Effects of field exposure to diazinon on small mammals inhabiting a semienclosed prairie grassland ecosystem. I. Ecological and reproductive effects

The widespread use of cholinesterase‐inhibiting pesticides in the environment presents increasing concerns about their effects on human, wildlife, and ecosystem health. As a group, these pesticides are generally highly toxic and have great potential for negatively affecting nontarget organisms. Smal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental toxicology and chemistry 2001-02, Vol.20 (2), p.284-296
Hauptverfasser: Sheffield, Steven R., Lochmiller, Robert L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 296
container_issue 2
container_start_page 284
container_title Environmental toxicology and chemistry
container_volume 20
creator Sheffield, Steven R.
Lochmiller, Robert L.
description The widespread use of cholinesterase‐inhibiting pesticides in the environment presents increasing concerns about their effects on human, wildlife, and ecosystem health. As a group, these pesticides are generally highly toxic and have great potential for negatively affecting nontarget organisms. Small mammals have proven to be ideal biomonitors of environmental contaminants, and were used here to test for possible effects of a widely used cholinesterase‐inhibiting insecticide, diazinon, in a natural field setting. Using 12 0.1‐ha terrestrial mesocosms, we examined the effects of low‐level diazinon exposure on the small mammal communities inhabiting semienclosed grassland ecosystems. Our primary objective was to test the hypothesis that diazinon, applied at two different recommended label application rates, would not cause any observable adverse ecological or reproductive effects on small mammal populations and communities. Experimental small mammal communities consisting of Sigmodon hispidus, Microtus ochrogaster, Reithrodontomys fulvescens, and Mus musculus were stocked at natural densities and sex ratios inside empty mesocosms. Diazinon 4E was applied at two different maximum recommended label application rates, 0.56 kg a.i./ha (1×) and 4.5 kg a.i./ha (8×), and controls remained unsprayed, with four enclosures (replicates) per treatment. Two 30‐d trials were run during peak rodent breeding seasons and enclosures were sampled on days 2, 16, and 30 of each trial. Recovery of small mammals was not significantly different among treatments, although fewer animals were recovered from the diazinon‐exposed enclosures in both trials. Analysis of trapping data suggested that the normally strong competitive relationship between Sigmodon and Microtus may be altered by the pesticide, favoring Microtus in the diazinon‐exposed enclosures. Incidence of reproductive condition was found to be reduced 20 to 80% and 33 to 100% in diazinon‐exposed males and females, respectively. Reproductive productivity, including percentage of pregnant females and of females giving birth, was significantly reduced in diazinon‐exposed animals. Percentage of pregnant females ranged from 13.6 to 43.5% in diazinon‐exposed animals compared to 40 to 80% for control animals, and percentage of females giving birth ranged from 0 to 17% in diazinon‐exposed animals compared to 22 to 50% for control animals. Generally, the effects found in this study suggest that diazinon was relatively persistent in
doi_str_mv 10.1002/etc.5620200209
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18024462</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>14568335</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4699-fc265d63aa51161e8a52021452f7da5f211c0cfe322f22973e669770dae8fd063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVFrFDEUhYModq2--igBwbcZc5NJZvIo7VoLRSlUfQxp5maNzkzWZEa7_g5_sCm7tPhUCFxCvnPvyT2EvARWA2P8Lc6uloozXi5MPyIrkJJXnYLuMVmxVrCq5ao7Is9y_s4YKK31U3IEICQ0vFuRv2vv0c2ZRk99wKGneLONeUlI50j7YP-EKU60nDzaYaCjHUvNNEzf7HWYw7ShlmYcA05uiBl7uk02pIB0k2zOg51KRxfzLs841vS8pmsXh7gJzg709jHhNsV-cXP4hRT3Zp6TJ74MwReHekw-v19fnXyoLj6dnZ-8u6hcUz5SeceV7JWwVgIowM7KsghoJPdtb6XnAI45j4Jzz7luBSql25b1FjvfMyWOyZt932Lh54J5NmPIDofiGuOSDXSMN43iD4ONVJ0QsoD1HnQp5pzQm20Ko007A8zcBmZKYOY-sCJ4dei8XI_Y3-OHhArw-gDYXHbmk51cyHecBsU1FErvqd9hwN0DQ00h_7NQ7bWhZHRzp7Xph1GtaKX5-vHM6C-Xl3B12plG_APlUb87</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14568335</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of field exposure to diazinon on small mammals inhabiting a semienclosed prairie grassland ecosystem. I. Ecological and reproductive effects</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Sheffield, Steven R. ; Lochmiller, Robert L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sheffield, Steven R. ; Lochmiller, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><description>The widespread use of cholinesterase‐inhibiting pesticides in the environment presents increasing concerns about their effects on human, wildlife, and ecosystem health. As a group, these pesticides are generally highly toxic and have great potential for negatively affecting nontarget organisms. Small mammals have proven to be ideal biomonitors of environmental contaminants, and were used here to test for possible effects of a widely used cholinesterase‐inhibiting insecticide, diazinon, in a natural field setting. Using 12 0.1‐ha terrestrial mesocosms, we examined the effects of low‐level diazinon exposure on the small mammal communities