Harvest retention patches are insufficient as stand analogues of fire residuals for litter-dwelling beetles in northern coniferous forests

We compared litter-dwelling beetle assemblages of

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of forest research 2004-06, Vol.34 (6), p.1319-1329
Hauptverfasser: Gandhi, K.J.K, Spence, J.R, Langor, D.W, Morgantini, L.E, Cryer, K.J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1329
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1319
container_title Canadian journal of forest research
container_volume 34
creator Gandhi, K.J.K
Spence, J.R
Langor, D.W
Morgantini, L.E
Cryer, K.J
description We compared litter-dwelling beetle assemblages of
doi_str_mv 10.1139/x04-018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18025030</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18025030</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-ef67f374baae24c82ff35952199a10b605938a95c9ce07a80827aa5cad4ec2173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0cuKFDEUBuBCFGxH8REMgiMIpSe3StVSBnWEARc663A6fdKdoSZpk5SXV_CpTdsNgqCussiXP-fSdY85vORcTq--geqBj3e6FRcw9gNIc7dbASjdaxjM_e5BKTcAIAcJq-7HJeYvVCrLVCnWkCLbY3U7KgwzsRDL4n1wod0xLKxUjBuGEee0XZpJnvnQXKYSNgvOhfmU2RxqpdxvvtI8h7hla6I6Nx0iiynXHeXIXIrBU07LryetgvKwu-dbAj06nWfd9ds3ny4u-6sP795fvL7qnZKi9uQH46VRa0QSyo3Ce6knLfg0IYf1AHqSI07aTY7A4AijMIja4UaRE9zIs-78mLvP6XNrotrbUFwrFSO1ciwfQWiQ8H-oDOeT0Q0-_QPepCW3IRUrJGgxGHlAz4_I5VRKJm_3Odxi_m452MPmbNucbZtr8tkpDovD2WeMLpTffAAj1HhIfHF0Mbs2QcLsdv8IPf87PiG73_gGnxyhx2Rxm9vP1x8FcAkwKSUElz8Bxoa_Hg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230526735</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Harvest retention patches are insufficient as stand analogues of fire residuals for litter-dwelling beetles in northern coniferous forests</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gandhi, K.J.K ; Spence, J.R ; Langor, D.W ; Morgantini, L.E ; Cryer, K.J</creator><creatorcontrib>Gandhi, K.J.K ; Spence, J.R ; Langor, D.W ; Morgantini, L.E ; Cryer, K.J</creatorcontrib><description>We compared litter-dwelling beetle assemblages of &lt;1- to 2-ha unharvested coniferous patches embedded in 1-year-old clearcuts with beetle assemblages from &lt;1- to 10-ha unburned fire residuals within 15- and 37-year-old burned forests. Our primary objective was to determine whether unharvested patches retain biotic elements that are similar to those of the surrounding uncut forests and to those of patches of forest skipped by wildfires. Beetle assemblages of the harvest residuals were similar to those of the uncut forest, suggesting that harvest residuals retain elements of the mature forest. However, beetle assemblages of harvest residuals differed from those of fire residuals. Thus, harvest residuals sited without regard to microhabitat characteristics or stand structure in fire residuals are insufficient analogues for the late successional habitats provided by fire residuals. There was no relationship between size of harvest residuals and either beetle catch or diversity. Beetle catches were higher in round harvest residuals, and a number of forest species also appeared to be aggregated in round residuals. Forest managers may preserve biotic elements of young uncut forest by leaving round harvest residuals in clearcuts; however, a closer habitat match between harvest and fire residuals is likely required to preserve and maintain landscape-level forest biodiversity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-5067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1208-6037</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1139/x04-018</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJFRAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa, Canada: NRC Research Press</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biodegradation of pollutants ; Biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biotechnology ; canopy gaps ; Clearcutting ; Coleoptera ; Coniferous forests ; conifers ; conservation practices ; Environment and pollution ; fauna ; forest fires ; forest habitats ; forest insects ; forest litter ; Forest management ; Forest management. Stand types and stand dynamics. Silvicultural treatments. Tending of stands. Natural regeneration ; forest stands ; forest succession ; forest trees ; Forestry ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; habitat fragmentation ; Habitats ; Harvest ; Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects ; insect ecology ; Insects ; Litter ; logging ; Microhabitats ; population size ; Rare species ; refuge habitats ; residual shape ; residual size ; species diversity ; stand structure ; Synecology ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Wildfires</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of forest research, 2004-06, Vol.34 (6), p.1319-1329</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright National Research Council of Canada Jun 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-ef67f374baae24c82ff35952199a10b605938a95c9ce07a80827aa5cad4ec2173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-ef67f374baae24c82ff35952199a10b605938a95c9ce07a80827aa5cad4ec2173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16072485$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gandhi, K.J.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spence, J.