Optimal timing of misoprostol administration in nulliparous women undergoing office hysteroscopy: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study
Objective To determine the optimal timing of vaginal misoprostol administration in nulliparous women undergoing office hysteroscopy. Design Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Setting University teaching hospital. Patient(s) One hundred twenty nulliparous patients were randomly allocat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Fertility and sterility 2016-07, Vol.106 (1), p.196-201 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 201 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 196 |
container_title | Fertility and sterility |
container_volume | 106 |
creator | Fouda, Usama M., M.D., Ph.D Gad Allah, Sherine H., M.D., Ph.D Elshaer, Hesham S., M.D., Ph.D |
description | Objective To determine the optimal timing of vaginal misoprostol administration in nulliparous women undergoing office hysteroscopy. Design Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Setting University teaching hospital. Patient(s) One hundred twenty nulliparous patients were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the long-interval misoprostol group or the short-interval misoprostol group. Intervention(s) In the long-interval misoprostol group, two misoprostol tablets (400 μg) and two placebo tablets were administered vaginally at 12 and 3 hours, respectively, before office hysteroscopy. In the short-interval misoprostol group, two placebo tablets and two misoprostol tablets (400 μg) were administered vaginally 12 and 3 hours, respectively, before office hysteroscopy. Main Outcome Measure(s) The severity of pain was assessed by the patients with the use of a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). The operators assessed the ease of the passage of the hysteroscope through the cervical canal with the use of a 100-mm VAS as well. Result(s) Pain scores during the procedure were significantly lower in the long-interval misoprostol group (37.98 ± 13.13 vs. 51.98 ± 20.68). In contrast, the pain scores 30 minutes after the procedure were similar between the two groups (11.92 ± 7.22 vs. 13.3 ± 6.73). Moreover, the passage of the hysteroscope through the cervical canal was easier in the long-interval misoprostol group (48.9 ± 17.79 vs. 58.28 ± 21.85). Conclusion(s) Vaginal misoprostol administration 12 hours before office hysteroscopy was more effective than vaginal misoprostol administration 3 hours before office hysteroscopy in relieving pain experienced by nulliparous patients undergoing office hysteroscopy. Clinical Trial Registration Number NCT02316301. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.022 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1801861516</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0015028216300553</els_id><sourcerecordid>1801861516</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-4f3391880e9f7a301f0fd887395ee2852f4f3a61cdacb490d52c838c5305d5be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUk2PFCEQ7RiNO67-BcPRS48FDN20BxPd-JVssgf1TGioXhkZaIFeM_4P7_4Wf5l0ZtXEk5ciKd6rqlevmoZQ2FKg3dP9dsJUQi41blnNbIFvgbE7zYYK0bWiE_xuswGgogUm2VnzIOc9AHS0Z_ebM9YD73cd2zTfr-biDtqTGl24JnEiB5fjnGIu0RNta9blknRxMRAXSFi8d7NOccnkazxgIEuwmK7jiT05g-TTcZ0sZhPn4zOif_5IOth4cN_QEhuX0WM7ehcsmb02OMbWxFBS9L7-57LY48Pm3qR9xke373nz8fWrDxdv28urN-8uXly2ZtcPpd1NnA9USsBh6jUHOsFkpez5IBCZFGyqCN1RY7UZdwNYwYzk0ggOwooR-Xnz5FS36v2yYC6qijfovQ5YBSoqgcqOCtpVqDxBTRWWE05qTnVx6agoqNUUtVd_TVGrKQq4qqZU6uPbLst4QPuH-NuFCnh5AmDVeuMwqWwcBoPWJTRF2ej-p8vzf4qYumNntP-MR8z7uKRQd6moykyBer8ex3obVRuAEJz_Ao8tvec</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1801861516</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimal timing of misoprostol administration in nulliparous women undergoing office hysteroscopy: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Fouda, Usama M., M.D., Ph.D ; Gad Allah, Sherine H., M.D., Ph.D ; Elshaer, Hesham S., M.D., Ph.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Fouda, Usama M., M.D., Ph.D ; Gad Allah, Sherine H., M.D., Ph.D ; Elshaer, Hesham S., M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To determine the optimal timing of vaginal misoprostol administration in nulliparous women undergoing office hysteroscopy. Design Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Setting University teaching hospital. Patient(s) One hundred twenty nulliparous patients were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the long-interval misoprostol group or the short-interval misoprostol group. Intervention(s) In the long-interval misoprostol group, two misoprostol tablets (400 μg) and two placebo tablets were administered vaginally at 12 and 3 hours, respectively, before office hysteroscopy. In the short-interval misoprostol group, two placebo tablets and two misoprostol tablets (400 μg) were administered vaginally 12 and 3 hours, respectively, before office hysteroscopy. Main Outcome Measure(s) The severity of pain was assessed by the patients with the use of a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). The operators assessed the ease of the passage of the hysteroscope through the cervical canal with the use of a 100-mm VAS as well. Result(s) Pain scores during the procedure were significantly lower in the long-interval misoprostol group (37.98 ± 13.13 vs. 51.98 ± 20.68). In contrast, the pain scores 30 minutes after the procedure were similar between the two groups (11.92 ± 7.22 vs. 13.3 ± 6.73). Moreover, the passage of the hysteroscope through the cervical canal was easier in the long-interval misoprostol group (48.9 ± 17.79 vs. 58.28 ± 21.85). Conclusion(s) Vaginal misoprostol administration 12 hours before office hysteroscopy was more effective than vaginal misoprostol administration 3 hours before office hysteroscopy in relieving pain experienced by nulliparous patients undergoing office hysteroscopy. Clinical Trial Registration Number NCT02316301.