Flower preferences of woodland butterflies in the UK: nectaring specialists are species of conservation concern

We report on a long-term study of the flower preferences of feeding adult butterflies undertaken in the Wyre Forest, UK. Examination of 5638 observations of nectar-feeding clearly demonstrates several findings: (i) that butterflies differ in their range of flower use, some are generalists and others...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biological conservation 2004-10, Vol.119 (3), p.397-403
Hauptverfasser: Tudor, O, Dennis, R.L.H, Greatorex-Davies, J.N, Sparks, T.H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 403
container_issue 3
container_start_page 397
container_title Biological conservation
container_volume 119
creator Tudor, O
Dennis, R.L.H
Greatorex-Davies, J.N
Sparks, T.H
description We report on a long-term study of the flower preferences of feeding adult butterflies undertaken in the Wyre Forest, UK. Examination of 5638 observations of nectar-feeding clearly demonstrates several findings: (i) that butterflies differ in their range of flower use, some are generalists and others specialists, respectively, exploiting more or less sources than expected; (ii) certain flower species are preferred over others. We find that (iii) generalism and specialism in flower use corresponds to generalism and specialism, respectively, in larval host range and biotope occupancy; that (iv) generalism in flower use is accounted for by life history and resource variables that increase opportunity for contact with a wider variety of flowering herbs; that (v) specialist flower users are more typically woodland butterflies and generalist flower users species of more open biotopes. A key finding is that (vi) many specialist flower users are butterfly species of conservation concern listed in Biodiversity Action Plans. We suggest that management of woodland sites for butterfly conservation should give as much consideration to nectar sources as to host plant sources.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.01.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18016550</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006320704000059</els_id><sourcerecordid>18016550</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-5ca5b5e6d717007d89fbbc920302caac57d2e90f09b7b16403bc993cb6dae1a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD9PwzAQxS0EEqXwDRi8wJZwtvOnYUBCFQVEJRY6W45zAVepHey0Fd8eV6nExnR653fPdz9CrhmkDFhxt05r47SzKQfIUmApAD8hEzYrRcIrVp6SCQAUieBQnpOLENZRlqLIJ8QtOrdHT3uPLXq0GgN1Ld0713TKNrTeDgP6tjOxbywdvpCu3u6pRT0ob-wnDT1qozoThkCVx1GPIXGjgH6nBuPsQWj09pKctaoLeHWsU7JaPH3MX5Ll-_Pr_HGZ6EywIcm1yusci6ZkZVy1mVVtXeuKgwCuldJ52XCsoIWqLmtWZCDiayV0XTQKmSrElNyOub1331sMg9yYoLGLR6HbBslmEVyeQzRmo1F7F0KkIHtvNsr_SAbyQFeu5UhXHuhKYDLSjWM3x3wVtOpar6w24W82r1jBZ1n0PYw-jMfuDHoZIp6IojE-MpSNM_9_9Au-H5RF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18016550</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Flower preferences of woodland butterflies in the UK: nectaring specialists are species of conservation concern</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Tudor, O ; Dennis, R.L.H ; Greatorex-Davies, J.N ; Sparks, T.H</creator><creatorcontrib>Tudor, O ; Dennis, R.L.H ; Greatorex-Davies, J.N ; Sparks, T.H</creatorcontrib><description>We report on a long-term study of the flower preferences of feeding adult butterflies undertaken in the Wyre Forest, UK. Examination of 5638 observations of nectar-feeding clearly demonstrates several findings: (i) that butterflies differ in their range of flower use, some are generalists and others specialists, respectively, exploiting more or less sources than expected; (ii) certain flower species are preferred over others. We find that (iii) generalism and specialism in flower use corresponds to generalism and specialism, respectively, in larval host range and biotope occupancy; that (iv) generalism in flower use is accounted for by life history and resource variables that increase opportunity for contact with a wider variety of flowering herbs; that (v) specialist flower users are more typically woodland butterflies and generalist flower users species of more open biotopes. A key finding is that (vi) many specialist flower users are butterfly species of conservation concern listed in Biodiversity Action Plans. We suggest that management of woodland sites for butterfly conservation should give as much consideration to nectar sources as to host plant sources.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3207</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2917</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.01.002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BICOBK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Habitat ; Lepidoptera ; Life history ; Nectar ; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking ; Specialism</subject><ispartof>Biological conservation, 2004-10, Vol.119 (3), p.397-403</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-5ca5b5e6d717007d89fbbc920302caac57d2e90f09b7b16403bc993cb6dae1a63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-5ca5b5e6d717007d89fbbc920302caac57d2e90f09b7b16403bc993cb6dae1a63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.01.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15916284$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tudor, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennis, R.L.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greatorex-Davies, J.