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langor, D.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgantini, L.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cryer, K.J</creatorcontrib><title>Harvest retention patches are insufficient as stand analogues of fire residuals for litter-dwelling beetles in northern coniferous forests</title><title>Canadian journal of forest research</title><addtitle>Revue canadienne de recherche forestière</addtitle><description>We compared litter-dwelling beetle assemblages of &lt;1- to 2-ha unharvested coniferous patches embedded in 1-year-old clearcuts with beetle assemblages from &lt;1- to 10-ha unburned fire residuals within 15- and 37-year-old burned forests. Our primary objective was to determine whether unharvested patches retain biotic elements that are similar to those of the surrounding uncut forests and to those of patches of forest skipped by wildfires. Beetle assemblages of the harvest residuals were similar to those of the uncut forest, suggesting that harvest residuals retain elements of the mature forest. However, beetle assemblages of harvest residuals differed from those of fire residuals. Thus, harvest residuals sited without regard to microhabitat characteristics or stand structure in fire residuals are insufficient analogues for the late successional habitats provided by fire residuals. There was no relationship between size of harvest residuals and either beetle catch or diversity. Beetle catches were higher in round harvest residuals, and a number of forest species also appeared to be aggregated in round residuals. Forest managers may preserve biotic elements of young uncut forest by leaving round harvest residuals in clearcuts; however, a closer habitat match between harvest and fire residuals is likely required to preserve and maintain landscape-level forest biodiversity.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biodegradation of pollutants</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>canopy gaps</subject><subject>Clearcutting</subject><subject>Coleoptera</subject><subject>Coniferous forests</subject><subject>conifers</subject><subject>conservation practices</subject><subject>Environment and pollution</subject><subject>fauna</subject><subject>forest fires</subject><subject>forest habitats</subject><subject>forest insects</subject><subject>forest litter</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forest management. Stand types and stand dynamics. Silvicultural treatments. Tending of stands. Natural regeneration</subject><subject>forest stands</subject><subject>forest succession</subject><subject>forest trees</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>habitat fragmentation</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Harvest</subject><subject>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</subject><subject>insect ecology</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Litter</subject><subject>logging</subject><subject>Microhabitats</subject><subject>population size</subject><subject>Rare species</subject><subject>refuge habitats</subject><subject>residual shape</subject><subject>residual size</subject><subject>species diversity</subject><subject>stand structure</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Wildfires</subject><issn>0045-5067</issn><issn>1208-6037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0cuKFDEUBuBCFGxH8REMgiMIpSe3StVSBnWEARc663A6fdKdoSZpk5SXV_CpTdsNgqCussiXP-fSdY85vORcTq--geqBj3e6FRcw9gNIc7dbASjdaxjM_e5BKTcAIAcJq-7HJeYvVCrLVCnWkCLbY3U7KgwzsRDL4n1wod0xLKxUjBuGEee0XZpJnvnQXKYSNgvOhfmU2RxqpdxvvtI8h7hla6I6Nx0iiynXHeXIXIrBU07LryetgvKwu-dbAj06nWfd9ds3ny4u-6sP795fvL7qnZKi9uQH46VRa0QSyo3Ce6knLfg0IYf1AHqSI07aTY7A4AijMIja4UaRE9zIs-78mLvP6XNrotrbUFwrFSO1ciwfQWiQ8H-oDOeT0Q0-_QPepCW3IRUrJGgxGHlAz4_I5VRKJm_3Odxi_m452MPmbNucbZtr8tkpDovD2WeMLpTffAAj1HhIfHF0Mbs2QcLsdv8IPf87PiG73_gGnxyhx2Rxm9vP1x8FcAkwKSUElz8Bxoa_Hg</recordid><startdate>20040601</startdate><enddate>20040601</enddate><creator>Gandhi, K.J.K</creator><creator>Spence, J.R</creator><creator>Langor, D.W</creator><creator>Morgantini, L.E</creator><creator>Cryer, K.J</creator><general>NRC Research Press</general><general>National Research Council of Canada</general><general>Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040601</creationdate><title>Harvest retention patches are insufficient as stand analogues of fire residuals for litter-dwelling beetles in northern coniferous forests</title><author>Gandhi, K.J.K ; Spence, J.R ; Langor, D.W ; Morgantini, L.E ; Cryer, K.J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-ef67f374baae24c82ff35952199a10b605938a95c9ce07a80827aa5cad4ec2173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biodegradation of pollutants</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>canopy gaps</topic><topic>Clearcutting</topic><topic>Coleoptera</topic><topic>Coniferous forests</topic><topic>conifers</topic><topic>conservation practices</topic><topic>Environment and pollution</topic><topic>fauna</topic><topic>forest fires</topic><topic>forest habitats</topic><topic>forest insects</topic><topic>forest litter</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forest management. Stand types and stand dynamics. Silvicultural treatments. Tending of stands. Natural regeneration</topic><topic>forest stands</topic><topic>forest succession</topic><topic>forest trees</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>habitat fragmentation</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Harvest</topic><topic>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</topic><topic>insect ecology</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Litter</topic><topic>logging</topic><topic>Microhabitats</topic><topic>population size</topic><topic>Rare species</topic><topic>refuge habitats</topic><topic>residual shape</topic><topic>residual size</topic><topic>species diversity</topic><topic>stand structure</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Wildfires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gandhi, K.J.