inhabiting semienclosed grassland ecosystems. Our primary objective was to test the hypothesis that diazinon, applied at two different recommended label application rates, would not cause any observable adverse ecological or reproductive effects on small mammal populations and communities. Experimental small mammal communities consisting of Sigmodon hispidus, Microtus ochrogaster, Reithrodontomys fulvescens, and Mus musculus were stocked at natural densities and sex ratios inside empty mesocosms. Diazinon 4E was applied at two different maximum recommended label application rates, 0.56 kg a.i./ha (1×) and 4.5 kg a.i./ha (8×), and controls remained unsprayed, with four enclosures (replicates) per treatment. Two 30‐d trials were run during peak rodent breeding seasons and enclosures were sampled on days 2, 16, and 30 of each trial. Recovery of small mammals was not significantly different among treatments, although fewer animals were recovered from the diazinon‐exposed enclosures in both trials. Analysis of trapping data suggested that the normally strong competitive relationship between Sigmodon and Microtus may be altered by the pesticide, favoring Microtus in the diazinon‐exposed enclosures. Incidence of reproductive condition was found to be reduced 20 to 80% and 33 to 100% in diazinon‐exposed males and females, respectively. Reproductive productivity, including percentage of pregnant females and of females giving birth, was significantly reduced in diazinon‐exposed animals. Percentage of pregnant females ranged from 13.6 to 43.5% in diazinon‐exposed animals compared to 40 to 80% for control animals, and percentage of females giving birth ranged from 0 to 17% in diazinon‐exposed animals compared to 22 to 50% for control animals. Generally, the effects found in this study suggest that diazinon was relatively persistent in the sprayed enclosures and that oral routes of exposure (consumption of dead and dying arthropods, grooming) may have been important. Ecological relationships and reproduction in both herbivorous and omnivorous mammals were negatively impacted by diazinon exposure. Overall, ecological relationships in the enclosed prairie grassland ecosystem were disrupted by diazinon, probably through a combination of sublethal effects, particularly reproductive effects, impacting individuals and their populations. This suggests that negative impacts on populations and community structure and function may persist longer than diazinon persists in the environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0730-7268</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8618</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/etc.5620200209</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11351428</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ETOCDK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Dazinon ; diazinon ; Diazinon - toxicity ; Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution ; Effects of pollution and side effects of pesticides on vertebrates ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Insecticides - toxicity ; Male ; Mammalia ; Mesocosm ; Microtus ochrogaster ; Mus musculus ; Reithrodontomys fulvescens ; Reproduction - drug effects ; Rodentia - physiology ; Sigmodon hispidus ; Small mammals ; Sublethal effects ; Terrestrial ecotoxicology</subject><ispartof>Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2001-02, Vol.20 (2), p.284-296</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2001 SETAC</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4699-fc265d63aa51161e8a52021452f7da5f211c0cfe322f22973e669770dae8fd063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4699-fc265d63aa51161e8a52021452f7da5f211c0cfe322f22973e669770dae8fd063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fetc.5620200209$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fetc.5620200209$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=916291$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11351428$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sheffield, Steven R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lochmiller, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of field exposure to diazinon on small mammals inhabiting a semienclosed prairie grassland ecosystem. I. Ecological and reproductive effects</title><title>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</title><addtitle>Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry</addtitle><description>The widespread use of cholinesterase‐inhibiting pesticides in the environment presents increasing concerns about their effects on human, wildlife, and ecosystem health. As a group, these pesticides are generally highly toxic and have great potential for negatively affecting nontarget organisms. Small mammals have proven to be ideal biomonitors of environmental contaminants, and were used here to test for possible effects of a widely used cholinesterase‐inhibiting insecticide, diazinon, in a natural field setting. Using 12 0.1‐ha terrestrial mesocosms, we examined the effects of low‐level diazinon exposure on the small mammal communities inhabiting semienclosed grassland ecosystems. Our primary objective was to test the hypothesis that diazinon, applied at two different recommended label application rates, would not cause any observable adverse ecological or reproductive