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sparks, T.H</creatorcontrib><title>Flower preferences of woodland butterflies in the UK: nectaring specialists are species of conservation concern</title><title>Biological conservation</title><description>We report on a long-term study of the flower preferences of feeding adult butterflies undertaken in the Wyre Forest, UK. Examination of 5638 observations of nectar-feeding clearly demonstrates several findings: (i) that butterflies differ in their range of flower use, some are generalists and others specialists, respectively, exploiting more or less sources than expected; (ii) certain flower species are preferred over others. We find that (iii) generalism and specialism in flower use corresponds to generalism and specialism, respectively, in larval host range and biotope occupancy; that (iv) generalism in flower use is accounted for by life history and resource variables that increase opportunity for contact with a wider variety of flowering herbs; that (v) specialist flower users are more typically woodland butterflies and generalist flower users species of more open biotopes. A key finding is that (vi) many specialist flower users are butterfly species of conservation concern listed in Biodiversity Action Plans. We suggest that management of woodland sites for butterfly conservation should give as much consideration to nectar sources as to host plant sources.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Habitat</subject><subject>Lepidoptera</subject><subject>Life history</subject><subject>Nectar</subject><subject>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</subject><subject>Specialism</subject><issn>0006-3207</issn><issn>1873-2917</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD9PwzAQxS0EEqXwDRi8wJZwtvOnYUBCFQVEJRY6W45zAVepHey0Fd8eV6nExnR653fPdz9CrhmkDFhxt05r47SzKQfIUmApAD8hEzYrRcIrVp6SCQAUieBQnpOLENZRlqLIJ8QtOrdHT3uPLXq0GgN1Ld0713TKNrTeDgP6tjOxbywdvpCu3u6pRT0ob-wnDT1qozoThkCVx1GPIXGjgH6nBuPsQWj09pKctaoLeHWsU7JaPH3MX5Ll-_Pr_HGZ6EywIcm1yusci6ZkZVy1mVVtXeuKgwCuldJ52XCsoIWqLmtWZCDiayV0XTQKmSrElNyOub1331sMg9yYoLGLR6HbBslmEVyeQzRmo1F7F0KkIHtvNsr_SAbyQFeu5UhXHuhKYDLSjWM3x3wVtOpar6w24W82r1jBZ1n0PYw-jMfuDHoZIp6IojE-MpSNM_9_9Au-H5RF</recordid><startdate>20041001</startdate><enddate>20041001</enddate><creator>Tudor, O</creator><creator>Dennis, R.L.H</creator><creator>Greatorex-Davies, J.N</creator><creator>Sparks, T.H</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041001</creationdate><title>Flower preferences of woodland butterflies in the UK: nectaring specialists are species of conservation concern</title><author>Tudor, O ; Dennis, R.L.H ; Greatorex-Davies, J.N ; Sparks, T.H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-5ca5b5e6d717007d89fbbc920302caac57d2e90f09b7b16403bc993cb6dae1a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Habitat</topic><topic>Lepidoptera</topic><topic>Life history</topic><topic>Nectar</topic><topic>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</topic><topic>Specialism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tudor, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennis, R.L.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greatorex-Davies, J.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sparks, T.H</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tudor, O</au><au>Dennis, R.L.H</au><au>Greatorex-Davies, J.N</au><au>Sparks, T.H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Flower preferences of woodland butterflies in the UK: nectaring specialists are species of conservation concern</atitle><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle><date>2004-10-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>119</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>397</spage><epage>403</epage><pages>397-403</pages><issn>0006-3207</issn><eissn>1873-2917</eissn><coden>BICOBK</coden><abstract>We report on a long-term study of the flower preferences of feeding adult butterflies undertaken in the Wyre Forest, UK. Examination of 5638 observations of nectar-feeding clearly demonstrates several findings: (i) that butterflies differ in their range of flower use, some are generalists and others specialists, respectively, exploiting more or less sources than expected; (ii) certain flower species are preferred over others. We find that (iii) generalism and specialism in flower use corresponds to generalism and specialism, respectively, in larval host range and biotope occupancy; that (iv) generalism in flower use is accounted for by life history and resource variables that increase opportunity for contact with a wider variety of flowering herbs; that (v) specialist flower users are more typically woodland butterflies and generalist flower users species of more open biotopes. A key finding is that (vi) many specialist flower users are butterfly species of conservation concern listed in Biodiversity Action Plans. We suggest that management of woodland sites for butterfly conservation should give as much consideration to nectar sources as to host plant sources.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.biocon.2004.01.002</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-3207
ispartof Biological conservation, 2004-10, Vol.119 (3), p.397-403
issn 0006-3207
1873-2917
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18016550
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Habitat
Lepidoptera
Life history
Nectar
Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking
Specialism
title Flower preferences of woodland butterflies in the UK: nectaring specialists are species of conservation concern
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T14%3A51%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Flower%20preferences%20of%20woodland%20butterflies%20in%20the%20UK:%20nectaring%20specialists%20are%20species%20of%20conservation%20concern&rft.jtitle=Biological%20conservation&rft.au=Tudor,%20O&rft.date=2004-10-01&rft.volume=119&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=397&rft.epage=403&rft.pages=397-403&rft.issn=0006-3207&rft.eissn=1873-2917&rft.coden=BICOBK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.01.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18016550%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18016550&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0006320704000059&rfr_iscdi=true