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spence, J.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langor, D.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgantini, L.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cryer, K.J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference &amp; Current Events</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of forest research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gandhi, K.J.K</au><au>Spence, J.R</au><au>Langor, D.W</au><au>Morgantini, L.E</au><au>Cryer, K.J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Harvest retention patches are insufficient as stand analogues of fire residuals for litter-dwelling beetles in northern coniferous forests</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of forest research</jtitle><addtitle>Revue canadienne de recherche forestière</addtitle><date>2004-06-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1319</spage><epage>1329</epage><pages>1319-1329</pages><issn>0045-5067</issn><eissn>1208-6037</eissn><coden>CJFRAR</coden><abstract>We compared litter-dwelling beetle assemblages of &lt;1- to 2-ha unharvested coniferous patches embedded in 1-year-old clearcuts with beetle assemblages from &lt;1- to 10-ha unburned fire residuals within 15- and 37-year-old burned forests. Our primary objective was to determine whether unharvested patches retain biotic elements that are similar to those of the surrounding uncut forests and to those of patches of forest skipped by wildfires. Beetle assemblages of the harvest residuals were similar to those of the uncut forest, suggesting that harvest residuals retain elements of the mature forest. However, beetle assemblages of harvest residuals differed from those of fire residuals. Thus, harvest residuals sited without regard to microhabitat characteristics or stand structure in fire residuals are insufficient analogues for the late successional habitats provided by fire residuals. There was no relationship between size of harvest residuals and either beetle catch or diversity. Beetle catches were higher in round harvest residuals, and a number of forest species also appeared to be aggregated in round residuals. Forest managers may preserve biotic elements of young uncut forest by leaving round harvest residuals in clearcuts; however, a closer habitat match between harvest and fire residuals is likely required to preserve and maintain landscape-level forest biodiversity.</abstract><cop>Ottawa, Canada</cop><pub>NRC Research Press</pub><doi>10.1139/x04-018</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0045-5067
ispartof Canadian journal of forest research, 2004-06, Vol.34 (6), p.1319-1329
issn 0045-5067
1208-6037
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18025030
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biodegradation of pollutants
Biodiversity
Biological and medical sciences
Biotechnology
canopy gaps
Clearcutting
Coleoptera
Coniferous forests
conifers
conservation practices
Environment and pollution
fauna
forest fires
forest habitats
forest insects
forest litter
Forest management
Forest management. Stand types and stand dynamics. Silvicultural treatments. Tending of stands. Natural regeneration
forest stands
forest succession
forest trees
Forestry
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
habitat fragmentation
Habitats
Harvest
Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects
insect ecology
Insects
Litter
logging
Microhabitats
population size
Rare species
refuge habitats
residual shape
residual size
species diversity
stand structure
Synecology
Terrestrial ecosystems
Wildfires
title Harvest retention patches are insufficient as stand analogues of fire residuals for litter-dwelling beetles in northern coniferous forests
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T08%3A37%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Harvest%20retention%20patches%20are%20insufficient%20as%20stand%20analogues%20of%20fire%20residuals%20for%20litter-dwelling%20beetles%20in%20northern%20coniferous%20forests&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20forest%20research&rft.au=Gandhi,%20K.J.K&rft.date=2004-06-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1319&rft.epage=1329&rft.pages=1319-1329&rft.issn=0045-5067&rft.eissn=1208-6037&rft.coden=CJFRAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1139/x04-018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18025030%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230526735&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true