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-0282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-5653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27037462</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Administration, Intravaginal ; Adult ; Ambulatory Care ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Egypt ; Female ; Hospitals, University ; Humans ; Hysteroscopy - adverse effects ; Internal Medicine ; misoprostol ; Misoprostol - administration & dosage ; Misoprostol - adverse effects ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; office hysteroscopy ; Office Visits ; Oxytocics - administration & dosage ; Oxytocics - adverse effects ; Pain ; Pain - diagnosis ; Pain - etiology ; Pain - prevention & control ; Pain Measurement ; Parity ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Fertility and sterility, 2016-07, Vol.106 (1), p.196-201</ispartof><rights>American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-4f3391880e9f7a301f0fd887395ee2852f4f3a61cdacb490d52c838c5305d5be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-4f3391880e9f7a301f0fd887395ee2852f4f3a61cdacb490d52c838c5305d5be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.022$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27037462$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fouda, Usama M., M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gad Allah, Sherine H., M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elshaer, Hesham S., M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><title>Optimal timing of misoprostol administration in nulliparous women undergoing office hysteroscopy: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study</title><title>Fertility and sterility</title><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><description>Objective To determine the optimal timing of vaginal misoprostol administration in nulliparous women undergoing office hysteroscopy. Design Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Setting University teaching hospital. Patient(s) One hundred twenty nulliparous patients were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the long-interval misoprostol group or the short-interval misoprostol group. Intervention(s) In the long-interval misoprostol group, two misoprostol tablets (400 μg) and two placebo tablets were administered vaginally at 12 and 3 hours, respectively, before office hysteroscopy. In the short-interval misoprostol group, two placebo tablets and two misoprostol tablets (400 μg) were administered vaginally 12 and 3 hours, respectively, before office hysteroscopy. Main Outcome Measure(s) The severity of pain was assessed by the patients with the use of a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). The operators assessed the ease of the passage of the hysteroscope through the cervical canal with the use of a 100-mm VAS as well. Result(s) Pain scores during the procedure were significantly lower in the long-interval misoprostol group (37.98 ± 13.13 vs. 51.98 ± 20.68). In contrast, the pain scores 30 minutes after the procedure were similar between the two groups (11.92 ± 7.22 vs. 13.3 ± 6.73). Moreover, the passage of the hysteroscope through the cervical canal was easier in the long-interval misoprostol group (48.9 ± 17.79 vs. 58.28 ± 21.85). Conclusion(s) Vaginal misoprostol administration 12 hours before office hysteroscopy was more effective than vaginal misoprostol administration 3 hours before office hysteroscopy in relieving pain experienced by nulliparous patients undergoing office hysteroscopy. Clinical Trial Registration Number NCT02316301.</description><subject>Administration, Intravaginal</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Drug Administration Schedule</subject><subject>Egypt</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitals, University</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysteroscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>misoprostol</subject><subject>Misoprostol - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Misoprostol - adverse effects</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>office hysteroscopy</subject><subject>Office Visits</subject><subject>Oxytocics - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Oxytocics - adverse effects</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Pain - prevention & control</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Parity</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0015-0282</issn><issn>1556-5653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUk2PFCEQ7RiNO67-BcPRS48FDN20BxPd-JVssgf1TGioXhkZaIFeM_4P7_4Wf5l0ZtXEk5ciKd6rqlevmoZQ2FKg3dP9dsJUQi41blnNbIFvgbE7zYYK0bWiE_xuswGgogUm2VnzIOc9AHS0Z_ebM9YD73cd2zTfr-biDtqTGl24JnEiB5fjnGIu0RNta9blknRxMRAXSFi8d7NOccnkazxgIEuwmK7jiT05g-TTcZ0sZhPn4zOif_5IOth4cN_QEhuX0WM7ehcsmb02OMbWxFBS9L7-57LY48Pm3qR9xke373nz8fWrDxdv28urN-8uXly2ZtcPpd1NnA9USsBh6jUHOsFkpez5IBCZFGyqCN1RY7UZdwNYwYzk0ggOwooR-Xnz5FS36v2yYC6qijfovQ5YBSoqgcqOCtpVqDxBTRWWE05qTnVx6agoqNUUtVd_TVGrKQq4qqZU6uPbLst4QPuH-NuFCnh5AmDVeuMwqWwcBoPWJTRF2ej-p8vzf4qYumNntP-MR8z7uKRQd6moykyBer8ex3obVRuAEJz_Ao8tvec</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Fouda, Usama M., M.D., Ph.D</creator><creator>Gad Allah, Sherine H., M.D., Ph.D</creator><creator>Elshaer, Hesham S., M.D., Ph.