Flower preferences of woodland butterflies in the UK: nectaring specialists are species of conservation concern
We report on a long-term study of the flower preferences of feeding adult butterflies undertaken in the Wyre Forest, UK. Examination of 5638 observations of nectar-feeding clearly demonstrates several findings: (i) that butterflies differ in their range of flower use, some are generalists and others...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biological conservation 2004-10, Vol.119 (3), p.397-403 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 403 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 397 |
container_title | Biological conservation |
container_volume | 119 |
creator | Tudor, O Dennis, R.L.H Greatorex-Davies, J.N Sparks, T.H |
description | We report on a long-term study of the flower preferences of feeding adult butterflies undertaken in the Wyre Forest, UK. Examination of 5638 observations of nectar-feeding clearly demonstrates several findings: (i) that butterflies differ in their range of flower use, some are generalists and others specialists, respectively, exploiting more or less sources than expected; (ii) certain flower species are preferred over others. We find that (iii) generalism and specialism in flower use corresponds to generalism and specialism, respectively, in larval host range and biotope occupancy; that (iv) generalism in flower use is accounted for by life history and resource variables that increase opportunity for contact with a wider variety of flowering herbs; that (v) specialist flower users are more typically woodland butterflies and generalist flower users species of more open biotopes. A key finding is that (vi) many specialist flower users are butterfly species of conservation concern listed in Biodiversity Action Plans. We suggest that management of woodland sites for butterfly conservation should give as much consideration to nectar sources as to host plant sources. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.01.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18016550</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006320704000059</els_id><sourcerecordid>18016550</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-5ca5b5e6d717007d89fbbc920302caac57d2e90f09b7b16403bc993cb6dae1a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD9PwzAQxS0EEqXwDRi8wJZwtvOnYUBCFQVEJRY6W45zAVepHey0Fd8eV6nExnR653fPdz9CrhmkDFhxt05r47SzKQfIUmApAD8hEzYrRcIrVp6SCQAUieBQnpOLENZRlqLIJ8QtOrdHT3uPLXq0GgN1Ld0713TKNrTeDgP6tjOxbywdvpCu3u6pRT0ob-wnDT1qozoThkCVx1GPIXGjgH6nBuPsQWj09pKctaoLeHWsU7JaPH3MX5Ll-_Pr_HGZ6EywIcm1yusci6ZkZVy1mVVtXeuKgwCuldJ52XCsoIWqLmtWZCDiayV0XTQKmSrElNyOub1331sMg9yYoLGLR6HbBslmEVyeQzRmo1F7F0KkIHtvNsr_SAbyQFeu5UhXHuhKYDLSjWM3x3wVtOpar6w24W82r1jBZ1n0PYw-jMfuDHoZIp6IojE-MpSNM_9_9Au-H5RF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18016550</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Flower preferences of woodland butterflies in the UK: nectaring specialists are species of conservation concern</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Tudor, O ; Dennis, R.L.H ; Greatorex-Davies, J.N ; Sparks, T.H</creator><creatorcontrib>Tudor, O ; Dennis, R.L.H ; Greatorex-Davies, J.N ; Sparks, T.H</creatorcontrib><description>We report on a long-term study of the flower preferences of feeding adult butterflies undertaken in the Wyre Forest, UK. Examination of 5638 observations of nectar-feeding clearly demonstrates several findings: (i) that butterflies differ in their range of flower use, some are generalists and others specialists, respectively, exploiting more or less sources than expected; (ii) certain flower species are preferred over others. We find that (iii) generalism and specialism in flower use corresponds to generalism and specialism, respectively, in larval host range and biotope occupancy; that (iv) generalism in flower use is accounted for by life history and resource variables that increase opportunity for contact with a wider variety of flowering herbs; that (v) specialist flower users are more typically woodland butterflies and generalist flower users species of more open biotopes. A key finding is that (vi) many specialist flower users are butterfly species of conservation concern listed in Biodiversity Action Plans. We suggest that management of woodland sites for butterfly conservation should give as much consideration to nectar sources as to host plant sources.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3207</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2917</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.01.002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BICOBK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Habitat ; Lepidoptera ; Life history ; Nectar ; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking ; Specialism</subject><ispartof>Biological conservation, 2004-10, Vol.119 (3), p.397-403</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-5ca5b5e6d717007d89fbbc920302caac57d2e90f09b7b16403bc993cb6dae1a63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-5ca5b5e6d717007d89fbbc920302caac57d2e90f09b7b16403bc993cb6dae1a63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.01.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15916284$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tudor, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennis, R.L.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greatorex-Davies, J.