Forum-selection clauses: beyond the contracting parties
Canadian courts have started to consider whether and in what circumstances a non-contracting party will be treated as bound by a forum selection clause. This article examines several possible reasons for holding non-parties bound by such clauses and considers how the analysis would unfold in three d...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of private international law 2016-01, Vol.12 (1), p.26-59 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 59 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 26 |
| container_title | Journal of private international law |
| container_volume | 12 |
| creator | Black, Vaughan Pitel, Stephen G. A. |
| description | Canadian courts have started to consider whether and in what circumstances a non-contracting party will be treated as bound by a forum selection clause. This article examines several possible reasons for holding non-parties bound by such clauses and considers how the analysis would unfold in three different contexts: taking jurisdiction, staying proceedings based on forum non conveniens, and obtaining an anti-suit injunction. It draws on recent American decisions which have used both a closely related test and a global-transaction test to hold non-parties bound, considering the extent to which these tests might be adopted by Canadian courts. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/17441048.2016.1142267 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1803808488</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20210730050965</informt_id><sourcerecordid>2568006785</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-6fcf2b18cd11d0b81a0adedeb3de7c492cb87dda6dbd3c2f9939f5903c3f4ba23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE2L1TAUhosoOI7-BKHgxk3vnHw0SV0pw4wzcMGNrsNpPu7N0NvUJEXuv7e1142C4Cohed6Hc96qektgR0DBDZGcE-BqR4GIHSGcUiGfVVdEtrJRnKjn653zZoVeVq9yfgJgouPqqpL3Mc2nJrvBmRLiWJsB5-zyh7p35zjauhxdbeJYEi7_46GeMJXg8uvqhcchuzeX87r6dn_39fah2X_5_Hj7ad-YVrDSCG887YkylhALvSIIaJ11PbNOGt5R0ytpLQrbW2ao7zrW-bYDZpjnPVJ2Xb3fvFOK32eXiz6FbNww4OjinDVRwBQortSCvvsDfYpzGpfpNG2FAhBStQvVbpRJMefkvJ5SOGE6awJ6rVP_rlOvdepLnUvuYculUygaDyFPRWeHyRx1GH389RzTQdsYVhVjS_iCUaAEJANooRPrCPu_VcdSpqwtFvx_3cdNt-XwR0yD1QXPQ0w-4WhC1uzfy_0EicavHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2568006785</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Forum-selection clauses: beyond the contracting parties</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Black, Vaughan ; Pitel, Stephen G. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Black, Vaughan ; Pitel, Stephen G. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Canadian courts have started to consider whether and in what circumstances a non-contracting party will be treated as bound by a forum selection clause. This article examines several possible reasons for holding non-parties bound by such clauses and considers how the analysis would unfold in three different contexts: taking jurisdiction, staying proceedings based on forum non conveniens, and obtaining an anti-suit injunction. It draws on recent American decisions which have used both a closely related test and a global-transaction test to hold non-parties bound, considering the extent to which these tests might be adopted by Canadian courts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1744-1048</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1757-8418</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/17441048.2016.1142267</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Routledge</publisher><subject>Canada ; Clauses ; Conflict of laws ; Contracting ; Contracting out ; CONTRACTS ; Court decisions ; Court decisions and opinions ; Court hearings & proceedings ; Courts ; Forum non conveniens ; forum non conveniens; anti-suit injunction ; forum-selection clause ; INJUNCTIONS ; JURISDICTION ; jurisdiction agreement ; privity of contract ; stay of proceedings ; submission ; United States ; Venue</subject><ispartof>Journal of private international law, 2016-01, Vol.12 (1), p.26-59</ispartof><rights>2016 Taylor & Francis 2016</rights><rights>2016 Taylor & Francis</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-6fcf2b18cd11d0b81a0adedeb3de7c492cb87dda6dbd3c2f9939f5903c3f4ba23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Black, Vaughan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitel, Stephen G. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Forum-selection clauses: beyond the contracting parties</title><title>Journal of private international law</title><description>Canadian courts have started to consider whether and in what circumstances a non-contracting party will be treated as bound by a forum selection clause. This article examines several possible reasons for holding non-parties bound by such clauses and considers how the analysis would unfold in three different contexts: taking jurisdiction, staying proceedings based on forum non conveniens, and obtaining an anti-suit injunction. It draws on recent American decisions which have used both a closely related test and a global-transaction test to hold non-parties bound, considering the extent to which these tests might be adopted by Canadian courts.