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Optimal timing of misoprostol administration in nulliparous women undergoing office hysteroscopy: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study</title><author>Fouda, Usama M., M.D., Ph.D ; Gad Allah, Sherine H., M.D., Ph.D ; Elshaer, Hesham S., M.D., Ph.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-4f3391880e9f7a301f0fd887395ee2852f4f3a61cdacb490d52c838c5305d5be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Administration, Intravaginal</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Drug Administration Schedule</topic><topic>Egypt</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitals, University</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysteroscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>misoprostol</topic><topic>Misoprostol - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Misoprostol - adverse effects</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>office hysteroscopy</topic><topic>Office Visits</topic><topic>Oxytocics - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Oxytocics - adverse effects</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Pain - prevention & control</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Parity</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fouda, Usama M., M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gad Allah, Sherine H., M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elshaer, Hesham S., M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fouda, Usama M., M.D., Ph.D</au><au>Gad Allah, Sherine H., M.D., Ph.D</au><au>Elshaer, Hesham S., M.D., Ph.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimal timing of misoprostol administration in nulliparous women undergoing office hysteroscopy: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study</atitle><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>196</spage><epage>201</epage><pages>196-201</pages><issn>0015-0282</issn><eissn>1556-5653</eissn><abstract>Objective To determine the optimal timing of vaginal misoprostol administration in nulliparous women undergoing office hysteroscopy. Design Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Setting University teaching hospital. Patient(s) One hundred twenty nulliparous patients were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the long-interval misoprostol group or the short-interval misoprostol group. Intervention(s) In the long-interval misoprostol group, two misoprostol tablets (400 μg) and two placebo tablets were administered vaginally at 12 and 3 hours, respectively, before office hysteroscopy. In the short-interval misoprostol group, two placebo tablets and two misoprostol tablets (400 μg) were administered vaginally 12 and 3 hours, respectively, before office hysteroscopy. Main Outcome Measure(s) The severity of pain was assessed by the patients with the use of a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). The operators assessed the ease of the passage of the hysteroscope through the cervical canal with the use of a 100-mm VAS as well. Result(s) Pain scores during the procedure were significantly lower in the long-interval misoprostol group (37.98 ± 13.13 vs. 51.98 ± 20.68). In contrast, the pain scores 30 minutes after the procedure were similar between the two groups (11.92 ± 7.22 vs. 13.3 ± 6.73). Moreover, the passage of the hysteroscope through the cervical canal was easier in the long-interval misoprostol group (48.9 ± 17.79 vs. 58.28 ± 21.85). Conclusion(s) Vaginal misoprostol administration 12 hours before office hysteroscopy was more effective than vaginal misoprostol administration 3 hours before office hysteroscopy in relieving pain experienced by nulliparous patients undergoing office hysteroscopy. Clinical Trial Registration Number NCT02316301.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27037462</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.022</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0015-0282 |
ispartof | Fertility and sterility, 2016-07, Vol.106 (1), p.196-201 |
issn | 0015-0282 1556-5653 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1801861516 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Administration, Intravaginal Adult Ambulatory Care Double-Blind Method Drug Administration Schedule Egypt Female Hospitals, University Humans Hysteroscopy - adverse effects Internal Medicine misoprostol Misoprostol - administration & dosage Misoprostol - adverse effects Obstetrics and Gynecology office hysteroscopy Office Visits Oxytocics - administration & dosage Oxytocics - adverse effects Pain Pain - diagnosis Pain - etiology Pain - prevention & control Pain Measurement Parity Time Factors Treatment Outcome Young Adult |
title | Optimal timing of misoprostol administration in nulliparous women undergoing office hysteroscopy: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T20%3A20%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimal%20timing%20of%20misoprostol%20administration%20in%20nulliparous%20women%20undergoing%20office%20hysteroscopy:%20a%C2%A0randomized%20double-blind%20placebo-controlled%20study&rft.jtitle=Fertility%20and%20sterility&rft.au=Fouda,%20Usama%20M.,%20M.D.,%20Ph.D&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=196&rft.epage=201&rft.pages=196-201&rft.issn=0015-0282&rft.eissn=1556-5653&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1801861516%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1801861516&rft_id=info:pmid/27037462&rft_els_id=S0015028216300553&rfr_iscdi=true |