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sparks, T.H</creatorcontrib><title>Flower preferences of woodland butterflies in the UK: nectaring specialists are species of conservation concern</title><title>Biological conservation</title><description>We report on a long-term study of the flower preferences of feeding adult butterflies undertaken in the Wyre Forest, UK. Examination of 5638 observations of nectar-feeding clearly demonstrates several findings: (i) that butterflies differ in their range of flower use, some are generalists and others specialists, respectively, exploiting more or less sources than expected; (ii) certain flower species are preferred over others. We find that (iii) generalism and specialism in flower use corresponds to generalism and specialism, respectively, in larval host range and biotope occupancy; that (iv) generalism in flower use is accounted for by life history and resource variables that increase opportunity for contact with a wider variety of flowering herbs; that (v) specialist flower users are more typically woodland butterflies and generalist flower users species of more open biotopes. A key finding is that (vi) many specialist flower users are butterfly species of conservation concern listed in Biodiversity Action Plans. We suggest that management of woodland sites for butterfly conservation should give as much consideration to nectar sources as to host plant sources.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Habitat</subject><subject>Lepidoptera</subject><subject>Life history</subject><subject>Nectar</subject><subject>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</subject><subject>Specialism</subject><issn>0006-3207</issn><issn>1873-2917</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD9PwzAQxS0EEqXwDRi8wJZwtvOnYUBCFQVEJRY6W45zAVepHey0Fd8eV6nExnR653fPdz9CrhmkDFhxt05r47SzKQfIUmApAD8hEzYrRcIrVp6SCQAUieBQnpOLENZRlqLIJ8QtOrdHT3uPLXq0GgN1Ld0713TKNrTeDgP6tjOxbywdvpCu3u6pRT0ob-wnDT1qozoThkCVx1GPIXGjgH6nBuPsQWj09pKctaoLeHWsU7JaPH3MX5Ll-_Pr_HGZ6EywIcm1yusci6ZkZVy1mVVtXeuKgwCuldJ52XCsoIWqLmtWZCDiayV0XTQKmSrElNyOub1331sMg9yYoLGLR6HbBslmEVyeQzRmo1F7F0KkIHtvNsr_SAbyQFeu5UhXHuhKYDLSjWM3x3wVtOpar6w24W82r1jBZ1n0PYw-jMfuDHoZIp6IojE-MpSNM_9_9Au-H5RF</recordid><startdate>20041001</startdate><enddate>20041001</enddate><creator>Tudor, O</creator><creator>Dennis, R.L.H</creator><creator>Greatorex-Davies, J.N</creator><creator>Sparks, T.H</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041001</creationdate><title>Flower preferences of woodland butterflies in the UK: nectaring specialists are species of conservation concern</title><author>Tudor, O ; Dennis, R.L.H ; Greatorex-Davies, J.N ; Sparks, T.H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-5ca5b5e6d717007d89fbbc920302caac57d2e90f09b7b16403bc993cb6dae1a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Habitat</topic><topic>Lepidoptera</topic><topic>Life history</topic><topic>Nectar</topic><topic>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</topic><topic>Specialism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tudor, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennis, R.L.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greatorex-Davies, J.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sparks, T.H</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tudor, O</au><au>Dennis, R.L.H</au><au>Greatorex-Davies, J.N</au><au>Sparks, T.H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Flower preferences of woodland butterflies in the UK: nectaring specialists are species of conservation concern</atitle><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle><date>2004-10-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>119</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>397</spage><epage>403</epage><pages>397-403</pages><issn>0006-3207</issn><eissn>1873-2917</eissn><coden>BICOBK</coden><abstract>We report on a long-term study of the flower preferences of feeding adult butterflies undertaken in the Wyre Forest, UK. Examination of 5638 observations of nectar-feeding clearly demonstrates several findings: (i) that butterflies differ in their range of flower use, some are generalists and others specialists, respectively, exploiting more or less sources than expected; (ii) certain flower species are preferred over others. We find that (iii) generalism and specialism in flower use corresponds to generalism and specialism, respectively, in larval host range and biotope occupancy; that (iv) generalism in flower use is accounted for by life history and resource variables that increase opportunity for contact with a wider variety of flowering herbs; that (v) specialist flower users are more typically woodland butterflies and generalist flower users species of more open biotopes. A key finding is that (vi) many specialist flower users are butterfly species of conservation concern listed in Biodiversity Action Plans. We suggest that management of woodland sites for butterfly conservation should give as much consideration to nectar sources as to host plant sources.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.biocon.2004.01.002</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0006-3207 |
ispartof | Biological conservation, 2004-10, Vol.119 (3), p.397-403 |
issn | 0006-3207 1873-2917 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18016550 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Biological and medical sciences Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Habitat Lepidoptera Life history Nectar Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking Specialism |
title | Flower preferences of woodland butterflies in the UK: nectaring specialists are species of conservation concern |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T14%3A51%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Flower%20preferences%20of%20woodland%20butterflies%20in%20the%20UK:%20nectaring%20specialists%20are%20species%20of%20conservation%20concern&rft.jtitle=Biological%20conservation&rft.au=Tudor,%20O&rft.date=2004-10-01&rft.volume=119&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=397&rft.epage=403&rft.pages=397-403&rft.issn=0006-3207&rft.eissn=1873-2917&rft.coden=BICOBK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.01.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18016550%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18016550&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0006320704000059&rfr_iscdi=true |