</description><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Clauses</subject><subject>Conflict of laws</subject><subject>Contracting</subject><subject>Contracting out</subject><subject>CONTRACTS</subject><subject>Court decisions</subject><subject>Court decisions and opinions</subject><subject>Court hearings & proceedings</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Forum non conveniens</subject><subject>forum non conveniens; anti-suit injunction</subject><subject>forum-selection clause</subject><subject>INJUNCTIONS</subject><subject>JURISDICTION</subject><subject>jurisdiction agreement</subject><subject>privity of contract</subject><subject>stay of proceedings</subject><subject>submission</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Venue</subject><issn>1744-1048</issn><issn>1757-8418</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkE2L1TAUhosoOI7-BKHgxk3vnHw0SV0pw4wzcMGNrsNpPu7N0NvUJEXuv7e1142C4Cohed6Hc96qektgR0DBDZGcE-BqR4GIHSGcUiGfVVdEtrJRnKjn653zZoVeVq9yfgJgouPqqpL3Mc2nJrvBmRLiWJsB5-zyh7p35zjauhxdbeJYEi7_46GeMJXg8uvqhcchuzeX87r6dn_39fah2X_5_Hj7ad-YVrDSCG887YkylhALvSIIaJ11PbNOGt5R0ytpLQrbW2ao7zrW-bYDZpjnPVJ2Xb3fvFOK32eXiz6FbNww4OjinDVRwBQortSCvvsDfYpzGpfpNG2FAhBStQvVbpRJMefkvJ5SOGE6awJ6rVP_rlOvdepLnUvuYculUygaDyFPRWeHyRx1GH389RzTQdsYVhVjS_iCUaAEJANooRPrCPu_VcdSpqwtFvx_3cdNt-XwR0yD1QXPQ0w-4WhC1uzfy_0EicavHw</recordid><startdate>20160102</startdate><enddate>20160102</enddate><creator>Black, Vaughan</creator><creator>Pitel, Stephen G. A.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160102</creationdate><title>Forum-selection clauses: beyond the contracting parties</title><author>Black, Vaughan ; Pitel, Stephen G. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-6fcf2b18cd11d0b81a0adedeb3de7c492cb87dda6dbd3c2f9939f5903c3f4ba23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Clauses</topic><topic>Conflict of laws</topic><topic>Contracting</topic><topic>Contracting out</topic><topic>CONTRACTS</topic><topic>Court decisions</topic><topic>Court decisions and opinions</topic><topic>Court hearings & proceedings</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Forum non conveniens</topic><topic>forum non conveniens; anti-suit injunction</topic><topic>forum-selection clause</topic><topic>INJUNCTIONS</topic><topic>JURISDICTION</topic><topic>jurisdiction agreement</topic><topic>privity of contract</topic><topic>stay of proceedings</topic><topic>submission</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Venue</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Black, Vaughan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitel, Stephen G. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of private international law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Black, Vaughan</au><au>Pitel, Stephen G. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Forum-selection clauses: beyond the contracting parties</atitle><jtitle>Journal of private international law</jtitle><date>2016-01-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>26</spage><epage>59</epage><pages>26-59</pages><issn>1744-1048</issn><eissn>1757-8418</eissn><abstract>Canadian courts have started to consider whether and in what circumstances a non-contracting party will be treated as bound by a forum selection clause. This article examines several possible reasons for holding non-parties bound by such clauses and considers how the analysis would unfold in three different contexts: taking jurisdiction, staying proceedings based on forum non conveniens, and obtaining an anti-suit injunction. It draws on recent American decisions which have used both a closely related test and a global-transaction test to hold non-parties bound, considering the extent to which these tests might be adopted by Canadian courts.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/17441048.2016.1142267</doi><tpages>34</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1744-1048 |
| ispartof | Journal of private international law, 2016-01, Vol.12 (1), p.26-59 |
| issn | 1744-1048 1757-8418 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1803808488 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
| subjects | Canada Clauses Conflict of laws Contracting Contracting out CONTRACTS Court decisions Court decisions and opinions Court hearings & proceedings Courts Forum non conveniens forum non conveniens anti-suit injunction forum-selection clause INJUNCTIONS JURISDICTION jurisdiction agreement privity of contract stay of proceedings submission United States Venue |
| title | Forum-selection clauses: beyond the contracting parties |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T23%3A12%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Forum-selection%20clauses:%20beyond%20the%20contracting%20parties&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20private%20international%20law&rft.au=Black,%20Vaughan&rft.date=2016-01-02&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=59&rft.pages=26-59&rft.issn=1744-1048&rft.eissn=1757-8418&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/17441048.2016.1142267&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2568006785%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2568006785&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20210730050965&rfr_iscdi=true |