effects on small mammal populations and communities. Experimental small mammal communities consisting of Sigmodon hispidus, Microtus ochrogaster, Reithrodontomys fulvescens, and Mus musculus were stocked at natural densities and sex ratios inside empty mesocosms. Diazinon 4E was applied at two different maximum recommended label application rates, 0.56 kg a.i./ha (1×) and 4.5 kg a.i./ha (8×), and controls remained unsprayed, with four enclosures (replicates) per treatment. Two 30‐d trials were run during peak rodent breeding seasons and enclosures were sampled on days 2, 16, and 30 of each trial. Recovery of small mammals was not significantly different among treatments, although fewer animals were recovered from the diazinon‐exposed enclosures in both trials. Analysis of trapping data suggested that the normally strong competitive relationship between Sigmodon and Microtus may be altered by the pesticide, favoring Microtus in the diazinon‐exposed enclosures. Incidence of reproductive condition was found to be reduced 20 to 80% and 33 to 100% in diazinon‐exposed males and females, respectively. Reproductive productivity, including percentage of pregnant females and of females giving birth, was significantly reduced in diazinon‐exposed animals. Percentage of pregnant females ranged from 13.6 to 43.5% in diazinon‐exposed animals compared to 40 to 80% for control animals, and percentage of females giving birth ranged from 0 to 17% in diazinon‐exposed animals compared to 22 to 50% for control animals. Generally, the effects found in this study suggest that diazinon was relatively persistent in the sprayed enclosures and that oral routes of exposure (consumption of dead and dying arthropods, grooming) may have been important. Ecological relationships and reproduction in both herbivorous and omnivorous mammals were negatively impacted by diazinon exposure. Overall, ecological relationships in the enclosed prairie grassland ecosystem were disrupted by diazinon, probably through a combination of sublethal effects, particularly reproductive effects, impacting individuals and their populations. This suggests that negative impacts on populations and community structure and function may persist longer than diazinon persists in the environment.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Dazinon</subject><subject>diazinon</subject><subject>Diazinon - toxicity</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</subject><subject>Effects of pollution and side effects of pesticides on vertebrates</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Insecticides - toxicity</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mammalia</subject><subject>Mesocosm</subject><subject>Microtus ochrogaster</subject><subject>Mus musculus</subject><subject>Reithrodontomys fulvescens</subject><subject>Reproduction - drug effects</subject><subject>Rodentia - physiology</subject><subject>Sigmodon hispidus</subject><subject>Small mammals</subject><subject>Sublethal effects</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecotoxicology</subject><issn>0730-7268</issn><issn>1552-8618</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVFrFDEUhYModq2--igBwbcZc5NJZvIo7VoLRSlUfQxp5maNzkzWZEa7_g5_sCm7tPhUCFxCvnPvyT2EvARWA2P8Lc6uloozXi5MPyIrkJJXnYLuMVmxVrCq5ao7Is9y_s4YKK31U3IEICQ0vFuRv2vv0c2ZRk99wKGneLONeUlI50j7YP-EKU60nDzaYaCjHUvNNEzf7HWYw7ShlmYcA05uiBl7uk02pIB0k2zOg51KRxfzLs841vS8pmsXh7gJzg709jHhNsV-cXP4hRT3Zp6TJ74MwReHekw-v19fnXyoLj6dnZ-8u6hcUz5SeceV7JWwVgIowM7KsghoJPdtb6XnAI45j4Jzz7luBSql25b1FjvfMyWOyZt932Lh54J5NmPIDofiGuOSDXSMN43iD4ONVJ0QsoD1HnQp5pzQm20Ko007A8zcBmZKYOY-sCJ4dei8XI_Y3-OHhArw-gDYXHbmk51cyHecBsU1FErvqd9hwN0DQ00h_7NQ7bWhZHRzp7Xph1GtaKX5-vHM6C-Xl3B12plG_APlUb87</recordid><startdate>200102</startdate><enddate>200102</enddate><creator>Sheffield, Steven R.</creator><creator>Lochmiller, Robert L.</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>SETAC</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200102</creationdate><title>Effects of field exposure to diazinon on small mammals inhabiting a semienclosed prairie grassland ecosystem. I. Ecological and reproductive effects</title><author>Sheffield, Steven R. ; Lochmiller, Robert L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4699-fc265d63aa51161e8a52021452f7da5f211c0cfe322f22973e669770dae8fd063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Dazinon</topic><topic>diazinon</topic><topic>Diazinon - toxicity</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</topic><topic>Effects of pollution and side effects of pesticides on vertebrates</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Insecticides - toxicity</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mammalia</topic><topic>Mesocosm</topic><topic>Microtus ochrogaster</topic><topic>Mus musculus</topic><topic>Reithrodontomys fulvescens</topic><topic>Reproduction - drug effects</topic><topic>Rodentia - physiology</topic><topic>Sigmodon hispidus</topic><topic>Small mammals</topic><topic>Sublethal effects</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecotoxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sheffield, Steven R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lochmiller, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sheffield, Steven R.