and Sr, Nd and Pb isotope geochemistry were used to identify the major sources of sediment delivered to MB. A Bayesian linear mixing model allowed the proportion of sediment sources to be estimated. Model estimates suggest that there are substantial differences in the proportions of sediment being delivered into MB by the two major tributaries, the Brisbane and Logan Rivers despite both rivers containing a similar suite of major rocktypes. Over 50% of the sediment delivered to MB is derived from soils developed on the Marburg Formation. This equates to a catchment area/bay sediment deposition ratio of ca. 5. Basaltic soils of the Main Range Volcanics (Brisbane River catchment) and Lamington Group (Logan River catchment) and sediments from the Walloon Subgroup (present in both catchments) are on average also enriched in MB relative to the catchment by a factor of ca. 2.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1023/A:1025454013160</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-8158 |
ispartof | Hydrobiologia, 2003-03, Vol.494 (1-3), p.145-152 |
issn | 0018-8158 1573-5117 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18045196 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Biological and medical sciences Catchment areas Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Geochemistry River catchments Rivers Sediments Trace elements |
title | The provenance of sediments in Moreton Bay, Australia: a synthesis of major, trace element and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic geochemistry, modelling and landscape analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T09%3A48%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20provenance%20of%20sediments%20in%20Moreton%20Bay,%20Australia:%20a%20synthesis%20of%20major,%20trace%20element%20and%20Sr-Nd-Pb%20isotopic%20geochemistry,%20modelling%20and%20landscape%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Hydrobiologia&rft.au=DOUGLAS,%20G&rft.date=2003-03-01&rft.volume=494&rft.issue=1-3&rft.spage=145&rft.epage=152&rft.pages=145-152&rft.issn=0018-8158&rft.eissn=1573-5117&rft.coden=HYDRB8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1025454013160&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18045196%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=821245018&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |