Global Energy Governance Needs to Be Multi-level and Regionalized

The exclusive focus on universal-level global energy governance is problematic. Even in the European Union, emphasis is placed on multi-level governance in the energy policy issue-area. Yet although the EU has been near the forefront of advocacy for global energy governance, it has failed to conside...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Caucasus international 2015-07, Vol.5 (2), p.91-106
1. Verfasser: Cutler, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 106
container_issue 2
container_start_page 91
container_title Caucasus international
container_volume 5
creator Cutler, Robert
description The exclusive focus on universal-level global energy governance is problematic. Even in the European Union, emphasis is placed on multi-level governance in the energy policy issue-area. Yet although the EU has been near the forefront of advocacy for global energy governance, it has failed to consider systematically, or at all, the advantages of multi-level governance from the global through the regional to the national levels, as well as the cross-cutting transnational and transgovernmental levels. The contrast between the failure of regional European-Ukrainian-Russian energy cooperation on the one hand and, on the other, the success of regional Azerbaijani-Georgian-Turkish energy cooperation drives the point home. Incentive structures of practitioners and academics, conditioned by the sociology of knowledge, inhibit common dialogue over energy governance. Academic-policy boundary organizations represent only a special case of knowledge transfer processes. If overarching global policy goals are to be achieve, then idiosyncratic regional contexts cannot be ignored in global energy governance. They must be respected and allowed their relative autonomy. [web URL: http://cijournal.az/post/caucaus-international-vol-5-o-no-2-o-summe r-2015]
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1801615453</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1801615453</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_18016154533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVyj0OgkAQQOEtNJEod5jShmR_QG3VIDZaGHuywkjWjLvKAImeXgsv4Gu-5o1EpL8lKjVmImLmm5TSaC11uozEuqBwsQS5x7Z5QREGbL31FcIRsWboAmwQDj11LiEckMD6Gk7YuOAtuTfWMzG-WmKMf07FfJeft_vk0YZnj9yVd8cVElmPoedSraRaqCzNjPlj_QCEJjyu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1801615453</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Global Energy Governance Needs to Be Multi-level and Regionalized</title><source>Political Science Complete (EBSCOhost)</source><creator>Cutler, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Cutler, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>The exclusive focus on universal-level global energy governance is problematic. Even in the European Union, emphasis is placed on multi-level governance in the energy policy issue-area. Yet although the EU has been near the forefront of advocacy for global energy governance, it has failed to consider systematically, or at all, the advantages of multi-level governance from the global through the regional to the national levels, as well as the cross-cutting transnational and transgovernmental levels. The contrast between the failure of regional European-Ukrainian-Russian energy cooperation on the one hand and, on the other, the success of regional Azerbaijani-Georgian-Turkish energy cooperation drives the point home. Incentive structures of practitioners and academics, conditioned by the sociology of knowledge, inhibit common dialogue over energy governance. Academic-policy boundary organizations represent only a special case of knowledge transfer processes. If overarching global policy goals are to be achieve, then idiosyncratic regional contexts cannot be ignored in global energy governance. They must be respected and allowed their relative autonomy. [web URL: http://cijournal.az/post/caucaus-international-vol-5-o-no-2-o-summe r-2015]</description><identifier>ISSN: 2222-1433</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Cooperation ; Energy policy ; Global economy ; Government ; Regional studies</subject><ispartof>Caucasus international, 2015-07, Vol.5 (2), p.91-106</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cutler, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Global Energy Governance Needs to Be Multi-level and Regionalized</title><title>Caucasus international</title><description>The exclusive focus on universal-level global energy governance is problematic. Even in the European Union, emphasis is placed on multi-level governance in the energy policy issue-area. Yet although the EU has been near the forefront of advocacy for global energy governance, it has failed to consider systematically, or at all, the advantages of multi-level governance from the global through the regional to the national levels, as well as the cross-cutting transnational and transgovernmental levels. The contrast between the failure of regional European-Ukrainian-Russian energy cooperation on the one hand and, on the other, the success of regional Azerbaijani-Georgian-Turkish energy cooperation drives the point home. Incentive structures of practitioners and academics, conditioned by the sociology of knowledge, inhibit common dialogue over energy governance. Academic-policy boundary organizations represent only a special case of knowledge transfer processes. If overarching global policy goals are to be achieve, then idiosyncratic regional contexts cannot be ignored in global energy governance. They must be respected and allowed their relative autonomy. [web URL: http://cijournal.az/post/caucaus-international-vol-5-o-no-2-o-summe r-2015]</description><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Global economy</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Regional studies</subject><issn>2222-1433</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVyj0OgkAQQOEtNJEod5jShmR_QG3VIDZaGHuywkjWjLvKAImeXgsv4Gu-5o1EpL8lKjVmImLmm5TSaC11uozEuqBwsQS5x7Z5QREGbL31FcIRsWboAmwQDj11LiEckMD6Gk7YuOAtuTfWMzG-WmKMf07FfJeft_vk0YZnj9yVd8cVElmPoedSraRaqCzNjPlj_QCEJjyu</recordid><startdate>20150701</startdate><enddate>20150701</enddate><creator>Cutler, Robert</creator><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150701</creationdate><title>Global Energy Governance Needs to Be Multi-level and Regionalized</title><author>Cutler, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_18016154533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Global economy</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Regional studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cutler, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Caucasus international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cutler, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Global Energy Governance Needs to Be Multi-level and Regionalized</atitle><jtitle>Caucasus international</jtitle><date>2015-07-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>91</spage><epage>106</epage><pages>91-106</pages><issn>2222-1433</issn><abstract>The exclusive focus on universal-level global energy governance is problematic. Even in the European Union, emphasis is placed on multi-level governance in the energy policy issue-area. Yet although the EU has been near the forefront of advocacy for global energy governance, it has failed to consider systematically, or at all, the advantages of multi-level governance from the global through the regional to the national levels, as well as the cross-cutting transnational and transgovernmental levels. The contrast between the failure of regional European-Ukrainian-Russian energy cooperation on the one hand and, on the other, the success of regional Azerbaijani-Georgian-Turkish energy cooperation drives the point home. Incentive structures of practitioners and academics, conditioned by the sociology of knowledge, inhibit common dialogue over energy governance. Academic-policy boundary organizations represent only a special case of knowledge transfer processes. If overarching global policy goals are to be achieve, then idiosyncratic regional contexts cannot be ignored in global energy governance. They must be respected and allowed their relative autonomy. [web URL: http://cijournal.az/post/caucaus-international-vol-5-o-no-2-o-summe r-2015]</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2222-1433
ispartof Caucasus international, 2015-07, Vol.5 (2), p.91-106
issn 2222-1433
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1801615453
source Political Science Complete (EBSCOhost)
subjects Cooperation
Energy policy
Global economy
Government
Regional studies
title Global Energy Governance Needs to Be Multi-level and Regionalized
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T08%3A26%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Global%20Energy%20Governance%20Needs%20to%20Be%20Multi-level%20and%20Regionalized&rft.jtitle=Caucasus%20international&rft.au=Cutler,%20Robert&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=106&rft.pages=91-106&rft.issn=2222-1433&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1801615453%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1801615453&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true