</au><au>Lochmiller, Robert L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of field exposure to diazinon on small mammals inhabiting a semienclosed prairie grassland ecosystem. I. Ecological and reproductive effects</atitle><jtitle>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry</addtitle><date>2001-02</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>284</spage><epage>296</epage><pages>284-296</pages><issn>0730-7268</issn><eissn>1552-8618</eissn><coden>ETOCDK</coden><abstract>The widespread use of cholinesterase‐inhibiting pesticides in the environment presents increasing concerns about their effects on human, wildlife, and ecosystem health. As a group, these pesticides are generally highly toxic and have great potential for negatively affecting nontarget organisms. Small mammals have proven to be ideal biomonitors of environmental contaminants, and were used here to test for possible effects of a widely used cholinesterase‐inhibiting insecticide, diazinon, in a natural field setting. Using 12 0.1‐ha terrestrial mesocosms, we examined the effects of low‐level diazinon exposure on the small mammal communities inhabiting semienclosed grassland ecosystems. Our primary objective was to test the hypothesis that diazinon, applied at two different recommended label application rates, would not cause any observable adverse ecological or reproductive effects on small mammal populations and communities. Experimental small mammal communities consisting of Sigmodon hispidus, Microtus ochrogaster, Reithrodontomys fulvescens, and Mus musculus were stocked at natural densities and sex ratios inside empty mesocosms. Diazinon 4E was applied at two different maximum recommended label application rates, 0.56 kg a.i./ha (1×) and 4.5 kg a.i./ha (8×), and controls remained unsprayed, with four enclosures (replicates) per treatment. Two 30‐d trials were run during peak rodent breeding seasons and enclosures were sampled on days 2, 16, and 30 of each trial. Recovery of small mammals was not significantly different among treatments, although fewer animals were recovered from the diazinon‐exposed enclosures in both trials. Analysis of trapping data suggested that the normally strong competitive relationship between Sigmodon and Microtus may be altered by the pesticide, favoring Microtus in the diazinon‐exposed enclosures. Incidence of reproductive condition was found to be reduced 20 to 80% and 33 to 100% in diazinon‐exposed males and females, respectively. Reproductive productivity, including percentage of pregnant females and of females giving birth, was significantly reduced in diazinon‐exposed animals. Percentage of pregnant females ranged from 13.6 to 43.5% in diazinon‐exposed animals compared to 40 to 80% for control animals, and percentage of females giving birth ranged from 0 to 17% in diazinon‐exposed animals compared to 22 to 50% for control animals. Generally, the effects found in this study suggest that diazinon was relatively persistent in the sprayed enclosures and that oral routes of exposure (consumption of dead and dying arthropods, grooming) may have been important. Ecological relationships and reproduction in both herbivorous and omnivorous mammals were negatively impacted by diazinon exposure. Overall, ecological relationships in the enclosed prairie grassland ecosystem were disrupted by diazinon, probably through a combination of sublethal effects, particularly reproductive effects, impacting individuals and their populations. This suggests that negative impacts on populations and community structure and function may persist longer than diazinon persists in the environment.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><pmid>11351428</pmid><doi>10.1002/etc.5620200209</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0730-7268
ispartof Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2001-02, Vol.20 (2), p.284-296
issn 0730-7268
1552-8618
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18024462
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Applied ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Dazinon
diazinon
Diazinon - toxicity
Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution
Effects of pollution and side effects of pesticides on vertebrates
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Insecticides - toxicity
Male
Mammalia
Mesocosm
Microtus ochrogaster
Mus musculus
Reithrodontomys fulvescens
Reproduction - drug effects
Rodentia - physiology
Sigmodon hispidus
Small mammals
Sublethal effects
Terrestrial ecotoxicology
title Effects of field exposure to diazinon on small mammals inhabiting a semienclosed prairie grassland ecosystem. I. Ecological and reproductive effects
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T12%3A54%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20field%20exposure%20to%20diazinon%20on%20small%20mammals%20inhabiting%20a%20semienclosed%20prairie%20grassland%20ecosystem.%20I.%20Ecological%20and%20reproductive%20effects&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20toxicology%20and%20chemistry&rft.au=Sheffield,%20Steven%20R.&rft.date=2001-02&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=284&rft.epage=296&rft.pages=284-296&rft.issn=0730-7268&rft.eissn=1552-8618&rft.coden=ETOCDK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/etc.5620200209&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14568335%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14568335&rft_id=info:pmid/11351428&rfr_iscdi=true